(meme) Musical Meme

A dessert following morning meme, based on an inspiration from shutterbug93:

The Musical Meme

  • Post a list of 10 shows (I did a dozen) you love
  • Have your friends list guess your favorite song from each show
  • When guessed bold the line and write a sentence about why you like that song.
  1. Two Gentlemen of Verona: Follow the Rainbow/Where’s North. A strong, brassy song.
  2. Avenue Q. Either “The Internet is for Porn” (because its so funny) or “I Want To Go Back To College” (ah, those were the days).
  3. The Wiz: Don’t Nobody Bring Me No Bad News. A classic heavy piano song, sung by that classic heavy, Mabel King.
  4. Baby: I Chose Right. Guessed by shutterbug93. I just love the melody, and the sentiment, in this song.
  5. Heartbeats: Putting Things Away and The Rose. The former because I agree with the sentiment; the latter because it is so pretty.
  6. The Rothschilds: Overture. I just love the overture to this show.
  7. Seussical: How Lucky You Are. Love the words.
  8. A Day In Hollywood/A Night in the Ukraine: Just Go To The Movies. Great Jerry Herman music.
  9. City of Angels: You Can Always Count On Me. Wonderful Cy Coleman.
  10. The Best Little Whorehouse Goes Public: Brand New Start, although I’m Leaving Texas isn’t bad. Just like the tunes.
  11. Miss Spectacular: Las Vegas. The perfect Vegas song.
  12. The Most Happy Fella: Standin’ on the Corner (…watching all the girls go by). Guessed by shutterbug93. C’mon, if I express the sentiments in I Love My Wife, I’ve just gotta like this song!

Again, not always easy choices.

Update on Sunday, April 10: I’ll update these posts with the answers on Tuesday, April 12, so get your guessing in now!

Update on Tuesday, April 12: Answers added.

Share

Leaving Things in Doubt

DoubtI just got back from the the Pasadena Playhouse, where I saw the play Doubt by John Patrick Shanley (shanleysmoney -at aol.com, yes, it was in the program). The play starred Linda Hunt as Sister Aloysious, Jonathan Cake as Father Flynn, Mandy Freund as Sister James, and Patrice Pitman Quinn as Mrs. Muller.

This play was excellent, and did what a classic good play should do: it made you think! The play takes place in 1964, just as the Vatican II reforms are starting to creep in. It takes place in a Catholic School, presumably in MA. The school is run by an old-school Mother Superior (Sister Aloysious), who is instructing her young new teacher (Sister James) that she has to be strict with the students, watch and protect them, not be compassionate or believe what is on the surface. She asks her to be especially suspicious when the new young priest is alone with the boys. Well, a report comes in, and then Sister Aloysious goes on a witch hunt against the father. The questions that are raised relate to the power of gossip to destroy a reputation, and how doggedly we should pursue our convictions even in the light of protestations they are wrong. In the end, Sister Aloysious ends up driving the father out of the school, but she admits she lied about part of the evidence…. but he wouldn’t had left had the lie been false. Would he? You walk out of the theatre questioning who was right: Aloysious or Flynn. This is good theatre.

I also found it timely to be seeing this play on the day of the passing of Pope John Paul II. The Pope had his faith, his certainty, on many issues that others disagreed with him on. The Pope presided over the church in a time of scandel in the priesthood. Did he have his doubts? Did these doubts shape his actions? All of these are good questions.

Talking Broadway, when reviewing the New York production of the play (which is running concurrently with the Playhouse production) noted: A play this thoughtful, this well-crafted, this passionate is hard to ignore and even harder to resist. Yes, it addresses issues of great meaning to many: faith, truthfulness, determination to do what’s right at any cost. But those are incidental concerns. The play’s specific story – about a Bronx Catholic school in 1964, where a priest might be carrying on an inappropriate relationship with the school’s lone black student – is also beside the point. The real drama comes from how you, like the characters, deal with a situation that can’t be fully understood because it cannot be interpreted in only one way. When you’re faced with a situation like this, for which there is no single clear answer, with whom do you identify? The priest, Father Flynn, who loves teaching and takes his faith seriously, but makes perhaps too many mistakes? The school’s principal, Sister Aloysius, who uses all of her education, experience, and personal beliefs to come to a conclusion, and then sticks to her guns in order to protect the children at any cost? School teacher Sister James, who can too easily see both sides of the question? Or, the black student’s mother, Mrs. Muller, who knows elements of the truth, but might let the consequences slide in pursuit of a possible greater good?

