California Highways
www.cahighways.org

California Highways

Routes 97 through 104

 
powered by FreeFind

California Highways Home Page
State Highway Routes
Numbered County Highways
State Highway Types
Interstate Types and History
Highway Numbering Conventions
State Highway Renumberings
State Highway Chronology
Maps Trails and Roads Related WWW Links Site Change Log Sources and Credits

Click here for a key to the symbols used. "LRN" refers to the Pre-1964 Legislative Route Number. "US" refers to a US Shield signed route. "I" refers to an Eisenhower Interstate signed route. "Route" usually indicates a state shield signed route, but said route may be signed as US or I. Previous Federal Aid (pre-1992) categories: Federal Aid Interstate (FAI); Federal Aid Primary (FAP); Federal Aid Urban (FAU); and Federal Aid Secondary (FAS). Current Functional Classifications (used for aid purposes): Principal Arterial (PA); Minor Arterial (MA); Collector (Col); Rural Minor Collector/Local Road (RMC/LR). Note that ISTEA repealed the previous Federal-Aid System, effective in 1992, and established the functional classification system for all public roads.


Quickindex

97 · 98 · 99 · 100 · 101 · 102 · 103 · 104


US Highway Shield

US Highway 97



Routing

From Route 5 in Weed to the Oregon state line near Dorris.

 

Post 1964 Signage History

This route was defined in 1963 as the route from "Route 5 at Weed to the Oregon state line near Calor."

In 1965, Chapter 1402 changed the origin to "Route 5 at Highway Avenue Interchange in Weed"

In 1984, Chapter 409 relaxed the routing to "Route 5 at Highway Avenue in Weed to the Oregon state line near Calor Dorris."

 

Pre 1964 Signage History

This route was signed as part of the original signage of US routes in October 1934. It was LRN 72 defined in 1931. Originally, this was proposed to start in Oregon.

 

Status

Caltrans is working on a project to realign Route 97 near Dorris. This project will bypass three 90° turns in the city, and provide a grade separation with the railroad. In February 2003, the CTC had on its agenda the route adoption of a freeway location for Route 97 near the City of Dorris, in Siskiyou County from 0.7 km south of Richardson Rd. to Sheepy Creek Rd. 02-Sis-97 KP 79.3/84.3 (PM 49.3/52.4). This is probably related to the realignment.

 

Named Structures

This route also has the following Safety Roadside Rest Areas:

  • Grass Lake, in Siskiyou County, 19.8 mi N of Weed.

 

Other WWW Links

 

Freeway

[SHC 253.1] Entire route; signed as US Highway. Added to the Freeway and Expressway system in 1959.

 

Scenic Highway

[SHC 263.1] Entire route.

 

National Trails

Pacific Highway Sign California To Banff Highway Sign This was part of the Pacific Highway and the California-Banff "B" Route.

[Volcanic Byways]This route is part of the Volcanic Legacy Scenic Byway All American Road.

 

Blue Star Memorial Highway

This route was designated as a "Blue Star Memorial Highway" by Senate Resolution 64 in 1961.

 

Interregional Route

[SHC 164.15] Entire route.

 


Overall statistics for US 97:

  • Total Length (1995): 54 miles
  • Average Daily Traffic (1992): 3,100 to 11,800
  • Milage Classification: Rural: 54; Sm. Urban 0; Urbanized: 0.
  • Previous Federal Aid Milage: FAP: 54 mi.
  • Functional Classification: Prin. Arterial: 54 mi.
  • Counties Traversed: Siskiyou.

 

Pre-1964 Legislative Route

In 1933, the route from "[LRN 4] near Stockton to [LRN 54] near Waite's Station" was added to the state highway system. In 1935, this was codified as LRN 97 in the code, with the same definition.

In 1959, Chapter 1062 added "a connection to [LRN 34] south of Ione".

This route ran from US 99 near Stockton to Route 16 near Waite's Station including a connection to Route 104 south of Ione. This was Route 88 between Stockton and Route 88 2 mi SE of Ione (present-day Route 88/Route 104 junction). It was also Route 104 from 2 mi SW of Ione to Route 16. This is present-day Route 124.


State Shield

State Route 98



Routing

From Route 8 near Coyote Wells to Route 8 via Calexico.

