This is a floating closed javascript menu.
Menu

Site Change Log
2025 Changes


December 2025:

This update covers the rest of October, November, and December 2025. Before we dive into the updates to the California Highways site, an update on the California Highways: Route by Route podcast. As always, you can keep up with the show at the podcast's forever home at https://www.caroutebyroute.org , the show's page on Spotify for Podcasters, or you can subscribe through your favorite podcaster or via the RSS feeds (CARxR, Spotify for Podcasters) . The following episodes have been posted since the last update in mid-October:

Turning to the updates to the California Highways pages: Updates were made to the following highways, based on my reading of the (virtual) papers and my research for the fourth season of the podcast in October, November, and December 2025 (which are posted to the roadgeeking category at the "Observations Along The Road" and to the California Highways Facebook group) as well as any backed up email changes. I also reviewed the the AAroads forum (Ꜳ). This resulted in changes on the following routes, with credit as indicated [my research(ℱ), contributions of information or leads (via direct mail or ꜲRoads) from Graham Bakulin(2), DTComposer(3), Tom Fearer(4), Metro I-5 North County Enhancements Project(5), Adrian Ople (City of Brawley)(6), Mike Palmer(7), Will Poundstone(8)]: Route 1(ℱ), Route 2(ℱ), Route 4(ℱ,4), I-5(ℱ,5), US 6(ℱ), I-15(ℱ), Route 16(4), Route 22(ℱ), Route 24(4), Route 26(ℱ), Route 27(ℱ), Route 33(4), Route 37(ℱ), Route 38(ℱ), Route 39(ℱ), Route 41(ℱ), Route 47(ℱ,7), Route 49(ℱ), US 50(ℱ), LRN 50(ℱ), Route 51(ℱ), Route 52(ℱ), Route 57(ℱ), Route 59(4), Route 64(ℱ), Route 70(ℱ,4), Route 78(ℱ), I-80(ℱ), Route 82(ℱ), Route 84(ℱ), US 99(ℱ), Route 99(4), US 101(ℱ), Route 110(ℱ), Route 116(ℱ), Route 118(ℱ), Route 120(ℱ), Route 121(ℱ), Route 131(ℱ), Route 134(ℱ), Route 135(ℱ), Route 170(ℱ), Route 180(4), LRN 183(2), Route 185(ℱ), Route 187(ℱ), Route 198(ℱ), Route 217(ℱ), Route 240(ℱ), Route 247(ℱ), Route 258(ℱ), Route 260(4), Route 275(4), I-280(ℱ), I-380(3), US 395(ℱ), I-405(ℱ), I-580(ℱ), I-605(ℱ), I-680(ℱ), I-710(ℱ,8), I-780(ℱ), County Sign Route J1(4), County Sign Route J6(4), County Sign Route J16(4), County Sign Route J17(4), County Sign Route S17(6).
(Source: private email through 1/1/2026, Highway headline posts through and including the December 2025 Headline post, AARoads through 1/1/2026)

Continued work on Season 4 of the Route by Route podcast. Research for and preparation of the episodes for the back half of the season (covering Route 11 through Route 14) resulted in changes and updates to the following routes: Route 12, Route 13, Route 14, Route 24, Route 29, I-110, Route 116, Route 121, LRN 7, LRN 12, LRN 13, LRN 51, LRN 74, LRN 104.

Added an interesting link to the maps page: Old Insurance Maps. This can provide some interesting comparisons of highway routing to redlining.

Reviewed the Pending Legislation page, based on the California Legislature site, for bills through 2025-12-29. As usual, I recommend to every Californian that they visit the legislative website regularly and see what their legis-critters are doing. As many people are unfamiliar with how the legislature operates (and why there are so many "non-substantive changes" and "gut and amend" bills), I've added the legislative calendar (updated for 2025) to the end of the Pending Legislation page. Noted the passage of the following bills / resolutions:

Reviewed the online agenda of the California Coastal Commission for the November and December meetings. There were no items related to state highways in the reviewed agendas.

I checked California Transportation Commission page for the results of the December 2025 meeting of the California Transportation Commission. As always, note that I tend not to track items that do not impact these pages — i.e., pavement rehabilitation or replacement, landscaping, drainage, culverts, roadside facilities, charging stations, or other things that do not impact the routing or history, unless they are really significant. As such, the following items were of interest:

[ Note: ° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages; ♠ is an indicator used to keep track of what has been added to the pages; ❧ indicates the results from the meeting, if the meeting minutes were available. ]

2.1a. STIP/SHOPP Program/Project Amendments

♠ (1) Request to SHOPP Amendments for Approval:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(4), 2.5b.(1), 2.5b.(2), and 2.5d.(1))

Of these, the following projects/allocation were at the level of interest for the highway pages (general, these are significant new structures or changes, as opposed to repair or rehabilitation in place; additions of bike paths, pedestrian, or complete street elements; or non-visible changes). “⊘” indicates phase not authorized.

2.1b. STIP Program/Project Amendments/Approvals for Notice

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2a. Submittal of Notice of Preparation for Comments

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2b. Submittal of Notice of Documents Available for Comment (DEIRs)

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2c. Approval of Projects for New Public Road Connection / Future Consideration of Funding

♠ (1) Approval of Three Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. °01-01-Hum-96, PM R38.9, 01-Hum-299, PM R7.4. Maintenance Facilities Project. Replace existing crew/equipment building, perimeter fencing, septic leach field, add fire suppression infrastructure, and install electrical vehicle chargers at the Orleans Maintenance Station on Route 96 at Post Mile (PM) R38.9 in Humboldt County. Replace the California Highway Patrol scale office/shelter, a stormwater drainage inlet, and the weigh scale and scale pad at the Buckhorn truck scale (Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Facility) site on State Route 299 at PM R7.4 in Humboldt County. (ND) (PPNO 2568) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  2. 02-05-Mon-101, PM R1.9/R9.7. Bradley Capital Preventative Maintenance Project. Perform capital preventative maintenance and replacement of San Antonio River Bridges and the southbound North Bradley Overcrossing on US 101 from PM R1.9 to R9.7 in Monterey County. (MND) (PPNO 2904) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  3. 03-07-Ven-33, PM 6.3/13.49. SR-33 Pavement Preservation Project. Perform multi-asset pavement preservation project in Ventura County on Route 33 from 0.6-miles south of Parkview Drive (PM 6.3) to 0.1-miles north of Foothill Trail (PM 13.49) in Casitas Springs and Ojai within Ventura County. (ND) (PPNO 5619) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))

♠ (4) Approval of Four Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. 01-04-Mrn-1, PM 28.4/28.6. State Route 1 Lagunitas Creek Bridge Project. Replace the existing bridge over Lagunitas Creek at PM 28.4 to 28.6 of Route 1 in Marin County, California. (FEIR Addenda) (PPNO 0756K) (SHOPP)
    (Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1) and 2.5d.(1))
  2. °02-04-Nap-29, PM 42.83. SR 29 One Bridge Scour Measures. Repair and prevent scour damage of No Name Creek Bridge (Bridge № 21-0100) safely and economically to prevent bridge failure on Route 29 at PM 42.83 in Napa County. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 1483E) (SHOPP)
  3. 03-04-Son-1, PM 15.1/15.7. State Route 1 Gleason Beach Roadway Realignment Project. Construct a two-lane roadway along a new alignment eastward and inland of the current alignment between PMs 15.1 and 15.7 of Route 1 in Sonoma County, California. (FEIR Addenda) (PPNO 0748E) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5e.(4))
  4. 04-07-LA-138, PM 66.0/70.1. 07-LA-18, PM 3.4/4.5. SR-138 Widening Project (Segment 13). Widen Route 138 from PM 66.0 to 68.5 from 2 lanes to 4 lanes, consisting of two 12-foot lanes and an 8-foot shoulder in each direction divided by a 16-foot two way left-turn median, creating additional capacity. Additionally, provide traffic striping improvements only (no additional capacity) on Route 138 from PM 68.5 to 70.1 and Route 18 from PM 3.4 to 4.5. (FEIR Addendum) (PPNO 4357) (STIP) [Note the following quote from the background item: Specifically, the Addendum addresses minor design modifications including a reduction in capacity increasing highway widening to a portion of the Segment 13 alignment (on Route 138 from PM 66.0 to 68.5) instead of the entire segment as originally proposed. The remainder of the segment on Route 138 from PM 68.5 to 70.1 and Route 18 from PM 3.4 to 4.5 will retain its existing roadway width and include traffic striping improvements only (no additional capacity). Further, bicycle lanes have been removed from the project scope. ]
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5c.(1))

♠ (5) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 12-Ora-241, PM 33.6/39.1, 12-Ora-91, PM R15.9/R18.9, 08-Riv-91, PM R0.0/R0.6, SR-241/SR-91 Tolled Express Lanes Connector Project. Construct a tolled direct connector between Route 241 and the Route 91 Tolled Express Lanes from Orange County to the Riverside County line. (FSEIR Addendum) (EA 0K970) (Local Funds)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(7) and 4.3)

♠ (6) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 03-Sacramento County. Hazel Avenue/US 50 Interchange Project. Modify interchange and extend and grade-separate Hazel Avenue over Folsom Boulevard and rail corridor. (FEIR) (PPNO 6222) (LPP (Competitive))

♠ (7) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 12-Ora-91, PM R17.8/R18.2. Coal Canyon Interim Bridge Widening Project. Construct an interim widening of Coal Canyon bridge (Bridge № 55-0507L) – a component of the Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project Ultimate Project. (FEIR Addendum) (STIP) (Local Funds) (PPNO 0077J)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(5) and 4.3)

2.3a. Route Adoptions

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3b. New Public Road Connection

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3c. Relinquishments

♠ One Relinquishment Resolution:

  1. 05-SB-101-PM 2.3/3.2. Right of Way along US 101 on Via Real, Casitas Pass Road, Ogan Road, and Linden Avenue, in the City of Carpinteria.

2.3d. Vacations

♠ One Vacation Resolution:

  1. 03-Pla-193-PM 4.4/5.5. Right of Way along Route 193 from 0.2 miles west of Clark Tunnel Road to Hidden Acres Lane, in the County of Placer.

