Post 1964 Legislative Route 230
Click here for a key to the symbols used. An explanation of acronyms may be found at the bottom of the page.
FromRoute 101 near the south city limits of San Francisco to Route 280 in San
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 89 of Chapter 1062 of the
of 1959, construction of all or any portion of Route 230 may be commenced
any time, if the City and County of San Francisco has conveyed or does
to the State of California, without charge, all real property presently
acquired by it for the construction of such route or portion thereof.
Post 1964 Signage History
In 1963, this route was defined as “Route 101 near the south city
San Francisco to Route 87 in San Francisco. Notwithstanding the provisions
Section 89 of Chapter 1062 of the Statutes of 1959, construction of all or
portion of Route 230 may be commenced at any time, if the City and County
San Francisco has conveyed or does convey to the State of California,
charge, all real property presently acquired by it for the construction of
route or portion thereof.”
In 1970, Chapter 1473 extended the routing “…to Route 280 in
This was done by transfer from Route 87, when the portion of former Route 87
from Route 230 to Route 280 was transferred to Route 230 (this might have
the Southern Crossing approach). This was a proposed route and a route was
adopted, but the adoption was rescinded in October 1976 . It was supposed
run from Route 101 south of Candlestick Park, over the SF Bay,
past the east side of Candlestick, and ending at the Hunter's Point
San Francisco. This was supposed be the link for the proposed Southern
bridge over the SF Bay. The current routing is undetermined. It might have
along the Hunter's Point expressway. More information on the Southern
may be found in the entry for I-380.
Pre 1964 Signage History
This was part of proposed LRN 289, defined in 1959. Portions were part of
[SHC 253.1] Entire route. Added to the Freeway and Expressway system in
1959. The freeway route adoption was rescinded effective 10/21/1976.
This routing is unconstructed. There is no traversable local road
Other WWW Links
Overall statistics for Route 230:
- Total Length (1995): 4 miles unconstructed.
- Mileage Classification: Rural: 0; Sm. Urban: 0; Urbanized: 4.
- Counties Traversed: San Mateo, San Francisco.
Pre-1964 Legislative Route
In 1947 (1st Ex Session), Chapter 13 defined LRN 230 as “[LRN 172]
to [LRN 173] via Indiana Street in Los Angeles County”.
This ran from LRN 172 (3rd St/US 60) to LRN 173 (Olympic, later Route 26,
later I-10) via Indiana Street in Los Angeles County. It ran from 3rd St
Indiana to Olympic, and then along Olympic W to Soto St. The portion along
Indiana was Route 165 between 1964 and 1965.
Acronyms and Explanations:
- "LRN" refers to the Pre-1964 Legislative Route Number.
"US" refers to a US Shield signed route.
"I" refers to an Eisenhower Interstate signed route.
"Route" usually indicates a state shield signed route, but said route may be signed as US or I.
- Previous Federal Aid (pre-1992) categories:
Federal Aid Interstate (FAI); Federal Aid Primary (FAP);
Federal Aid Urban (FAU); and Federal Aid Secondary (FAS).
Current Functional Classifications (used for aid purposes):
Principal Arterial (PA); Minor Arterial (MA);
Collector (Col); Rural Minor Collector/Local Road (RMC/LR). Note that ISTEA repealed the previous Federal-Aid System, effective in 1992, and established the functional classification system for all public roads.
- Other frequently used terms: California Transportation Commission (Commission or CTC), California Department of Transportation (Department or Caltrans), Regional Improvement Program (RIP), Interregional Improvement Program (IIP), State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP), Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP), Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990 (Proposition 116), High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program (Proposition 1A), Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 1B), Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), State Route 99 Bond Program (RTE or SR 99), Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Account (LBSRA), Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF), Highway-Railroad Crossing Safety Account (HRCSA), State-Local Partnership Program (SLPP), Environmental Phase (PA&ED), Design Phase (PS&E), Right of Way (R/W), Fiscal Year (FY), Active Transportation Program (ATP), Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP), Local Partnership Program (LPP), Local Streets and Roads Program (LSRP), Solutions for Congested Corridors Program (SCCP).
© 1996-2020 Daniel P. Faigin.
Maintained by: Daniel P. Faigin