 

Post 1964 Signage History

In 1963, Route 98 was defined as the route from "Route 8 near Coyote Wells to Route 8 near Midway Wells via Calexico."

In 1972, Chapter 1216 relaxed the terminus to be "Route 8 via Calexico."

 

Pre 1964 Signage History

This route was signed as part of the original state signage of routes in 1934. It was LRN 202, defined in 1933.

There were slight differences in the route in 1953. According to Chris Sampang, instead of taking the direct path from US 80 (now I-8) near Coyote Wells to Mt. Signal, Route 98 started at Seeley and went south to Mt. Signal (this segment is now San Diego County Route S29). The portion from Coyote Wells east to Mt. Signal seems to have been unpaved, and not a state highway at the time.

 

Status

TCRP Project #148 will widen this route from 8 miles from Route 111 to Route 7. There is also a regional transportation improvement project to widen the highway from one to two lanes in Calexico. In October 2000, environmental studies for the widening of the existing alignment, and consideration of alternative alignments, began. State Budget shortfalls, combined with increased growth and significant land use changes (with concurrant speculation that this growth could dramatically accelerate) occurred shortly thereafter. Additionally, at that time, the traffic models indicated only the widening of the existing alignment was warranted. However, regional advocates, including the County of Imperial and the City of Calexico, believed that future growth patterns and expected land use changes would require a new alignment. This resulted in delays in the environmental work until more refined future traffic projections, growth, and land use information became available. Since then, much of the previously speculated growth has occurred. Major land use developments have provided a foundation for revised traffic modeling and identification of interregional trips. As a result, the project has been reallocated, and the current scheduled completion date is the 2013/2014 fiscal year.

The SAFETEA-LU act, enacted in August 2005 as the reauthorization of TEA-21, provided the following expenditures on or near this route:

  • High Priority Project #1039: Widen Route 98, including storm drain developments, from Kloke Road to Route 111, Calexico. $2,400,000.

  • High Priority Project #1040: Widen Route 98 from Route 111 to Route 7, Calexico. This is additional funding for TCRP Project #148. $4,000,000.

 

 

Other WWW Links

 

National Trails

De Anza Auto Route This route is part of the De Anza National Historic Trail.

 


Overall statistics for Route 98:

  • Total Length (1995): 57 miles
  • Average Daily Traffic (1992): 840 to 19,200
  • Milage Classification: Rural: 53; Sm. Urban 4; Urbanized: 0.
  • Previous Federal Aid Milage: FAP: 57 mi.
  • Functional Classification: Prin. Arterial: 9 mi; Minor Arterial: 48 mi.
  • Counties Traversed: Imperial.

 

Pre-1964 Legislative Route

In 1933, Chapter 767 added the route from "[LRN 4] S of Sacramento to [LRN 3] near Ben Ali" to the state highway system. In 1935, it was added to the state highway code with this definition.

In 1957, Chapter 1911 related the definition to change the terminus to "[LRN 3] near N Sacramento".

This route ran from the junction of cosigned US 50/US 99 and US 99W in Sacramento to US 40 near N Sacramento. It was cosigned as US 50/US 99E. It is present-day Route 51 between the US 50/Route 99 junction and Route 160, and is signed as Business Route 80. Previously, the route ran from 16th Street to H Street, then over the American River. After crossing the bridge, the route became Fair Oaks Blvd. The route turned left at Howe, and then left on El Camino Ave to Auburn Blvd. According to Joel Windmiller, LRN 98 (and the H Street Bridge) were designated and constructed to provide an alternate route for US 40 and 99E when the southern section of Del Paso Boulevard was flooded by the American River. When the Natomas Viaduct on what is now the North Sacramento Freeway (Route 160) was built, bypassing that low-level portion of Del Paso, the flooding issues were reduced.


State Shield

State Route 99



Routing
  1. From Route 5 south of Bakersfield to Route 50 in Sacramento.


    Post 1964 Signage History

    As defined in 1963, this was segment (a) and ran from "Route 5 south of Bakersfield to Route 80 in Sacramento."

    In 1981, Chapter 292 changed "Route 80" to "Route 50", reflecting the renumbering of routes in Sacramento (i.e., I-80 moved to a new alignment that had been I-880; the old I-80 alignment became Route 51 and US 50 (FAI 305), but was signed Business Route 80).

