![]() www.cahighways.org |
California HighwaysInterstate Highway Types and the History of California's Interstates |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
As defined in the state highway code, there is no distinction between "Interstates", "US Highways", and state highways -- they are all state highways.
Federal law is different. Federal Law (specifically 23 USC 103, which was significantly reworked by Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991) defines two highway systems: the National Highway System (NHS) and the Interstate System, which is a component of the National Highway System. Note that this is a change from the original method of Interstate funding, where there were four Federal-Aid systems: Interstate, Primary, Secondary, and Urban.
The Interstate system (formally "The Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense Highways") serves the 48 contiguous states, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia. It carries more than 21 percent of the nation's traffic on only 1% of the nation's total road and street milage. A good history of the interstate system can be found at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/routefinder/index.htm. Stephen Summers has created a nice page on the history of the interestate system at http://www.nwindianahwys.homestead.com/INTER_MAIN.HTML. There are specific design requirements for Interstate highways, and all highways classified as Interstate (with the exception of those in Alaska and Puerto Rico) must meet those standards. The goals of the highways on the Interstate system are to:
To connect by routes, as direct as practicable, the principal metropolitan areas, cities, and industrial centers.
To serve the national defense.
To the maximum extent practicable, to connect at suitable border points with routes of continental importance in Canada and Mexico.
The Interstate system has a maximum number of miles defined in law: it cannot exceed 43,000 miles (currently, it is at 42,795 miles). This milage does not include milage signed as interstate under 23 USC 103(4). Such milage is colloquially called "non-chargeable" milage.
Under ISTEA, the Interstate Program includes completion funding for Interstate Construction, Interstate Substitute highway projects, and an Interstate Maintenance program to rehabilitate, restore, and resurface the Interstate system. Reconstruction is also eligible for funding if it does not add capacity, except for high occupancy vehicle (HOV) or auxiliary lanes. Federal Aid comes in multiple forms. The Surface Transportation Program can be used on Interstate, National Highway System, and all roads functionally classified by FHWA as other than local or rural minor collectors. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program is directed towards transportation projects which will contribute to Clean Air Act requirements in non-attainment areas for ozone and carbon monoxide. The Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program is continued.
According to the FHWA, to mark the Interstate routes, the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO) asked its member states to submit suggestions. The States submitted dozens of ideas in several forms, ranging from a 55mm color transparency to a 4-foot square aluminum blank. The signs were tested, an a final version, a combination of submissions from Missouri and Texas, was selected. On September 19, 1967, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued Trademark Registration 835,635 for the shield.
Questions often arise on the control cities for California Interstates. Information on Control Cities in general can be found here. Specifically, according to the MUTCD:
The direction of a freeway and the major destinations or control cities (see Section 2D.34) along it shall be clearly identified through the use of appropriate destination legends. Successive freeway guide signs shall provide continuity in destination names and consistency with available map information. At any decision point, a given destination shall be indicated by way of only one route.
Control city legends are required to be used at interchanges, separation points of overlapping freeway routes, on directional signs on intersecting routes, on Pull-Through signs, and on the bottom line of post-interchange distance signs.
The control cities defined for California Interstates are as follows:
| I-5 NB | San Diego, Santa Ana, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacramento, Redding, Mt. Shasta City, Weed, Yreka, Ashland (OR) |
| I-5 SB | Ashland (OR), Yreka, Weed, Mt. Shasta City, Redding, Sacramento, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Santa Ana, San Diego |
| I-8 | San Diego, El Centro, Yuma (AZ) |
| I-10 | Santa Monica, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, Indio, Blythe, Phoenix (AZ) |
| I-15 | San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Barstow, Las Vegas (NV) |
| I-40 | Barstow, Needles, Kingman (AZ) |
| I-80 | San Francisco, Sacramento, Reno (NV) |
Other routes do not have control citiesthey are forward directions. The difference is that continuous signing is (nationally) guaranteed for a control city. It appears on every pull-through sign on the Interstate leading to it until it is reached, then the next control city appears on every pull-through until that is reached, and so on. This doesn't work for things like loop routes (3-digits) or spurs (which might be within a city); and AASHTO doesn't have jurisdiction over the state routes.
