{"id":5954,"date":"2012-07-06T13:18:33","date_gmt":"2012-07-06T20:18:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/?p=5954"},"modified":"2012-07-06T18:19:27","modified_gmt":"2012-07-07T01:19:27","slug":"periodic-musings-on-the-ipod-classic-and-itunes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/?p=5954","title":{"rendered":"Periodic Musings on the iPod Classic and iTunes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-4986\" title=\"userpic=ipod\" src=\"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/userpicipod.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"80\" align=\"right\" hspace=\"10\" vspace=\"10\" \/>A late lunchtime post: I recently ran across <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technobuffalo.com\/companies\/apple\/ipod\/ipod-classic-1000-days-without-any-love\/\">an article from TechnoBuffalo that noted that early June marked 1,000 days since the iPod Classic had received any love from Apple<\/a>. In fact, we&#8217;re coming up on three years (in September) since the iPod Classic received any updates. There are those who believe the iPod Classic is a dead-player-walking. On the other hand, Apple still hasn&#8217;t killed off the little-music-box-of-holding, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tapscape.com\/whatever-happened-to-the-ipod\/\">it still remains one of the most cost-effective music players around<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>However, I continue to worry about the iPod Classic. Mine is now over 29,000 songs (specifically, I&#8217;m at 29,065 songs and spoken-word comedy tracks, and 28,891 specifically music tracks). I truly enjoy having my entire music collection in my pocket, and go to (perhaps excessive) lengths to ensure I listen to it evenly, with playlists for unplayed music, &lt; 5 plays, &lt; 8 plays, and music not listened to in 21 months. All of these are a 0 except for &lt; 8 plays, and that&#8217;s currently at 22,687 tracks. I worry about Apple discontinuing their high-capacity players; I don&#8217;t believe the cloud is the answer for music, both due to bandwidth costs and the fact that one doesn&#8217;t always have an internet connection (despite what the media and the vendors would like to portray).<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m also worried about iTunes. I&#8217;ve <a href=\"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/?tag=ipod\">written about problems with iTunes<\/a> before. These problems have led me to eschew regular upgrading of iTunes. I&#8217;m still on iTunes 10.4.2; iTunes is now up to 10.6.<em>something<\/em>. I have yet to have confidence that the 10.6 versions work reliability with the iPod Classic on Windows 7. [As an aside: If you have an iPod Classic and are using with iTunes &gt; 10.4, please let me know]. Further, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/business\/technology\/la-fi-tn-apple-revamped-itunes-20120628,0,6905457.story\">the rumors are now starting to swirl that Apple is completely rewriting iTunes for iTunes 11<\/a>. I have little confidence that they will get the iPod Classic interface right.<\/p>\n<p>If I had to replace it, what would be the options? Ideally, it would be something with 160GB or greater hard-disk or solid-state disk, and could import the iTunes database (so as to preserve playcounts and ratings). A <a href=\"http:\/\/mp3-players.toptenreviews.com\/hard-drive\/index.htm\">recent review of high-capacity players<\/a> pointed to the <a href=\"http:\/\/mp3-players.toptenreviews.com\/hard-drive\/archos\/archos-501129-reviews-24208.htm\">Archos 5<\/a> as a potential alternative; however, the Archos website doesn&#8217;t list a current Archos 5 product with 250GB of storage. They do have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.archos.com\/products\/gen9\/index.html?country=us&amp;lang=en\">an Android G9 Tablet with a 250 GB hard disk<\/a> that is worth exploring; the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.archos.com\/products\/ta\/archos_70it\/index.html?country=us&amp;lang=en\">Archos 7 can also support 250GB<\/a>. Another high-capacity possibility is the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jetaudio.com\/products\/cowon\/X7\/\">Cowon X7 with 160GB<\/a>; it is probably closest in form factor to the iPod Classic. [ETA: Looking at the reviews on Amazon, both the Archos and the Cowon are getting middling reviews &#8212; one can now see why the iPod Classic is being retained &#8212; it has no competition and thus keeps selling.] [As an aside: If you have thoughts regarding high-capacity MP3 players, I&#8217;d welcome them]<\/p>\n<p>But for right now, I&#8217;ll just stick with my Classic (which I use <em>every<\/em> day for a large portion of the waking hours) and iTunes 10.4. It works. But I do worry everytime Apple makes an announcement or updates the Apple Store.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Music: <\/strong><em>The Six String Conspiracy<\/em> (Rick Ruskin): Slow Drag (Piano Rag)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A late lunchtime post: I recently ran across an article from TechnoBuffalo that noted that early June marked 1,000 days since the iPod Classic had received any love from Apple. In fact, we&#8217;re coming up on three years (in September) since the iPod Classic received any updates. There are those who believe the iPod Classic <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/?p=5954\">Read More &#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[364],"tags":[290],"class_list":["post-5954","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-miscellaneous","tag-ipod"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5954","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5954"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5954\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6536,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5954\/revisions\/6536"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5954"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5954"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5954"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}