Community Theatre and Sausage

Merely Players (HFF 15)userpic=fringeIt is often said that laws are like sausages: you don’t want to see how they are made — you just want to enjoy the end product. In many ways, theatre is equally like sausage — the end product is enjoyable, but the manufacturing… that’s another story. Last night we saw a World Premiere production at the 2015 Hollywood Fringe Festival (FB) that explored the manufacturing process: it took you behind the scenes to see how the theatrical magic is made. OK, well maybe not magic, perhaps just the illusion. OK, well maybe not the illusion, just a crumbling façade.

Last night’s show at the Lounge Theatre (FB) was Merely Players (FB), a new musical play by James Penca (FB) [book] and Alex Syiek (FB) [music and lyrics] produced by the Color & Light Theatre Ensemble (FB). Merely Players tells the story of Boyle Community Players/FB, a  fictitious theatre company out of Boyle Heights. Past BCP shows have included (in a wonderful bit of inspired backstory): Waiting for (a Werewolf named) Godot, Damned Yankees (in Hell)!; The Little Prints; Greece! The Musical; Saturday Night Malaria; Fifty Shades of Blue; The Catcher in the Rye: A Rock Experience, and more. Their latest production is “Bus Stop: The Musical“. Now, not that Bus Stop.  This Bus Stop is a painting by Max Ginsburg (click here to see it). The artistic director of BCP, Parker (Courtney C. Reed (FB)) has attempted to turn it into a musical based solely on the image in the picture, imagining the character’s lives and motivations that brought them to this point. Translation: She’s not only the artistic director, she’s the writer and producer and choreographer as well.

Merely Players provides us with the early days of the life of this musical, from the auditions through opening night and the first review. This includes temperamental actors, constant changes, personal crises, showmances, and the typical stuff that goes on backstage. It also includes a conceit seemingly drawn from The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee: it draws a out number of audience members to audition. Better have your performing resume handy and be ready to perform (although the songs are simple: Itsy Bitsy Spider, I Have a Little Teapot, Twinkle Twinkle, Happy Birthday, etc). As one might expect, most of the audience members get rejected, but two actually make it into the cast, and one gets a starring role. As such, the play incorporates some elements of the edge of improv, as the scripted actors cannot predict how the audience member will react, their skill level, or what they will do. About the only advantage they have is that they are performing this in Hollywood at the Fringe. That means they’ve got a good chance that their audience member is an actor or someone involved with the industry who can improvise (good thing I didn’t volunteer — I can’t sing, I can’t dance, I can’t memorize lines — although my resume is online).

I won’t go into all the trials and tribulations of the show — watching them is a lot of the fun. I certainly can’t comment as to their accuracy, as I’ve never been on-stage or off. I can say, however, that if what was portrayed was true, it finally gave me some needed insight. One of my continual confusions has been the role of the director. To me, an audience member, I always thought that the actor came with the skills (or should that be skillz) to create the character from the printed page — to be able to determine the motivation, the characterization, the accent, the movement, and such. One thing that Merely Players illustrated is the role of the director in that process: being able to guide the actor into the desired portrayal they see in their head. This insight was very useful, although it is still hard seeing the finished product to be able to tease the contributions of the director from the contributions of the actor.

This show essentially had two stories and three layers:

  1. There was the fictitious story of the Bus Stop painting and its characters: the Mexican Guy, the Black Guy, the Walker, the Old Lady, the Business Woman, the Girlfriend, the Student, the Single Dad, the Cripple, and the guy in the Baseball Cap. As you can tell, their characterizations weren’t deep. In fact, most of the characters didn’t even have characterizations but caricatures.
  2. There was the story of the actors playing the characters (and, alas, the program handed out does not provide that mapping; I attempt to indicate it below with ⇒): Glen, Rene, Kiley, Delaney, Sonny, Addison, Len, Jamey, Hunter, and Cecil. Here we got to see the real-life actors creating various types of characters: the stage manager, the new actress, the over-eager chorine, the gay guy, the professional black man, the good looking musicians. Hmmm, as I write that up, we see that each of the actors in the stories was  an archetype, with the director attempting to draw out a non-archetypical performance. The bulk of the story — and most of the humor — comes from this process. It also comes from seeing the interaction between these various characters, especially as they go through the stress of attempting to mount a play that is already f*cked.
  3. Lastly, we had the real life actors playing the fake actors playing the characters.

The director, Joanna Syiek (FB), who also served as choreographer, did a good job of illuminating this process while performing it herself. Specifically, she seemed to draw realistic archtypical performances from the acting ensemble, making the movement work and seem realistic given the limited 2015 Hollywood Fringe Festival (FB) rehearsal time. She was also able to make the characters appropriately flawed, so that we could see the character of the director actually direct the real actors as actors to become the characters the actors had to become. Confused yet?

I found the performances quite good. In the “lead” position (at least of Bus Stop – The Musical) was an audience member, Erik Przytulski (FB), who was actually the writer, composer, and lyricist of Alien vs. Musical (FB), another 2015 Hollywood Fringe Festival (FB) production. Whether this qualifies as a  “plant” is unknown; however it is clear that Erik is a person that is more comfortable behind the scenes than on the stage. As a result, he captured the “deer in the headlights” quite well — not remembering his lines or the songs, and not quite being in character. It was fun to watch.

Turning to the “staff” of the BCP: there was the aforementioned Courtney C. Reed (FB) as Parker, the Artistic Director, Director, Choreographer, and Producer; Nick Pavelich/FB (Jamey, the Stage Manager); Joseph McMahon/FB as the BCP Usher; Jennifer Lin (FB) as Jen the Music Director (as well as being the music director offstage) ⇒ Student; and Emily Arkuss (FB) (BCP Usher). Reed’s Parker was the perfect portrayal of chaos under stress and calmness under focus. If those two sound like they do not balance, it is because at time’s Reed’s character was unbalanced. Despite all of that, Reed portrayed her well. I liked Lin’s portrayal of Jen, who seemed unfazed by everything going on around. Lin played the keyboard beautifully (even if it wasn’t the organ), and had a wonderful solo classical piece in a brief interlude. McMahon and Arkuss were perfect as the over-eager theatre ushers and aides that you (well, at least I) want to run away and hide from. They had that continuously bubbly personality that can so drive one crazy. An excellent portrayal. [ETA: Now that I’ve identified who is playing the stage manager: I did appreciate him crawling off the stage after hurting his ankle]