2.5a Minor Projects

♠ Request of $1,250,000 for One District Minor project:

2.5b. Financial Allocations for SHOPP Projects / Federal Discretionary Grant Funds

♠ (1) Request $104,586,000 for seven construction phase SHOPP projects.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1), 2.5b.(2), and 2.5d.(2))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (2) Request of $68,372,000 $67,272,000 for 52 51 2024 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support, design, and R/W support.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1), 2.2c.(1) and 2.5b.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

2.5c Financial Allocations for STIP Projects

♠ (1) Request of $55,206,000 for the State-Administered STIP Widen Conventional Highway (Segment 13) project, on the State Highway System, in Los Angeles County. (Route 138 07-LA-138 66.0/70.1 and Route 18, 07-LA-18 3.4/4.5, PPNO 4357)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.2c.(4))

2.5d Allocations for Projects with Costs that Exceed 20 Percent of the Programmed Amount

♠ (1) Request for $23,730,000 (67.3 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $4,750,000 (18.8 percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the SHOPP Bridge Formula Program project on Route 1, in Marin County. (EA 0G642, PPNO 0756K)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1) and 2.2c.(4))

2.5e Supplemental Fund Allocations

♠ (3) Request for an additional $9,800,000 (3.1 percent increase) in Construction Capital and $5,000,000 (19.4 percent increase) in Construction Support for the SHOPP Roadway Rehabilitation and Multimodal Corridor Enhancement project on US 50, in Sacramento County. (EA 0H08U, PPNO 6254)

♠ (4) Request for an additional $12,640,000 (180.6 percent increase) in Pre-Construction RW Capital, for the SHOPP Major Damage (Permanent Restoration) project on Route 1, in Sonoma County. (EA 0A021, PPNO 0748R)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.2c.(4))

♠ (5) Request for an additional $250,000 (11.2 percent increase) in Pre-Construction Support, RW phase, for the SHOPP Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement project on Route 47, in Los Angeles County. (EA 13820, PPNO 0444E)

2.5f Financial Allocations for SHOPP

♠ Informational Reports on Allocations Under Delegated Authority:

The following projects were of interest for the highway pages. Uninteresting projects included emergency storm damage mitigation that was primarily repairs; repairing damage from unhoused individuals; and damage from accidents, because all of these eventually restore the facility to the condition it was in before the emergency (and thus there is no new facility or significant change to the facility).

2.5g Prop 1B Project Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5p Local Transportation Climate Adaptation Program (LTCAP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5s Senate Bill 1 Programs Project Allocations Local Partnership Program (LPP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5t Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5w Active Transportation Program (ATP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.6g Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

4. TCIF and Aeronautic Program Updates / Policy Matters

♠ 4.3 State Route 241 and State Route 91 Express Lane Connector Project – Tolling Approval Request
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(5) and 2.2c.(7))

♠ 4.14 Local Partnership Formulaic Program Amendment.  Add four projects in Nevada, Marin, Sonoma, San Francisco, and San Joaquin Counties and program $7,494,000. Of these, the following was of interest to the highway pages:

♠ 4.16 2024 Trade Corridor Enhancement Program Amendments. Amendments to the Coastal Rail Infrastructure Resiliency Project, the Harbor Scenic Drive Enhancements Project, the Port of Los Angeles Rail System Efficiency Reduction - Terminal Island Rail Infrastructure Project, the State Route 60 / World Logistics Center Parkway Interchange Project, and the State Route West 132 West Phase 3A Project. The following specific changes were of interest:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.6s.(5) and 4.11)

Other Matters/Public Comment

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

FREQUENTLY USED TERMS IN CTC MINUTES: California Transportation Commission (Commission or CTC), California Department of Transportation (Department or Caltrans), Regional Improvement Program (RIP), Interregional Improvement Program (IIP), State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP), Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP), Public Transportation Account (PTA), Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990 (Proposition 116), High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program (Proposition 1A), Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 1B), Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), State Route 99 Bond Program (RTE or SR 99), Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Account (LBSRA), Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF), Highway-Railroad Crossing Safety Account (HRCSA), State-Local Partnership Program (SLPP), Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TLSP), Letter of No Prejudice (LONP), Environmental Phase (PA&ED), Design Phase (PS&E), Right of Way (R/W), Fiscal Year (FY), Active Transportation Program (ATP), Intercity Rail (ICR), California Aid to Airports Program (CAAP), Acquisition & Development (A&D), Transit and Inter-City Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), Transportation Facilities Account (TFA), Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP), Local Partnership Program (LPP), Local Streets and Roads Program (LSRP), Solutions for Congested Corridors Program (SCCP).

❦

October 2025:

This update covers the rest of August, September, and October 2025. Before we dive into the updates to the California Highways site, an update on the California Highways: Route by Route podcast. As always, you can keep up with the show at the podcast's forever home at https://www.caroutebyroute.org , the show's page on Spotify for Podcasters, or you can subscribe through your favorite podcaster or via the RSS feeds (CARxR, Spotify for Podcasters) . The following episodes have been posted since the last update in early August:

Turning to the updates to the California Highways pages: Updates were made to the following highways, based on my reading of the (virtual) papers and my research for the fourth season of the podcast in July, August, September, and October 2025 (which are posted to the roadgeeking category at the "Observations Along The Road" and to the California Highways Facebook group) as well as any backed up email changes. I also reviewed the the AAroads forum (Ꜳ). This resulted in changes on the following routes, with credit as indicated [my research(ℱ), contributions of information or leads (via direct mail or ꜲRoads) from Nathan Edgars (NE2)(2), Tom Fearer(3), Ann Maris(4), Adrian Ople/City of Brawley(5), Plutonic Panda(6)]: Route 1(ℱ,3), Route 2(ℱ), Route 3(2), Route 9(ℱ), Route 11(ℱ), Route 17(ℱ), Sign Route 18(ℱ), Route 28(ℱ), Route 29(ℱ), Route 36(2), Route 38(ℱ), Route 47(ℱ), Route 49(ℱ,3), Route 57(ℱ), Route 59 (Atwater-Merced Expressway)(3), Route 60(ℱ), Route 61(ℱ), LRN 69(ℱ), Route 71(ℱ,6), I-80(ℱ), US 80(ℱ), Route 89(ℱ), Route 91(ℱ,6), US 97(ℱ), Route 99(ℱ), US 101(ℱ), LRN 105(ℱ), LRN 107(ℱ), Route 120(ℱ), Route 131(ℱ), Route 133(ℱ), Route 166(ℱ), Route 180(3), Route 185(ℱ), LRN 226(ℱ), Route 227(3), LRN 228(ℱ), Route 238(ℱ,4), LRN 252(ℱ), Route 260(ℱ), I-580(ℱ), I-680(ℱ), I-710(ℱ), I-880(ℱ), Imperial County Sign Route S31(5).
(Source: private email through 10/19/2025, Highway headline posts through and including the September 2025 Headline post, AARoads through 10/18/2025)

Continued work on Season 4 of the Route by Route podcast. It is surprising how pulling the thread on one particular route's page touches a large number of routes, and often results in a reorganization and deep review of information on the page that may have gotten stale in the light of subsequent research. This resulted in changes and updates to the following routes: Route 3, I-5, Route 9, I-10, Route 11, Route 17, Route 18, Route 26, Route 30, Route 36, Route 38, Route 74, Route 110, Route 118, Route 138, Route 172, Route 195, Route 206, Route 236, Route 248, Route 259, Route 262, US 40, US 48, US 60, US 70, US 66, US 91, US 99, US 395, LRN 5, LRN 9, LRN 26, LRN 31, LRN 35, LRN 42, LRN 43, LRN 44, LRN 59, LRN 154, LRN 161, LRN 171, LRN 172, LRN 173, LRN 186, LRN 190, LRN 191, LRN 205, LRN 240.

As the Maps page is rapidly turning to a "research starting point" page, added a link to the AASHTO Route Numbering Archive, which is a great starting point for researching the history of US and Interstate numbering. Adding this, in preparation for the bonus podcast episode on the LA Metro Archives, led to updating and correcting a number of links on the map pages that had gone stale, and adding in a few more links, especially some meta links like the Digital Library Directory.

Reviewed the Pending Legislation page, based on the California Legislature site, for bills through 2025-10-19. As usual, I recommend to every Californian that they visit the legislative website regularly and see what their legis-critters are doing. As many people are unfamiliar with how the legislature operates (and why there are so many "non-substantive changes" and "gut and amend" bills), I've added the legislative calendar (updated for 2025) to the end of the Pending Legislation page. Noted the passage of the following bills / resolutions:

Reviewed the online agenda of the California Coastal Commission for the August, September, and October meetings. The following was of interest:

I checked California Transportation Commission page for the results of the August and October 2025 meetings of the California Transportation Commission. As always, note that I tend not to track items that do not impact these pages — i.e., pavement rehabilitation or replacement, landscaping, drainage, culverts, roadside facilities, charging stations, or other things that do not impact the routing or history, unless they are really significant. As such, the following items were of interest:

[ Note: ° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages; ♠ is an indicator used to keep track of what has been added to the pages; ❧ indicates the results from the meeting, if the meeting minutes were available. ]

2.1a. STIP/SHOPP Program/Project Amendments

♠ (Aug) (1) SHOPP Amendments for Approval:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.5b.(1), 2.5b.(2), 2.5d.(11) and 2.5d.(14))

Of these, the following projects/allocation were at the level of interest for the highway pages (general, these are significant new structures or changes, as opposed to repair or rehabilitation in place; additions of bike paths, pedestrian, or complete street elements; or non-visible changes). “⊘” indicates phase not authorized.

♠ (Oct) (1) Request to:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(8), 2.4a., 2.5b.(1), 2.5b.(2), 2.5d.(3), 2.5d.(4), 2.5d.(5), 2.5d.(16), 2.5f. and 4.18)

Of these, the following projects/allocation were at the level of interest for the highway pages (general, these are significant new structures or changes, as opposed to repair or rehabilitation in place; additions of bike paths, pedestrian, or complete street elements; or non-visible changes). “⊘” indicates phase not authorized.

