I’ve Got a Little List: Obsolete Technology, Left-Handed Problems, LA Drivers

userpic=fountain-penThe unifying theme for today’s lunchtime news chum is enumeration: these are all lists of things. Further, they are all lists of things with which I have some disagreement:

  • 12 Obsolete Technologies Americans Still Use. Andrew Ducker brought this list to my attention. I disagree with many of these items — both with the “obsolete” aspect, and the implication that there is no rationale for their use. For almost all of these, I’ll argue that there are still narrow use cases that justify their use. #2 Pagers, for example, have the advantage of being one-way, which make them ideally suited for environments where one is worried about information exfiltration. #3, Dot Matrix Printers, are needed in cases where multiple copies are required and printing multiple originals is burdensome (or when a real signature is required). #5, Pay Phones, are vital for emergencies and cases where people either cannot use or cannot afford cell service. #7, landline phones, are a vital backup communication medium when the power goes out (they have independent power, whereas VoIP depends on main power), and still have superior sound quality to cell lines. #9, film, has inherent artistic qualities that cannot be duplicated with digital (which is the same argument for #12, vinyl). #11, fax machines, can provide security advantages as it is not stored. Which do I use? #7, #8, #11 (some places still require it), #12.
  • 18 Worst Things for Left Handed People. Being left handed, I agree with many items on this list, although some I disagree with. For example, #5 — really now? Pushing the ball? If so, then how can I write with a fountain pen. Similarly, with #6, that’s only a problem if you are using ink that doesn’t dry fast enough. #7 is only a problem if you don’t take care where you sit (it’s now automatic for me to sit in the correct corner), and I’ve never had a problem with #10 or #15. Some of these still annoy me, such as #1, #2, and #12, and my personal pet peeve is #16 — those signature capture machines are never designed for left handers.
  • 30 Things Only Drivers in Los Angeles Will Understand. This, perhaps, is the list I have the greatest disagreement with, for much of these are things that native Los Angeles people have no problems with. For example, regarding #1 — I never scream on the freeway — I just turn on a podcast and go with the flow (or get off and get some tea and wait for the mess to subside). As for #4, Sigalert is so yesterday — real people use Quickmap from Caltrans. As for #3 — that sign isn’t even from Los Angeles, although the parking signs can be confusing (which I’ve written about before).  As for #11, real Angelenos know to visit the Auto Club for most DMV services. #17 is really only a excuse for those that live in the LA Basin — those in the valley will drive anywhere. However, #13 is most definitely true!

 

Share

Skeuomorphism. Love It. Hate It.

userpic=father-and-sonA big word in design circles these days is Skeuomorphism. Those who design interfaces are gnashing teeth and bemoaning the skeuomorphism in today’s interfaces, and newer interfaces are supposedly going to eschew it entirely. What is skeuomorphism? According to Wikipedia, it is when “a physical ornament or design on an object made to resemble another material or technique.” In other words, it is when an application used to delete files looks like a trashcan, an icon indicating saving files looks like a floppy disk, directories look like folders, email looks like envelopes, and (in general) thinks look like their archaic real world equivalents. Apple is supposedly going to a flat design and dropping skeuomorphic icons in the next version of iOS, and Windows has already started to do it in the flat design of Windows 8.

What got me thinking about skeuomorphism was a segment of this week’s Science Friday that we listened to on the drive home. This segment talked about helping seniors to tackle new technology. It talked about how seniors could be introduced to use the iPad and the iPhone, how to teach them to use computers, how they can be set in their habits… and how one can teach new technology by relating it to older things they know.

Yup. You can put 2 and 2 together as well as I can. The move away from skeuomorphism could be an attempt to get seniors — or at least less adaptable seniors — off the new technology. If you are dealing with a senior who can’t even figure out the power button, delete files, or do any simple tasks… now try imagine explaining it when the icon to do the task is something they don’t recognize.

So what are your thoughts? Is moving away from skeuomorphic design a good idea or a bad idea? What will be its impact on seniors?