In the review of the Los Angeles production, Talking Broadway commended the play, but didn’t like the casting as much. I disagree. I thought the casting was great. You can see a picture of Linda Hunt in the Hollywood Reporter link below. Suffice it to say here is this little over 4’9″ Mother Superior, old, standing up to this 7′ handsome young priest. Yet she has such power and presence over him. Yet there is one seen where the priest is in front of her, and she is in the back of the stage, and suddenly you feel his power.

The Hollywood Reporter notes that: Ultimately, Shanley, in dialogue that blends the poetic and the realistic (with bits of humor to lighten the load) asks whether Sister Aloysius is being overly protective or not protective enough, and whether Father Flynn’s casual approach to his students has an evil intent. All is cast in the gray area of doubt — and this is Shanley’s overall point in his timely and engrossing play.

Curtain Up notes: “John Patrick Shanley’s Doubt flowers from a conventional seed into an intricate vine whose tendrils go beyond did-he or didn’t-he to nudge ramifications of faith, justification, and even the future, where we dwell in the dubious miasma of the invasion of Iraq. But there’s nothing flowery about the exquisite clarity of this play. Unlike the heightened poetic language in the playwright’s previous works, Doubt sets its parameters out in the black and white worn by the priest and nun whose duel this is.”

ReviewPlays says: “The Doubt here is not only whether Father Flynn is guilty of priestophilia—Shanley craftily lets that decision rest squarely on the shoulders of each individual audience member—but whether Sister A’s ruthless campaign is justified in the first place. Under Claudia Weill’s taut direction on Gary L. Weissmann’s gloriously atmospheric set, this is thrilling, highly provocative theatre that does just what it’s meant to do: asks more questions than it answers. Hunt is magnificently rigid as Sister Aloysius, using her familiarly croaky voice to wonderful advantage here, although her performance is marred by fumbled words and odd little pauses, possibly waiting to hear her lines fed to her through an earpiece? Cake could not be better as the accused priest and Freund is quietly arresting as the novice nun, perfect in her subtlety as we watch her character’s sweetly guileless passion for teaching being squashed right in front of us, but it is Patrice Pitman Quinn, as the mother of the young kid Sister A suspects is performing more rituals than simply lighting altar candles, who in one brief scene offers the most memorable performance.”

This was a fascinating evening of theatre. If you get a chance to go see this play, do so. Our next play at the playhouse will be Private Lives by Noel Coward at the end of May.

Share

Leaving Things in Doubt

DoubtI just got back from the the Pasadena Playhouse, where I saw the play Doubt by John Patrick Shanley (shanleysmoney -at aol.com, yes, it was in the program). The play starred Linda Hunt as Sister Aloysious, Jonathan Cake as Father Flynn, Mandy Freund as Sister James, and Patrice Pitman Quinn as Mrs. Muller.

This play was excellent, and did what a classic good play should do: it made you think! The play takes place in 1964, just as the Vatican II reforms are starting to creep in. It takes place in a Catholic School, presumably in MA. The school is run by an old-school Mother Superior (Sister Aloysious), who is instructing her young new teacher (Sister James) that she has to be strict with the students, watch and protect them, not be compassionate or believe what is on the surface. She asks her to be especially suspicious when the new young priest is alone with the boys. Well, a report comes in, and then Sister Aloysious goes on a witch hunt against the father. The questions that are raised relate to the power of gossip to destroy a reputation, and how doggedly we should pursue our convictions even in the light of protestations they are wrong. In the end, Sister Aloysious ends up driving the father out of the school, but she admits she lied about part of the evidence…. but he wouldn’t had left had the lie been false. Would he? You walk out of the theatre questioning who was right: Aloysious or Flynn. This is good theatre.

I also found it timely to be seeing this play on the day of the passing of Pope John Paul II. The Pope had his faith, his certainty, on many issues that others disagreed with him on. The Pope presided over the church in a time of scandel in the priesthood. Did he have his doubts? Did these doubts shape his actions? All of these are good questions.