2.1b. STIP Program/Project Amendments/Approvals for Notice

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2a. Submittal of Notice of Preparation for Comments

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2b. Submittal of Notice of Documents Available for Comment (DEIRs)

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2c. Approval of Projects for New Public Road Connection / Future Consideration of Funding

♠ (Aug) (1) Approval of Five Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. °01-01-Men-128, PM 0.0/50.5. Culvert Rehabilitation and Fish Passage Project Rehabilitate drainages and provide fish passage on Route 128 in Mendocino County from Post Miles (PM) 0.0 to 50.5. (ND) (PPNO 4754) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  2. 02-04-Ala-24, PM R5.80/R6.24; 04-Cc-24, PM R0.00/R0.60. Caldecott Tunnel Bores 1, 2, and 3 Rehabilitation and Ventilation Upgrade Project. Rehabilitate Bores 1, 2, and 3 of the Caldecott Tunnel at PM R5.80/R6.24 and R0.00/R0.60 on Route 24 in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. This project will preserve the structural integrity of the tunnel and extend its service life. (MND) (PPNO 0480B) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  3. 03-08-SBd-40, PM R104.6/R120.5. San Bernardino County Interstate 40 Bridge and Rock Slope Protection Replacements. Restore Rock Slope Protection at Ardis Ditch Bridges, Tank Tower Ditch Bridges, and Homer Wash Bridges, and Replace Woods Wash Bridges on I-40 West of the City of Needles in San Bernardino County. (MND) (PPNO 3017K) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  4. °04-09-Iny-395, PM 100.80/113.00. Keough Pavement. Rehabilitate pavement, upgrade existing drainage facilities, improve bicyclist access, and perform other work on US 395 from PM 100.80 to 113.00 in Inyo County, California. (ND) (PPNO 2719) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  5. °05-12-Ora-133, PM 11.4/13.6; 12-Ora-241, PM 24.5/35.7. Silverado Fire Permanent Restoration. Make necessary repairs on the fire damaged guardrails, drainage facilities, traffic control devices, roadway signs, and electrical systems on Route 133 and Route 241 in the cities of Irvine, Orange, and Orange County, unincorporated. (MND) (PPNO 5498) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))

♠ (Aug) (3) Approval of 4 3 Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. 01-01-DN-197, VAR/VAR; 01-DN-199, VAR/VAR. 197/199 Safe STAA Access Project. Construct improvements at spot locations along Route 197 and US 199 in Del Norte County to allow the reclassification of the Route 197– US 199 corridor as part of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) network of truck routes. Specifically, the project would include curve lengthening, shoulder widening, culvert extensions and replacements, installation of new culverts and drainage inlets, roadbed elevation changes, upgrades to local road approaches, widening of existing lanes (to accommodate STAA standards), installation of retaining walls, concrete barriers, and a rockfall mitigation system and sand trap. (FEIR Addendum) (PPNO 1161) (SHOPP) Withdrawn prior to the CTC meeting
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(1))
  2. °02-04-Ala-580, PM R41.3/44.8. (Oakland) Bridge Rehabilitation Project. Upgrade existing non-standard bridge barrier railings to current standards along Interstate 580 (I-580) at the Broadway-Richmond Boulevard Undercrossing (UC), the Fruitvale Avenue UC, and the Webster Street UC, as well as seismically retrofit both the Broadway- Richmond UC and Fruitvale UC. Demolish the Santa Clara Avenue Pedestrian Overcrossing (POC) and the Van Buren Avenue POC and either constrict a new replacement POC over I-580 connecting Crescent Street to MacArthur Boulevard or instead provide surface street improvements to nearby Grand Avenue, MacArthur Boulevard, and Santa Clara Avenue. (ND Addendum) (PPNO 2020M) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(1))
  3. °03-05-Mon-68, PM 0.2/15.7. State Route 68 Drainage Improvements. Repair or replace culverts, replace lights near Fairground Road, and install two new traffic census stations on Route 68 from post miles 0.2 to 15.7 in Monterey County. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 2787) (SHOPP)
    (Related Items under Ref. 2.5d.(10) and 2.8d.(1))
  4. °04-05-Mon-101, PM R28.23/100.3. Monterey 101 Drainage Improvements Project. Upgrade drainage systems and other highway elements along US 101 from post miles R28.23 to 100.3 in Monterey County. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 2797) (SHOPP)
    (Related Items under 2.1a.(1) and 2.5d.(11))

♠ (Oct) (3) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 01-Men-1, PM 43.3/44.2. Albion River Bridge Project. Replace the Albion River Bridge on Route 1 in Mendocino County near Albion from 3.0 miles north of the Route 128 junction to 0.2 mile north of the Albion River. (FEIR) (PPNO 4490) (SHOPP)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.5b.(2) and 2.5b.(3))

♠ (Oct) (4) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 03-Sacramento County. I Street Bridge Replacement Project. New two-lane bridge to replace existing two-lane vehicle crossing. (FEIR) (PPNO 1809) (LPP) [Note: This is former Sign Route 24]

♠ (Oct) (5) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 05-Mon-68, PM 4.8/13.7. Scenic Route 68 Corridor Improvements Project. Improve operations at nine intersections along Route 68 from post miles 4.8 to 13.7 in Monterey County. Specifically, construct roundabouts or upgraded signalized intersections with enhanced lane configurations and wildlife crossing improvements including replacing existing underground culverts at five locations and providing fencing along the highway at culvert entrances. (FEIR) (PPNO 1790) (STIP) (LPP (Formulaic))

♠ (Oct) (6) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 07-LA-39, PM 40.0/44.4. California State Route 39 (San Gabriel Canyon Road) Reopening Project. Restore and reopen a segment of Route 39 as an evacuation route and for use by the Department, United States Forest Service, and emergency-response personnel. (FEIR) (PPNO 5381) (SHOPP)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))

♠ (Oct) (7) Approval of Project for Future Consideration of Funding: 10-Stanislaus County. 7th Street Bridge Project. Replace existing structurally deficient two-lane bridge with a four-lane bridge. (FEIR) (PPNO 1809) (LPP) [Note: This is former US 99]

♠ (Oct) (8) Approval of two Projects for Future Consideration of Funding:

  1. 01-06-Fre-41, PM 0.0/7.1; 06-Kin-41, PM R48.0/R48.3. Excelsior Expressway. Widen Route 41 in Fresno County from a 2-lane expressway to a 4-lane expressway from kilometer post 0.0 (PM 0.0) at Excelsior Avenue to kilometer post 11.4 (PM 7.1) at Elkhorn Avenue and install streetlights at the Excelsior interchange from PM R48.0 to R48.3 in Kings County. (MND Addenda) (PPNO 1350) (STIP)
  2. 02-07-LA-47, PM R0.4/2.1. Vincent Thomas Bridge Deck Replacement Project. Replace the deteriorated bridge deck, upgrade seismic sensors, and improve the existing median barrier and railings on the Vincent Thomas Bridge (Route 47) in the Port of Los Angeles. (FEIR Addenda) (PPNO 6024) (SHOPP)
    (Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1) and 2.5d.(16))

2.3a. Route Adoptions

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3b. New Public Road Connection

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3c. Relinquishments

♠ (Oct) Four Relinquishment Resolutions:

  1. 03-Sac-99-PM 14.8/15.1. Right of way along Route 99 on West Stockton Blvd, in the City of Sacramento.
  2. 06-Tul-99-PM 33.2/34.3. Right of way along Route 99 on Avenue 264 (Liberty Avenue), Road 94, and North J Street, in the County of Tulare.
  3. 11-SD-5-PM 23.7. Right of way along I-5 on Santa Fe Street, in the City of San Diego.
  4. 11-SD-163-PM 4.4. Right of way along Route 163 on Friars Road, in the City of San Diego.

2.3d. Vacations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5a Minor Projects

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5b. Financial Allocations for SHOPP Projects / Federal Discretionary Grant Funds

♠ (Aug) (1) Request $1,716,352,000 for 68 construction phase SHOPP projects.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1), 2.2c.(3), 2.5b.(2), 2.5c.(1), 2.5d.(21), 2.5s.(1) and 2.8d.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Aug) (2) Request of $66,248,000 for 47 2024 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support, design, and R/W support.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1) 2.2c.(1), and 2.5b.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Oct) (1) Request $354,845,000 for 23 construction-phase SHOPP projects.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1), 2.5b.(2), and 2.5c.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Oct) (2) Request of $148,306,000 for 103 2024 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support, design, and R/W support.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1), 2.2c.(1), 2.2c.(3), 2.2c.(6), 2.4a., 2.5b.(1), 2.5b.(3), and 4.18)

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Oct) (3) Request of $13,977,000 for the Right of Way Capital phase for the SHOPP Bridge Preservation project, on Route 1, in Mendocino County, programmed in Fiscal Year 2026-27. (PPNO 4490)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(3) and 2.5b.(2))

2.5c Financial Allocations for STIP Projects

♠ (Aug) (1) Request of $95,338,000 for the State-Administered STIP I-5 Improvement Project from I-405 to Yale Avenue, Segment 1, on the State Highway System, in Orange County. (PPNO 2743)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(1))

♠ (Oct) (2) Request of $10,000,000 for the locally-administered STIP I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange Improvement project, on the State Highway System, in Santa Clara County. (PPNO 2091M)

2.5d Allocations for Projects with Costs that Exceed 20 Percent of the Programmed Amount

♠ (Aug) (7) Request for $3,159,000 (199.1 percent increase) STIP allocation in Construction Capital, $52,411,000 (0 percent increase) TCEP allocation in Construction Capital, and $8,883,000 (0 percent increase) TCEP allocation in Construction Support, for the State-Administered multi-funded STIP and TCEP Five Cities Multimodal Transportation Network Project on US 101, in San Luis Obispo County. (EA 1G680, PPNO 2653)

♠ (Aug) (17) Request for $10,584,000 (41.0 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $1,800,000 (16.1 percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the SHOPP Safety Improvements project on Route 180, in Fresno County. (EA 0Y410, PPNO 7009)

♠ (Aug) (21) Request for $14,615,000 (0 percent increase) TCEP allocation in Construction Capital, $6,301,000 (75.8 percent increase) STIP allocation in Construction Capital and $3,132,000 (11.9 percent increase) STIP allocation in Construction Support, for the State- Administered multi-funded STIP and TCEP RT 49 Corridor Improvements, La Barr-McKnight, SB Truck Climbing Lane project on State Route 49, in Nevada County. (EA 4E170, PPNO 4117)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(1))

♠ (Oct) (2) Request for $82,027,000 (68.3 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $5,327,000 (16.9 percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the SHOPP Major Damage (Permanent Restoration) project on Route 299, in Humboldt County. (EA 0J801, PPNO 2535)

♠ (Oct) (10) Request for $45,735,000 (43.1 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $5,200,000 (zero percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the State-Administered multi-funded STIP and LPP (Formulaic) Excelsior Expressway project on Route 41, in Kings and Fresno counties. (EA 0S370, PPNO 6705)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.5d.(13))

♠ (Oct) (12) Request for $8,681,000 (34.4 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $2,636,000 (1.4 percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the SHOPP Safety Improvements project on Route 41, in Kings County. (EA 0X950, PPNO 7031)