Share

How? Well, First I stick the flag in the sand, and then I…

userpic=frebergToday’s collection of lunchtime news chum all explore the question of “How?”:

  • How the Prime Meridian Changed The World? Today, we take many things for granted. Navagation. Time. Starbucks. Except for Starbucks, establishment of the prime meridian was critical in the standardization and acceptance of the concepts. So why is the prime meridian where it is? This article from National Geographic provides a good answer.
  • How Did a Worlds Fair Pavillion Become a Family Cabin? The 1964 Worlds Fair in Queens NY had a number of iconic structures, many of which are still standing. Three of them (which looked a lot like the LaConcha motel office) were at the Worlds Fair marina. Two of them remain there. One, however, is now a cabin in the mountains of Pennsylvania. Here’s how that came to be.
  • How Does One Bake the Earth? No, this isn’t about global warming… at least in the sense you are thinking about. A baker in Australia received a request to bake a spherical cake that mirrored the internal structure of the earth. Here’s how she did it.
  • How Do You Measure Pencil Hardness? We’ve all used the ubiquitous Number 2 pencil (or, if you are a mechanical pencil person like me, the B-Soft lead). Ever wonder how those designations came about and what they mean? Wonder no more.
  • How Do Child Stars Go Bad? We’ve all seen the misbehaving former-child star, from Lindsay Lohan to Amanda Bynes. Ever wonder how it happens? Mara Wilson, herself a former child-star, provides a very good explanation of the process.

 

Share

Feeding Your Body: News to Chew On

userpic=teaToday’s lunchtime news chum post has to do, quite appropriately, with food:

  • Tea is In? I’ll Believe It When I See It. All food fads come in cycles. Cupcakes are in, then they are out. FroYo is in, then out, then in. According to this article, coffee is on its way out and fancy tea is in. At least, that is, in the beverage industry. As a tea drinker, I’ll believe this one when I see it. I still see far too many coffee houses with only bagged tea, too many places that use concentrated iced tea, too many conferences that use coffee pots to make tea water, and too many places that don’t even bother to put out hot water for tea. I agree that tea is a better beverage — you can drink it hot or cold, and it doesn’t require any doctoring to drink. I still stand by my adage that coffee only belongs in ice cream or covered in dark chocolate.
  • Don’t Eat This. Alton Brown led me to this article, enumerating 7 foods a nutritionist will never eat. What’s on the list? Rice cakes, fat-free salad dressing, seitan, shark, refined and refortified grains, grits, sugar sweetened beverages. See that last one? That’s why I drink tea. No sugar required — it is perfect black. Try that with most coffees!
  • Book ‘Em. We’re seeing electronic books everywhere. One place electronic books shouldn’t be is the kitchen. Want to know why? This article explains the value of a printed cookbook quite well. I’ve always felt that anything electronic doesn’t belong in a place where there is water and heat, but the article gives a myriad of even more reasons to stick with print.
  • Date Conjunction. This last piece comes courtesy of mail.jewish. It appears that 2013 will be the first year in a long time — and it will be an even longer time until it occurs again — that Thanksgiving coincides with the first night of Chanukkah. Let’s see if my sister-in-law reads this — we’re going to need to figure out where to do things this year as we normally split T-day and C-day. Oh, and think of the menu: Turkey, latkes, mashed potatoes, donuts. Of course, this is the perfect year to try a deep-fried turkey!

 

Share

It All Comes SMASHing Down

Smashuserpic=theatre_ticketsThis weekend brought the end of one of the few television shows I’ve enjoyed over the past two seasons: Smash” on NBC. The end wasn’t surprising; the ratings were in the cellar for much of the second season. Still, I’ll miss the show… and so I thought I would share with you (over lunch) what I think went right… and where it all went wrong. Of course, there is the obligatory triple of news chum related to Smash as well.