Talking Broadway, when reviewing the New York production of the play (which is running concurrently with the Playhouse production) noted: A play this thoughtful, this well-crafted, this passionate is hard to ignore and even harder to resist. Yes, it addresses issues of great meaning to many: faith, truthfulness, determination to do what’s right at any cost. But those are incidental concerns. The play’s specific story – about a Bronx Catholic school in 1964, where a priest might be carrying on an inappropriate relationship with the school’s lone black student – is also beside the point. The real drama comes from how you, like the characters, deal with a situation that can’t be fully understood because it cannot be interpreted in only one way. When you’re faced with a situation like this, for which there is no single clear answer, with whom do you identify? The priest, Father Flynn, who loves teaching and takes his faith seriously, but makes perhaps too many mistakes? The school’s principal, Sister Aloysius, who uses all of her education, experience, and personal beliefs to come to a conclusion, and then sticks to her guns in order to protect the children at any cost? School teacher Sister James, who can too easily see both sides of the question? Or, the black student’s mother, Mrs. Muller, who knows elements of the truth, but might let the consequences slide in pursuit of a possible greater good?

In the review of the Los Angeles production, Talking Broadway commended the play, but didn’t like the casting as much. I disagree. I thought the casting was great. You can see a picture of Linda Hunt in the Hollywood Reporter link below. Suffice it to say here is this little over 4’9″ Mother Superior, old, standing up to this 7′ handsome young priest. Yet she has such power and presence over him. Yet there is one seen where the priest is in front of her, and she is in the back of the stage, and suddenly you feel his power.

The Hollywood Reporter notes that: Ultimately, Shanley, in dialogue that blends the poetic and the realistic (with bits of humor to lighten the load) asks whether Sister Aloysius is being overly protective or not protective enough, and whether Father Flynn’s casual approach to his students has an evil intent. All is cast in the gray area of doubt — and this is Shanley’s overall point in his timely and engrossing play.

Curtain Up notes: “John Patrick Shanley’s Doubt flowers from a conventional seed into an intricate vine whose tendrils go beyond did-he or didn’t-he to nudge ramifications of faith, justification, and even the future, where we dwell in the dubious miasma of the invasion of Iraq. But there’s nothing flowery about the exquisite clarity of this play. Unlike the heightened poetic language in the playwright’s previous works, Doubt sets its parameters out in the black and white worn by the priest and nun whose duel this is.”

ReviewPlays says: “The Doubt here is not only whether Father Flynn is guilty of priestophilia—Shanley craftily lets that decision rest squarely on the shoulders of each individual audience member—but whether Sister A’s ruthless campaign is justified in the first place. Under Claudia Weill’s taut direction on Gary L. Weissmann’s gloriously atmospheric set, this is thrilling, highly provocative theatre that does just what it’s meant to do: asks more questions than it answers. Hunt is magnificently rigid as Sister Aloysius, using her familiarly croaky voice to wonderful advantage here, although her performance is marred by fumbled words and odd little pauses, possibly waiting to hear her lines fed to her through an earpiece? Cake could not be better as the accused priest and Freund is quietly arresting as the novice nun, perfect in her subtlety as we watch her character’s sweetly guileless passion for teaching being squashed right in front of us, but it is Patrice Pitman Quinn, as the mother of the young kid Sister A suspects is performing more rituals than simply lighting altar candles, who in one brief scene offers the most memorable performance.”

This was a fascinating evening of theatre. If you get a chance to go see this play, do so. Our next play at the playhouse will be Private Lives by Noel Coward at the end of May.

Note: This entry was originally posted on Observations Along The Road (on cahighways.org) as this entry by California Highway Guy. You may comment either here or there (where there are comment(s)).

Share

You Can’t Get A Man With A Gun

This afternoon, we went to see the Cabrillo Music Theatre (CMT) production of Annie Get Your Gun (google-cached Review). CMT is the resident musical theatre company for the Thousand Oaks Playhouse, and we’ve been subscribers for four seasons now. Their productions are consistantly high quality, and very affordable.

