Here in California (and in Los Angeles in particular), we have an election coming up. You know what that means: Every election, I do a detailed ballot analysis of my sample ballot. This is where I examine each candidate and share my conclusions, and invite you to convince me to vote for the other jerk. Because this is a long ballot, I’m splitting this analysis into a few chunks (note: links may not be available until all segments are posted):
- State and National Offices (excluding judges)
- County and City (Los Angeles) Local Offices (excluding judges)
- Local and State Measures (nee Propositions)
- Judicial Offices (County and State)
- Summary
Note: This analysis is NOT presented in the same order as the Sample Ballot (the ballot order makes no sense). I’ve attempted instead to present things in more logical order.
This part covers all the judgeships on the ballot:
- Judge of the Superior Court: Office № 60 ❦ № 67 ❦ № 70 ❦ № 90 ❦ № 118 ❦ № 151
- State Judicial:
- Supreme Court: Chief Justice ❦ Assoc. Justice ❦ Assoc. Justice
- Appeals Court, 2nd District:
- Presiding: Dist 1 ❦ Dist 5 ❦ Dist 8
- Assoc: Dist 2 ❦ Dist 3 ❦ Dist 4 ❦ Dist 4 ❦ Dist 5 ❦ Dist 6 ❦ Dist 7 ❦ Dist 8 ❦ Dist 8
For your reference and mine, here’s where the candidates for this post were covered in my primary analysis:
Note: This post was updated Sun 10/16 with additional information on Judith M. Ashmann-Gerst and Elizabeth Annette Grimes, but my recommendations did not change.