But, just to confuse things, the term "control city" is also used at the state level, in a more broader sense, to refer to any one on a list of forward destinations that are to be signed on the state highway system (not just Interstates or freeways). Examples of documents referring to designated control cities are Caltrans' own 'M.U.T.C.D.' Supplement (which, however, only directs the Districts to come up with control city lists--no set of control cities is actually given in the Supplement). Often, the forward destinations are the ultimate destinations, or (such as with I-405) the names of cities reachable with the next Interstate connection (Sacramento, Santa Monica, Long Beach, San Diego).
First, to eliminate some confusion, thanks to a posting by Paul Wolf:
All highways in the US, except on federally-owned land (such as within
national parks) are state or locally maintained, although many are eligible for
federal aid in construction. The Interstate system created in 1956 has a
specific set of design criteria, and specific funding ratios. The design
criteria and funding ratios are different from that of the 1926 Federal system.
The standards include a minimum of four 12-foot wide travel lanes, a minimum
shoulder width of 10 feet, full control of access, and design speeds of 50 to
70 miles per hour (depending on the type of terrain). Initially, the design had
to be adequate to meet the traffic volumes expected in 1975. Later, the
requirement was changed to a more general 20-year design period rather than for
a specific year to allow for evolution of the System. The design standards have
been codified in Section 109(b), 23 U.S.C.
[Information on
the Design Standards from the FHWA Interstate Log]
The Federal government, working with the states, established the system (i.e. designated the general corridors, but not the exact locations) and allocated the milage to the states. The states designed and built the roads, with the Federal government reviewing and approving the plans. States could, and did, decide not to build portions of the system. There are also routes built to the standards of the system, usually with some percentage of federal money, that were not chargable to the milage in the system, but were signed as part of the system.
The Interstate System was created by the 1944 Federal-Aid Highway act, which authorized 40,000 miles nationally. California was initially allocated 1,938 miles. Later allocations in 1955 brought the total milage to 2,135 miles. The 1956 Federal-Aid Highway Act authorized an additional 1,000 miles nationally; California received none of this. The 1968 Highway Act added another 1,500 miles, expanding the system to 42,500 miles. An amendment sponsored by U.S. Representatives James Howard and William Cramer authorized an additional 200 miles for modification or revision of the basic System. The mileage authorized under the Howard-Cramer Amendment was increased eventually to 500 miles under the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973. The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 brought the total authorized milage to 43,000. Of these miles, California has been allocated 2,311 miles. This milage is called "chargeable Interstate". All of this milage is/was eligible for construction with regular Interstate funds.
The Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1978 provided full Interstate Construction funding for all routes designated under previous System adjustments. Another provision of this Act prohibited the use of Interstate Construction (IC) funds for the construction of any new miles designated after passage of the Act. A total of 42,795 miles had been designated for development with IC funds before this measure was enacted.
The following summarizes California's chargable Interstate milage:
| Route | Description | Miles | Miles Per FHWA Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| I-5 | International Boundary near Tijuana, Mexico to the Oregon state line near Ashland, Oregon | 797.0 | 796.53 |
| I-8 | I-5 in San Diego to the Arizona state line near Yuma, Arizona | 170.0 | 169.92 |
| I-10 | Santa Monica to I-5 in Los Angeles and from I-5 in Los Angeles to the Arizona state line near Blythe | 240.9 | 242.54 |