Today’s production was up to their high standards. It used the revised version seen on Broadway (review) in 1999. This version has a revised book from the original (revisions by Peter Stone) that rework a few songs, and get rid of three songs in their entirety: Colonel Buffalo Bill; I’m A Bad Bad Man; and I’m An Indian Too. These songs were deleted because of their lack of political correctness: either they were problematic for Native Americans or for (I guess) unwed mothers. [Article on the CMT Revision] No matter what, this is a show with some classic songs, including There’s No Business Like Show Business, Anything You Can Do, Doin’ What Comes Naturally, I Got The Sun In The Morning, and many more.

This was an excellent production, with an outstanding cast. Kevin Baily played Frank Butler. He had a remarkable voice, and even more remarkable chemistry with the Annie actress. Annie was played by Katherine McPhee, a relatively new actress with a remarkable stage presence, great facial expressions, and a wonderful voice. She will go far. Also notable in this production were Noah Rivera as Tommy Keeler and Jaclyn Miller as Winnie Tate, both making their Cabrillo Music Theatre debuts. Others in the cast included Sandy Mulvihill as Dolly Tate; Cary Pitts as Buffalo Bill Cody; Tim Polzin as Charlie Davenport; Frank Bonventure as Sitting Bull; Nick Mencola as Pawnee Bill/Foster Wilson, Tara Baumann as Jessie Oakley; Sofie Thurston as Nellie Oakley; and Eric Austin Young as Jake Oakley (I’m not listing the ensemble members).

This show closes Sunday evening, March 22. The next CMT production is The Wizard of Oz (Yip Harberg score) the last week of July and the first week of August.

CMT also announced their 2005-2006 season, which sounds like a great one: Oliver!, Forever Plaid, and Seussical. I’ve seen two of the three of these, but won’t mind seeing them again. I’ll note that CMT has great prices: Subscription prices (if they haven’t changed) are only $11 per ticket per show for the balcony on Saturday Matinees—what a great way to introduce your family to theatre!

[Crossposted to socal_theatre]

Share

My Day as a Sine Wave

(down and…) Today, I spent the day at the USC Research Review in the Costing Secure Systems workshop. This meant driving down to USC and spending the day down there. Ugh. Alien territory. I think I need to take a shower. (You have to remember: my degrees are UCLA BS ’82, MS ’82) Seriously, I wasn’t that impressed with the campus: they are overbuilding it more than UCLA is!

(up and…) However, the workshop itself was great. It was exploring the COCOMO II model, and I was able to make significant contributions to the model, impressing the folks running it. I basically came up with a better approach to estimating KSLOC (1000 Source Lines of Code) based on the security functions included in a product.

(down and…) Came home to find Katie Kaboom. One of these days, I’ll be able to get that girl to clean her room without fighting. As I’m sure deedeebythebay knows, it seems to be an endless battle.

(up and…) But, she agreed to work out with the trainer with me tomorrow night, as gf_guruilla will be at a gluten-free dining out night.

(down and…) I got the response from the Pantages on Wicked Group Sales. I’m not sure what it will buy us… in fact, for some nights, group sales are more expensive than the regular sales. For example, outside the preview period, Saturdays at 1PM or Sundays at 2PM are more expensive for group sales ($98 orch group vs. $89 orch single, $62.50 back mezz group vs $57 back mezz group). The only place group sales might work would be Sunday July 10 or July 17 at 6:30 PM, when Center Orchestra B-ZZ, Side Orchestra L-ZZ, Center and Side Mezz A-H would be $80.50 vs $89.00 (Mezz J-N would be $51.5, and Side Mezz J-N and the last two Mezz rows would be $31.75). You can find a seating chart here. Note that there would be a $2.50 ticket charge per ticket. The ordering information is as follows:

The group minimum for “Wicked” is 20. When placing an order please note that we do not have access to seating availability. Once you place the order, the Group Sales division of the box office will process it within 7 to 10 business days. Please do not tell your group that you have the tickets unless you receive an invoice from us. Please do not call us to check the status of your order unless it has been 10 business days since you placed the order. Once you place an order you can not add tickets to it unless you place a new order for 20 or more. You can estimate a higher number of tickets than you think you may need -and then reduce that number before you make payment. If you are greatly reducing the number of your group- notify us as early as possible so we can sell those seats. If the number in your party dips below 20- it is no longer considered a group and we will not be able to sell you the tickets. You can request up to 3 different choices of dates for your group. If your first choice is sold out the box office will move to your second choice and so on. Once you have paid for your tickets, it is a final sale. There are no refunds or exchanges. We cannot make any changes to the order once you have paid for it. There is no elevator in the Pantages Theatre. If you need wheelchair accessible seats you must request them at the time you place your order.”