♠ (Oct) (14) Request for $14,790,000 (140.4 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $3,450,000 (60.8 percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the SHOPP Safety Improvements project on Route 138, in Los Angeles County. (EA 36490, PPNO 5573)

♠ (Oct) (16) Request for $639,085,000 (3.3 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $61,336,000 (32.4 percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the SHOPP Bridge Formula Program project on Route 47, in Los Angeles County. (EA 39020, PPNO 6024)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1) and 2.2c.(8))

2.5e Supplemental Fund Allocations

♠ (Aug) (1) Request for an additional $4,455,000 (26.3 percent increase) in Construction Capital and $3,900,000 (93.8 percent increase) in Construction Support for the SHOPP Bridge Seismic Restoration project on Route 162, in Mendocino County. (EA 0A131, PPNO 4692)

♠ (Aug) (3) Request for an additional $2,200,000 (22.0 percent increase) in Construction Support for the SHOPP Bridge Seismic Restoration project on Route 162, in Glenn County. (EA 3F060, PPNO 2633)

♠ (Aug) (4) Request for an additional $1,600,000 (69.8 percent increase) in Pre-Construction Support for the PS&E phase, for the SHOPP Bridge Formula Program project on Route 84, in Solano County. (EA 0G660, PPNO 0886)

♠ (Aug) (5) Request for an additional $2,900,000 (26.4 percent increase) in Construction Support for the STIP San Benito Route 156 Improvement Project on Route 156, in San Benito County. (EA 34490, PPNO 0297)

♠ (Aug) (12) Request for an additional $1,897,000 (12.5 percent increase) in Construction Capital for the SHOPP Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement project on State Route 9, in Santa Cruz County. (EA 1H470, PPNO 2655)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.8b.(1))

♠ (Oct) (2) Request for an additional $950,000 (44.6 percent increase) in Pre-Construction Support for the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) phase, for the SHOPP Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement project on Route 96, in Siskiyou County. (EA 0H730, PPNO 3660)

♠ (Oct) (5) Request for an additional $850,000 (14.0 percent increase) in Construction Capital for the SHOPP Safety Improvements project on State Route 49, in Placer County. (EA 1H240, PPNO 4785)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.8v.(7))

2.5f Financial Allocations for SHOPP

♠ (Aug) Informational Reports on Allocations Under Delegated Authority:

The following projects were of interest for the highway pages. Uninteresting projects included emergency storm damage mitigation that was primarily repairs; repairing damage from unhoused individuals; and damage from accidents, because all of these eventually restore the facility to the condition it was in before the emergency (and thus there is no new facility or significant change to the facility).

♠ (Oct) Informational Reports on Allocations Under Delegated Authority
(Related Item under Ref. 2.1a.(1))

The following projects were of interest for the highway pages. Uninteresting projects included emergency storm damage mitigation that was primarily repairs; repairing damage from unhoused individuals; and damage from accidents, because all of these eventually restore the facility to the condition it was in before the emergency (and thus there is no new facility or significant change to the facility).

2.5g Prop 1B Project Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5p Local Transportation Climate Adaptation Program (LTCAP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5s Senate Bill 1 Programs Project Allocations Local Partnership Program (LPP) Allocations

♠ (Aug) (1) Request of $9,780,000 for the State-Administered LPP (Formulaic) I-5 Improvement from Yale to SR-55 (Segment 2) project, on the State Highway System, in Orange County. (PPNO 2743A)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(1))

♠ (Aug) (4) Request of $129,000,000 for the locally-administered multi-funded TCEP and INFRA Otay Mesa East Port of Entry Construction – Underground Utilities and Grading Work Package project on Route 11 on the State Highway System, in San Diego County. (PPNO 0999K)

♠ (Aug) (5) Request of $32,100,000 for the State-Administered TCEP Castroville Boulevard Interchange project, on Route 156 on the State Highway System, in Monterey County. (PPNO 0057D)

♠ (Oct) (7) Request for an additional $4,567,000 (142.0 percent increase) in Pre-Construction Right of Way (RW) Capital, for the locally-administered multi-funded LPP (Formulaic) and STIP State Route 132 West Freeway/Expressway Phase II Project on State Route 99 and 132, in Stanislaus County. (EA 40352, PPNO 0944A)

2.5t Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5w Active Transportation Program (ATP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.6g Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

4. TCIF and Aeronautic Program Updates / Policy Matters

♠ (Aug) 4.24 Local Partnership Formulaic Program Amendment: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages, or were not related to state highways)

♠ (Oct) 4.14 Local Partnership Formulaic Program Amendment (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages, or were not related to state highways)

Other Matters/Public Comment

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

FREQUENTLY USED TERMS IN CTC MINUTES: California Transportation Commission (Commission or CTC), California Department of Transportation (Department or Caltrans), Regional Improvement Program (RIP), Interregional Improvement Program (IIP), State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP), Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP), Public Transportation Account (PTA), Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990 (Proposition 116), High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program (Proposition 1A), Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 1B), Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), State Route 99 Bond Program (RTE or SR 99), Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Account (LBSRA), Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF), Highway-Railroad Crossing Safety Account (HRCSA), State-Local Partnership Program (SLPP), Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TLSP), Letter of No Prejudice (LONP), Environmental Phase (PA&ED), Design Phase (PS&E), Right of Way (R/W), Fiscal Year (FY), Active Transportation Program (ATP), Intercity Rail (ICR), California Aid to Airports Program (CAAP), Acquisition & Development (A&D), Transit and Inter-City Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), Transportation Facilities Account (TFA), Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP), Local Partnership Program (LPP), Local Streets and Roads Program (LSRP), Solutions for Congested Corridors Program (SCCP).

❦

July 2025:

This update covers the rest of April, May, June, and July 2025. Before we dive into the updates to the California Highways site, an update on the California Highways: Route by Route podcast. As always, you can keep up with the show at the podcast's forever home at https://www.caroutebyroute.org , the show's page on Spotify for Podcasters, or you can subscribe through your favorite podcaster or via the RSS feeds (CARxR, Spotify for Podcasters) . The following episodes have been posted since the last update just before the end of April:

Turning to the updates to the California Highways pages: Updates were made to the following highways, based on my reading of the (virtual) papers and my research for the fourth season of the podcast in June and July 2025 (which are posted to the roadgeeking category at the "Observations Along The Road" and to the California Highways Facebook group) as well as any backed up email changes. I also reviewed the the AAroads forum (Ꜳ). This resulted in changes on the following routes, with credit as indicated [my research(ℱ), contributions of information or leads (via direct mail or ꜲRoads) from DTComposer(3), Tom Fearer(2), Mike Palmer(3), PDERocco(4), KPhoger(5), therocket(6), Voyager(7)]: Route 1(ℱ,2,5,7), Route 2(ℱ), Route 4(ℱ), I-10(ℱ), I-15(ℱ), Route 17(ℱ), Route 19(6), Route 25(ℱ), Route 37(ℱ), US 40(2), Route 41(ℱ,2), Route 46(ℱ), Route 47(3), Route 49(ℱ), US 50(ℱ), Route 55(ℱ), Route 58(ℱ), Route 65(ℱ), Route 70(ℱ), Route 71(ℱ), Route 74(ℱ), Route 78(ℱ), I-80(ℱ), US 80(ℱ), Route 91(ℱ), US 97(ℱ), Route 99(ℱ), US 101(ℱ,2), Route 107(ℱ), Route 108(ℱ), Route 140(ℱ), Route 154(ℱ), Route 156(ℱ), Route 160(ℱ), Route 162(ℱ), Route 164(6), Route 173(ℱ), Route 178(2), Route 180(ℱ), Route 203(ℱ), Route 217(3,4), Route 232(ℱ), LRN 234(ℱ), Route 246(ℱ), I-380 (Southern Crossing)(ℱ), I-405(ℱ), US 466(ℱ), Route 480(ℱ), I-580(ℱ), I-680(ℱ), County Sign Route A9(ℱ), County Sign Route E16(2), County Sign Route G11(2), County Sign Route G12(2), County Sign Route J42(2).
(Source: private email through 8/7/2025, Highway headline posts through the July 2025 Headline post, AARoads through 8/7/2025)

Started work on Season 4 of the Route by Route podcast. This resulted in changes and updates to the following routes: LRN 5, LRN 21, LRN 30, Sign Route 8, I-8, US 80, Sign Route 88, Sign Route 104, Route 109, Route 115, County Sign Route S2, County Sign Route S80

Updated almost every route page (sigh—good thing I'm retired) to adjust to the AARoads change in page references.

Added a good link to a bridge inspection website: Bridge Inspections: California

Reviewed the Pending Legislation page, based on the California Legislature site, for bills through 2025-08-08. As usual, I recommend to every Californian that they visit the legislative website regularly and see what their legis-critters are doing. As many people are unfamiliar with how the legislature operates (and why there are so many "non-substantive changes" and "gut and amend" bills), I've added the legislative calendar (updated for 2025) to the end of the Pending Legislation page. Noted the passage of the following bills / resolutions:

Reviewed the online agenda of the California Coastal Commission for the April, May, June, and July meetings. Nothing rose to the level of interest for the highway pages.

I checked California Transportation Commission page for the results of the April, May, and June 2025 meetings of the California Transportation Commission. As always, note that I tend not to track items that do not impact these pages — i.e., pavement rehabilitation or replacement, landscaping, drainage, culverts, roadside facilities, charging stations, or other things that do not impact the routing or history, unless they are really significant. As such, the following items were of interest:

[ Note: ° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages; ♠ is an indicator used to keep track of what has been added to the pages; ❧ indicates the results from the meeting, if the meeting minutes were available. ]

2.1a. STIP/SHOPP Program/Project Amendments

♠ (May) (1) SHOPP Amendments for Approval: Request to:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.5b.(1) and 2.5b.(2))

Of these, the following projects/allocation were at the level of interest for the highway pages (general, these are significant new structures or changes, as opposed to repair or rehabilitation in place; additions of bike paths, pedestrian, or complete street elements; or non-visible changes). “⊘” indicates phase not programmed.

♠ (May) (2) SHOPP Amendments for Approval:

Of these, the following projects/allocation were at the level of interest for the highway pages (general, these are significant new structures or changes, as opposed to repair or rehabilitation in place; additions of bike paths, pedestrian, or complete street elements; or non-visible changes). “⊘” indicates phase not programmed.