The “actors” in Bus Stop – The Musical were (⇒ Bus Stop role*): Adam Ballard/FB (Glen ⇒ The Black Man), Katie Deshan (FB) (Rene ⇒ The Old Woman); Sara Guarnieri (FB) (Kiley ⇒ The Business Woman); Ari Gwasdoff/FB (Delaney ⇒ The Guy in the Baseball Cap); Josh Hillinger (FB) (Sonny ⇒ The Single Dad); Rose Leisner (FB) (Female Cover / Addison at our show ⇒ The Girlfriend); Seth Salsbury (FB) (Hunter ⇒ The Mexican Worker); and Caleb Mills Stewart (FB) (Cecil ⇒ The Cripple).  I was most taken with Leisner’s Addison. There was just something about her face and style that caught my eye; she also was great in her audition. She did a wonderful job of capturing a newbie trying to hide behind an aura of faking it. I also enjoyed Guarnieri’s Kiley, who had a wonderfully bubbly personality that was able to transform in a moment once she learned how to do so. Salsbury’s Hunter provided the stereotypical gay actor; I’m not sure whether that is a good stereotype to be perpetuating, but it fit with this show. He had a nice transformation to the Mexican worker, and gave a great audition song. Similarly strong was Ballad’s Black Man, who as the actor had a wonderful professional side, but was able to bring out the stereotypical ghetto performance when necessary. That aspect is unfortunately far too common in today’s word, where people are seen only as stereotypes (perhaps that’s the deeper commentary of this piece). Hillinger’s Sonny had a wonderful naivete that worked well. Gawsdoff’s was good as Delaney, the musician seen only for his looks; he had some great interactions in his relationship with Erik. In smaller roles were Deshan’s Rene (although she did have a wonderful singing voice) and Stewart’s Cecil (who was suitably creepy). Performers we did not see were Ian Klingenberg/FB (Usher Cover) and Kelsey Schulte (FB) (Addison on other nights). Lastly there was Pavelich’s Jamey, who I absolutely cannot remember. This is not necessarily the fault of the actor, but for not providing a good connection between the actor and the character portrayed in the painting… and I guess of the actor for not having his picture on his Facebook page to jog my memory. [ETA: I now know who Jamey was, so things have been corrected.] [A hint to actors: some folks who write up theatre like to link to your pages — so please have a page out there that is clearly an acting page, and have your Facebook such that is shows who you are: I may be just an audience member who writes up shows to share with friends, but some casting director might see you in a show and attempt to do the same thing… and what will they find?]

Dance and movement were under the choreography of Joanna Syiek (FB). Both the music and lyrics were by Alex Syiek (FB). This really wasn’t a musical as such; there were one or two songs ostensibly from Bus Stop – The Musical that were reasonable; there was no music specific to Merely Players that served to illuminate character, serve as an “I want”, or do anything else to move the piece along. Mitchell Webb/FB was the assistant director and provided additional choreography. As noted earlier, Jennifer Lin (FB) was the musical director.

Turning to the technical side. The set design was by umm, well, there’s no credit in the program, which corresponds to the lack of a set design other than some tables, some boxes, some chairs, and the painting. Still, it worked for a Fringe show. The lighting design by Brandon Baruch (FB) was mostly white, as would be the case in a rehearsal room, although there were some places where some blue washes were used effectively. The sound design by Corwin Evans (FB) didn’t stand out, which is a what a good sound design is supposed to do — I’m presuming there were some special effect sounds somewhere. There were no credits for costume design or makeup; presumably costumes came from the actor’s closets and they did their own makeup. Chiffon Valentine (FB) was the stage manager.

Merely Players (FB) was produced by the Color & Light Theatre Ensemble (FB), a group I had never heard off before. That’s too bad because they have done some shows I would have liked to have seen, such as Things to Ruin or See Rock City. I’ll have to keep an eye on them.

Merely Players (FB) has one more weekend of performances at the 2015 Hollywood Fringe Festival (FB), although I hear rumors they may be sold out. Check their ticketing page on the Fringe website to see if any tickets are available. Although I didn’t find it quite as laugh out loud funny as some of the other shows, I thought it was quite enjoyable and entertaining.

Ob. Disclaimer: I am not a trained theatre critic; I am, however, a regular theatre audience. I’ve been attending live theatre in Los Angeles since 1972; I’ve been writing up my thoughts on theatre (and the shows I see) since 2004. I do not have theatre training (I’m a computer security specialist), but have learned a lot about theatre over my many years of attending theatre and talking to talented professionals. I pay for all my tickets unless otherwise noted. I am not compensated by anyone for doing these writeups in any way, shape, or form. I subscribe at three theatres:  REP East (FB), The Colony Theatre (FB), and Cabrillo Music Theatre (FB). Through my theatre attendance I have made friends with cast, crew, and producers, but I do strive to not let those relationships color my writing (with one exception: when writing up children’s production, I focus on the positive — one gains nothing except bad karma by raking a child over the coals).  I believe in telling you about the shows I see to help you form your opinion; it is up to you to determine the weight you give my writeups.

Upcoming Shows: Today the craziness continue with The Count of Monte Cristo – The Musical  (FB) (HFF) at  the Lounge Theatre (FB) in the afternoon, and  Uncle Impossible’s Funtime Variety & Ice Cream Social, (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) in the evening. The Fringe craziness ends with Medium Size Me, (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) on Thursday 6/25 and Might As Well Live: Stories By Dorothy Parker (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) on Saturday. June ends with our annual drum corps show in Riverside on Sunday. July begins with “Murder for Two” at the Geffen Playhouse (FB) on July 3rd, and “Matilda” at the Ahmanson Theatre (FB) on July 4th. July 11th brings “Jesus Christ Superstar” at REP East (FB). The following weekend brings “The History Boys” at the Stella Adler Theatre (FB) on Saturday (Goldstar), and “Green Grow The Lilacs” at Theatricum Botanicum (FB) on Sunday.  July 25th brings “Lombardi” at the Lonny Chapman Group Rep (FB), with the annual Operaworks show the next day. August starts with “As You Like It” at Theatricum Botanicum (FB), and is followed by the summer Mus-ique show, and “The Fabulous Lipitones” at  The Colony Theatre (FB). After that we’ll need a vacation! September right now is mostly open, with the only ticketed show being “The Diviners” at REP East (FB) and a hold-the-date for “First Date” at The La Mirada Theatre for the Performing Arts (FB). October will bring another Fringe Festival: the NoHo Fringe Festival (FB). October also has the following as ticketed or hold-the-dates: Kelrik Production (FB)’s Urinetown at the Monroe Forum Theatre (Hold for Sat 10/3);  “Mrs. A. Lincoln” at The Colony Theatre (FB) (Ticketed for Sat 10/10); and  “Damn Yankees” at Cabrillo Music Theatre (FB) (Ticketed for Sat 10/17). As always, I’m keeping my eyes open for interesting productions mentioned on sites such as Bitter-Lemons, and Musicals in LA, as well as productions I see on Goldstar, LA Stage Tix, Plays411.

 

Share

I currently have within my reach the sum of Forty-Two Million United States dollars….

The Nigerian Spam Scam Scam (HFF 2015)userpic=fringeYesterday afternoon, something very rare happened after attending a 2015 Hollywood Fringe Festival (FB) show: I turned to my wife, and wondered, “Gee, I wonder if I could get CISSP CPE credit for this show?” Even rarer was my wife’s response, “Perhaps we should think about this as entertainment for the conference?” Perhaps I should explain…

Although you may think I’m a professional theatre reviewer (I’m not; I just love to share theatre with friends) or a Caltrans worker (I’m not; just a hobbiest highway historian), in real life I’m a cybersecurity expert (as I’ve recently written). It is rare to find a theatre offering that touches upon my field of expertise, so when I saw The Nigerian Spam Scam Scam (FB, non-HFF website) on the HFF schedule, I just had to get tickets. Nigerian Spam is one of those areas that people think never works, but it gets just enough of a response (when you’re sending out 10 million emails for free, even a fractional percentage response is great). If people are gullible enough to fall for the scam, they are gullible enough to click on malware links in email.

