{"id":3886,"date":"2010-04-04T07:45:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-04T14:45:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/?p=3886"},"modified":"2010-04-04T07:45:00","modified_gmt":"2010-04-04T14:45:00","slug":"februarymarch-changes-to-california-highways","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/?p=3886","title":{"rendered":"February\/March Changes to California Highways"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

It’s been a while, hasn’t it. As usual, life got in the way: be it \t\t\t other weekend plans, or the death of a dear family friend, or other medical \t\t\t issues. But this weekend is an update weekend, and so while you celebrate \t\t\t Easter (if you do), I’ll update highway pages. With that said….<\/p>\n

\t\t <\/p>\n

The following are any updates from backed up email changes, notes \t\t\t from my reading of the papers (which are usually posted to \t\t\t the \t\t\t Facebook group<\/a>), \t\t\t the AAroads \t\t\t forum<\/a>, as well as updates from misc.transport.road (which has become \t\t\t useless). This resulted in changes on the following routes, with credit as \t\t\t indicated [my research(1)<\/sup>, contributions of information or leads \t\t\t (via direct mail or Usenet) from Julie East(2)<\/sup>, Eric \t\t\t Fischer(3)<\/sup>, Mark Furqueron(4)<\/sup>, Michael \t\t\t Patrick(5)<\/sup>, SLO Richards(6)<\/sup>, Daniel T(7)<\/sup>, and \t\t\t Joel Windmiller(8)<\/sup>]:El Camino<\/a>(6)<\/sup>, Route\u00a017<\/a>(7)<\/sup>, \t\t\t Route\u00a024<\/a>(1)<\/sup>, Route\u00a049<\/a>(8)<\/sup>, Route\u00a076<\/a>(4)<\/sup>, Route\u00a077<\/a>(2)<\/sup>, Route\u00a084<\/a>(1)<\/sup>, Route\u00a091<\/a> (Orange-Riverside County \t\t\t Connector<\/a>)(1)<\/sup>, Route\u00a092<\/a>(1)<\/sup>, Route\u00a0125<\/a>(1)<\/sup>, Route\u00a0152<\/a>(5)<\/sup>, Route\u00a0160<\/a>(1)<\/sup>, Route\u00a0283<\/a>(2)<\/sup>, Former Route\u00a0480<\/a>(1)<\/sup>, US\u00a0101<\/a>(1)<\/sup>, I-80<\/a>(1)<\/sup>, I-380<\/a>(3)<\/sup>, I-405<\/a>(1)<\/sup>, I-710<\/a>(1)<\/sup>. <\/p>\n

Updated a link into AARoads, as they start their dynamic link \t\t\t conversion project. This is something I’m not<\/i> looking foward to.<\/p>\n

Reviewed the Pending Legislation \t\t\t page<\/a>. In the assembly, over three months, just about 1100 new bills were \t\t\t introduced; in the senate, over 500. One would think, over time, we would get \t\t\t it closer to right than having to modify things more! As the OC Register called \t\t\t it: squirrels<\/a>, distracting folks \t\t\t from getting the real work done! There were some new bills introduced, but \t\t\t nothing has passed yet. <\/p>\n

I checked \t\t\t the CTC Liaison \t\t\t page,<\/a>, for the results of the February and March meetings (although March \t\t\t had nothing of interest). The following items were of interest: <\/p>\n