| I-15 | I-8 in San Diego to the Nevada state line near Las Vegas, Nevada | 287.3 | 287.26 |
| I-40 | I-15 in Barstow to the Arizona state line near Kingman, Arizona | 154.6 | 154.61 |
| I-80 | First Street in San Francisco to the Nevada state line near Reno, Nevada | 202.2 | 199.24 |
| I-105 | Route 1 (Sepulveda Blvd) at the Los Angeles
International Airport to I-605 *: I-105 includes 7.0 "Howard-Cramer" miles. |
*17.3 | 17.32 |
| I-110 | Route 47 in San Pedro to I-10 in Los Angeles | 20.5 | 20.43 |
| I-205 | I-580 W of Tracy to I-5 E of Tracy | 13.0 | 12.97 |
| I-210 | I-5 near Tunnel Station to I-10 near Pomona | 48.6 | 48.72 |
| I-280 | I-680 in San Jose to Sixth Street in San Francisco | 57.1 | 57.22 |
| I-305 | I-80 W of Sacramento to Route 99 in Sacramento. (Signed as US 50) | 5.3 | 8.44 |
| I-380 | I-280 S of San Francisco to the San Francisco International Airport | 3.3 | 3.30 |
| I-405 | I-5 near El Toro to I-5 near Tunnel Station | 72.4 | 72.15 |
| I-505 | I-80 near Vacaville to I-5 near Dunnigan | 33.0 | 32.98 |
| I-580 | Vicinity of Castro Street in Richmond to I-80 in Albany, and from I-80 in Oakland to I-5 near Tracy | 68.4 | 67.83 |
| I-605 | I-405 near Seal Beach to I-210 near Azusa | 27.4 | 27.40 |
| I-680 | I-280 in San Jose to I-780 in Benicia | 58.0 | 58.02 |
| I-780 | I-80 in Vallejo to I-680 in Benicia | 6.5 | 6.50 |
| I-805 | I-5 S of San Diego to I-5 N of San Diego | 28.0 | 28.02 |
| I-980 | I-880 in Oakland to S of the San Pablo undercrossing | 0.8 | 1.03 |
| TOTAL CHARGABLE MILAGE (includes 7.0 "Howard-Cramer" miles) | 2,311.5 | 2312.93 | |
The following is a history of routes submitted for inclusion as chargable miles in the Interstate system. Information and maps of the original Interstate proposals may be found at http://www.roadfan.com/intreg.html#yellowbk. Note that these dates are based on those shown in the Caltrans history of Interstate submissions. They may correspond to initial submission dates, or dates the basic route was approved, but not necessarily the number.
| Current Route # |
Route Description | Route Status | Numbering History | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-51 | Mexican border to
Oregon state line (via Route 99) Westside Freeway Relocation: May 1957 |
Approved 8/7/1947 | 14-Aug-1957 | I-5, I-5E Tentatively Approved |
| 08-Nov-1957 | Proposed as I-11 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Back to I-5 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-5, I-5E (Sacramento) | |||
| I-82 | I-5, San Diego to Arizona state line | Approved 8/7/1947 | 14-Aug-1957 | I-8 Tentatively Approved |
| 05-Dec-1957 | Proposed as I-10 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Back to I-8 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-10 | |||
| I-102 | I-5, Los Angeles to the Arizona state line | Approved 8/7/1947 | 14-Aug-1957 | I-10 Tentatively Approved |
| 05-Dec-1957 | Proposed as I-12 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Back to I-10 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-10 | |||
| I-15 | I-10, San Bernardino to the Nevada state line | Approved 8/7/1947 | 14-Aug-1957 | I-15 Tentatively Approved |
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-15 | |||
| I-403 | I-15, Barstow to the Nevada state line | Approved 8/7/1947 | 14-Aug-1957 | I-40 Tentatively Approved |
| 08-Nov-1957 | Proposed as I-30 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Back to I-40 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-40 | |||
| I-803 | San Francisco to the Nevada state line | Approved 8/7/1947 | 14-Aug-1957 | I-80 Tentatively Approved |
| 08-Nov-1957 | Proposed as I-76 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Back to I-80 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-80 | |||
| I-5054 | I-80 to I-5, Vacaville to Dunnigan | Approved 8/7/1947 | 14-Aug-1957 | I-5W Tentatively Approved |
| 08-Nov-1957 | Proposed as I-7 | |||
| 01-Apr-1958 | Proposed as I-115 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Proposed as I-5W | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-5W | |||
| 01-Jul-1964 | Renumbered as I-505 | |||
| I-5804 | I-80 to I-5, Oakland to
Modesto (Oakland adjustment, MacArthur Freeway, Sept. 1995) (Tracy adjustment, November 1957) |
Approved 8/7/1947 | 14-Aug-1957 | I-5W Tentatively Approved |