Here’s the description of the show from the Fringe website, which is as good as the description I might write: ““Please help me transfer $100 million from Bank of Nigeria!” We’ve all gotten this e-mail. Writer performer Dean Cameron did something about it. After he received an email from a Nigerian con artist posing as the wife and son of a dead Nigerian leader, Cameron replied. Posing as a sexually confused Florida millionaire, whose only companions were his cats, houseboy, and personal attorney, Perry Mason. Cameron embarked on a 11 month correspondence with  the bewildered and tenacious Nigerian, impeccably played by co-star Victor Isaac. This hit duologue, taken from actual email threads, documents the hilarious relationship as it descends into a miasma of misunderstanding, desperation, and deception.”

That is literally the show. Two podiums and a digital projector. Dean Cameron (FB, IMDB) relates the story of how he baited along Nigerian spammers, with the ultimate goal of getting them to send him money. Co-star Victor Isaac (FB) provides the voices of the spammer side, from MRS MARIAM ABACHA to IBRAHIM ABACHA to DR DONALD ABAYOMI. The story itself is pretty much just condensed versions of the actual email dialogue, with hysterical side commentary and the occasional visual.

In short, Cameron has done something all of us has wanted to do: lead along a spammer and get them caught up in the game. If you’re in the cybersecurity biz, you’ll find this hilarious (and a great demonstration that the spammers are no smarter than the great unwashed public). If you’re not in the cybersecurity biz, you’ll find this hilarious just for what Cameron got away with. This is just an hour or so of pure fun and humor.

This show reminded me at bit of the recent musical, Loopholes, that we saw at the Hudson. In Loopholes, the authors took a real life absurd situation and turned into into a stage musical to highlight to the world the absurdity. It is similar in The Nigerian Spam Scam Scam: an absurd situation is presented on stage to highlight the absurdity of the interplay. Wisely, the authors of Nigerian decided to stay with the duologue route, eschewing the inherent musical possibilities. Although (I must note) to hear them talk, one never knows….

About my only complaint is that there is no program, so that there is no way to acknowledge the technical, support, and producing team. Mike Blaha is listed on the Fringe website, but his exact role (producer? director?) is not stated.

There are two performances left of The Nigerian Spam Scam Scam at the Fringe: June 22 (Monday) and June 27 (Saturday). If you can get tickets, go see it. If not, well, do you think we should book it as entertainment after the Conference Dinner?

Ob. Disclaimer: I am not a trained theatre critic; I am, however, a regular theatre audience. I’ve been attending live theatre in Los Angeles since 1972; I’ve been writing up my thoughts on theatre (and the shows I see) since 2004. I do not have theatre training (I’m a computer security specialist), but have learned a lot about theatre over my many years of attending theatre and talking to talented professionals. I pay for all my tickets unless otherwise noted. I am not compensated by anyone for doing these writeups in any way, shape, or form. I subscribe at three theatres:  REP East (FB), The Colony Theatre (FB), and Cabrillo Music Theatre (FB). Through my theatre attendance I have made friends with cast, crew, and producers, but I do strive to not let those relationships color my writing (with one exception: when writing up children’s production, I focus on the positive — one gains nothing except bad karma by raking a child over the coals).  I believe in telling you about the shows I see to help you form your opinion; it is up to you to determine the weight you give my writeups.

Upcoming Shows: Today the craziness continue with The Count of Monte Cristo – The Musical  (FB) (HFF) at  the Lounge Theatre (FB) in the afternoon, and  Uncle Impossible’s Funtime Variety & Ice Cream Social, (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) in the evening. The Fringe craziness ends with Medium Size Me, (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) on Thursday 6/25 and Might As Well Live: Stories By Dorothy Parker (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) on Saturday. June ends with our annual drum corps show in Riverside on Sunday. July begins with “Murder for Two” at the Geffen Playhouse (FB) on July 3rd, and “Matilda” at the Ahmanson Theatre (FB) on July 4th. July 11th brings “Jesus Christ Superstar” at REP East (FB). The following weekend brings “The History Boys” at the Stella Adler Theatre (FB) on Saturday (Goldstar), and “Green Grow The Lilacs” at Theatricum Botanicum (FB) on Sunday.  July 25th brings “Lombardi” at the Lonny Chapman Group Rep (FB), with the annual Operaworks show the next day. August starts with “As You Like It” at Theatricum Botanicum (FB), and is followed by the summer Mus-ique show, and “The Fabulous Lipitones” at  The Colony Theatre (FB). After that we’ll need a vacation! September right now is mostly open, with the only ticketed show being “The Diviners” at REP East (FB) and a hold-the-date for “First Date” at The La Mirada Theatre for the Performing Arts (FB). October will bring another Fringe Festival: the NoHo Fringe Festival (FB). October also has the following as ticketed or hold-the-dates: Kelrik Production (FB)’s Urinetown at the Monroe Forum Theatre (Hold for Sat 10/3);  “Mrs. A. Lincoln” at The Colony Theatre (FB) (Ticketed for Sat 10/10); and  “Damn Yankees” at Cabrillo Music Theatre (FB) (Ticketed for Sat 10/17). As always, I’m keeping my eyes open for interesting productions mentioned on sites such as Bitter-Lemons, and Musicals in LA, as well as productions I see on Goldstar, LA Stage Tix, Plays411.

Share

Saturday News Chum: Lastpass, Food Waste, Celiacs, Music, and Sons

userpic=lougrantIt’s Saturday, and that means it is time to clear out the links. These are articles I found interesting during the week, but either didn’t have the time or the inclination to write about then:

  • The Lastpass Hack. One of the big security items last week was the hack of Password Manager “Lastpass” (which happens to be the password manager I use and recommend). There was word about how hashed Master Passwords may have been leaked, as well as password reminders. But as usual, Lastpass provided the best explanation on why and whether you should worry, and showed why people still don’t understand risk — In response to the question “Was my master password exposed?”, their response was:
    “No, LastPass never has access to your master password. We use encryption and hashing algorithms of the highest standard to protect user data. We hash both the username and master password on the user’s computer with 5,000 rounds of PBKDF2-SHA256, a password strengthening algorithm. That creates a key, on which we perform another round of hashing, to generate the master password authentication hash. That is sent to the LastPass server so that we can perform an authentication check as the user is logging in. We then take that value, and use a salt (a random string per user) and do another 100,000 rounds of hashing, and compare that to what is in our database. In layman’s terms: Cracking our algorithms is extremely difficult, even for the strongest of computers.” In other words, what may have been exposed was a deep one-way hash of an already deeply one-way hashed password. You’re really only at risk if they could guess your password, and that comes from a dumb password reminder. Still, they recommended changing your master password. I did so, and I changed it in the few other places I use it (none of which are web accessble; it is for similar non-web application vaults).
  • Going to Waste. We are an incredibly wasteful country. Two articles from NPR on that subject. The first deals with a grocery chain in Northern California, that has decided to sell “ugly produce” that would otherwise go to waste at deeply discounted prices. The second deals with a landfill of lettuce — salad tossed because it might not make it to market in time. In this time of drought, and considering the amount of water that goes into growing and raising food, we should work hard to make sure that all food, ugly or not, is put to good use. We have loads of families in need that could benefit from just-in-time delivery of fresh, but ugly, vegetables and similar food products.
  • The Celiac Cry. I’ve been pressing this point for a while, but this article expresses it really well: why the gluten free fad dieters are a bad thing for Celiacs. People think they know GF, but don’t do complete checking and poison those for home it really makes a difference.
  • Buying Music Is For Old People. This article really saddened me. It posited the notion that only old people buy music these days. The “younger generation” wants more and more variety, and they can get that by streaming their music from music services anywhere anytime. Of course, this is like AM radio of old, but we won’t tell them. The problem is that streaming doesn’t work everywhere, doesn’t cover all audiences, and tends to cost money (both subscriptions and data). It also puts what you listen to in the hands of the streaming services. No thank you. I’ll keep owning my music, making copies of my digital music as backups, and listening to it whenever and whereever I can.
  • Architecture in the West. Two architectural articles. The first deals with interesting undiscovered architecture in Tucson. The second deals with another product of the 50s to go away: first it was drive-ins, not it is bowling alleys. There aren’t many left in the valley; Mission Hills Bowl is now gone. Bowlers will miss it.
  • Sons!. My first live theatre that I saw on stage was the LACLO’s production of The Rothschilds, which I still love to this day. This week news came out that a revamped version is in the works.

