This is a floating closed javascript menu.
Menu


State Shield

State Route 56

Click here for a key to the symbols used. An explanation of acronyms may be found at the bottom of the page.


Routing Routing

Rte 56From Route 5 north of La Jolla to Route 67.

Post 1964 Signage History Post 1964 Signage History

The definition of this route remains unchanged from 1963.

Pre 1964 Signage History Pre 1964 Signage History

Before the 1964 renumbering, this route was LRN 278 (defined in 1959). The routing was determined, but the highway was unconstructed.

Route 56 was not defined as part of the initial state signage of routes in 1934. It is unclear what (if any) route was signed as Route 56 between 1934 and 1964.

Status Status

Unconstructed Unconstructed from Route 15 to Route 67. There are no current plans to construct a state highway in this segment. There is no traversable highway identified.

TCRP 86Constructed a fully access controlled freeway from I-5 to I-15 (~ SD 0.000 to SD 9.471). This project was completed in June 2004. The new constructed portion is a joy to drive, as its lightly traveled, and still very much in a semi-rural state, save for a few retail developments and some homes popping up in the distance. It appears there is sufficient right of way for up to 10 lanes in the future. In July 2006, the CTC considered modification of the project funding related to the landscaping portion is currently under construction in 2006. TCRP funds, the amount of $3,430,000, were set aside for a future traffic operations project. However, costs to R/W have increased due to the final condemnation case. The traffic operations project will be funded in a future STIP cycle.

In August 2015, it was reported that the city of San Diego and Caltrans are working together to find solutions for commuters who struggle daily with the heavily congested Route 56.  Specifically, the City of San Diego has asked Caltrans to look into the possibility of doing smaller projects which could be done sooner and would help reduce some of the congestion on Route 56. They could pay for it using city funds. In March, Council President Sherri Lightner led a City Council vote to initiate a feasibility study process, including various technical studies and reports, to expand the busy thoroughfare from four to six lanes. In her endorsement of the study, she stated that the 2040 target date for the highway expansion is too far off and improvements need to happen sooner rather than later. It is anticipated that all of the SR-56 improvements can be done within the existing right of way. The widening of Route 56 could occur before the construction of the Route 56 and I-5 connector project.
(Source: Del Mar Times, 8/18/2015)

Route 5/Route 56 Connectors (SD 0.0/2.5)

However, there is not a connector from the NB I-5 to WB Route 56, and from SB I-5 to EB Route 56 (~ SD 0.035). According to an article in the San Diego Union-Tribune, motorists will be required to exit the freeway and use surface streets to make those transitions. This is because "Caltrans typically requires that 1,500 vehicles an hour pass through an interchange at peak travel times to necessitate a direct connector. Until recently, Caltrans contended that neither connection met that threshold. Moreover, the connectors would cost nearly $140 million. Caltrans spokesman Tom Nipper said spending $140 million to benefit 1,500 vehicles an hour didn't seem like a wise investment, so Caltrans and the San Diego Association of Governments decided to spend the region's limited transportation dollars on more pressing projects." Later meetings resulting in Caltrans updating its traffic projections and agreeing that the ramp connecting westbound 56 to northbound I-5 needs to be built before 2020. However, it still may take as long as 10 years to perform the necessary environmental studies, and design and build that segment. As for the ramp from SB I-5 to EB Route 56, the consensus was to put off construction of that ramp and concentrate on the west-to-north connector.

The SAFETEA-LU act, enacted in August 2005 as the reauthorization of TEA-21, provided the following expenditures on or near this route:

In San Diego: In July 2005, the CTC received a notice of EIR preparation for Route 5 and Route 56 in San Diego County that would provide a connector between Route 5 and Route 56 near Del Mar Heights (NOP). The alternatives being considered are:

In June 2012, Caltrans started soliciting comments on the proposals. Options include building direct connectors between the freeways, adding auxiliary lanes on I-5, doing a mix of both, or doing nothing. The price tag to do something ranges from $95 million to $250 million. Up to 27 homeowners' properties could be affected, but no homes would be displaced entirely, according to Caltrans documents. Caltrans is hoping to select an option by the end of this year so crews can work concurrently with the I-5 corridor project. Construction will begin when funding is available, likely sometime after 2020. For more than 10 years Caltrans, the San Diego Association of Governments and the city of San Diego have been studying a proposed project to address mobility at the interchange and conducting public workshops to create options. Visual, noise and right-of-way impacts were the primary issues. Based on those concerns, 17 alternatives were developed and all eventually but five were eliminated. Of those, the first would connect westbound Route 56 to northbound I-5 and southbound I-5 to eastbound Route 56 with two-lane, freeway-to-freeway ramps that would add two lanes on westbound Route 56 and one lane on the eastbound side between Carmel Country Road and El Camino Real at a cost of about $260 million. The second option adds an auxiliary lane on southbound I-5 between Del Mar Heights and Carmel Valley roads and includes improvements on westbound Route 56 for an estimated cost of $100 million. The third proposal is a hybrid of the first two plans, connecting westbound Route 56 to northbound I-5 with a two-lane, freeway-to-freeway ramp. It adds an auxiliary lane on southbound I-5 between Del Mar Heights and Carmel Valley roads as well two lanes on westbound Route 56 and one lane on eastbound Route 56 between Carmel Country Road and El Camino Real for an estimated $170,000 million. Plan four, called the hybrid with a flyover, connects westbound Route 56 to northbound I-5 with a two-lane, freeway-to-freeway ramp. It includes a connector ramp from eastbound Carmel Valley Road to eastbound Route 56 and adds an auxiliary lane on southbound I-5 between Del Mar Heights and Carmel Valley roads. This option would also add two lanes on westbound Route 56 and one lane on eastbound Route 56 between Carmel Country Road and El Camino Real, all at a cost of about $205 million to $225 million. All proposed alternatives would replace and enhance the Del Mar Heights Road overcrossing and include operational improvements at existing ramps and intersections in the project area. Approximately $15.8 million has been programmed for the project through federal and local funds. It is included in TransNet, a voter-approved, half-cent tax for transportation projects. If all goes as planned, construction would begin between 2020 and 2030 and take two years to complete. More information can be found at KeepSanDiegoMoving.
(Source: The Coast News, 6/18/12)

In October 2017, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding the following project for which a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) has been completed: I-5 and Route 56 in San Diego County. Construct roadway and interchange improvements on I-5 and Route 56 in and near the city of San Diego. (11-SD-5, PM R32.7/R34.8, 11-SD-56, PM 0.0/2.5) (EA 17790). This project proposes to provide direct connections between I-5 and Route 56 in San Diego County. This project is not fully funded and is included the San Diego Association of Governments 2016 Regional Transportation Improvement Program for $16.9 million, which includes local funding for preliminary engineering. The project will be constructed in multiple stages upon further programming. Construction is estimated to begin in 2020.

According to Carl Rogers, the southbound connector from I-15 is not yet complete (~ SD 9.6). There are pillars constructed for a distribution ramp though. As an interim option, there is a frontage road funneling SB I-5 traffic to Route 56. The eastbound Route 56 connector to southbound I-15 is still under construction; in fact, a sharp 90-degree at-grade turn is presently in place.

Portions of the original routing have been relinquished. For example, at the June 2000 meeting of the California Transportation Commission, the original routing in the City of Poway was considered for relinquishment (Agenda Item 2.3c).

Naming Naming

Ted Williams ParkwayThe segment from Route 5 to Route 15 (~ SD 0.035 to SD 9.471) is officially named the "Ted Williams Parkway". Ted Williams achieved national recognition for his outstanding career in professional baseball. He was born in San Diego in 1910, and began his professional baseball career in 1936 at the age of 17, when he began playing for the San Diego Padres of the Pacific Coast League. He played for the Boston Red Sox for a total of 19 seasons, and was named most valuable player for the 1946 and 1949 seasons. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 21, Chapter 74 in 1993.
(Image sources: Flikr; History Channel)

Classified Landcaped Freeway Classified Landcaped Freeway

The following segments are designated as Classified Landscaped Freeway:

County Route Starting PM Ending PM
San Diego 56 T0.18 2.00
San Diego 56 2.00 6.20
San Diego 56 6.20 9.00

Exit Information Exit Information

Other WWW Links Other WWW Links

Freeway Freeway

[SHC 253.1] Entire route. Added to the Freeway and Expressway system in 1959.