     

    Pre 1964 Signage History

    US Highway Shield This route was signed as US 99 from the signage of US highways in 1928. Currently, there is a movement to have this cosigned as historic Highway 99. Such signage is authorized by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 19, Chapter 73, approved in 1993. This resolution requests the Department of Transportation, upon application by an interested local agency or private group, to identify any section of former U.S. Highway 99 that is still a publicly maintained highway but is not designated as having formerly been U.S. Highway 99 and to designate that section as "historic U.S. Highway 99."

    The business routes off of Route 99 are portions of the original routing of US 99. This was LRN 4, defined in 1909 into Sacramento; it was cosigned with US 50 from Manteca (present day junction with Route 120) into Sacramento.

    Through Bakersfield, the route originally ran along present-day Union Avenue and Golden State Avenue. Portions of this are now present-day Route 204. In 1962, Route 99 was shifted westward to its current routing (at which point, it appears the old routing became part of LRN 141).

    Before the establishment of the Golden State Blvd. bypass of downtown Fresno, Route 99 took a routing of (from the south) Railroad Avenue, Church Street, E Street, Cherry Avenue, and Broadway into town, and then north to Railroad Avenue (now Motel Drive/Business Route 99) via H Street. Broadway is now cut off by Grizzly Stadium.

    In Traver, California, there appears to be an "Old State Route 99" between Avenue 360 and Avenue 368. This was bypassed, apparantly, because a diamond interchange for Merritt Drive (and freeway upgrade) could not be done right next to the Southern Pacific line. Thanks to Chris Sampang for this information.

    Chris Sampang has also attempted to reconstruct the history of Route 99 in the Sacramento area:

    • 1926. US 99 established, following what appears to be Stockton Boulevard into town, Broadway to 16th Street, 16th north to L Street, and L/M Streets west out of town co-signed with US 40. In Davis, US 99 and US 40 entered via current Olive Drive, Richards Boulevard (going under the railroad tracks on the Richards Subway), First Street, B Street, and Russell Boulevard, splitting at the current Route 113/Russell Boulevard junction. From there, US 99 continued north up on Route 113 to Main Street in Woodland, then west on Main Street to County Road 98, and County Road 98 north to current County Road 99W near the town of Yolo. However, a different routing may have existed in Sacramento in 1926, where US 99 met up with US 50 near the current Folsom Boulevard/Business Route 80 (hidden Route 51) interchange and continued west into town on M Street.

    • 1933 (perhaps July 1932). US 99E and US 99W are established; this map shows the routings. US 99W north and US 40 westbound followed the older M Street routing out of town. US 99E began at the junction of L Street (US 40 west of 16th; US 50 east of 16th) and followed US 40 eastbound north on 16th Street to cross the American River (eventually continuing up (former) Route 256, current Route 65, Route 70, Route 20, and Route 99 to Red Bluff). Note: the Auburn Boulevard name was being applied to the northernmost portion of 12th Street (Auburn Boulevard now begins slightly north of North Sacramento), and Stockton Boulevard north of 5th Avenue (now Broadway), as well as Alhambra Boulevard and US 50 west into downtown via L Street may have been part of the routing of US 99 at the time.

    • 1934. State signed routes established; a portion of US 99W in Woodland (from East Street west to Road 98) is now co-signed with Route 16. Meanwhile, as work on the M Street Bridge's replacement begins, US 99W and US 40 are temporarily routed on the I Street Bridge with Route 16. It is unknown if Route 16 was co-signed with US 99 on L Street with US 50. Also in 1934, the first portion of the existing 16th Street Bridge was constructed across the American River; this is now the southbound bridge for the North Sacramento Freeway (originally US 40/99E, now Route 160). Additionally, Alternate US 99 is resigned over US 99W from Manteca to Stockton and US 99E from Sacramento to Red Bluff.

    • 1935. Tower Bridge (replacement for the older M Street Bridge) is built; US 99W and US 40 are diverted off of the I Street Bridge.