| 08-Nov-1957 | Proposed as I-72 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Proposed as I-5W | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-5W | |||
| 01-Jul-1964 | Renumbered as I-580 | |||
| Route 4 | Hercules to Concord, 12 mi | Not Approved | ||
| Route 11 | Harbor and Pasadena Freeways, I-10 to I-210, 13 mi | Not Approved | ||
| Route 13 Route 24 |
Emeryville to Walnut Creek, 14 mi | Not Approved | ||
| Route 19 | Long Beach to Pasadena, 27 mi | Not Approved | ||
| Route 37 US 101 |
San Francisco to Vallejo via Sears Point, 40 mi | Not Approved | ||
| US 1015 | Los Angeles to San Francisco, 430 mi | Not Approved | ||
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF 8/7/1947: | 1,938 | |||
Footnotes:
| 1 |
Caltrans documents show this as being approved in 1947, although later documents the number having been approved as of October 1956. In a letter dated November 8, 1957, G.T. McCoy of the Department of Highways recommended that I-5 become I-11, to allow assignment of I-3 and I-5 to the Bay Area (for the San Francisco Bay circumferential routes, which later became I-280 and I-680). However, by August 1958, the Department of Highways had gone back to recommending I-5. Other letters objected to proposed I-5W through the Bay Area, because the suffix would be confusing. However, the original assignments did result in I-5 and I-5W, although some maps show I-5 and I-5E. |
| 2 |
In September 1957, before route numbers were finalized, Arizona suggested that present-day I-8 and I-10 be numbered as I-10 and I-12, respectively (I-10 for the San Diego-Yuma-Casa Grande-Tucson-Lordsburg freeway, I-12 for the Los Angeles-Ehrenberg-Phoenix freeway). In December 1957, the California Department of Highways concurred with this suggestion. However, by April 1958, Arizona was suggesting the I-8 and I-10 numbering, which was approved by AASHTO on June 25, 1958. The Arizona proposal had the side effect of having California propose renumbering what they had proposed as I-12 (now I-210) as I-14. |
| 3 |
In November 1957, California officials objected to the route number duplication between proposed I-40 and I-80, and existing US 40 and US 80 elsewhere in the state. They suggested that I-40 and I-80 become, respectively, I-30 and I-76. Arizona endorsed this suggestion, but AASHTO went with the I-40 and I-80 designations. Another rationale for I-76 was to provide a future number for a northerly bypass of Sacramento (current I-80, but originally proposed as I-880). |
| 4 |
Originally, these routes were numbered as I-5W. In the map that accompanied the November 1957 letter proposing I-76, I-505 is shown proposed as I-7, and I-580 is shown as I-72. |
| 5 |
It is interesting that in all their proposal for interstate numbers, the California Department of Highways never proposed I1. This could be because they were hoping that number might be used for the US 101 routing between Los Angeles and San Francisco, which would actually provide many large cities with an interstate. |
Note: The original plans (without numbers) for the major cities can be found here: Los Angeles, San Francisco
| Route | Description | Route Status | Number Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-102 | Santa Monica to I-5, Los Angeles | Approved | 14-Aug-1957 | I-10 Tentatively Approved |
| 05-Dec-1957 | Proposed as I-12 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Back to I-10 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-10 | |||
| I-2106 | I-5 to I-10 in Los Angeles | Approved | 08-Nov-1957 | Proposed as I-12 |
| 05-Dec-1957 | Proposed as I-14 | |||
| 01-Apr-1958 | Proposed as I-102 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Proposed as I-210 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-210 | |||
| I-2807,8 | San Jose to San Francisco | Approved | 08-Nov-1957 | Proposed as I-3 |
| 01-Apr-1958 | Proposed as I-109 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Proposed as I-180 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-280 | |||
| I-4056 | El Toro to San Fernando | Approved | 08-Nov-1957 | Proposed as I-9 |
| 01-Apr-1958 | Proposed as I-3 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Proposed as I-405 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-405 | |||