Statistics Statistics

Overall statistics for Route 56:

Pre-1964 Legislative Route Pre-1964 Legislative Route

The route that would become LRN 56 (the coast route, part of today's Route 1) was first defined in the 1919 Third Bond Act as running from Carmel to San Simeon. In 1921, Chapter 837 extended the route by declaring "the county road extending from San Simeon SE-ly to the town of Cambria is hereby...declared to be a state highway".

In 1931, Chapter 82 extended it further by adding the segment from Cambria to San Luis Obispo to the route. As of 1931, the Coast Route (LRN 56) terminated state jurisdiction near Cambria. A county highway then connected it to Route 2 at San Luis Obispo. It was included in the highway system to provide a through drive and extending to a connection with an existing state highway. The more interesting aspect of the rationale was that it was also implementing a policy to increase mileage in the southern portion of the state.

In 1933, it received a number of additional extensions: (a) a segment from [LRN 2] near Las Cruces via Lompoc and Guadalupe to [LRN 2] near Pismo; (b) [LRN 56] near Carmel to Santa Cruz; (c) Santa Cruz to San Francisco via Coast; (d) State Highway near the Southerly end of the Marin Peninsula to the Marin-Sonoma County Line via the Coast Route; (e) Russian River near Jenner to Westport; and (f) Ferndale to [LRN 1] near Fernbridge. In 1935, all of these extensions were captured in the highway code as follows:

  1. [LRN 2] near Las Cruces via Lompoc and Guadalupe to [LRN 2] near Pismo.
  2. San Luis Obispo to San Francisco along the coast via Cambria, San Simeon, Carmel, and Santa Cruz
  3. State Highway near southerly end of Marin Peninsula to the Marin-Sonoma County Line via the Coast Route
  4. Russian River near Jenner to Westport
  5. Ferndale to [LRN 1] near Fernbridge

In 1943, Chapter 661 permitted the commission and the department "to abandon and relocate any portion or portions of [LRN 56] as now established and laid out between the intersection of [LRN 56] and [LRN 55] south of San Francisco and the town of Farallon City in San Mateo County and to take any and all action necessary for such abandonment and relocation. Such abandonment may be effected prior to relocation and pending relocation the commission and the department may adopt and maintain any traversable road around the portion or portions so abandoned." This was done because of the excessive number of rock and mudslides on portions of LRN 56/Route 1 which made maintenance excessive and endangered the public.

In 1951, Chapter 1588 filled gaps north of San Francisco and added a branch near Leggett Valley. This combined the third through fifth segments into:

State highway near southerly end of Marin Peninsula to [LRN 1] near Fernbridge via the coast route through Jenner, Westport, and Ferndale; provided however that Section 600 of this code shall be applicable to those portions of said road added to the state highway system by this section, the same as if said portions had been added by the Collier-Burns Act of 1947, and the Department of Public Works shall not be required to maintain any such portion or portions of said route until the same have been laid out and constructed as a state highway

In 1955, Chapter 1488 removed the language related to Section 600. It also reworded the definition of the last segment to be "State highway near southerly end of Marin Peninsula to [LRN 1] near Fernbridge via the coast route through Jenner, Westport, and Ferndale, including lateral connection with [LRN 1] near Leggett Valley "

In 1957, Chapter 36, deleted the reference to "Carmel" from segment (b).

In 1959, Chapter 1841 changed segment (a) to refer to "the vicinity of Lompoc and Guadalupe."

There were no further changes before the 1963 renumbering. This route was all signed as Route 1. The final definition was:

  1. From LRN 2 near Las Cruces via the vicinity of Lompoc and Guadalupe to LRN 2 near Pismo.
  2. From San Luis Obispo to San Francisco along the coast via Cambria, San Simeon, and Santa Cruz.
  3. From LRN 1 near the southernly end of the Marin Peninsula to LRN 1 near Fernbridge via the coast route through Jenner, Westport and Ferndale, including a lateral connection with LRN 1 near Leggett Valley.

Acronyms and Explanations:


Back Arrow Route 55 Forward Arrow Route 57

© 1996-2020 Daniel P. Faigin.
Maintained by: Daniel P. Faigin <webmaster@cahighways.org>.