    • 1942. As seen here, by 1942, US 99 was most definitely not routed on Stockton Boulevard north of 5th Avenue (now Broadway), but rather followed 5th, Sacramento Boulevard (this portion is also now part of Broadway) and Broadway west to 16th Street. Also, Route 24 had been extended from Woodland to Sacramento (into Oakland) by this time; a portion of US 99 and US 50 (from 16th Street east to Freeport Boulevard) was co-signed with Route 24. The US 99E/W split now began at the junction of 16th Street and N Street, as L Street was removed from the state system in favor of M Street (which was now US 50/Route 16). US 99W and US 40 were likely co-signed with Route 16 down N, 9th, and M Streets west to the junction of 5th and M, where Route 16 was joined by Route 24 and continued up 5th and I to the I Street Bridge.

      Also in 1942, an older section of Del Paso Boulevard was bypassed due to flooding issues from the nearby American River and Natomas East Main Drainage Canal/Steelhead Creek (the road level is low because of two railroad bridges overhead at the junction of Del Paso and Railroad); this section runs from Northgate Boulevard north to about Globe Avenue (site of a Sac RT light rail station). The Natomas Viaduct was built; this includes part of the current Del Paso Boulevard Y interchange and some of the current freeway lanes of the North Sacramento Freeway.

    • Mid-1940s. US 40 bypass of Davis built; as a consequence, only US 99W now enters Davis on the Olive-Richards-First-B-Russell routing under the railroad tracks.

    • 1953. US 40A is established on the routing of Route 24 from Reno Junction to Woodland; however, unlike Route 24, US 40A is routed to bypass Sacramento by a co-signage on US 99W between Main Street in Woodland and Russell Boulevard in Davis (on what is now Route 113). Between Marysville and Yuba City, US 40A is co-signed with Route 20 and US 99E.

    • 1955: US 40A/US 99W bypass of downtown Davis built, bisecting lands owned by the University of California; the downtown Davis routing of US 99W is decomissioned, as well as the Pedrick Road/Road 98/Russell Boulevard portion of US 40A on what is now locally termed "Cactus Corner". Both US 40A and US 99W in the area are former segments of US 40. US 40A now begins within US 99W's route, at the junction of the US 40 and US 99W Davis bypasses. Also, US 99E was moved out of downtown Sacramento in favor of a routing through Midtown on 29th and 30th Streets, co-signed with US 50 from Broadway north to Folsom Boulevard, as a result of construction of the Elvas Freeway (now the Capitol City Freeway, hidden Route 51/signed Business Route 80) bridge over the American River. Thus, the North Sacramento Freeway from Arden Way southwest, as well as 12th/F and 16th Streets, were all no longer part of US 99E (and became solely US 40).

    • 1963. Major changes to several routes in downtown Sacramento, as a response to freeway construction and the adjustment of several streets to become one-way thoroughfares. First, US 50 no longer enters downtown Sacramento (also negating the need for Bypass US 50 on 14th Avenue and Power Inn Road. Instead of entering downtown via US 99W's routing on Broadway and 15th/16th, US 50 is now routed up 29th and 30th, before meeting up with Folsom Boulevard (Route 16) and continuing eastbound. Also, US 50 and US 99 no longer use Stockton Boulevard and the portion of Broadway east of 29th Street, instead being placed on the South Sacramento Freeway from Broadway south (US 50 remained signed on the South Sacramento Freeway until the early 1970s). US 99W retains its co-signage with Route 24 at Broadway and 16th, but runs by its lonesome on 15th and 16th and on most of Broadway. M Street had been renamed Capitol Avenue in the 1950s (although according to one local, Capitol Avenue had been a colloquial name for the whole street as early as the 1940s, and West Capitol Avenue had been present in West Sacramento on US 99W/US 40 before the name change in Sacramento.) US 99W and US 40 (as well as Route 16) no longer reached Capitol Avenue via 9th Street, but via 7th and 6th. Instead of just using 5th Street to reach I Street, Route 16 now used the couplet of 3rd and 5th, both converted to one-way. West Capitol Avenue was no longer part of US 99W/US 40, as the West Sacramento Freeway (an early signed portion of I-80) and decomissioned Route 275 now supplanted it. US 40 now ran by its lonesome across the American River (rather than with US 99E), 12th Street being added to this route as a one-way coupling.