♠ (Jun) (1) SHOPP Amendments for Approval: Request to:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.5b.(1), 2.5b.(2), 2.5d.(2) 2.5d.(5), and 2.8a.(1))

Of these, the following projects/allocation were at the level of interest for the highway pages (general, these are significant new structures or changes, as opposed to repair or rehabilitation in place; additions of bike paths, pedestrian, or complete street elements; or non-visible changes). “⊘” indicates phase not programmed.

♠ (Jun) (3) STIP Amendment for Action: The Department, Calaveras County, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Fresno County, and the San Diego Association of Governments propose to amend the 2024 STIP to reflect changes to ten projects in various counties: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. Route 4 Wagon Trail Realignment Project (Eastern Segment) (PPNO 3546) in Calaveras County. Reprogram $1,042,000 in CON from FY 2027-28 to Right of Way (RW) 2025-26.
  2. °Treat Boulevard Corridor Improvements (PPNO 0294E) in Contra Costa County. Reprogram $1,600,000 in CON funds from FY 2025-26 to 2026-27.
  3. °Route 4 Operational Improvements - Phase 1 (PPNO 0299A) in Contra Costa County. Reprogram $7,500,000 in PS&E funds from FY 2025-26 to 2026-27
  4. °Innovate 680 Coordinated Adaptive Ramp Metering (CARM) Project (PPNO 0521L) in Contra Costa County. Reprogram to combine $3,200,000 CON Support and $21,800,000 CON, totaling $25,000,000 CON. There is no increase to STIP.
  5. I-80/Central Avenue - Phase 2 (Local Road Realignment) (PPNO 2025H) in Contra Costa County. Reprogram $1,873,000 in CON funds from FY 2025-26 to 2026-27.
  6. °Silverado Trail Five-Way Intersection Improvements (PPNO 1483B) in Napa County. Reprogram $1,153,000 in RW from FY 2025-26 to 2026-27.
  7. US 101 Managed Lanes Project, North of Interstate 380 (I-380 to SM/SF County Line) (PPNO 0658M) in San Mateo County. Reprogram $1,700,000 in RW from FY 2025-26 to 2027-28.
  8. °Central Bikeway (PPNO 2091L) in Santa Clara County. Deprogram $5,500,000 in PS&E FY 2027-28.
  9. South Fresno Route 99 Corridor Project: North Avenue Interchange (PPNO 6288) in Fresno County. Reprogram $42,346,000 in CON funds from FY 2025-26 to 2027-28.
  10. Route 94/Route 125 Auxiliary Lanes (PPNO 0356) in San Diego County. Reprogram $85,000,000 in CON funds from FY 2026-27 to 2025-26.
    (Related Items under Ref. 2.5d.(3) and 2.5s.(8))

♠ (Jun) (6) SHOPP Amendments for Approval: Request to: Revise one project currently programmed in the 2024 SHOPP. (2.1a.(6d)). Specifically, the change was:
(Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(5))

2.1b. STIP Program/Project Amendments/Approvals for Notice

♠ (May) (1) STIP Amendment for Notice: The Department, Calaveras County, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Fresno County, and the San Diego Association of Governments propose to amend the 2024 STIP to reflect changes to ten projects in various counties: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. Route 4 Wagon Trail Realignment Project (Eastern Segment) (PPNO 3546) in Calaveras County. Reprogram $1,042,000 in CON from FY 2027-28 to Right of Way (RW) 2025-26.
  2. °Treat Boulevard Corridor Improvements (PPNO 0294E) in Contra Costa County. Reprogram $1,600,000 in CON funds from FY 2025-26 to 2026-27.
  3. °Route 4 Operational Improvements - Phase 1 (PPNO 0299A) in Contra Costa County. Reprogram $7,500,000 in PS&E funds from FY 2025-26 to 2026-27
  4. °Innovate 680 Coordinated Adaptive Ramp Metering (CARM) Project (PPNO 0521L) in Contra Costa County. Reprogram to combine $3,200,000 CON Support and $21,800,000 CON, totaling $25,000,000 CON. There is no increase to STIP.
  5. I-80/Central Avenue - Phase 2 (Local Road Realignment) (PPNO 2025H) in Contra Costa County. Reprogram $1,873,000 in CON funds from FY 2025-26 to 2026-27.
  6. °Silverado Trail Five-Way Intersection Improvements (PPNO 1483B) in Napa County. Reprogram $1,153,000 in RW from FY 2025-26 to 2026-27.
  7. US 101 Managed Lanes Project, North of Interstate 380 (I-380 to SM/SF County Line) (PPNO 0658M) in San Mateo County. Reprogram $1,700,000 in RW from FY 2025-26 to 2027-28.
  8. °Central Bikeway (PPNO 2091L) in Santa Clara County. Deprogram $5,500,000 in PS&E FY 2027-28.
  9. South Fresno Route 99 Corridor Project: North Avenue Interchange (PPNO 6288) in Fresno County. Reprogram $42,346,000 in CON funds from FY 2025-26 to 2027-28.
  10. Route 94/Route 125 Auxiliary Lanes (PPNO 0356) in San Diego County. Reprogram $85,000,000 in CON funds from FY 2026-27 to 2025-26.
    (Related Items under Ref. 2.5c.(4), 2.8a.(9), and 2.8d.(2))

2.1c. TCIF Baseline Amendments

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.1s. TCEP Baseline Amendments

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2a. Submittal of Notice of Preparation for Comments

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2b. Submittal of Notice of Documents Available for Comment (DEIRs)

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2c. Approval of Projects for New Public Road Connection / Future Consideration of Funding

♠ (May) (1) Approval of Eight Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. °01-02-Sha-5, PM 58.0/67.019; 02-Sis-5, PM 0.0/2.7. Flume Creek CAPM Project. Perform pavement, drainage, and safety improvements on I-5 between Post Miles (PM) 58.0 and 67.019 in Shasta County, and PM 0.0 to 2.7 in Siskiyou County. (MND) (PPNO 3777) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  2. 02-03-ED-89, PM 24.4/25.3. Meeks Creek Bridge Replacement Project. Replacement of Meeks Creek Bridge, creek restoration, fish and wildlife connectivity improvements, enhancement of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, and Transportation Management System elements on Route 89 in El Dorado County, from PM 24.4 to 25.3. (ND) (PPNO 3473) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  3. 03-03-Sac-12, PM 0.70/6.11. Sac 12 Terminous Safety Project. Improve safety of the traveling public, install a concrete median barrier, provide standard width inside shoulders, improve left turn lane access at Terminous Road, rehabilitate drainage systems, and install Transportation Management System elements on Route 12 in Sacramento County, from PM 0.70 to 6.11, east of Solano County and west of San Joaquin County. (ND) (PPNO 5963) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  4. °04-05-Scr-9, PM 0.046/7.500. South Santa Cruz 9 Capital Preventative Maintenance Project. Roadway and drainage rehabilitation and infrastructure improvement on Route 9 between Santa Cruz and Felton, from PM 0.046 to 7.500 in Santa Cruz County. (MND) (PPNO 2879) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  5. °05-06-Fre-Var, PM Var/Var. Fresno County Culvert Improvements. Repair or replace existing blocked and defective drainage across multiple state routes and I-5 at various post miles in Fresno County. (MND) (PPNO 7071) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  6. 06-08-SBd-138, PM T16.20/R17.35. State Route 138 Curve Revision. Realign Route 138, from 1.0 mile east of I-15 to just west of Hog Ranch Creek Bridge (PM T16.20 to R17.35) near the City of Hesperia in San Bernardino County. (MND) (PPNO 3019X) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  7. °07-10-Alp-4, PM Var/Var; 10-Alp-207, Var/Var. Alpine County State Route 4 Drainage System Restoration. Rehabilitate existing drainage systems at 29 locations on Route 4 and Route 207 in Alpine County. (MND) (PPNO 3511) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  8. °08-10-Sta-120, PM 8.94/9.54. Wamble Road Left-Turn Channelization Project. Install left-turn channelization on Route 120 turning onto Wamble Road, east of the City of Oakdale in Stanislaus County. (MND) (PPNO 3540) (SHOPP)

♠ (May) (2) Approval of Eight Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. 01-01-DN-101, PM 35.8/36.5. Dr. Fine Bridge Replacement Project. Replacement of Dr. Fine Bridge on US 101 in Del Norte County from postmile (PM) 35.8 to 36.5. (FEIR Addendum) (PPNO 0100V) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5e.(2))
  2. 02-04-Mrn-101, PM 18.6/27.7; 04-Son-101, 0.0/7.1. Marin Sonoma Narrows (MSN) HOV Widening Project. Relieve recurrent congestion along 16.1 miles of US 101 in Marin County from PM 18.6 to PM 27.7 and in Sonoma County from PM 0.0 to PM 7.1. Widen and realign existing mainline to improve overall traffic operations and access. (FEIR Addendum) (PPNO 0361M) (SCCP) (LPP) (STIP)
    (Related Items under Ref. 2.5s.(9)/2.5v.(2), 2.5s.(10), 2.8c.(3), and 2.8v.(5))
  3. 03-04-Sol-80, PM 10.8/17.0; 04-Sol-680, PM 10.0/13.1; 04-Sol-12, PM 1.7/L2.8; 04-Sol-12, PM L1.8/4.8. Interstate 80/Interstate 680/State Route 12 Interchange Project: I-80 Westbound Cordelia Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Facility (CCVEF) Refinements. Remove the existing I-80 Westbound Truck Scales facility and construct a new more efficient facility that complies with current California Highway Patrol and Caltrans DES Architecture standards. Modify on- and off-ramps from westbound Route 12 East and WB I-80 to accommodate the truck traffic to and from the new facility. (FEIR Addendum) (PPNO 8273C) (TCEP) (STIP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5s.(6))
  4. °04-05-Mon-68, PM 0.2/15.7. State Route 68 Drainage Improvements. Repair or replace culverts, replace lights near Fairground Road, and install two new traffic census stations on Route 68 from post miles 0.2 to 15.7 in Monterey County. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 2787) (SHOPP)
  5. 05-05-SB-101, PM 21.3/21.9. U.S. Route 101 San Jose Creek Bridge Replacement. Replace the existing San Jose Creek Bridges (№ 51-0163 L/R) with a single-span bridge on US 101 at post mile 21.6 in Santa Barbara County. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 2649) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5e.(7))
  6. °06-05-SCr-9, PM 8.5/25.5. Upper Drainages Erosion Control Improvements. Upgrade drainage systems along Route 9 in Santa Cruz and San Mateo Counties from Scenic Way in Ben Lomond to 0.25 mile north of the Summit Meadows trailhead parking lot. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 2627) (SHOPP)
    (Related Items under Ref. 2.5e.(6) and 2.8v.(4))
  7. 07-06-Fre-99, PM 21.2/24.4. El Dorado to Clinton Rehabilitation Project. Rehabilitate the pavement, improve existing interchange spacings and structures, and replace interchanges on Route 99 from post miles 21.2 to 24.4 in Fresno County. (FEIR Addendum) (PPNO 6949) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5e.(13))
  8. 08-10-Cal-12, PM 17.1/17.5. Calaveras County Bridge Replacement. Replace the North Fork Calaveras River Bridge next to its current alignment, and realign Route 12 from post miles 17.1 to 17.5 in Calaveras County. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 3288) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(1))