| I-4807,9 | Route 80 to US 101 in San Francisco | Approved (Later Deleted) |
08-Nov-1957 | Number Unknown |
| 01-Apr-1958 | Proposed as I-110 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Proposed as I-380 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-480 | |||
| I-6056 | I-405 to I-10 in Los Angeles | Approved | 08-Nov-1957 | Proposed as I-13 |
| 01-Apr-1958 | Proposed as I-105 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Proposed as I-605 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-605 | |||
| I-6806 | San Jose to Vallejo San Jose Adjustment: October 1964 |
Approved | 08-Nov-1957 | Proposed as I-5 |
| 01-Apr-1958 | Proposed as I-113 | |||
| 07-Aug-1958 | Proposed as I-580 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-680 | |||
| I-7806 | Portion of I-680 Number revised: July 1973 |
Approved | Jul 1973 | Approved as I-780 |
| TOTAL MILAGE FOR 1955 ADDITIONS AND PRIOR LINE ADJUSTMENTS: | 197 | |||
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF 9/15/1955: | 2,135 | |||
Footnotes:
| 6 |
California officials suggested two-digit Interstate assignments for some routes that are now three-digits: I-9 for what ultimately became I-405; I-12 (then I-14) for what became I-210, and I-13 for what became I-605. There was one proposal that showed I-405 as I-3, I-605 as I-105, and I-210 as I-102, but this was flatly rejected by AASHTO. |
| 7 |
These routes were submitted in 1947, but the numbering was not approved by AASHTO unitl 1955, probably because AASHTO was focusing on the long-haul, two-digit routes first. |
| 8 |
In November 1957, the San Francisco circumferential routes were proposed as I-3 and I-5. By August 1958, these routes were being proposed as I-180 and I-580. In November 1958, these routes were approved as I-280 and I-680. There was one proposal that showed I-280 as I-109 and I-680 as I-113, but this was flatly rejected by AASHTO. |
| 9 |
In August 1958, this route was proposed as I-380. In November 1958, this route was approved as I-480. One early proposal showed this as I-110, but this was flatly rejected by AASHTO. |
| Route | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Route 37 US 101 |
San Francisco to Vallejo via Sears Point, 40 mi | Not Approved |
| Route 5810 | I-5, Bakersfield to Barstow, 145 mi | Not Approved |
| Route 86 | El Centro to Indio, 84 mi | Not Approved |
Footnotes:
| 10 |
There are some who surmise that, if approved, this would have been proposed as an extension to I-40, given that I-40 terminates in Barstow, and the (former) US 99 corridor has a dearth of interstates. |
| Route | Route Description | Route Status | Number Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-205 | North Tracy Bypass | Approved | 8-Nov-1957 | Number Unknown |
| 1-Apr-1958 | Proposed as I-112 | |||
| 7-Aug-1958 | Proposed as I-205 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-205 | |||
| Route | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Route 143 Route 14811 |
Sacramento South and East Belt Route, 23 mi | Not Approved |
Footnotes:
| 11 |
These routes would have connected to existing I-880 (now I-80) in Sacramento, making I-880 into a true loop around the city of Sacramento. Hence, this would likely have been numbered as I-880 (it was proposed before the I-80 rebuild was cancelled). |
| Route | Route Description | Route Status | Number Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-805 | San Diego belt route | Approved | 6-Nov-1958 | Submitted as I-805 |
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-805 | |||
| I-880 | Sacramento Belt Route (Present-day I-80) |
Approved | 6-Nov-1958 | Submitted as I-880 |
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-880 | |||
| 1980 | Renumbered as I-80 | |||
| Route 143 Route 14811 |
Sacramento South and East Belt Route, 23 mi | Not Approved | ||
| TOTAL MILAGE FOR 1958 ADDITIONS AND 1957 LINE ADJUSTMENTS: | 42 | |||
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF JULY 1958: | 2,177 | |||
| Route | Description | Route Status | Number Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-28012 | ReRoute in San Francisco | Approved +2.1 miles |
No Number Changes | |
| I-8 | Adjustment E of San Diego | Approved -1.8 miles |
No Number Changes | |