 

Share

Work and Hobbies: An Important Cross-Fertilization

userpic=99loveIt is a long held belief of mine that time spent on hobbies isn’t wasted. What you do as a hobby informs what you do at work, and what you do at work informs your hobbies.  Professionally, I do cybersecurity at a Federally Funded Research and Development Center. My hobbies include highways and live theatre. Today over lunch I kept thinking about this cross-fertilization in relation to the debate raging over Bitter Lemon’s decision to solicit payment from theatres for reviews, which was recently highlighted in the LA Times, and has been excoriated across the board  (from the LA Weekly (Steven Leigh Morris) to Howard Sherman (former head of the Theatre Wing) to ACTA to many others). I’ve even discussed it here.

Let me give you an example of this flow. As I noted, one of my hobbies is highways. A number of years ago, I took a day off and went to a Caltrans presentation on making safer highways. The goal was to reduce traffic deaths — reduce the number of times a CHP officer has to go to a door and say, “I’m sorry to inform you…”. They talked about a program from Minnesota DOT called “Toward Zero Death“: a program with the goal of reducing fatalities on the highways to zero. They realized they couldn’t just engineer safer highways, and as a result emphasized the Four “E”s: Education, Enforcement, Emergency Services, Engineering. Each contributed a piece. I heard that and went “Wow! That works perfectly for cybersecurity.” I ordered it differently: Engineering, Education, Enforcement, and Emergency Planning. Engineering means building mechanisms in your systems to provide cybersecurity and protection; Education is educating your users on how to use those mechanisms and how not to do boneheaded things; Enforcement is having policies and making sure they are followed; and Emergency Planning is what is also called Resiliency: making sure your system doesn’t die, but can continue to support the mission in a degraded mode while being repaired. The point here is that my hobby informed my work.

It works the other way around as well. As I wrote earlier, I work for an FFRDC. We provide the government with an independent voice to ensure success of the mission. We are trusted to protect proprietary information, have the highest ethics, and to focus on independently assessing solutions — and not hesitating to tell the vendor when they are wrong, or the government when they are wrong. Note carefully what I just said: even though we are government funded (the FF in FFRDC), we have the ability to tell the government when they are wrong. This is achieved through our strong focus on ethics, our commitment as a corporation to those ethics, an immediate response when an ethics violation is discovered (as in, that person does not work for us anymore and may face penalties, depending on the violation).

Our company is depended upon to conduct independent assessments on behalf of the government, including things like penetration testing. When you look at areas like cybersecurity assurance, having that independent assessor is a must. Similarly, when you look at theatrical reviews and criticism, that independent assessment is a must. The independence of the reviewer is at the heart of the Bitter Lemons debate.

Independence is important in many industries. Both of my parents were accountants. They performed audits, which is an independent financial assessment of a company. Major public corporations depend on independent accountants and independent internal oversight organizations. Yet that paradox of paying the independent arm exists: the corporations pay the auditing firms, the corporations pay their internal oversight organizations. So how is that independence achieved? Typically, there is a requirement for all assessors to sign and adhere to a specific ethical code for their industry. If the organization is internal, there is typical a distinct reporting chain with perhaps only the CEO in common (and sometimes not even then; often auditors report to the Board). The British auditing association describes it thusly: “It is characterised by integrity and an objective approach to the audit process. The concept requires the auditor to carry out his or her work freely and in an objective manner.”

I’ll note that similar processes exist in numerous other industries, such as Internal Affairs departments in law enforcement, or internal investigatory organizations.

Let’s bring this back to the concern at hand: the “Bitter Lemons Imperative” and the perception of pay for play reviews. Certainly, strong ethics rules would preclude a theatre giving money (or providing anything above a nominal value, such as an information packet) to an individual reviewing their show. Yet, if we look at the financial arena, there are ways to address the concern. Let’s learn from what industry does, and insist that:

  • Anyone who writes up a show must subscribe to a code of ethics that prohibits direct payments from the theatre to the reviewer (ideally, it would prohibit providing anything other than a comp ticket or an information package (and I don’t personally support comp tickets, although that is industry practice)).
  • Anyone who writes up a show must disclose any past, present, or future relationships with the theatre or any cast or crew members, and must agree to not let those relationships color their assessment of the show reviewed.
  • Anyone who writes up a show must agree that their assessment of the show will be based solely on the story, performance and presentation, and that their assessment will be honest, even if it is negative.
  • If evidence is uncovered that their writeup was not unbiased but was influenced by a relationship, either personal or financial, then the community will be clearly informed of this so that their writeups may be skewed to take that into account.
  • A list of those writing up theatre who subscribe to these rules will be published and available to the general public.

In an ideal world, journalism outlets would assign reviewers to the shows that are of interest, and the complete independence of the advertising and editorial arms would provide separation between payment and reviewer salary. But times are changing. Independent websites that accept advertising don’t have that strong separation. Papers that still employ reviewers often do not send them to the new theatres, the small theatres, the out of the way theatres. There is no way for these theatres to get independent writeups that sway the audience, either drawing them in or warning them away.

A solution is required to address the changing journalistic and dramatic criticism world. A solution is also required to address the unknown pop-up blogger whose ethics are unknown.

[Edited to Add: Another day, another lunch, and a few more thoughts: One key difference between auditing (and the work I do) and theatre reviews/criticism is that the former can be objective, while the latter is subjective. Any theatre review reflects the opinion of the reviewer, and it not necessarily capable of substantiation with facts. This prevents confirming the independent results, and opens up the aura of “taint” if a reviewer happens to like a show whose review was requested and funded by the production. The solution here, surprisingly, is what Bitter Lemons is already doing: aggregating reviews and looking at the overall consensus. If a single reviewer out of a set of reviewers is “in the pocket” of the theatre, they will show up as anomalous in a particular production’s review set. Over time, statistics might demonstrate that reviewer is a consistent outlier statistically. Of course, this mechanism is destroyed if the community simply produces consistently good theatre (oh, the horrors of consistently good theatre).