♠ (May) (5) Approval of Project for Consideration of Funding: 03-Yub-70, PM 14.8/15.7. State Route 70 Binney Junction Roadway Rehabilitation and Complete Streets Project. Replace Binney Junction Underpass and Marysville Railroad Underpass, make operational and safety improvements which include a turn pocket and 2 auxiliary lanes on Route 70 from post miles 14.8 to 15.7 in Yuba County. (FEIR) (PPNO 9820) (SHOPP)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.4e.(1), 2.4e.(2), and 2.5e.(3))

♠ (Jun) (1) Approval of Four Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. °01-01-Men-1, PM 75.47/84.10. Westport Culverts Project. Culvert improvements on Route 1 in Mendocino County, from Post Miles 75.47 to 84.10 starting 1.5 miles south of Westport. (MND) (EA 0K170) (SHOPP Minor A)
  2. 02-04-Sm-1, PM 17.4/18.2. San Gregorio Creek Bridge Project. Seismic Restoration of the San Gregorio Creek Bridge on Route 1 in Unincorporated San Mateo County from Post mile 17.4 to Post mile 18.2. (MND) (PPNO 2021J) (SHOPP)
  3. 03-04-Son-101, PM 21.0/21.8. Santa Rosa U.S. Highway 101 Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing. Construct a 14.5-foot clear width, Class I shared-use bicycle/pedestrian overcrossing spanning US 101 at PM 21.5 in the City of Santa Rosa in Sonoma County. (MND) (PPNO 2354) (STIP)
  4. °04-05-Sb-135, PM 0.00/0.73. Los Alamos Connected Community Project. Construct pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure to connect residential areas to the downtown community corridor and to Olga Reed Elementary School on Route 135 from 0.1 mile south of the US 101/Route 135 separation to post mile 0.73 in Santa Barbara County. (ND) (PPNO 3111A) (ATP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5w.(2))

♠ (Jun) (4) Approval of Five Projects for Consideration of Funding:

  1. 01-04-Ala-880, PM 30.47/31.61; 04-Ala-260, PM R0.78/R1.90. Oakland Alameda Access Project. Improve connectivity and accessibility between Alameda and I-880 by way of Route 260. (FEIR Addendum) (PPNO 0044D) (STIP) (LPP)
    (Related Items under Ref. 2.5s.(6) and 2.8b.(3))
  2. 02-05-Slo-101, PM 16.0/R22.5. Pismo Congestion Relief Pilot Project. Widen the inside shoulder of U.S. Highway 101 through Pismo Beach to provide a part-time travel lane, in San Luis Obispo County. (FEIR Addendum) (PPNO 2653) (STIP) (TCEP)
  3. 03-07-LA-10, PM 44.9/48.3; 08-SBd-10, PM 0.0/R37.0. Interstate 10 Corridor Project. Construct additional lanes on a portion of I-10 in Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties. (FEIR Addendum) (PPNO 0134K and PPNO 1325) (STIP) (TCEP) (LPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5s.(5))
  4. 04-08-Riv-60, PM 28.03/30.42. State Route 60/Potrero Boulevard New Interchange Project. Construct new interchange on Route 60 at Potrero Boulevard in Riverside County. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 1321) (TCEP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5s.(17))
  5. 05-12-Ora-5, PM 21.3/R25.8. Interstate 5 (I-5) Improvement Project from Interstate 405 (I-405) to State Route 55 (SR-55). Widen I-5 between I-405 and Route 55 in Orange County. (MND Addenda) (PPNO 2743) (STIP) (LPP)

2.3a. Route Adoptions

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3b. New Public Road Connection

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3c. Relinquishments

♠ (May) Three Relinquishment Resolutions:

  1. 01-Hum-101-PM 57.0/59.1. Right of way along US 101 on Fowler Lane, Sandy Prairie Road, and Drake Hill Road in the county of Humbolt.
  2. 03-Sac-5-PM 24.4/25.8. Right of way along I-5 on Bannon Street and Garden Highway in the city of Sacramento.
  3. 11-SD-5-PM 23.7. Right of way along I-5 on Santa Fe Street in the city of San Diego.

♠ (Jun) One Relinquishment Resolution:

  1. 07-LA-72-PM 0.0/6.5. Right of way on Route 72 (Whittier Boulevard) from Lockheed Avenue to Valley Home Avenue, in the city of Whittier.
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(1))

2.3d. Vacations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5a Minor Projects

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5b. Financial Allocations for SHOPP Projects / Federal Discretionary Grant Funds

♠ (May) (1) Request of $539,245,000 $503,915,000 for 18 16 construction phase SHOPP projects.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1), 2.2c.(2), and 2.5w.(2))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (May) (2) Request of $48,878,000 for 36 2024 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support, design, and R/W support.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1) and 2.2c.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Jun) (1) Request $367,528,000 for 25 construction phase SHOPP projects.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1), 2.3c., and 2.5w.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Jun) (2) Request of $57,507,000 for 43 2024 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support, design, and R/W support.
(Related Item under Ref. 2.1a.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Jun) (5) Request of $387,560,000 for the SHOPP Major Damage (Permanent Restoration) project, in Mariposa County. (PPNO 3636): $387,560,000. 10-Mpa-140 42.00/42.70. PPNO 10-3636; ProjID 1023000226; EA 0P924. Route 140 Near El Portal and Yosemite National Park, from 1.2 miles west to 0.5 mile west of South Fork Merced River. Outcome/Outputs: Construct rock shed. This is a Construction Manager/General Contractor (CMGC) project. CEQA - EIR, 01/28/2014; Re-validation 04/15/2025. NEPA - EIS, 01/28/2014; Re-validation 04/15/2025. Future consideration of funding approved under Resolution E-14-20; May 2014. Concurrent Amendment under SHOPP Amendment 24H-013; June 2025. As part of this allocation request, the Department is requesting to extend the completion of CONST and CON ENG an additional 44 months beyond the 36 month deadline. Pre-Construction Phase: Budgeted (Actual, if different): PA&ED $0; PS&E $3,610,000 ($3,303,540); R/W Sup $100,000 ($33,255). Construction Phase - Programmed (Allocation, if different): CON ENG $23,000,000; CONST $364,560,000.
(Related Item under Ref. 2.1a.(6))

2.5c Financial Allocations for STIP Projects

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5d Allocations for Projects with Costs that Exceed 20 Percent of the Programmed Amount

♠ (May) (2) Request for $7,542,000 (71.4 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $1,500,000 (15.4 percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for 06-Ker-43, PM 25.1/25.3; 06-Ker-46, PM 51.0/51.4. Wasco State Route 43/State Route 46 Intersection Improvements on Route 43 and Route 46, in Kern County. (EA 0X770, PPNO 6982)

♠ (Jun) (4) Request for $2,835,000 (30.3 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $838,000 (zero percent increase) allocation in Construction Support, for 05-Mon-1 8.7/9.1 Gordo Realignment (Permanent Restoration) project on Route 1, in Monterey County. (EA 1K020, PPNO 2850)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.8v.(4))

2.5e Supplemental Fund Allocations

♠ (May) (2) Request for an additional $5,750,000 (43.1 percent increase) in Construction Support for 01-DN-101, PM 35.8/36.5. Dr. Fine Bridge Replacement Project on US 101, in Del Norte County.
(EA 43640, PPNO 0100V)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.2c.(2))

♠ (May) (3) Request for an additional $10,000,000 (65.4 percent increase) in Pre-Construction RW Capital, for 03-Yub-70, PM 14.8/15.7. State Route 70 Binney Junction Roadway Rehabilitation and Complete Streets Project. on Route 70, in Yuba County. (EA 0H160, PPNO 9820)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.4e.(1), 2.4e.(2), and 2.2c.(5))

♠ (May) (7) Request for an additional $1,355,000 (30.8 percent increase) in Construction Support for 05-SB-101, PM 21.3/21.9. U.S. Route 101 San Jose Creek Bridge Replacement on US 101, in Santa Barbara County. (EA 1H430, PPNO 2649)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.2c.(2))

♠ (Jun) (2) Request for an additional $1,000,000 (50.0 percent increase) in Construction Support for 03-Sac-99 12.7/16.3, PPNO 03-6930, Elk Grove to Calvine Aux Lanes on Route 99, in Sacramento County. (EA 1H630, PPNO 6930)

♠ (Jun) (5) Request for an additional $620,000 (37.3 percent increase) in Pre-Construction Support for the PS&E phase, for 05-Mon-1 27.5/27.7. PPNO 2853. Vincente Creek / Big Creek Drainage Systems on Route 1, in Monterey County. (EA 1K010, PPNO 2853)

♠ (Jun) (6) Request for an additional $7,200,000 (46.3 percent increase) in Construction Support for the STIP Route 46/41 Wye project on Route 41 and Route 46, in San Luis Obispo County. (EA 3307C, PPNO 0226K)

♠ (Jun) (12) Request for an additional $14,800,000 (105.7 percent increase) in Pre-Construction Support for the PS&E phase, San Diego – Coronado Bay Bridge Suicide Deterrent Project (11-SD-75 PM R20.1/R22.3 & 11-SD-5 PM R13.8/R14.3) on Route 75 and I-5, in San Diego County. (EA 43063, PPNO 1352)

2.5f Financial Allocations for SHOPP

♠ (May) Informational Reports on Allocations Under Delegated Authority

The following projects were of interest for the highway pages. Uninteresting projects included emergency storm damage mitigation that was primarily repairs; repairing damage from unhoused individuals; and damage from accidents, because all of these eventually restore the facility to the condition it was in before the emergency (and thus there is no new facility or significant change to the facility).

♠ (Jun) Informational Reports on Allocations Under Delegated Authority

The following projects were of interest for the highway pages. Uninteresting projects included emergency storm damage mitigation that was primarily repairs; repairing damage from unhoused individuals; and damage from accidents, because all of these eventually restore the facility to the condition it was in before the emergency (and thus there is no new facility or significant change to the facility).

