{"id":10315,"date":"2015-06-06T12:52:45","date_gmt":"2015-06-06T19:52:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/?p=10315"},"modified":"2015-07-02T18:01:44","modified_gmt":"2015-07-03T01:01:44","slug":"paying-for-reviews-the-right-way","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/?p=10315","title":{"rendered":"Paying for Reviews… The Right Way"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"userpic=99love\"In the last few days, there has been a… discussion… over on one of my Facebook groups regarding a decision by Bitter Lemons<\/a> to allow theatres to pay money to get a critic to review their show<\/a>. General reaction to the decision has been poor, there have even been a few blogs (one<\/a>, two<\/a>, three<\/a>) railing against the issue. There has even been criticism on Bitter Lemons itself<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Now, when I first heard about it, I thought it might be a good way for theatres that are never reviewed to get known. But the discussion has made me realize that that benefit is offset by too many negatives: it looks like pay for good reviews, theatres would be upset paying for bad reviews. It also takes away money that theatres don’t have, according to our pro99 arguments. In short, it’s a bad idea. <\/strong>[I’ll also note that if <\/em>it is done, there must be transparency: such paid reviews must be clearly marked and segregated<\/strong>.] [ETA: Edited to add emphasis. Note that the segregation mentioned in the previous bracketed comment is so that people can clearly know to ignore the pay-for-play review — I suggested on BL that a glyph such as 💩 (a steaming pile of poo) be used.]<\/ins><\/p>\n

But I’m not an actor. I’m an engineer. I solve problems. These are the problems as I see it:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Bitter Lemons needs to raise funds to support their work.<\/li>\n
  2. We need to increase the amount of theatre criticism being published.<\/li>\n
  3. Lesser known theatres and theatres off the beaten path with no reputation need an equal chance to be reviewed.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    I thought about this a bit, and was musing about how even comp tickets provided to reviewers are a conflict of interest. True independence would be critics buying their own tickets to shows (something I do). This would be just like Consumers Reports buying cars off the lot, not having them be provided by manufactures.<\/p>\n

    Buying cars off the lot. Like Consumers Reports. Then it hit me…<\/p>\n

    Perhaps that’s the model we need to move to (and I think someone suggested something like this in the discussion). Theatres and individuals can pay into a fund managed by Bitter Lemons to get reviews for theatres in general, just like people can donate to the Consumers Union foundation.<\/del> [My wife pointed out that even Consumers Union prohibits manufacturers from donating; in that vein, my original notion was wrong. If we create such a fund — indeed, if reviews are funded — it can only be done by media outlets or perhaps non-profits with no connection to theatre production. Again, this averts any actual or perceived conflict of interest.]<\/ins> This fund can then send critics out to theatres that traditionally don’t get a sufficient threshhold of reviews on Bitter Lemons. That may well be the theatre that has donated, but the theatre did not fund that particular review — there’s not a direct causation of the payment to the review like you have now. In fact, it might be in the interest of larger theatres that regularly get reviewed — and have the funds — to contribute to this fund to help the entire Theatre community get visibility.<\/del> [The indirect payment notion goes away if we do not permit funding by theatrical entities. The last notion has been pointed out to me to be unworkable — small theatres don’t have the funds to spare; larger theatres would not spare them.]
    \n<\/ins><\/p>\n

    This, my friends, meets the three goals: (1) Bitter Lemons can still get its cut for reviews; (2) more theatre reviews are published; and (3) theatres that don’t get reviewed get reviewed. It does away with the negative: the theatre is not directly paying for the review of its show. It also permits the “haves” in the community to help those who have not.<\/del><\/p>\n

    [When one raises ideas up the flagpole, sometimes they get shot down. Sometimes it is a BB gun, sometimes a bazooka. In any case, it appears that I, like Colin, didn’t think this through completely. I would still like to come up with a solution to get the theatres that don’t have visibility — and cannot afford publicists — visibility. I have some other ideas to address that, but any idea that does address it must be done under the auspices and funding of a media outlet, not even indirectly funded by the entities reviewed.]<\/ins><\/p>\n

    I have suggested this idea to Colin. We shall see what happens.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    In the last few days, there has been a… discussion… over on one of my Facebook groups regarding a decision by Bitter Lemons to allow theatres to pay money to get a critic to review their show. General reaction to the decision has been poor, there have even been a few blogs (one, two, three) Read More …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[433,424],"class_list":["post-10315","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-theatre","tag-bitter-lemons-initiative","tag-i-love-99"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10315","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10315"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10315\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10322,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10315\/revisions\/10322"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cahighways.org\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}