Statistical reporting can work well to identify outlier reviews and bias, when looking at an entire season. Of course, the statistics become useless unless editors assign critics to shows they know will be horrible. If people self-pick shows (as I do, and as Steven Stanley does, and I’m sure others as well), we tend to pick shows we’re likely to like. Even if the tickets are comp, we are still investing our time and we don’t want to waste that on two hours we’ll never get back (I Caligula, The Musical , I’m looking at you). This is the most likely explanation of why most reviews are positive, even if there isn’t a financial incentive involved (unless, of course, you are just writing to appear clever — Charles McNulty, I’m looking at you).

In short it boils down to trust in the integrity of the reviewer — or as one trainer put it, you either have ethics in your soul or you don’t. Ethical and honest reviewers will honestly tell you what they think of a production, irrespective of any “bribes” from the theatre, because their goal is not to make that production succeed, but to make theatre as a whole better. Unethical reviewers don’t have that mission, and unscrupulous producers will take advantage of them (Subways are for Sleeping and David Merrick, I’m looking at you).]

The approach taken by Bitter Lemons recognized the need for such a solution, but was a flawed implementation and deserves to be shut down and reconsidered from the ground up to publicly incorporate clear ethics rules and restrictions. I’m not going to attempt to propose a specific solution here; I’ve done so in the past and had it shot down. I do think a solution is needed, and that solution needs strong publicized ethics rules that participants will follow. I’m open to suggestions in the comments (anatomically possible, please — my head won’t fit up my ass).

A few PSs to address some additional points:

  • There is an argument that any payments by theatres are a slippery slope: if one review organization does it, they all will. Poppycock. There will always be individuals who put ethics above all and refuse payment. Additionally, journalism in general is no longer so high and mighty — we’ve increasingly seen the mix of the editorial and the advertiser (Los Angeles Times, I’m looking at you and your special wrappers). It may be a matter of time, but it may also be that the wrong approach will fail miserably (witness the original attempt at paywalls).
  • There are arguments that there is an important function of an editor in being able to decide what to review. That may be the case, but it also reflects the inherent bias of the editor. They have a concern — not of advertising dollars but of readership — and they direct the reviewers to the better known theatres, the ones that will draw the eyes of the reader. They will not care about the lesser known smaller theatres at all. Don’t believe me? How often does the LA Times review the Center Theatre Group, Pantages, Pasadena Playhouse, Wallis Annenberg, Colony, or Geffen. How does that compare with how often they review intimate theatre? There is not balanced editorial assignments. The papers that attempted to do so (LA Weekly, I’m looking at you) have drastically curtailed their reviews.

 

Share

A Lovely Duet on a Sunday Afternoon

Marry Me a Little (Good People Theatre)userpic=fringeWhat’s better on a Sunday afternoon that a little Sondheim?

Sorry, I’m getting ahead of myself. A common trick for a producer wanting to create a small cast musical is to take a collection of a composers songs, ideally those unfamiliar to an audience (such as songs cut from other musicals and not easily available), arrange them together into a show, and hope it works. Sometimes, if that producer is lucky, they can create a through theme and perhaps a modicum of a story. If a producer is really good, and the songs are really good, they can come together and form something with a distinct identity that can succeed on its own. That’s what happened with Marry Me a Little, created as an off-off-Broadway review back in 1981. Now, if you combine that with great direction and performance, you can get what I saw this afternoon: an instantiation of such a musical that can make you forget the sources of the previously little-known songs (that are now well known thanks to easy publishing and deep archives), and see the collection as a touching whole piece. That is what you get at Good People Theatre (FB)’s production of Marry Me a Little at the 2015 Hollywood Fringe Festival (FB).

Marry Me a Little started as an off-off-Broadway piece in 1980, conceived by Craig Lucas and Norman Rene, drawing together music from Sondheim‘s then-unpublished Saturday Night, as well as songs cut from Company, Follies, A Little Night Music, Funny Thing…Forum, Anyone Can Whistle, and some even rarer shows. They were connected in a cycle that created a story of two singles in apartments in New York that were adjacent vertically. The story showed them both longing for love and imagining love with each other. Since the piece was published a number of the songs have become better known: Saturday Night has been recorded and released, Side by Side by Sondheim and a number of tribute albums have captured songs like Foxtrot, and the incessant explorations of Company have captured the many songs cut from that show. Still, Marry Me a Little remains a small easy to do show (and thus perfect for Fringe festivals :-)), with minimal requirements and lots of audience oomph.

Good People Theatre, under the direction of Janet Miller (FB), was the perfect choice to bring this to the Fringe, having done a great job on other musicals. What particularly struck me watching this was that it didnt’ seem like a Fringe show. In other words, most of the other Fringe shows have that edgy feel to them — actors with minimal props using their imagination to do lots of different things, often frantically (because I like comedies). But this was… elegant. About the only way to improve it would be to import the grant piano from Closer Than Ever. It felt like the set was right and not improvised; it felt like the music was right and not rushed. This is the same feel that came from 2014’s Fantastik‘s and 2013’s Man of No Importance. This is why I particularly look forward to GPT’s productions at the Fringe (or anywhere else for that matter).

Marry Me a Little - Jessie Withers and David Laffey, Credit: Rich Clark PhotographyThe performances were great, both individually and together. Some general comments before I touch upon the individual actors (who are illustrated in the production still to the right). I particularly enjoyed that GPT did not cast the typical image of a Hollywood actor — thin and chisled and shaped. The actors in this show looked like real people, and that little, subtle touch made the show relatable and believable. This wasn’t an unobtainable couple, this was an everyperson couple. That was great. The two actors had remarkable chemistry together, which was clearly visible in songs like “So Many People” (from Saturday Night), “A Moment With You” (also from Saturday Night), and “Pour Le Sport” (from the unproduced The Last Resorts).

The woman was played by Jessie Withers, who had a lovely operatic soprano voice. If you understand the difference between an operatic and a pop music voice, you’ll realize that I’m saying she had both wonderful controlled power and a purity of tone that was a joy to listen to. One of my favorite performances of hers was in “Can That Boy Foxtrot” (from Follies), where in addition to the voice she combined some wonderful little facial expressions and movements to bring the acting side to the fore. She was also particularly good on “Marry Me a Little” (from Company).

The man was played by David Laffey (FB), who had a lovely what I would guess to be a tenor voice. It didn’t quite have the operatic power of Withers, but blended well with hers and was nice to listen to in his solo moments. Laffey was particularly good on “Uptown, Downtown”  (from Follies), with some lovely dance moves.

Music was provided by wonderful Corey Hirsch (FB) on an electronic keyboard; he had some great interactions with the characters that made him much more than just an onstage accompanist.

As noted earlier, the scenic design by Robert Schroeder (FB) was simple and worked very well, making one forget this was a Fringe production. This was aided and abetted with the props from  Good People Theatre (FB). The lighting by Katherine Barrett (FB) and appeared to be a combination of movers and programmable LED lights. These worked great for the Fringe (which often leaves productions stuck in terms of lights), and allowed the lights to enhance the mood. The costumes by Kathy Gillespie (FB) worked well on the characters. Other technical credits:  Kimberly Fox, Marketing Director; Michael P. Wallot (FB), Marketing/Media Manager; Oliver Lan, Graphic Designer; Rebecca Schroeder (FB), Stage Manager.