(up and…) So looking at this, I think the best possibilities for a group might be Sunday July 10 or Sunday July 17 at 6:30 PM. I know that I would be able to fill 5 spots: me, my wife, my daughter, ixixlix, and the Karate Kid. elisabeta75 has also expressed interest (that’s 6), and previously, lordandrei had expressed interest for 2 potentially. That would take us to 8. ellipticcurve would make 9.

(down and…) So I’m not sure we would be able make 20. Are more folks interested?

So, that’s my roller coaster of a day. Can I get off now?

Share

Wicked at the Pantages

As I previously noted in this blog (link, link, link), Wicked is coming to the Pantages. It will be at the Pantages from June 17 – July 31, 2005 (although the last weekend will be bad for me). Ticket prices are $25.00 – $89.00… my guess is that for a Saturday (2pm) or Sunday matinee (1pm) (probably the best time), decent orchestra seats at full price would be over $80 each.

Ouch.

So, I had the bright idea to see if we might be able to go the group sales route. It looks like we need 20 or more tickets for that show. I’ve dropped email to Nederlander asking how we might do this, but I’d need 20 people. Who, who wants to join the LiveJournal Los Angeles Theatre Group, i.e., who is interested in attending. If we can get 20… better prices, woo-hoo. If not, at least we might be able to coordinate attendance.

Individual tickets go on sale Sunday, April 3, 2005.

Feel free to spread the word of this entry around to other folks. We can work out how the money works, but for those wanting to use credit cards, I can run stuff through PayPal.

Share

This is the story of a little girl…

Last night gf_guruilla, ellipticcurve, S&F and I went to go see “Once On This Island” at the International City Theatre in Long Beach.

The evening started out poorly, as S&F was in a mood from being overtired. This mood spread to gf_guruilla, so that part wasn’t pretty. We all got dressed up (my wife was beautiful in a black velvet outfit; ellipticcurve was also lovely in a blue flowing dress; I wore my usual slacks, brown oxford cloth, tie and sportjacket, and S&F had one black pants and a nice red and black top… alas, in the craziness, we didn’t get pictures). However, although all of us were dressed up, we couldn’t get into a nice place for dinner. They all had wait times of 45 to 90 minutes. Later, we discovered why: The Reggae festival was in Long Beach the same weekend. Crowds, crowds.

On to the show. This was our first time at ICT, and we were impressed. The theatre is on the size of the Mark Taper Forum, with good sight lines throughout. As for the production: this was the second non-preview performance, and there were some kinks. Although the acting was marvolous (the entire ensemble was great), the sound was less than purpose. I don’t know if it was bad quality mikes or bad speakers, but things sounded speaker-ish, which is not what you want. You want to hear the actors, not the speakers.

For those not familiar with the story, here’s how ICT describes it: When peasant girl Ti Moune falls in love with wealthy landowner Daniel, the supernatural interference of four powerful deities catapults the star-crossed lovers into a fantastic swirling odyssey. Filled with hypnotic dancing, brilliant colors and beguiling music with a calypso beat, its infectious spirit and Caribbean charm are an uplifting tropical breeze that’s guaranteed to refresh! This enchanting tropical tale of romance, loss and redemption includes the songs: One Small Girl, Waiting for Life, The Human Heart, Pray, Mama Will Provide and Forever Yours.

I love the music to this show, especially the song Mama Will Provide. It is just a very uplifting show (and I could swear that the authors later reused music from this in Seussical). As I said above, the singing was great (and I got a chance to point out to Nicole that one of the singers was a UC Davis grad!)

Our next show is in early March: Annie Get Your Gun at CMT. Until then, I guess we’ll just be doing what comes naturally.

Share