Smash, if you are unfamiliar with it, is a musical TV drama that purported to tell the story of the mounting of a Broadway musical about Marilyn Monroe, eventually called Bombshell. It started with the idea for the musical; it ended at the Tony awards. When Smash started, I had high hopes for it. It was, after all, on NBC — the network that had given us Fame in the 1980s (the Glee of its era, only with original music, not cover tunes). Smash started off well — we saw the drama of writing the show, the difficult life of actors, the audition and rehearsal process. The problem was that Smash rapidly devolved into a soap opera, focusing more on the love lives and drama of the characters than that drama of the show development process. There’s loads of drama there — much of which was glossed over — such as the set, technical, sound, light, costume designs. As the second season came on, the new show runner tossed some of the problematic subplots that were overly melodramatic… only to replace them with equally melodramatic subplots.

Looking back, what suggestions would I have made if I had been in charge? Here are a few:

  • View Smash as a Miniseries. Open-ended dramas work well only if each episode is self-contained (e.g., CSI:), or if one is dealing with a true soap opera (e.g., Dallas). If Smash had been defined as a fixed number of episodes for its particular story, it could have been well plotted out — in advance — and appropriate time allocated to build to the various elements. By the way, this was the same problem Heroes had — it needed to have a fixed number of episodes. Trying to stretch out the story with the same characters in multiple books started to make it implausible.
  • Focus on the Broadway. The show development was unrealistic. I have no problem with compressing the schedule, but focusing more on the drama of the process would have been good. Songs going in. Songs going out. Songs being added at the last minute, or to support/not support a particular character. Set issues, lighting issues, sound issues, costume issue. Issues with Broadway unions. Issues with the entire development process, from multiple workshops to non-profit tryouts. These were all glossed over and resolved far too quickly… and far too much time was spent with a focus on the personal lives.
  • Understand the Role of the Music. Music in a show needs a context. Within the musical itself, musical numbers don’t exist to just get out a song — they must move the plot forward or illustrate something internal. This is why some of the fantasy numbers of the first season didn’t work. The music that did work was the numbers from the shows under development (and this is why adding the second musical in the second season worked). What was missing was musical numbers about the drama of the show development itself. These numbers (and they do exist — just look at Kiss Me Kate or Me and Juliet) could have provided the needed avenues for the actors to explore their hidden turmoils, or the technical creatives to explore the struggles they deal with.
  • Don’t Make Things Too Convenient. Although I know this is TV, things worked out far too easy for Smash, and its internal musicals Bombshell and Hit List. It is unlikely they would have swept the Tonys as they did, or have had such an easy process to get to Broadway. I’ve seen shows languish for years (look at Spiderman or some of the development projects from the Pasadena Playhouse.

There are a number of things about Smash that I did like — starting with the casting. I’ve enjoyed Katherine McPhee since we saw her in Annie Get Your Gun at Cabrillo Music Theatre (what’s this American Idol of which you speak — I know of no such show). As for Megan Hilty, we saw her when she was in 9 to 5 at the Ahmanson. All the other leads were great, and the cameos by other Broadway folk were fun. I enjoyed both shows under development (Bombshell and Hit List), and actually hope that both are further developed into real pieces — it would have been great to have had Smash-specials where they actually presented the full productions. One can dream. The songwriters chosen were good (Todd and Mark are always one, and Joe Iconis is a new songwriter waiting to hit it big).

I promised you some news chum related to Smash, so here are the articles that caught my eye… and actually prompted this post:

ETA (for my reference):

Songs by the Smash Cast (Amazon)

Smash Music (NBC)

Smash Original Songs (Wikia)

Smash – Complete Season Two (Wikia)

 

Share

March / April / May 2013 Updates to California Highways

userpic=roadgeekingWhat did you do over Memorial Day weekend? Me — I updated the highway pages.

It’s been a busy time, and time for highway page updates have been few and far between. As always, you can keep up to date with me by following my blog at California Highways (just follow the “Roadgeeking” category). There you will find bi-monthly collections of articles related to California Highways, as well as other items of interest. There is also a California Highways Facebook group, where you can post updates.