Marry Me a Little” has 7 more performances at the Fringe, and it is well worth seeing. Tickets are available through the Fringe website, and may be available through Goldstar (some are already sold out).

Ob. Disclaimer: I am not a trained theatre critic; I am, however, a regular theatre audience. I’ve been attending live theatre in Los Angeles since 1972; I’ve been writing up my thoughts on theatre (and the shows I see) since 2004. I do not have theatre training (I’m a computer security specialist), but have learned a lot about theatre over my many years of attending theatre and talking to talented professionals. I pay for all my tickets unless otherwise noted. I am not compensated by anyone for doing these writeups in any way, shape, or form. I subscribe at three theatres:  REP East (FB), The Colony Theatre (FB), and Cabrillo Music Theatre (FB). Through my theatre attendance I have made friends with cast, crew, and producers, but I do strive to not let those relationships color my writing (with one exception: when writing up children’s production, I focus on the positive — one gains nothing except bad karma by raking a child over the coals).  I believe in telling you about the shows I see to help you form your opinion; it is up to you to determine the weight you give my writeups.

Upcoming Shows: Next weekend sees the craziness continue with the Nigerian Spam Scam Scam (HFF) at Theatre Asylum (FB) and Merely Players (HFF) at the Lounge Theatre (FB) on Saturday, and (on Sunday) The Count of Monte Cristo – The Musical  (FB) (HFF) at  the Lounge Theatre (FB) in the afternoon, and  Uncle Impossible’s Funtime Variety & Ice Cream Social, (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) in the evening. The Fringe craziness ends with Medium Size Me, (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) on Thursday 6/25 and Might As Well Live: Stories By Dorothy Parker (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) on Saturday. June ends with our annual drum corps show in Riverside on Sunday. July begins with “Murder for Two” at the Geffen Playhouse (FB) on July 3rd, and “Matilda” at the Ahmanson Theatre (FB) on July 4th. July 11th brings “Jesus Christ Superstar” at REP East (FB). The following weekend brings “The History Boys” at the Stella Adler Theatre (FB) on Saturday (Goldstar), and “Green Grow The Lilacs” at Theatricum Botanicum (FB) on Sunday.  July 25th brings “Lombardi” at the Lonny Chapman Group Rep (FB), with the annual Operaworks show the next day. August starts with “As You Like It” at Theatricum Botanicum (FB), and is followed by the summer Mus-ique show, and “The Fabulous Lipitones” at  The Colony Theatre (FB). After that we’ll need a vacation! As always, I’m keeping my eyes open for interesting productions mentioned on sites such as Bitter-Lemons, and Musicals in LA, as well as productions I see on Goldstar, LA Stage Tix, Plays411.

Share

Silly Wombat, Trix Are For …

Wombat Man (Hollywood Fringe)userpic=fringeDo you remember the days when Superheros were clearly good, not these brooding tortured psychological studies we see on the screen today? The days when good meant clear ethics and clear morals, that hint of sparkle from the teeth? The days when our heroes may not have been the brightest bulbs in the bunch, but they were good?

Do you remember the days when our Supervillains were truly cartoonish, not these brooding tortured psychological studies we see on the screen today (hmmm, there’s not much difference today between good and bad)? The days when being bad meant stealing candy from children and killing off significant plot points in bloodless ways, with no ethics or morals? The days when our villains were clearly not the brightest bulbs in the bunch?

Do you remember the days when live was accompanied by a voice-over track setting the scene, when our police officers were more interested in going after cartoon threats than the real source of crime — actual criminals committing common crimes (assault, murder, mayhem, theft).

Yes, I’m talking about the days of innocence. The days of — Batman on television, when being a superhero was to be campy and funny and unconsciously self-aware. I certainly remember those days, watching Batman on television. Chrisi Talyn Saje (FB) also remembers those days, and has captured their style and tone perfectly in her 2015 Hollywood Fringe Festival (FB) comedy, Wombat Man: The Cereal Murders (Blog, FB), which we saw last night at Underground Theatre (FB). [This is a product of the Female Playwrights Initiative]

Wombat Man tells the story of (who else) Wombat Man, a blissfully good and completely clueless superhero in Slotham City. He is so unaware that he keeps leaving his cellphone for his roommate, Gladys to find, and prefers to be contacted by pigeon than his phone. He has barely 20 twitter followers, yet the city depends on him. When Trix the Rabbit steals all the marshmallow bits from Lucky Charms cereal (together with kidnapping Lucky the Leprechaun so that no more can be made), Commissioner Borden and Police Chief Leibowitz (who oddly has an Irish accent) summon Wombat Man into action. The subsequent adventure, involving the plot by Trix, his evil henchmen Milk and Spoon, and his girlfriend Lucy first involves capturing Tony the Tiger. When Tony is inadvertently killed, they go next after Snap, Crackle, and Pop. Trix’s goal: Finally get a taste of his namesake cereal (which he seems to never be able to get, because, all together now, “Trix are for kids”.

I think, from the names and the descriptions, you get a real sense of the show. It is blatantly silly, hilariously funny, and a complete mindless diversion (which we all need occasionally). It is truly helped along if you understand the parameters of the good era of superheroes — the 1960s — when Superman, Batman, and WonderWoman were all white and clean cut, villians were truly cartoonish, and every fight was accompanied by word balloons.

In addition to a very funny and silly story, Chrisi Talyn Saje (FB) directed her team to capture the mood and style very well. In the lead positions were Brian Cunningham (FB) as Wombat Man and Jan-David Sohtar (FB) as Trix the Rabbit. Cunningham’s Wombat Man was the perfection of clueless good in a furry coat and purple cape; fun to watch just for the silliness. He had a certain charm that made his character work well. Sohtar’s Trix was an equally cartoonish rabbit, with the typical high nasally voice and outlandish plot ideas. He also captured the stereotypical performance well.

Most of the other roles were similarly stereotypical to the their appropriate tropes. On the side of good were Steve Jun (FB) (Sidekick), Chrisanne Eastwood (FB) (Gladys, the housekeeper), Jim McCaffree (FB) (Police Chief Leibowitz, Tony the Tiger, Jimmy), John David Wallis (FB) (Commissioner Borden, Lucky, Arena Stage Manager). Jun’s Sidekick, who shows up in the middle of the show after he loses his ride (Tony the Tiger) brings a wonderful breath of fresh rationality to the show — he seems completely confused by the other characters but ends up playing along, much like Sancho Panza goes along with Don Quixote. Eastwood’s Gladys is marvelously cynical; again, she is seemingly wondering why Wombat Man doesn’t see his own ridiculousness. On the law and order side of the issue, Borden and Leibowitz are remarkable parodies of Gordon and O’Hara (except that Leibowitz keeps wanting to sing showtunes).

On the henceperson side were Clare Wess Yauss (FB) (Lucy, Jenny), Dan Horstman (FB) (Spoon), and John Potter (FB) (Milk). Yauss’ Lucy captured the sexy but ditzy girlfriend well; Horstman and Potter were the typical non-descript  henchment from the Batman days, down to the point of having their names on their shirts (presumably, so they don’t forget them). Potter had a short running gag about not talking.

