{"id":2176,"date":"2007-05-02T11:14:00","date_gmt":"2007-05-02T18:14:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/?p=2176"},"modified":"2007-05-02T11:14:00","modified_gmt":"2007-05-02T18:14:00","slug":"theres-no-escaping-death-and-taxes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/?p=2176","title":{"rendered":"There&#8217;s No Escaping Death and Taxes&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230; unless you&#8217;re Sam Zell.<\/p>\n<p>Most of you have heard by now how our hometown paper, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Los Angeles Times<\/a> has been sold by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">the Chicago Tribune<\/a> to <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sam_Zell\" target=\"_blank\">Sam Zell<\/a> &#8212; in fact, all Tribune properties have been sold. You may be thinking to yourself&#8230; boy, those <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Los_Angeles_Times\" target=\"_blank\">Chandlers<\/a> (former owners of the Times) knew how to avoid taxes, but the Tribune as a whole is probably a good upstanding corporate citizen, and under Zell ownership, will be paying its fair share of taxes.<\/p>\n<p>Think again, oh naive readers.<\/p>\n<p>After the transaction completes, do you know how much tax Sam Zell will pay on Tribune and its income? A big fat Zero. Goose Egg. No taxes.<\/p>\n<p>How, you may ask, is Zell doing this? Both <a href=\"http:\/\/www.laobserved.com\/biz\/2007\/04\/zells_tax_dodge.php\" target=\"_blank\">LA Biz Observed<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/04\/30\/AR2007043001553.html\" target=\"_blank\">the Washington Post<\/a> are describing the scheme. Zell is using a provision that was stuck into a minimum-wage-increase bill in 1996 at the behest of the owner of a small Minnesota company who wanted to sell a stake to his workers via an employee stock-ownership plan. The company couldn&#8217;t do the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nceo.org\/library\/esops.html\" target=\"_blank\">ESOP<\/a> because it was an <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/S_corporation\" target=\"_blank\">S corporation<\/a> (usually small businesses that have income taxed directly to its shareholders) rather than a C corporation (generally large ones). The provision permitted <a href=\"http:\/\/www.irs.gov\/retirement\/article\/0,,id=120107,00.html\" target=\"_blank\">S corporations to do ESOPs<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So what is Zell doing? The $34-a-share, $8.2 billion buyout of Tribune is being run through an ESOP, using borrowed money, for a total transaction cost of $13B. Zell is lending the post-buyout company &#8212; which will be an S corporation &#8212; $225 million. He&#8217;ll pay it an additional $90 million for a warrant that gives him the right to buy 40% of it for prices ranging from $500 million to $600 million. The post-buyout Tribune (call it S-Tribune) will be an S corp, with its only shareholder the employee stock ownership plan, which &#8212; like all ESOPs and other employee-benefit plans &#8212; is tax-exempt. Had it been a C-Tribune, the post buyout taxes would have had $527 million in pretax profit and a $167 million tax bill, according to a recent filing. Taxes for S-Tribune: $0. <\/p>\n<p>As for Zell himself? Zell and Tribune&#8217;s management avoid taxes on their pieces of S-Tribune by having &#8220;phantom stock,&#8221; not real stock. These are warrants giving the rights to buy the stock, but not actual ownership, and thus no tax liabilitity. <\/p>\n<p>I find this really problematic, for the government will still need the money to finance its activities. So where will it go to get it? You guessed it. <\/p>\n<p>I think we should call this to the attention of our congress-critters, and see if something can be done about it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230; unless you&#8217;re Sam Zell. Most of you have heard by now how our hometown paper, the Los Angeles Times has been sold by the Chicago Tribune to Sam Zell &#8212; in fact, all Tribune properties have been sold. You may be thinking to yourself&#8230; boy, those Chandlers (former owners of the Times) knew how <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/?p=2176\">Read More &#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[273,125],"class_list":["post-2176","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lj-xfer","tag-media","tag-money"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2176","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2176"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2176\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2176"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2176"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2176"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}