Updates were made to the following highways, based on my reading of the papers (which are posted to the roadgeeking category at the “Observations Along The Road” and to the California Highways Facebook group) as well as any backed up email changes. I also reviewed the the AAroads forum; I’ve given up on misc.transport.road. This resulted in changes on the following routes, with credit as indicated [my research(*), contributions of information or leads (via direct mail) from Mike Ballard(1), Henry at AARoads(2), Xuan Luo(3), Robert J. Pachinger(4), Curtis Reeves(5), Joel Windmiller(6)]: Route 1(*), Route 2(*,1), Route 4(*), I-5(*), Route 12(*), I-15(*), Route 19(*), Route 23(*), Route 27(*), Route 29(*), Former US 40(*,6), Route 48(4,5), US 50(*), Route 79(*), I-80(*), Route 91(*), Route 99(*,6), US 101(*), Route 103(*), Route 133(*), Route 134(*), Route 135(*), Route 148(6), Route 156(*), Route 170(1), Route 178(*), Route 241(*), I-280(*),I-405(*), I-580(*), I-680(*),I-710(1), I-805(*), I-880(*), El Camino Real(3). For a number of the larger routes, I made an effort to get the status and structures into the correct geographical order; specifically, this was done for US 50, Route 99, Route 299. I plan to do it for a few of the larger ones (such as US 101) as time permits.

Added a link to the Western Map Co Freeway and Artery Map of Los Angeles (1963). Added a link to the Unbuilt Freeways of San Francisco(2). Updated the links to Mike Ballards SCV Resources page.

Reviewed the Pending Legislation page. The new California Legislature site is very nice, but it occasionally switches to another bill when moving tabs. As usually, I recommend to every Californian that they visit the legislative website regularly and see what their legis-critters are doing. The legislature has been busy introducting bills and resolutions (over 1,000 of them in the Assembly, and almost 700 in the State Senate). However, none of them has reached the point where they have been sent to the Governor for signature.

Read More …

Share

The Truth May Not Set You Free, But It Can Inspire

Scottsboro Boys (Ahmanson)userpic=ahmansonThis weekend has been an interesting juxtaposition of theatre with two productions that echo the same theme, but tell the story in different ways and make different points. Saturday night we were in Newhall seeing REP’s production of “To Kill a Mockingbird; last night we were in DTLA seeing CTG’s production of the Kander-Ebb musical, “The Scottsboro Boys. Both tell the story of black men accused of raping white women in the south in the early 1930s. Both involve trials where the innocence of the black men becomes clear. Both involve a jury going with its prejudices instead of with the truth. Both end up with tragic ends for the defendants, with ultimately important larger realizations. If you can afford to do so, I strongly recommend you see both in close proximity — you’ll find it very moving.  Further, if you can find a production of Jason Robert Brown’s Parade to add to the mix, I strongly suggest you do so. The melding of the three themes will be mind-altering.

Yesterday, I related the story of To Kill a Mockingbird. That story deals with the loss of innocence and the perversion of justice, but does so in a comfortable manner. It uses a traditional courtroom setting and the curiousity of children to bring home its point. Although the point is strong, it is accessible. Scottsboro Boys, on the other hand, is “in your face” uncomfortable from the opening, primarily due to how the authors and composers chose to present the story. More on that in a minute.

Scottsboro Boys tells the story of the Scottsboro 9. The Scottsboro Boys were nine black teenage boys accused of rape in Alabama in 1931. The case included a frameup, an all-white jury, rushed trials, an attempted lynching, an angry mob, and is an example of an overall miscarriage of justice. The short version is this: On March 25, 1931, several people were hoboing on a freight train traveling between Chattanooga and Memphis, Tennessee. Several white boys jumped off the train and reported to the sheriff they had been attacked by a group of black boys. The sheriff deputized a posse, stopped and searched the train. He arrested the black boys, and found two white girls who accused the boys of rape. The case was first heard in Scottsboro, Alabama in three rushed trials, where the defendants received poor legal representation. All but the thirteen-year-old Roy Wright were convicted of rape and sentenced to death, the common sentence in Alabama at the time for black men convicted of raping white women. But with help from the American Communist Party, the case was appealed. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed seven of the eight convictions, and granted thirteen-year-old Eugene Williams a new trial because he was a juvenile. Chief Justice John C. Anderson dissented however, ruling that the defendants had been denied an impartial jury, fair trial, fair sentencing, and effective counsel. The case was returned to the lower court and the judge allowed a change of venue, moving the retrials to Decatur, Alabama. During the retrials, one of the alleged victims admitted fabricating the rape story and asserted that none of the Scottsboro Boys touched either of the white women. The jury found the defendants guilty, but the judge set aside the verdict and granted a new trial. After a new series of trials, the verdict was the same: guilty. The cases were ultimately tried three times. For the third time a jury—now with one black member—returned a third guilty verdict. Charges were finally dropped for four of the nine defendants. Sentences for the rest ranged from 75 years to death. All but two served prison sentences. One was shot in prison by a guard. Two escaped, were charged with crimes, and were sent back to prison.