      With the construction of the North Sacramento Freeway, former US 40/99E (Del Paso Boulevard, El Camino Avenue, and Auburn Boulevard) were reverted to local jurisdiction. For US 99E itself, it followed the constructed portion of the 29/30 Freeway and the Roseville Freeway across the American River through North Sacramento, and then followed the Roseville Freeway northeast with US 40 (and I-80). Route 24 no longer continued to Woodland and Marysville (via Route 16, US 40A, and Route 20), but rather continued north to Marysville more directly via Jiboom Street, Garden Highway, El Centro Road, and US 99E. Also, the Yolo Causeway underwent a complete tear-down and reconstruction to accomodate traffic for I-80.

    • Between 1963 and 1964. N Street, which had been a part of the US 40, Route 16, US 99W, and US 50 routings, becomes a one-way street, necessitating all signed highways headed east-west to now use the couplet of P and Q Streets.

    • 1964. The Great Renumbering. As a result, US 99E and 99W (plus US 40) are officially decomissioned, but not immediately de-signed (unlike US 40A). Route 24 is removed northeast of Antioch, with Route 160 replacing it into downtown Sacramento; US 99W between Broadway and P Street is replaced by Route 160 as well (plus former US 99E/then-current US 40 on the North Sacramento Freeway and on 12th/16th Streets). US 99W and US 40 west between Sacramento and Davis are removed officially in favor of Interstate 80; US 99W north of Davis (as well as US 40A) is replaced with Route 113 and I-5, with the co-signed portion in Woodland becoming solely Route 16. US 50 is officially dedesignated south of the under-construction Oak Park Interchange, though also not immediately de-signed. Route 70 is established as a replacement for Route 24 between Sacramento and Marysville and US 40A between Marysville and Reno Junction; with the elimination of US 99E and 99W, (State) Route 99 now follows the old Route 24 routing with Route 70 north out of town, then split off 10 miles north on a new routing to Tudor, meeting up with Route 113 (former US 40A); Route 99 now continues north to Yuba City via old US 40A, and then to Chico via old US 99E.

    • 1967. The Pioneer Bridge is completed for I-80 (now Business Route 80/US 50/I-305), and while US 99W is still signed on the portion of the West Sacramento Freeway from the Tower Bridge west, this is now officially hidden Route 275. US 99W and 99E are still signed (with US 99W signage continuing west to Davis and north to Woodland, then intermittently along the I-5 corridor to Red Bluff). Former US 99W/US 40 in West Sacramento (West Capitol Avenue) had been designated BR US 40 in the early sixties, as well as former US 99E/US 40 in North Sacramento via Del Paso Boulevard, El Camino Avenue, and Auburn Boulevard. Former US 99/50 on Broadway (to the now-defunct State Fair site) south via Stockton Boulevard to Florin is now Business US 50. As a result of US 99W's vestigal signage, Route 16 is co-signed with US 99W between P Street and Capitol Avenue; Route 160 may have been co-signed with US 99W between 16th Street and P Street, and probably with US 40 between there and current Business I-80. The 29/30 Freeway (now Business I-80/hidden Route 51) was co-signed for US 99E and I-80 (with a small portion co-signed with US 50 from Folsom Boulevard south to Broadway). Route 99 was routed on former Route 24 via Broadway and 3rd/5th to I Street (Route 16) as the WX and West Side (I-5) freeway reroutings of Route 99 through downtown were not completed. The Oak Park interchange was scheduled to be finished by 1968; Interstate 5 construction on the riverfront had not begun. As for (State) Route 99, it began co-signed with Route 70 at the Jiboom Street/I Street (Route 16) junction, which may explain the old Route 99/70/16 Marysville green sign still (2003) present, sans Route 16 shield, on Capitol Avenue (former US 99W/US 40) near 3rd Street.

    • Late 1960s. While (State) Route 99 is established south of Sacramento, US 50 continues its co-signage to Stockton.

    • 1969. Stockton Boulevard from P Street south is now designated as Business US 50 (this was the possible 1933 routing of US 99 and 50).

    • Early 1970s. Route 70 signage into downtown removed; a few straggler signs still remain at the junction of I and 4th Streets (2003).

