A Piece of History Dies

Most people who use Sprint today don’t remember its origins, as a private phone network for Southern Pacific Railroad. But those of us growing up in the 1970s and 1980s remember those days, and the days of phone phreaking.

As NPR reported today, the NY Times is reporting the death of Joybubbles. Joybubbles, who was originally known as Joe Engressia, was one of the original phone phreakers. With an IQ of 172, perfect pitch and whistling ability, and a love of telephones, he learned to use and abuse the phone system. According to the obit, “Joybubbles loved the phone company, reported problems he had illegally discovered and even said he had planned his own arrest on fraud charges to get a phone job. And so he did, twice.”

In 1988, according to the article, he made the decision to stay 5 forever. He amassed piles of toys, Jack and Jill magazines and imaginary friends, and he took a name he said made people smile. His second life as a youngster included becoming a minister in his own Church of Eternal Childhood and collecting tapes of every “Mr. Rogers” episode.

The obituary makes fascinating reading. In my early days at UCLA (around 1979-1980), I had some contact with some phone phreakers of the era, who mostly used Sprint and MCI to make phone calls. I never got into that subculture (I was more into the ethical hacking subculture of the UCLA Computer Club), but I do remember those type of phreakers well.

Share

Naked Phone Service

No, not that. Get your minds out of the gutter.

Actually, this is one more lunchtime observation from the news, of specific interest to you VoIP users out there. According to USA Today, as a condition of the BellSouth merger, AT&T will soon be offering “DSL-only” service for $19.95/month, guaranteed to be offered for 30 months from when it is first issued. Note that AT&T is only providing 748 kbps DSL, claiming this is “sufficient” for telephone service.

This is quite significant, for one of the hurdles to moving to VoIP is that you must already have the DSL infrastructure in place. Thus, if you are a Satellite TV user, you either have to move to Cable TV (with appropriate fees for the monthly cable), or keep your local phone service in addition to the DSL/VoIP (thus taking away VoIP’s price advantage). Having “Naked” DSL permits one to use VoIP exclusively as your phone service. Of course, you’re still likely to have trouble keeping the same phone number :-).

The FCC hopes this competition will lead more companies to offer “Naked” broadband, including cable competitors. We shall see. I would think if “Naked Broadband” was offered by cable, folks with Satellite TV might move to it from DSL, as I hear it is faster.

Share

Another One Bites The Dust

The Daily News (via the NY Times) is reporting that Monday starts another “debranding”. This time, the brand biting the dust is Cingular, which won’t be “raising the bar” for much longer. Yes, that Cingular, the one that was just in the news for being the exclusive telephony service supplier of the iPhone (™ Apple Inc. Cisco). You see, thanks to the purchase of BellSouth (Cingular was 60% AT&T and 40% BellSouth), Cingular is returning to the AT&T name, after it spent gobs of money weaning folks from the “AT&T Wireless” name after it purchased AT&T Wireless from, ummm, AT&T. A campaign last year to promote AT&T as the new brand name of SBC Communications cost an estimated $1 billion.

The advertising should be fun. When AT&T became Cingular, the campaign showed the AT&T globe logo morphing into the orange dot atop the Cingular logo, a blob shaped like a jack. The new campaign shows the Cingular logo being transformed into an AT&T globe. The AT&T slogan, “Your world delivered,” replaces the Cingular slogan, “Raising the bar.” The actor Stanley Tucci, who serves as the announcer in Cingular commercials, will be heard in AT&T commercials, and the color orange will turn up in ads for what AT&T will call “wireless service from AT&T”… but “AT&T Wireless” will not be revived.

Of course, the wireless market has a history of renaming. I should know — I used to be with AirTouch Cellular, which was the former Pacific Telesis Cellular (and of course Pacific Telesis, nee PacBell, is now part of AT&T, nee SBC), and is now Verizon Wireless, after the merger with Bell Atlantic and GTE.

All of this is yet another step in the reestablishment of “Ma Bell“. Divesture, Schmesture. It’s back. The next thing you’ll know, they’ll start distributing Unix again, and we’ll have lovely trademark footnotes.

This has also reignited the Technology Dead Pool, of trademarks that die. I still have WebVan and WebGrocer magnets on my refrigerator. We’re going to be seeing more, this time through mergers.

One thing that hasn’t died (yet) is National Delurking Week. Show that you’re still alive. Delurk. Remember, if you don’t leave a comment, we’ll think you’ve been bought by Google.

Share

What’s That In Your Holster, Pardner…

I fight the continual battle of finding a good cell phone case. I’ve tried the ones that come with my Nokia phones (Verizon), but the swivel always breaks off. Ideally, I would find one that I could use at work, at home, and as a belt-pouch at RenFaire, so I don’t have to squeeze my phone into my Oberon Designs pouch. As reference, I currently have a Nokia 2128i “candybar” style phone.

I currently have black leather cell phone case (Case #0). I’ve been using it for about 8 months now, and it is already starting to fall apart. The clip was ripping the soft leather in the back (superglue fixed that), and now the leather is coming off the clip. So I’m thinking about replacing the case. But with what?