John Kander and Fred Ebb (composer and lyricist), together with David Thompson (book), chose to tell this story in a novel fashion. Eschewing the traditional musical style, they chose to tell the story as a minstrel show. This was a style of variety show that has disappeared, and was known for lampooning black people and accentuating stereotypes. As such, the style of the show makes the audience intentionally uncomfortable. It has been said by some that this style is one reason this show died on Broadway; I would tend to agree, and I think this show is (like Chicago before it) intentionally ahead of its time. Despite all of our professed acceptance of racial tolerance, our society is not yet tolerant (as illustrated by the reception of our first black president). Until there is true and deep racial acceptance in society, I don’t think audiences will be comfortable with this show.

In any case, this story is told in the style of a minstrel show. This means that there is a elderly interlocutor who runs the show, two fools (Mr. Bones and Mr. Tambo) who buffoonishly provide comic relief, and the rest of the performers (in this case, the nine Scottsboro boys). Through a series of acts, these actors tell the story of the Scottsboro Boys from their initial arrest through the various trials. Repeatedly, the boys emphasize that they want to tell the truth this time — to have the true story come out — and that telling the truth is unlike what had happened before. Lastly, observing this all is an unnamed middle-aged black woman … more on this later.

When the show starts, the boys obligingly do what the interlocutor wants, without question — even if it foolish. As time goes on the insistence to stick with the truth grows and grows. By the time the musical ends, the boys are defiant. No longer subservient to the white interlocutor, they insist on doing things on their terms and sticking with the truth. This mirrors how blacks have grown in society, insisting on their civil rights … insisting on the truth. It is in understanding this that the role of the unnamed women becomes significant.(slight spoiler here) … for the last scene reveals that the women is Rosa Parks, and the courage of the boys insistence to do what is right is one of the inspirations for her not to go to the back of the bus.

As I indicated, this is a musical that makes one uncomfortable. It holds up — to a bright light — the racial stereotypes that were common in the south in the 1930s. It not only makes fun of those stereotypes, it also highlights the antisemitism that was common as well in the South. This is why earlier I mentioned that seeing this musical in the context of JRB’s Parade is so important — Parade tells the story of the Leo Frank trial and subsequent lynching — another travesty of justice where a man was killed because he was Jewish.

Scottsboro Boys is an important musical, but it is not easy to watch. In this, it is much like Caberet or Kiss of the Spider Woman — it attempts to present an uncomfortable subject in a way that calls for discussion afterwards. In doing so, this is theatre at its best — something that challenges and exposes. This isn’t the feel-good musical that leaves you humming (think Oklahoma, Hello Dolly, Hairspray, or Wicked). This is a musical — like South Pacific, Carousel, or Parade — that leaves you thinking about the uncomfortable side of human nature. The truth is sometimes uncomfortable. To put it another way… as we walked out of this show, we found ourselves quoting Urinetown: “But the music, its so pretty.This line referred to the fact that Urinetown had pretty music, but an uncomfortable subject matter and title. Similarly, Scottsboro Boys has pretty music… but the subject and the point it makes is pretty uncomfortable.