    • 1980. I-5 construction either in progress or completed in Sacramento; as a result, Route 99 and Route 70 are now moved off of the Jiboom/Garden/El Centro routing south of the area near Sacramento International Airport, and co-signed on I-5 into downtown. Also, Route 99 is now no longer signed for "Los Angeles", but rather "Fresno", with I-5 now being labeled as the primary route for Los Angeles (it had been signed for South Sacramento for a few years). With the completion of the Oak Park Interchange (current junction of US 50, Business I-80, hidden I-305, hidden Route 51, and Route 99), Route 16 is de-designated from Old Town to Perkins (creating an implied multiplex with I-5 and I-80), and with the completion of the El Dorado Freeway, US 50 is removed from Folsom Boulevard and Capitol Avenue; around this time, US 50 is completely removed south/west of Sacramento, orphaning Business US 50. (Both Business US 40 routes are probably gone as well.) Route 99 no longer uses surface streets, but now follows I-80 west to I-5 north to the Route 70/99 split near the airport.

    • 1982. Due to the dedesignation of the downtown bypass as I-880 (and the commissioning of Business Route 80 due to the substandard former US 99E/40 29/30 and North Sacramento freeways), Route 99 is now co-signed with US 50 and Business Route 80 on the WX Freeway portion of former I-80 (and secretly co-routed with Interstate 305); no changes on the actual route occur however.

    • 1984. Route 16 is dedesignated between Woodland and Sacramento, taking the I Street Bridge (the temporary routing of US 40 and 99W in 1934) out of the state system. As a result, the implied co-routing of Route 16 with I-5 now extends to the entire portion of the signed Route 99/I-5 co-signage. Also, US 50/99 shields are finally removed from Stockton Boulevard.

    • Late 1980s. Route 65 freeway bypass of Roseville constructed. While the corridor through Roseville via Washington Boulevard was given to Route 256, it remained signed Route 65 into the early 1990s; this routing was US 99E from the 1930s to the mid 1960s.

    • 1994. Route 256, a former routing of Route 65 and US 99E in Roseville, was deleted. While the eventual freeway version of it (a west routing past town) was new alignment, the corridor followed Washington Boulevard, which was former Route 65 and 99E.

    • 1996. Business Route 80 offically named "Capitol City Freeway", in an attempt to reduce usage of colloquial names (WX Freeway, 29/30 Freeway). Except for the Pioneer Bridge, all of the Capitol City route has been a part of Route 99 at one time or another: West Sacramento Freeway (I-80 bypass (former I-880) east to then-Route 275): US 99W from 1954 to 1968, WX Freeway (Interstate 5 to Oak Park Interchange): 1968- present 29/30 Freeway, North Sacramento Freeway, and Roseville Freeway (Oak Park Interchange north to Roseville): US 99E from 1962 to 1967 Also, that year, Route 275, the portion of the West Sacramento Freeway between Jefferson Boulevard and the Tower Bridge (originally constructed in 1954 as US 40/99W) was decomissioned.

    • 2000. Route 99 is now no longer acknowledged on trailblazers from the 99/5 split near the Sacramento International Airport southeast to the Oak Park Interchange (as seen by personal experience and noted on Andy Field's site); but many interchange signs showing the co-routing are present (known examples are at the I Street and Richards Boulevard junctions off of I-5, I-5's junction with the WX Freeway, and the Oak Park Interchange - most strikingly the accurate "Route 99 TO I-5 I-80" gantry on the WX Freeway right before the Oak Park Interchange), and some of the Route 99 shields in those areas have recently been replaced with newer specimens. Also, Route 70's co-signage with Route 99 south to I-5 is taken down for good; this southern portion of the route was never official but was probably originally designated by CalTrans to directly replace the 1960-1964 portion of Route 24.

    Nathan Edgars looked at traffic counts, and came up with the following:

    • 1964: Route 16: I Street Bridge, down 3rd-5th and over Broadway to Route 160, then a break until the split from US 50

      Route 80: Tower Bridge, over Capitol/N to 29th-30th, then a break to Broadway at 29th-30th and up 29th-30th

      Route 99: from the south to Broadway, then west on Broadway, then a break to the east end of the I Street Bridge and up Jibboom Street

    • By 1966: Another piece of Route 99 added along P and Q Streets between Route 160 and Route 16. The changes to Route 80 are unclear.