2.5g Prop 1B Project Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5p Local Transportation Climate Adaptation Program (LTCAP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5s Senate Bill 1 Programs Project Allocations Local Partnership Program (LPP) Allocations

♠ (May) (5) Request of $30,000,000 for the locally-administered TCEP US 395 – Phase 2 Freight Mobility and Safety Project-CON Mainline (08-SBd-395 4.0/11.2), on the State Highway System, in San Bernardino County. (PPNO 3019L)

♠ (May) (6) Request of $129,000,000 for the State-Administered TCEP Westbound I-80 Cordelia Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Facility project (04-Sol-80 14.8/16.5), on Route 80, Route 12, and Route 680 on the State Highway System, in Solano County. (PPNO 8273C)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.2c.(2))

♠ (May) (7) Local Partnership Program (LPP) (Formulaic) – Allocation Amendment: Request to amend the locally-administered LPP (Formulaic) I-215/Placentia Avenue Interchange Project, on the State Highway System, in Riverside County, to deallocate $4,136,000 from the CON phase to reflect project savings and revise the Recipient. (PPNO 3013G)
(Related Item under Ref. 4.17)

♠ (Jun) (5) Request of $87,731,000 for the locally-administered multi-funded LPP (Formulaic) and TCEP I-10 Corridor Freight and Managed Lane Project: I-15 to Sierra Avenue, Contract 2A, on the State Highway System, in San Bernardino County, programmed in Fiscal Year 2025-26. (PPNO 1325)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.2c.(4))

♠ (Jun) (6) Multi-funded STIP and Local Partnership Program (LPP) (Formulaic and Competitive) – Allocation Amendment Request to amend the State-Administered STIP and LPP (Competitive and Formulaic) Oakland Alameda Access Project (Route 260,I-880), on the State Highway System, in Alameda County, to revise the Postmiles. There is no change to the allocation amount. (PPNO 0044D)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(4) and 2.8b.(3))

♠ (Jun) (8) LPP (Formulaic) – Allocation Amendment: Request to amend the State-Administered LPP (Formulaic) Route 94/125 Connector project, on the State Highway System, in San Diego County, to deallocate $147,000 in Right of Way (RW) Support and $3,000,000 in RW Capital due to the funds lapsing. (PPNO 0356)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.1a.(3))

♠ (Jun) (17) Request of $33,500,000 for the locally-administered TCEP Route 60/Potrero Boulevard Interchange Phase II project, on the State Highway System, in Riverside County. (PPNO 1321)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.2c.(4)

2.5t Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5w Active Transportation Program (ATP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.6g Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

4. TCIF and Aeronautic Program Updates / Policy Matters

♠ (May) 4.17 Local Partnership Formulaic Program Amendments

♠ (Jun) 4.15 Local Partnership Formulaic Program Amendment

Other Matters/Public Comment

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

FREQUENTLY USED TERMS IN CTC MINUTES: California Transportation Commission (Commission or CTC), California Department of Transportation (Department or Caltrans), Regional Improvement Program (RIP), Interregional Improvement Program (IIP), State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP), Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP), Public Transportation Account (PTA), Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990 (Proposition 116), High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program (Proposition 1A), Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 1B), Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), State Route 99 Bond Program (RTE or SR 99), Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Account (LBSRA), Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF), Highway-Railroad Crossing Safety Account (HRCSA), State-Local Partnership Program (SLPP), Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TLSP), Letter of No Prejudice (LONP), Environmental Phase (PA&ED), Design Phase (PS&E), Right of Way (R/W), Fiscal Year (FY), Active Transportation Program (ATP), Intercity Rail (ICR), California Aid to Airports Program (CAAP), Acquisition & Development (A&D), Transit and Inter-City Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), Transportation Facilities Account (TFA), Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP), Local Partnership Program (LPP), Local Streets and Roads Program (LSRP), Solutions for Congested Corridors Program (SCCP).

❦

March 2025:

This update covers January, February, March, and some of April 2025. Before we dive into the updates to the California Highways site, an update on the California Highways: Route by Route podcast. As always, you can keep up with the show at the podcast's forever home at https://www.caroutebyroute.org , the show's page on Spotify for Podcasters, or you can subscribe through your favorite podcaster or via the RSS feeds (CARxR, Spotify for Podcasters) . The following episodes have been posted since the last update just before the end of December:

Turning to the updates to the California Highways pages: Updates were made to the following highways, based on my reading of the (virtual) papers and my research for the podcast in January and February 2025 (which are posted to the roadgeeking category at the "Observations Along The Road" and to the California Highways Facebook group) as well as any backed up email changes. I also reviewed the the AAroads forum (Ꜳ). This resulted in changes on the following routes, with credit as indicated [my research(ℱ), contributions of information or leads (via direct mail or ꜲRoads) from Bickendan(2), DTComposer(3), Tom Fearer(4), Mark Furqueron(5), Mike Palmer(6), Plutonic Panda(7), Huntington W. Sharp(8), Voyager(9)]: Route 1(4), I-5(ℱ), US 6(5), Sign Route 7(ℱ), Route 37(ℱ), US 50(ℱ,4), Route 51/Business Route 80(ℱ), Route 54(ℱ), Route 55(ℱ), Route 57(ℱ), Route 67(ℱ), Route 68(4), Route 70(ℱ), Route 71(ℱ), Route 72(ℱ,6), Route 74(ℱ), Route 90(2), Route 91(ℱ), Route 92(6), Route 99(ℱ,4), US 101(ℱ,5,3,6), I-105(7), Route 108(9), Route 118(ℱ), Route 120(ℱ), LRN 126(4), Route 138(ℱ), Route 145(4), Route 152(ℱ), Route 156(ℱ), LRN 158(ℱ), LRN 159(5), Route 170(5), Route 180(ℱ,4), Route 198(ℱ), I-210(ℱ), Route 216(ℱ), Route 217(ℱ), Route 275(8), I-280(ℱ), US 395(ℱ,4), I-580(ℱ), I-680(ℱ), I-710(ℱ). Added the 1925 Highway Advisory Committee Report(4) to the Chronology pages. Added a lot of information from "The Implications of Freeway Siting in California: Four Case Studies on the Effects of Freeways on Neighborhoods of Color", UCLA Inst. for Transportation Studies, 2023 to a number of pages (I-210, Route 118, I-5, US 50, Route 99, Route 51, I-280, I-680). I mention the report in particular because it contains a lot of useful historic information on the freeway planning and construction. The report is also at risk from the current political administration, as due to their hatred of anything DEI, it is subject to removal. Whether or not you agree with the administration, historical information such as this (as well as related articles and sites) should be preserved.
(Source: private email through 4/26/2025, Highway headline posts through the March 2025 Headline post, AARoads through 4/22/2025)

Made more updates to pages based on podcast research, and the various rabbit-holes that research takes me down: LRN 4, US 6, LRN 6, Sign Route 7, LRN 7, LRN 8, Route 14, Route 21, LRN 23, LRN 26, Route 29, Route 37, US 40, LRN 74, LRN 79, US 99, US 101, Route 103, Route 121, Route 126, Route 134, Route 141, LRN 161, Route 163, Route 170, Route 190, Route 221, LRN 240, LRN 265, US 395, I-680, I-710, I-780.

Added back links to Mark Furqueron's pages, which are still out on the Internet Archive. Did some additional updates to the map page links, as I discovered some sources have gone away or changed URLs.

Reviewed the Pending Legislation page, based on the California Legislature site, for bills through 2025-04-05. As usual, I recommend to every Californian that they visit the legislative website regularly and see what their legis-critters are doing. As many people are unfamiliar with how the legislature operates (and why there are so many "non-substantive changes" and "gut and amend" bills), I've added the legislative calendar (updated for 2025) to the end of the Pending Legislation page.We're early in the legislative session, when legislators justify their pay by introducing lots of legislation, most of which goes nowhere. They also introduce lots of "non-substantive changes" legislation, which allows them to amend the legislation later in the session, after the deadline to introduce new bills have passed. By the way, this is what makes monitoring legislation hard: by the end of a session, a bill may have changed into something completely unrelated to the original bill introduced. More significantly, a non-transportation or non-substantive transportation bill may have morphed into something of interest. So far, in this session, it is just deciding what to monitor.

Reviewed the online agenda of the California Coastal Commission. There was no meeting in January. In the February and March meetings, the only item of interest related to Route 1 in Big Sur.

I checked California Transportation Commission page for the results of the January and March 2025 meetings of the California Transportation Commission. As always, note that I tend not to track items that do not impact these pages — i.e., pavement rehabilitation or replacement, landscaping, drainage, culverts, roadside facilities, charging stations, or other things that do not impact the routing or history, unless they are really significant. As such, the following items were of interest:

[ Note: ° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages; ♠ is an indicator used to keep track of what has been added to the pages; ❧ indicates the results from the meeting, if the meeting minutes were available. ]

2.1a. STIP/SHOPP Program/Project Amendments

♠ (Jan) (1) SHOPP Amendments for Approval: Request to:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.5b.(1) and 2.5b.(2))

Of these, the following projects/allocation were at the level of interest for the highway pages (general, these are significant new structures or changes, as opposed to repair or rehabilitation in place; additions of bike paths, pedestrian, or complete street elements; or non-visible changes). “⊘” indicates phase not programmed.

♠ (Mar) (1) SHOPP Amendments for Approval: Request to:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.5b.(1), 2.5b.(2), and 2.5d.(3))

Of these, the following projects/allocation were at the level of interest for the highway pages (general, these are significant new structures or changes, as opposed to repair or rehabilitation in place; additions of bike paths, pedestrian, or complete street elements; or non-visible changes). “⊘” indicates phase not programmed.