| I-8012 | Delete westerly of Route 280 in San Francisco | Approved -5.3 miles |
No Number Changes | |
| I-10512 | Delete (portion) in
Central L.A. (now part of US 101) |
Approved -1.3 miles |
1-Apr-1958 | Proposed as I-106 |
| 7-Aug-1958 | Proposed as I-105 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-105 | |||
| I-11012 | Delete (portion) in
Central L.A. (now part of I-5) |
Approved -0.7 miles |
1-Apr-1958 | Proposed as I-106 |
| 7-Aug-1958 | Proposed as I-110 | |||
| 10-Nov-1958 | Approved as I-110 | |||
| I-48012 | Delete entire Route in San Francisco | Approved -5.5 miles |
No Number Changes | |
| TOTAL MILAGE FOR 1965 ADJUSTMENTS: | -12.5 | |||
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF AUGUST 1965: | 2,165 | |||
Footnotes:
| 12 |
Note that these were all adjustments that actually took place in January 1968 as part of the Howard Cramer bill, under 23 USC 103. Specifically:
These changes resulted in a net of 7 miles being charged against the 103(e)(2) limitations. These 7 miles reappeared as part of the Century Freeway, new I-105 (see below), which had 10.3 miles from 23 USC 103(e)(1), and 7 miles from 23 USC 103(e)(2). |
| Route | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| I-10512 | Century Freeway (includes 7.0 miles Howard-Cramer, 10 mi from San Francisco) |
Approved |
| TOTAL MILAGE FOR MARCH 1968
ADDITIONS: (*: Includes 7.0 miles "Howard-Cramer") |
*17 | |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF MARCH
1968: (*: Includes 7.0 miles "Howard-Cramer") |
*2,182 | |
| Route | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Route 3013 | I-210 to I-15, San Dimas to Etiwanda, 19.2 mi | Not Approved (1970) |
| Route 50 | Sacramento to Nevada, 99.9 mi | Not Approved (1970) |
| Route 5810 | I-5, Bakersfield to Barstow, 145 mi | Not Approved (1970) |
| Route 23814 | Fremont to Hayward, 15.2 mi | Not Approved (1970) |
| Southern Crossing of San Francisco Bay and Approaches, 25 mi | Not Approved |
Footnotes:
| 13 |
Although this was not approved in 1970, this segment is now part of Route 210, and is being resubmitted to AASHTO, probably as non-chargable interstate milage. |
| 14 |
This segment was later approved as non-chargable [139(a)] I-238. |
| Route | Description | Status | Milage |
|---|---|---|---|
| I-1515 | I-8 to I-10, San Diego to San Bernardino ($201,200,000) | Approved | 102.5 |
| Corona-Norco adjustment N of Temecula to Devore: February 1972. This may be the San Bernardino West Bypass, the 14.2 mi segment that was pending in 1970. | |||
| I-38016 | I-280 to San Francisco International Airport ($31,200,000). | Approved | 1.6 |
| I-60517 | Extension I-10 to I-210 ($19,000,000) | Approved | 5.5 |
| TOTAL MILAGE FOR DECEMBER 1968 ADDITIONS AND LINE ADJUSTMENTS: | 112 | ||
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF DECEMBER
1968: (*: Includes 7.0 miles "Howard-Cramer") |
*2,294 | ||
Footnotes:
| 15 |
This history of this segment is very confusing. It appears that between 1965 and 1986, the segment of US 395 from San Diego to San Bernardino was signed as TEMP I-15/US 395. In 1969, portions of Route 71 and Route 31 were effectively renumbered as I-15 (actually, a new I-15 freeway was constructed), with the older US 395 routing being redesignated as I-15E or I-215 (the designations swapped at times). It is unclear which routing was proposed in 1968: the US 395 routing, or the Route 71/Route 31 routing. |
| 16 |
This segment was originally part of Route 186. |
| 17 |
This segment was originally Route 243. |
| Route | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| I-980 | Route 17 (now I-880) to I-580 in Oakland | Approved |
| TOTAL MILAGE FOR 1976 ADDITIONS: | 1 | |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF JANUARY
1976: (*: Includes 7.0 miles "Howard-Cramer") |
*2,295 | |
| Route | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| I-180 | I-80 in Albany to Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Number changed to I-580 in June 1983 |
Approved |
| TOTAL MILAGE FOR APRIL 1978 ADDITIONS: | 6 | |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF APRIL
1978: (*: Includes 7.0 miles "Howard-Cramer") |
*2,301 | |
| Route | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| I-15 | Milage correction in Lake Elsinore Area | Approved |