  • Case #1. Texas Star Case ($30). This is a heavy-leather tooled case, with a large Texas star. If you look at the alternative view, you’ll see there’s a strong metal clip on the back. I’m not sure about the star, though.
  • Case #2. Silver Concho Phone Holder ($22.99). This is a saddle leather tooled cell phone cases with a concho and Velcro® closure. It has a belt clip, but I can’t see the quality of it. It may be too fancy for a guy’s phone.
  • Case #3. Belt-Mount Phone ($9.99). This is the simplest design, but it also seems to be a belt-loop only, which makes taking it on and off a pain.
  • Case #4. Saddle-Leather Cell Phone. This is a case made out of Grade A chestnut colored leather. They do not state the size. It has no metal clips on it; it is a velcro closure. Steel clip on the back.

Here’s are some pictures of the phones:

Case #0
Black Leather
Cell Phone Pouch
Case #1
American West
Texas Star
Case #2
Silver Concho
Phone Holder
Case #3
Belt-Mount
Phone Holder
Case #4
Saddle-Leather
Cell Phone


So, which phone case do you think I should get. Remember, I’m looking for both day-to-day and faire usage.

Share

The Great Phone Switch of 2007 Has Happened.

We hit VerizonWireless this morning. As a result:

  • I now have a new Nokia 2128i. I went with this because I know it has good reception and I can use existing adaptors I have. The candybar aspect doesn’t bother me.
  • gf_guruilla has a Motorola V710 that we were given by venedotia.
  • NSS&F has GFG’s old LG VX 3300. We’ll see if this works for her. If it doesn’t, we’ll likely use a gift-card for Circuit City and get her a new small phone.

In other news… I wish this friggin’ headache would go away. I think it is the weather change from 15% humidity to 30% humidity. Bleh.

Share

Picking a New Cellphone

We’re about to do a cellphone dance. Currently, my wife is using a LG VX3300, which although small, seems to have spotty reception. Both myself and my daughter are using older Nokia 3589is (reviews). My daughter’s phone’s keys have started to get flakey, and venedotia has provided my wife with a newer phone, one of the Motorola camera phones. We’re with Verizon Wireless, so we also have “new every two“.

What we would like to do is: Give the LG VX 3300 to my daughter, enable the Motorola for my wife, and get me a newer phone. Here’s the rub however: the place where I work absolutely, positively, does not allow camera phones. Although I’m sure I could disable the camera, I wouldn’t even want to try to bring one in.

Where does that leave me? My favorite option would be to stay with a Nokia phone (I like their reception), but the only one listed by VerizonWireless is the Nokia 2128i (Verizon page, Mobiledia page). The stated features are all Digital, Voice-activated dialing, Built-in Flashlight, TTY Compatible, Speakerphone. However, it is not capable of nationwide coverage, according to the Verizon Website, even though it is 800/1900 MHz CDMA. This particular Nokia also doesn’t get good ratings.

Other ones listed on the VerizonWireless website are:

  • The Samsung SCH-a630 (Verizon page, Mobiledia page). This has about the same features, but I have no real idea of battery life or reception. It is also CDMA 1900/800 MHz. Some folks (based on reviews seem to like it. It supposedly gets great reception.
  • The LG VX3300 (Verizon page, Mobiledia page) my wife has. Feh!
  • The LG VX4650 (Verizon page, Mobiledia page), but reviews are so-so and I don’t trust LG reception. It does have national access. Perhaps this is because it is “Tri-Mode”.

Opinions? Has anyone else had reception problems with the LG phones? Does anyone have experience with the Samsung phones? With business travel, I think nationwide access is important, but how widely are solely analog systems seen anymore?

Share

Repeal of Long Distance Phone Tax

According to the New York Times and the Washington Post, the U.S. Treasury Department Thursday said uncle in a legal dispute over the federal excise tax on long-distance telephone service. As a result, the IRS will be directed to refund tax paid on the service over the past three years. The tax will officially disappear on July 31. The Treasury Department said individuals will be allowed to claim refunds on their 2006 tax returns, filed in 2007, for taxes paid on long-distance telephone calls since March 2003. The long-distance tax was established in 1898 as a luxury tax on wealthy Americans who owned telephones and lawmakers needed money to fight the Spanish-American War. U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow also urged Congress to repeal the excise tax on local telephone service.

Individuals who do not have to file a tax return will be instructed to use a special form to apply for the refund. Businesses would be required to calculate the taxes they paid before requesting their money back.

Of course, I would think most consumers will have no idea how much they paid specifically in long-distance taxes. Do you think we’ll get a statement from our current and past phone companies? I sort of doubt it. According to the treasury department, taxpayers can calculate the actual taxes paid and apply for a refund, or they can claim a standard amount that will be set later by the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service.

Even more worrisome: Snow estimated the cost of refunding taxpayers for three years of past taxes would total about $13 billion, and said that there would be no problem in finding that amount. Sayeth Snow, “The revenue stream is strong and can easily absorb this” If the revenue stream is that strong, then why aren’t we paying down the debt?

Share