Turning from the subject to the performance, which were spectacular. Framing the Scottsboro Boys minstrel show were Hal Linden as the Interlocutor, Trent Armand Kendall as Mr. Bones, and JC Montgomery as Mr. Tambo. I’ve been a fan of Mr. Linden’s since 1972, when I saw him at the LA Civic Light Opera in The Rothschilds (my first musical). He was a bit weaker as the Interlocutor, but you could still see the old rascal within… and the power and strength. Kendall and Montgomery were both very strong — not only in their comic buffoonery, but in their singing and dancing and acrobatics. Montgomery was particularly good as the S. Leibowitz, the last lawyer for the boys.

The Scottsboro Boys were played by 9 remarkable actors: Gilbert L Bailey II (Ozie Powell), David Bazemore (Olen Montgomery), Christopher James Culberson (Andy Wright), Joshua Henry (Haywood Patterson), Justin Prescott (Willie Roberson), Clinton Roane (Roy Wright), Cedric Sanders (Clarence Norris), Deandre Sevon (Eugene Williams), and Christian Dante White (Charles Weems). All were strong; a few deserve some special discussion. Joshua Henry was just a force of nature as Haywood Patterson. Powerful, emotional, and strong, he provided the center and the heart of the nine boys. His performance was just riveting. Bailey and White doubled as the two female accusers, and carried off that transformation quite well. As for the rest — well, this was such an ensemble it is hard to separate.

Lastly, in what might be the smallest role — but the most emotional — was C. Kelly Wright as the Lady. Standing in as both the mother of the boys — but more importantly as Rosa Parks — she provided the perspective of the silent observer, gaining strength from the boys devotion to holding on to what is right.

The choreography and direction of Susan Stroman (assisted by Associate Director/Choreographer Jeff Whiting) was just remarkable. Energetic dances and creative staging is what makes this musical pop. The direction brought out the raw emotion and nerves this story requires. The show also featured an innovate scenic design by Beowulf Boritt that consisted primarily of steel chairs, planks, and tamborines. These simple items were rearranged and locked together to provide every scene in the musical. The only flying scenic piece was a sign at the end of the show. Given this simple staging, I can easily see this show being done in a small to mid-size theatre with no fly space. It would have an even strong “in your face” nature in a small venue. The sparse scenic elements were enhanced by the lighting design of Ken Billington, which truly emphasized the mood within the piece. The sound design by Jon Weston was also strong, especially sitting near the front where the percussion truly resonated. The costume design by Toni-Leslie James was effective, establishing the tone very well. Fight direction was by Mark B. Simon. Eric Santagata was Assistant Choreographer.  Evangeline Rose Whitlock was the Production Stage Manager, assisted by Ryan C. Durham and Lora K. Powell.

The Scottsboro Boys” continues at the Ahmanson Theatre through June 30. Tickets are available through the Ahmanson Box Office; discount tickets are available usually through Hottix or sometimes via Goldstar. I strongly recommend you see this in tandem with To Kill a Mockingbird at REP East; the two productions serve to amplify each other (although I doubt the juxtaposition was intentional as it would have been marketed). Alas, JRB’s Parade isn’t in town to compete the trifecta.

Upcoming Theatre and Concerts:   June brings “Priscilla – Queen of the Desert” at the Pantages. June will also bring a Maria Muldaur concert at McCabes.  I’m also considering Rent at the Hudson Theatres or A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Forum at the Hillcrest Center for the Arts in Thousand Oaks. July is currently more open, with “9 to 5 – The Musical” at REP East in the middle of the month, and “Legally Blonde – The Musical” at Cabrillo at the end of the month. August is currently completely open due to vacation planning. I’m also keeping my eyes open as the various theatres start making their 2013 season announcements. Lastly, what few dates we do have open may be filled by productions I see on Goldstar, LA Stage Tix, Plays411, or discussed in the various LA Stage Blogs I read (I particularly recommend Musicals in LA and LA Stage Times).

Share

California Highway News: 5/15/13 – 5/26/13

userpic=roadgeekingHere is the news about California Highways for the latter half of May. Yes, this is being published before the end of the month — that’s because I’m in the process of doing highway page updates this weekend….

Share