On the technical side…. this is a Fringe production. The set itself (designed by one of the henchmen, Dan Horstman (FB)) was some simple black flats with shiny curtains; a sense of place was conveyed more by props (the Wombatputer, the cereal table, the boxes of cereal, the “red phone”, etc.) and costumes. General costume credit was not provided — overall the costumes provided a good sense of character, especially those of the cartoon characters, the henchmen, and Lucy (Glady’s costume was the typical shapeless shift you expect a housekeeper to wear). There was specific credit for Wombat Man’s costume (Lara Kristine Elliott/FB) and hat (Toni Johnson/FB). His costume was the typical superhero costume (you should know, you see them on the street everyday): tights, shorts, a hairy top) with a cap with Wombat ears. It was reasonably well executed and suited the character well. No credit was provided for lighting or sound design. Jeremy Saje (FB) was the real stage manager and wrote the Wombat Man theme song.

Wombat Man: The Cereal Murders (Blog, FB) has 4 more shows at Underground Theatre (FB) as part of the 2015 Hollywood Fringe Festival (FB): June 19, 20, 26, and 27 at 8:00 pm. Tickets are available through the Fringe Website. If you like humor you don’t need to think too much about — and especially if you were a fan of the 1966 Batman series, this is worth seeing. For us, it was the perfect show after the bad interaction at Fringe Central after our 4pm show left a bad taste in our psyches.

Ob. Disclaimer: I am not a trained theatre critic; I am, however, a regular theatre audience. I’ve been attending live theatre in Los Angeles since 1972; I’ve been writing up my thoughts on theatre (and the shows I see) since 2004. I do not have theatre training (I’m a computer security specialist), but have learned a lot about theatre over my many years of attending theatre and talking to talented professionals. I pay for all my tickets unless otherwise noted. I am not compensated by anyone for doing these writeups in any way, shape, or form. I believe in telling you about the shows I see to help you form your opinion; it is up to you to determine the weight you give my writeups.

Upcoming Shows: This afternoon brings Marry Me a Little (HFF) by Good People Theatre (FB) at the Lillian Theatre (FB). Next weekend sees the craziness continue with the Nigerian Spam Scam Scam (HFF) at Theatre Asylum (FB) and Merely Players (HFF) at the Lounge Theatre (FB) on Saturday, and (on Sunday) The Count of Monte Cristo – The Musical  (FB) (HFF) at  the Lounge Theatre (FB) in the afternoon, and  Uncle Impossible’s Funtime Variety & Ice Cream Social, (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) in the evening. The Fringe craziness ends with Medium Size Me, (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) on Thursday 6/25 and Might As Well Live: Stories By Dorothy Parker (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) on Saturday. June ends with our annual drum corps show in Riverside on Sunday. July begins with “Murder for Two” at the Geffen Playhouse (FB) on July 3rd, and “Matilda” at the Ahmanson Theatre (FB) on July 4th. July 11th brings “Jesus Christ Superstar” at REP East (FB). The following weekend brings “The History Boys” at the Stella Adler Theatre (FB) on Saturday (Goldstar), and “Green Grow The Lilacs” at Theatricum Botanicum (FB) on Sunday.  July 25th brings “Lombardi” at the Lonny Chapman Group Rep (FB), with the annual Operaworks show the next day. August starts with “As You Like It” at Theatricum Botanicum (FB), and is followed by the summer Mus-ique show, and “The Fabulous Lipitones” at  The Colony Theatre (FB). After that we’ll need a vacation! As always, I’m keeping my eyes open for interesting productions mentioned on sites such as Bitter-Lemons, and Musicals in LA, as well as productions I see on Goldstar, LA Stage Tix, Plays411.

Share

A Sound of Music Midrash

Max and Elsa No Kids No Music (Norton School / Theatre Asylum)userpic=fringeIn Judaism, there is this concept of a midrash. A midrash tells the story between the lines; it explains the story that appears in the formal scripture by providing the back, side, and around story. Classic examples of midrashim include the story of Abraham smashing his father’s idols or the story of Lillith. Neither appear in the book of Genesis, but both are the explanations of the story that does appear.

Yesterday, we saw our second 2015 Hollywood Fringe Festival (FB) show: Max and Elsa. No Kids. No Music. This show is a midrash on the Rodgers and Hammerstein musical The Sound of Music. It tells the back, interstitial, and after story of two minor characters: Max Detweiler (Clayton Farris (FB)) and Baroness Elsa Schraeder (Megan Rose Greene (FB)) during the times not portrayed on the stage.  It begins with Max trying to find the right man for Elsa — a man who is wealthy enough that Max can sponge off of him as well as Elsa. Elsa is insistent that he not have kids, for she’s not the mothering type; however Max convinces her that Captain Georg Von Trapp (Frank Smith/FB) is the man for her. She’s unsure because of “all those kids”, but gives in.  Max tells her not to worry; he’s hired this non-descript nun to watch over them. What Max doesn’t tell her is his new position: he’s a booking agent and he’s looking for acts.

You know the rest of the visible story: how Georg and Elsa fell in love and got engaged, and how Maria and Georg fell in love and destroyed the engagement, creating a singing act in the process.  What you don’t know (and what this story shows) is how Max engineering the whole thing, including getting Maria to storm off and return. He even engineered their escape, and got arrested for it… which brought Max and Elsa back to where they were: trying to find the right man for Elsa.

The story itself was very amusing and laugh-out-loud funny at many points. The authors of this production, Mason Flink (FB) and Lindsay Kerns (FB), came up with a wonderful backstory for these characters — a backstory that meshes well with our memories of the characters. Under the direction of Flink (FB), Max is clearly a man obsessed with, and out for, … Max. His philosophy is to move in whatever direction advances the cause of Max, and provides Max with the ability to live large on someone else’s nickle. Elsa is that Baroness we see in the movies: cold and calculating, uncomfortable around children and music, strongly wanting someone with particular qualities — the ability to support her parties and her lifestyle, and keep up with her.

Clayton Farris (FB) (Max) and Megan Rose Greene (FB) (Elsa) did a wonderful job of creating and projecting these character traits. They worked well together and had a strong chemistry and humor. They also rolled wonderfully with the unpredictable beast that is live theatre: Elsa when the cap to her fountain pen just wouldn’t cooperate, and the both of them when Max slipped up and talked about the escape to Austria (no, Switzerland).

What adds to the humor in this production is the character that Flink (FB) created for Capt Von Trapp. As portrayed wonderfully by Frank Smith/FB, Von Trapp was a dim bulb who couldn’t even remember the names of all his children, didn’t want them to sing, and pretty much allowed himself to be manipulated by whomever was around him. His only passion was for Austria. The dim nature of Von Trapp, combined with Elsa’s cynical dislike for both children and music (with a mixture of Max’s self-obsession) combined to create wonderful comedy.

Supporting these three characters was Matthew Gilmore (FB) as both Rolf Gruber, Liesl’s 17 (going on 18) boyfriend, and the Mother Abbess. These side portrayals were hilarious.