| TOTAL MILAGE FOR JULY 1978 ADJUSTMENTS: | -1 | |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF JULY
1978: (*: Includes 7.0 miles "Howard-Cramer") |
*2,300 | |
| Route | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| I-11017 | Route 47 in San Pedro to I-10 in Los Angeles | Approved |
| TOTAL MILAGE FOR DECEMBER 1978 ADDITIONS: | 20 | |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF DECEMBER
1978: (*: Includes 7.0 miles "Howard-Cramer") |
*2,320 | |
Footnotes:
| 17 |
This was formerly part of Route 11, and with the approval of this segment, was renumbered I-110. For continuity of numbering, the remaining segment of Route 11 north of I-10 was renumbered as State Route 110. |
| Route | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| I-80 | Withdrawal of segment in Sacramento Route 80/99/50 interchange to (former) I-880 near Watt Avenue |
Approved |
| I-305 | A 5.3 mi segment of existing I-80 from (former) I-880 to the 80/99/50 interchange was redesignated as I-305. This is currently signed as part of Business Route 80. | Approved |
| TOTAL MILAGE FOR MAY 1980 ADDITIONS AND LINE ADJUSTMENTS: | -7 | |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF MAY
1980: (*: Includes 7.0 miles "Howard-Cramer") |
*2,313 | |
| Route | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| I-280 | Withdrawal of segment in San Francisco 6th Street to San Francisco and Oakland Bay Bridge |
Approved |
| TOTAL MILAGE FOR 1981 LINE ADJUSTMENTS: | -2 | |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF JANUARY
1981: (*: Includes 7.0 miles "Howard-Cramer") |
*2,311 | |
| Route | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| I-210 | Eliminate I-210 from (former) Route 30 to I-10 (Pomona); New routing of I-210 along (former) Route 30 to I-15 to I-10, San Dimas to Redlands, 42.5 mi | Submitted, but deferred |
| Route | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| I-210 | Eliminate I-210 from (former) Route 30 to I-10 (Pomona); New routing of I-210 along (former) Route 30 to I-15 to I-10, San Dimas to Redlands, 42.5 mi | Submitted, then withdrawn |
Section 139, Title 23 of the US Code allows for the designation of certain highways as Interstate routes in addition to that which is "chargeable". These highways are not eligible for regular Interstate Completion funds and are called "Non-chargeable Interstates". They are all Federal-aid Primary highways that meet the criteria for Interstate routes. They are signed as interstates to provide continuity and connectivity for motorists and truckers. There are two types:
Note that the section numbers have changed. According to the FHWA log:
The FHWA may, at the request of a State or States, designate sections of the National Highway System (NHS) as Interstate Highway under Section 103(c)(4)(A), Title 23, United States Code (23 U.S.C.). The proposed section must:
- Be built to Interstate standards and
- Be a logical addition to the System.
Although Section 103(c)(4)(A) segments look like any other Interstate highway, they are not eligible for development with IC funds. In all, the FHWA has approved 2,145.29 miles of highways in the contiguous 48 States, District of Columbia, and Hawaii as Section 103(c)(4)(A) additions to the Interstate System (including additions under former Section 139(a)).
Also added to the Interstate System under Section 103(c)(4)(A) are highways in Alaska and Puerto Rico for a total of 1,331.99 miles (including additions under former Section 139(c)). Alaska and Puerto Rico are exempt from the design standards of Section 109(b). Section 103(c)(1)(B)(ii), 23 U.S.C., states: "Highways on the Interstate System in Alaska and Puerto Rico shall be designed in accordance with such geometric and construction standards as are adequate for current and probable future traffic demands and the needs of the locality of the highway."
The FHWA may also, at the request of a State or States, add highways to the Interstate System that are designated as National Highway System (NHS) high priority corridors and future parts of the Interstate System in Section 1105 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). The proposed section must:
- Be built to Interstate standards and
- Connect with an existing Interstate route.