♠ (Mar) (2) STIP Amendment for Action: The Department and San Luis Obispo Council of Governments propose to amend the 2024 STIP to reflect changes to five projects in San Luis Obispo County, as follows:
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(7), 2.5w.(1), and 4.20)

2.1b. STIP Program/Project Amendments/Approvals for Notice

♠ (Jan) (1) STIP Amendment for Notice: The Department and San Luis Obispo Council of Governments propose to amend the 2024 STIP to reflect changes to five projects in San Luis Obispo County, as follows:

2.1c. TCIF Baseline Amendments

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.1s. TCEP Baseline Amendments

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2a. Submittal of Notice of Preparation for Comments

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2b. Submittal of Notice of Documents Available for Comment (DEIRs)

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.2c. Approval of Projects for New Public Road Connection / Future Consideration of Funding

♠ (Jan) (1) Approval of Six Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. °01-04-Son-1, PM 51.1/56.4. Sonoma 1 Drainage System Restoration Project. The Project proposes to replace 14 culverts from Moonraker Road to 2.2 miles south of Gualala River Bridge on Route 1, in Sonoma County. (MND) (PPNO 2907A) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  2. °02-05-SB-101, PM R0.0/R52.2. South Coast 101 Drainage Project. Restore 38 culvert locations within a total of 22 drainage systems and install Transportation Management System (TMS) elements at two locations from the Ventura County line to the Old Coast Highway, 4 miles south of Buellton, on US 101, in Santa Barbara County. (MND) (PPNO 2799) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  3. 03-05-SLO-46, PM 59.8-60.9; 05-Ker-46, PM 0.0-0.9. Antelope Grade Vertical Curve Correction and Truck Climbing Lane Extension Project. Extend the existing westbound truck climbing lane and correct a vertical curve on Antelope Grade on Route 46 from post miles 59.8 to 60.9 in San Luis Obispo County and post miles 0.0 to 0.9 in Kern County. (ND) (PPNO 3660 and PPNO 3178) (SHOPP Minor A) (STIP)
  4. °04-06-Ker-46, PM 33.2/46.0. Kern 46 Semitropic Capital Preventive Maintenance (CAPM) Project. Rehabilitate pavement, upgrade bridge rails, and make additional roadway sign improvements on Route 46 from post miles 33.2 to 46.0 in Kern County. (ND) (PPNO 3425) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  5. °05-08-Riv-10, PM R0.0/R4.4. Interstate 10 Facility Restoration Project. Conduct roadway improvements and upgrades along I-10 from post mile R0.0 to R4.4 in Riverside County. (MND) (PPNO 3011W) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  6. °06-08-Riv-15, PM 30.0/33.0. Interstate 15 Drainage System Rehabilitation Project. Along I-15 from 0.4 miles south of Indian Trail Undercrossing Bridge (post mile 30.0) to 1.1 miles north of Temescal Canyon Road Undercrossing Bridge (post mile 33.0) in Riverside County. (MND) (PPNO 3017J) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))

♠ (Jan) (2) Approval of Two Projects for Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. 01-05-SB-01, PM 50.3-50.6; 05-SLO-01, PM 0.0-0.3. Santa Maria River Bridge Replacement Project. Replace the existing Santa Maria River Bridge on Route 1 at the border of San Luis Obispo County and Santa Barbara County, just north of the City of Guadalupe. (MND Addenda) (PPNO 2650) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5d.(1))
  2. 02-05-SCR-9, PM 13.6/15.5. San Lorenzo River Bridge and Kings Creek Bridge Replacement Project. Replace bridges on Route 9 at San Lorenzo River Bridge № 36-0052 (at PM 13.6) and Kings Creek Bridge № 36-0054 (at PM 15.5) in Santa Cruz County. (MND Addendum) (PPNO 2655) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(1))

♠ (Mar) (1) Approval of Four Projects for Future Consideration of Funding: (° indicates items that were below the level of detail for updating the specific route pages)

  1. 01-01-Men-101, PM R9.5/10.8. La Franchi Safety Project. Provide standard shoulders, left-turn lane, and merge-lanes on this section of US 101 in Mendocino County, from Post Mile R9.5 at Hopland Overhead to Post Mile 10.8 at Feliz Creek Bridge. (ND) (PPNO 4763) (SHOPP)
    (Related Items under Ref. 2.5d.(1) and 2.5b.(2))
  2. °02-03-Var-Var, PM Var. Bridge Scour Mitigation Project. Scour mitigation and countermeasures at various locations on I-5 in Colusa County, Route 20 in Sutter County, and Route 70 in Butte County. (MND) (PPNO 8145) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  3. 03-08-SBd-210U, PM 20.80. State Route-210U Frontage Road Lytle Creek Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project. Seismically Retrofit Lytle Creek Bridge № 54-0422 on State Route 210U, E. Highland Avenue, at post mile 20.8 in San Bernardino County. (MND) (PPNO 3016L) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))
  4. °04-11-SD-78, PM 37.2/60.0. Route 78 Julian Asset Management Project Construct improvements to various transportation assets along Route 78 (from post miles 37.2 through 60.0) in eastern San Diego County, including pavement rehabilitation, culvert rehabilitation, Complete Streets and mobility elements, and safety/roadside elements. (MND) (PPNO 1383) (SHOPP)
    (Related Item under Ref. 2.5b.(2))

2.3a. Route Adoptions

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3b. New Public Road Connection

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.3c. Relinquishments

♠ (Jan) One Relinquishment Resolution:

  1. 07-LA-5-PM 6.1/7.1. Right of way along I-5 from Cecilia Street to San Gabriel River, in the City of Downey.

♠ (Mar) One Relinquishment Resolution:

  1. 05-MON-68-PM 19.2. Right of way along Route 68 on Hitchcock Road, in the county of Monterey.

2.3d. Vacations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5a Minor Projects

♠ (Mar) Request $1,794,000 for two District Minor projects.

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

2.5b. Financial Allocations for SHOPP Projects / Federal Discretionary Grant Funds

♠ (Jan) (1) Request of $391,263,000 for 12 SHOPP projects.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1), 2.2c.(2), and 2.2c.(4))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Jan) (2) Request of $50,537,000 for 44 2024 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support, design, and R/W support.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1) and 2.2c.(1))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

♠ (Mar) (1) Request $298,292,000 for 12 Construction Phase SHOPP projects.
(Related Item under Ref. 2.1a.(1))

None of the projects reached the level of interest needed for the highway pages.

♠ (Mar) (2) Request of $41,764,000 for 33 2024 SHOPP preconstruction project phases for environmental support, design, and R/W support.
(Related Items under Ref. 2.1a.(1), 2.2c.(1), 2.5d.(1), 2.5d.(3))

Of these, the following were of interest for the highway pages: (Uninteresting projects included environmental mitigation, drainage and culvert improvements, pavement rehabilitation, pedestrian and bike lane improvements, repairs and improvements to Caltrans buildings and labs, trash and water discharge capture, signage and guardrail repairs, and so forth)

2.5c Financial Allocations for STIP Projects

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5d Allocations for Projects with Costs that Exceed 20 Percent of the Programmed Amount

♠ (Jan) (1) Request for $61,334,000 (87.9 percent increase) allocation in Construction Capital and $9,660,000 (no increase) allocation in Construction Support, for the SHOPP Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement project on State Route 1, in San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara counties. (EA 1H440, PPNO 2650)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.2c.(2))

♠ (Mar) (1) Request for $2,450,000 (75.8 percent increase) allocation in Pre-Construction Support, Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) phase, for the SHOPP Safety Improvements project on US 101, in Mendocino County. (EA 0L110, PPNO 4763)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.2c.(1) and 2.5b.(2))

2.5e Supplemental Fund Allocations

♠ (Jan) (5) Request for an additional $1,800,000 (16.0 percent increase) in Construction Support for the STIP Cholame project on State Route 46, in San Luis Obispo County. (EA 3307A, PPNO 0226J)
(Related Item under Ref. 2.8c.(2))

♠ (Jan) (7) Request for an additional $37,174,000 (39.3 percent increase) in Construction Capital and $715,000 (7.1 percent increase) in Construction Support for the multi-funded SHOPP, STIP, and Prop 1B Route 99 Delano to Pixley 6-Lane with Pavement Rehabilitation Project on State Route 99, in Kern and Tulare counties. (EA 0W79U, PPNO 8112)
(Related Items under Ref. 2.8b.(1) and 2.8b.(5))

♠ (Mar) (2) Request for an additional $5,135,000 (1.6 percent increase) in Construction Capital for the SHOPP Roadway Rehabilitation and Multimodal Corridor Enhancement project on US 50, in Sacramento County. (EA 0H08U, PPNO 6254)

♠ (Mar) (3) Request for an additional $700,000 (23.7 percent increase) in Pre-Construction Support, PS&E phase and $60,000 (3.0 percent increase) in Right of Way (RW) Support phase, for the SHOPP Collision Severity Reduction project on State Route 49, in Nevada County. (EA 3H510, PPNO 4136)

2.5f Financial Allocations for SHOPP

♠ (Jan) Informational Reports on Allocations Under Delegated Authority

The following projects were of interest for the highway pages. Uninteresting projects included emergency storm damage mitigation that was primarily repairs; repairing damage from unhoused; and damage from accidents.

♠ (Mar) Informational Reports on Allocations Under Delegated Authority:

No projects were of interest for the highway pages. Uninteresting projects included emergency storm damage mitigation that was primarily repairs; repairing damage from unhoused; and damage from accidents.

2.5g Prop 1B Project Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5p Local Transportation Climate Adaptation Program (LTCAP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5s Senate Bill 1 Programs Project Allocations Local Partnership Program (LPP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5t Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.5w Active Transportation Program (ATP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

2.6g Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Allocations

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

4. TCIF and Aeronautic Program Updates / Policy Matters

♠ (Jan) 4.8 Update on the San Diego-Coronado Bay Bridge Foundation Rehabilitation Project on Route 75 in San Diego County.

Other Matters/Public Comment

There were no items of interest for this agenda item in the reviewed minutes.

FREQUENTLY USED TERMS IN CTC MINUTES: California Transportation Commission (Commission or CTC), California Department of Transportation (Department or Caltrans), Regional Improvement Program (RIP), Interregional Improvement Program (IIP), State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP), Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP), Public Transportation Account (PTA), Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990 (Proposition 116), High Speed Passenger Train Bond Program (Proposition 1A), Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 1B), Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), State Route 99 Bond Program (RTE or SR 99), Local Bridge Seismic Retrofit Account (LBSRA), Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TCIF), Highway-Railroad Crossing Safety Account (HRCSA), State-Local Partnership Program (SLPP), Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TLSP), Letter of No Prejudice (LONP), Environmental Phase (PA&ED), Design Phase (PS&E), Right of Way (R/W), Fiscal Year (FY), Active Transportation Program (ATP), Intercity Rail (ICR), California Aid to Airports Program (CAAP), Acquisition & Development (A&D), Transit and Inter-City Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), Transportation Facilities Account (TFA), Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP), Local Partnership Program (LPP), Local Streets and Roads Program (LSRP), Solutions for Congested Corridors Program (SCCP).

❦


<- 2024 Changes-> 2026 Changes

© 1996-2024 Daniel P. Faigin.
Maintained by: Daniel P. Faigin <webmaster@cahighways.org>.