On the technical side, the set design by Lindsay Kerns (FB) was simple: some boxes, photos, tables, etc. They worked just well enough to establish the requisite place and time. The sound design by Alysha Bermudez (FB) worked well, particularly the sound effect of the children and the interstitial music (musical echos of The Sound of Music‘s music, composed and whistled by  Mason Flink (FB)). Brandon Baruch (FB)’s lighting design illuminated the action, but due to Fringe limitations couldn’t do that much more. The costume design by Megan Rose Greene (FB) worked well: Elsa’s costumes gave off a wonderful sense of elegance and warmth; Max’s were suitably eccentric, and Georg’s had that echo of Austrian military. Rolf and the Mother Abbess were… inspired. Lastly, Jean Ansolabehere (FB) was the stage manager and coordinated props.

Max and Elsa. No Music. No Children. has five more performances, all of which are supposedly sold out. They will also supposedly be adding more pop-up performances (which will be announced on Twitter @thenortonschool). If you can get tickets, the show is well worth seeing.

Ancillary Notes. Be forewarned that parking may be horrible. We hunted in the area for ½ hour before giving up and paying $10 for the valet at the Dragonfly — the supposed Fringe central. This left us in a poor mood, which luckily the show brightened considerably. Alas, the good mood from the show was destroyed by the customer service problem we ran into at Fringe central afterward, but restored somewhat by our excellent evening show, Wombat Man: The Cereal Murders.  None of this is the fault of Max or Elsa, which is why this is an ancillary note.

Ob. Disclaimer: I am not a trained theatre critic; I am, however, a regular theatre audience. I’ve been attending live theatre in Los Angeles since 1972; I’ve been writing up my thoughts on theatre (and the shows I see) since 2004. I do not have theatre training (I’m a computer security specialist), but have learned a lot about theatre over my many years of attending theatre and talking to talented professionals. I pay for all my tickets unless otherwise noted. I am not compensated by anyone for doing these writeups in any way, shape, or form. I believe in telling you about the shows I see to help you form your opinion; it is up to you to determine the weight you give my writeups.

Upcoming Shows: This afternoon brings Marry Me a Little (HFF) by Good People Theatre (FB) at the Lillian Theatre (FB). Next weekend sees the craziness continue with the Nigerian Spam Scam Scam (HFF) at Theatre Asylum (FB) and Merely Players (HFF) at the Lounge Theatre (FB) on Saturday, and (on Sunday) The Count of Monte Cristo – The Musical  (FB) (HFF) at  the Lounge Theatre (FB) in the afternoon, and  Uncle Impossible’s Funtime Variety & Ice Cream Social, (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) in the evening. The Fringe craziness ends with Medium Size Me, (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) on Thursday 6/25 and Might As Well Live: Stories By Dorothy Parker (HFF) at the Complex Theatres (FB) on Saturday. June ends with our annual drum corps show in Riverside on Sunday. July begins with “Murder for Two” at the Geffen Playhouse (FB) on July 3rd, and “Matilda” at the Ahmanson Theatre (FB) on July 4th. July 11th brings “Jesus Christ Superstar” at REP East (FB). The following weekend brings “The History Boys” at the Stella Adler Theatre (FB) on Saturday (Goldstar), and “Green Grow The Lilacs” at Theatricum Botanicum (FB) on Sunday.  July 25th brings “Lombardi” at the Lonny Chapman Group Rep (FB), with the annual Operaworks show the next day. August starts with “As You Like It” at Theatricum Botanicum (FB), and is followed by the summer Mus-ique show, and “The Fabulous Lipitones” at  The Colony Theatre (FB). After that we’ll need a vacation! As always, I’m keeping my eyes open for interesting productions mentioned on sites such as Bitter-Lemons, and Musicals in LA, as well as productions I see on Goldstar, LA Stage Tix, Plays411.

 

Share

Fringes on My Mind

userpic=fringeFringes are on my mind today. This morning, I was Bimah Buddy at a service where we first read about the commandment to wear fringes on our clothes. This afternoon, I was at the Hollywood Fringe Festival.  This morning we read about how G-d told Moses to treat the scouts who came back from the Promised Land with a negative attitude. Today, I encountered someone with a negative attitude which provoked a similar urge (not acted upon).  Here’s what happened:

As you know (if you read my schedule at the bottom of any recent theatre post), I’m going to a lot of Fringe shows. When I purchased my tickets, I got a “Fringe Button” to get a discount. This corresponds to a real physical button you can get at “Fringe Central” which is a particular bar on Theatre Row. Last week, during Fringe Previews, we attempted to pick up our button. Fringe Central, however, wasn’t ready — we were told to come back this week.

This week we had shows at 4pm and 8pm (write-ups tomorrow and later in the week). Parking in Hollywood was especially bad, and after 30 minutes of looking we were forced to use the valet at Fringe Central and walk 4 blocks (with my wife’s sore knee) to get to our show. At that time, we were told Fringe Central was open. After our show we walked back, expecting to be able to pick up our pin and sit for a bit before we went to dinner and our 8pm show. However, Fringe Central had been kicked out by the venue owner because they booked something else without telling them; the director of the Fringe was sitting outside, and we were told to ask him. We asked if we could get our button from him, and we were told the stuff was inside; come back tomorrow. We related our exasperation to him, and were about to suggest he mail them to us when he claimed we were aggressive, and told us to go away. Very poor customer service, although I understand his exasperation.

We ended up driving around, having a cheap dinner, and then sitting in our car near the other theatre for 45 minutes while we waited for it to open (it was too cold outside). This left my wife so pissed off at the Fringe she doesn’t want to book additional shows, and doesn’t want to go next year. All due to bad customer service.

I don’t like to dwell on the bad. The Fringe has great shows, but has fallen down this year on patron services. I sent the following specific suggestions to the director for next year. These come from my over 25 years of involvement with ACSAC:

  1. The minute HFF found out they had lost Fringe Central for the day, an email should have gone out to those with tickets for today to inform them.
  2. Ideally, the venue booked for Fringe Central should have, as part of their contract, been required to provide you with an alternate venue and help you temporarily relocate and provide signage. HFF could quite likely have made arrangements with the Hudson or EatThis to temporarily camp there to take care of patrons. They should also have provided you with compensation. If that wasn’t in HFF contract this year, put it in next year.
  3. As you discovered the parking was going to be bad, you could have used the email mechanism to warn patrons to provide extra time to find parking. Next year, HFF might make arrangements with some of the schools and businesses to rent out their lots on heavy days.
  4. The online sales system should permit multiple buttons to be purchased As it is, you can only purchase one, creating difficulty if you are buying tickets for a couple. You could create one ID for each person in your party to get multiple buttons, but that is too much work for many. You should be able to purchase multiple buttons, and have the system apply one button to one ticket.
  5. For online sales, there should be an option to mail the buttons so people can have something before the show. You can use this to provide information on discounts, which will help your sponsors; information on parking, which will reduce patron frustration; and getting the buttons out will enthuse your patrons. HFF cannot assume everyone lives in or near Hollywood. We drove to the Fringe from Northridge.

This year was an experiment for me, trying to take advantage of the Fringe to book lots of shows. Previous years, I only booked one. I hope that they can figure out how to fix their problems so I don’t have to go back to my previous model. [And hopefully, the North Hollywood Fringe (FB) in October will not have these problems.]

 

Share