The following is a summary of California's non-chargable interstate milage:
| Route | Description (139(b) milage is still non-interstate and not counted in the FHWA log) | Miles | Miles Per FHWA Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| I-215 | Temecula to Devore (6.2 mi is still 139(b)) | 60.20 | 54.50 |
| I-238 | Between I-580 and Route 17 in San Leandro. | 2.0 | 2.23 |
| I-680 | Between Benicia and Cordelia. | 12.0 | 12.50 |
| I-580 | Castro Street in Richmond to US 101 in San Rafael | 7.0 | 7.30 |
| I-710 | Ocean Blvd in Long Beach to I-10 (1.6 mi is still 139(b)) | 21.6 | 19.66 |
| I-880 | San Jose to I-80 | 45.0 | 47.22 |
| I-905 | Route 117/125 from I-5 to the Mexico border (all 139(b)) | 8.80 | 0.0 |
| I-980 | The constructed freeway portion of I-980 between I-580 and 1 mi S, | 1.0 | 1.00 |
| TOTAL | 158.0 | 144.41 | |
The following is a chronology of California's non-chargable interstate routes:
| Route | Description | 139(a) Miles | 139(b) Miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Route 215 | The alignment of I-15 between Temecula and Devore was shifted westerly to a location via Corono-Norco. Existing completed I-15 Freeway in San Bernardino between I-10 and Devore was redesignated as I-215 (changed to I-15E in April 1973, and back to I-215 in June 1982) | 14 | 0 |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF FEBRUARY 1972: | 14 | 0 | |
| Route | Description | 139(a) Miles | 139(b) Miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Route 215 | The FHA approved future I-15E
(changed to I-215, June 1982) as non-chargable mileage between Route 60 and
I-15.
(This has since been constructed and is now 139(a) milage) |
0 | 29 |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF OCTOBER 1972: | 14 | 29 | |
| Route | Description | 139(a) Miles | 139(b) Miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Route 680 | Between Benicia and Cordelia. The basis for this change was continuity for the public. The existing I-680 segment between Benicia and Vallejo was renumbered to I-780. | 12 | 0 |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF JULY 1973: | 26 | 29 | |
| Route | Description | 139(a) Miles | 139(b) Miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Route 215 | Between I-10 and Route 60. Approved as I-15E, changed to I-215, June 1982 | 11 | 0 |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF DECEMBER 1973: | 37 | 29 | |
| Route | Description | 139(a) Miles | 139(b) Miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Route 980 | The constructed freeway portion of I-980 between I-580 and 1 mi S was approved as non-chargable interstate. The remaining unconstructed 0.8 mi segement to I-880 was approved for chargable interstate funding. | 1 | 0 |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF JANUARY 1976: | 38 | 29 | |
| Route | Description | 139(a) Miles | 139(b) Miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Route 580 | The constructed portion of Route 17 (now I-580) between Castro Street in Richmond and US 101 in San Rafael was added as I-180, changed to I-580 in July 1983. | 7 | 0 |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF APRIL 1978: | 45 | 29 | |
| Route | Description | 139(a) Miles | 139(b) Miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Route 880 | The Nimitz Freeway (Route 17) between San Jose and I-80 at the San Francisco. Designation of I-880 approved by AASHTO on July 7, 1983. | 45 | 0 |
| Route 238 | Between I-580 and Route 17 in San Leandro. Designation of I-238 approved by AASHTO on July 7, 1983. | 2 | 0 |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF MAY 1983: | 92 | 29 | |
| Route | Description | 139(a) Miles | 139(b) Miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Route 710 | Route 7 between Route 1 and I-10. I-710 approved by AASHTO on 5/30/1984. | 20 | 0 |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF SEPTEMBER 1983: | 112 | 29 | |
| Route | Description | 139(a) Miles | 139(b) Miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Requests for six routes totaling 47 mi were forwarded for approval as non-chargable interstate. One Route (US 101/I-80 in San Francisco) was not approved, leaving five under consideration as of 10/1/1984. | 0 | 0 | |
| Route | Description | 139(a) Miles | 139(b) Miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Route 710 | Ocean Blvd in Long Beach to Route 1 | 0 | 1.6 |
| Route 15 | I-5 to I-8 in San Diego | 0 | 6.2 |
| Route 905 | Route 117/125 from I-5 to the Mexico border | 0 | 8.8 |
| Route 4 | Pinole and West Pittsburg in Contra Costa County | Not Approved | |
| Route 113 | Between Davis and Woodland in Yolo County | Not Approved | |
| TOTAL MILAGE AS OF OCTOBER 1984: | 112 | 46 | |
| Return to California Highways Home Page |
Start Visiting Highways |
© 1996-2006 Daniel P. Faigin.
Maintained
by: Daniel P. Faigin <webmaster@cahighways.org>.