    • By 1968: Route 80 moved to the new route, with the west part becoming Route 275

      Route 16 cut back to I-5 at the east end of the I Street Bridge

      Route 99 removed from P and Q Streets and instead routed back west on Broadway, replacing Route 16, but only to Route 275, where it broke until Jibboom Street

    • By 1970: Route 99 removed from Jibboom Street etc.

    Route 99 S of Sacramento (South Sacramento Freeway) has several cut-outs for bus stops. These were installed for Sacramento Transit's bus service in the 1960s; the bus-usage signs were removed in the early 1990s (and the current Sacramento transit system, Sacramento Reigonal Transit, only has one daily line on the South Sacramento Freeway).

    SignThere are still times when Caltrans still missigns the route as US 99. An example from October 2009 involves a sign replacement project on eastbound US 50 on the W/X Freeway portion, as illustrated to the right -->. As of December 2009, this sign has already been corrected.

     

    Status

    The following portions of this are constructed to freeway standards: (1) from I-5 to to 5 miles north of Chowchilla; (2) from 2 miles south of Merced to 2 miles north of Atwater; and (3) from 1 mile north of Livingston to Sacramento. The portion from Chowchilla Boulevard north to Gerard Avenue in south Merced, through Athlone, appears to still be just divided highway. The portion between Grove Avenue west of Atwater and Hunter Road east of Livingston has not been upgraded.

    TCRP 103TCRP Project #103 will improve the interchange at Seventh Standard Road, north of Bakersfield. The goal of TCRP Project #103 is to alleviate congestion and eliminate safety hazards associated with existing geometrics and an at-grade railroad crossing by providing operational improvements and constructing interchange modifications. The scope of work includes improvements to the existing interchange on Route 99, an additional bridge over Route 99, ramp modifications, widening to four lanes, realignment of the 7th Street Road, signalization of ramp intersections, as well as an adjacent grade separation over the Union Pacific Railroad. The project schedule was updated due to the temporary suspension of the project until additional funding was identified for right of way acquisition. With the Public Utilities Commission and the Union Pacific Railroad providing alternate funding for both Right of Way and Construction phases, right of way acquisition is now nearing completion and construction is underway. In August 2007, the CTC amended the project schedule to indicate completion in FY08/09.

    In 2007, it appeared there was construction ongoing on Route 99 from Route 152 to Fairmead/Brenda, near Chowchillla.

    The CTC in July 2002 considered for future funding converting Route 99 from a four lane expressway to a six lane freeway near Atwater. [2.2c.(4)]. As of early 2007, construction was underway on this segment, between Atwater and Livingston.

    TCRP Project #88 will improve the Shaw Interchange in northern Fresno.

    In October 2009, the CTC adjusted the baseline agreement related to a project that will widen approximately 6.6 miles of Route 99 from four to six lanes from Ashlan Avenue in the city of Fresno to 0.6 mile north of Avenue 7 in Madera County. The Department proposed to amend the Island Park 6-Lane project baseline agreement to split the scope into two projects, the North Fresno 6-Lane project (PPNO 6274A) and the Island Park 6-Lane project (PPNO 6274), and to reflect changes to the financial plan. The split will permit Caltrans to deliver the North Fresno 6-Lane project two years early, and deliver the Island Park 6-Lane project on the original schedule as specified in the project baseline agreement. The Department has determined that a project split will allow early delivery of the southern 3.9 miles of the project, starting at the existing 6-lane freeway at Ashlan Avenue and continuing through the regionally significant Grantland Avenue interchange. The updated schedule shows the first part completing in 2014, and the second part completing in 2018.

    Avenue 12In December 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project that will widen Avenue 12 Interchange on Route 99 from two to four lanes, add an onramp to Route 99, and construct roadway improvements in the city of Madera. The project is programmed in the State Route 99 Bond Program and the 2008 State Transportation Improvement Program, and includes local funds. Total estimated project cost is $68,000,000, capital and support. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2011-12. The scope as described for the preferred alternative is consistent with the project scope set forth in the approved project baseline agreement.

    TCRP Project #140 will add an overpass in the city of Goshen.

    In October 2009, the CTC approved relinquishment of right of way in the county of Merced along Route 99 from 0.3 mile east of Arena Way to the Livingston city limits, consisting of reconstructed county roads and frontage roads. They also approved relinquishment of right of way in the city of Livingston along Route 99 from the east Livingston city limits to 0.05 miles east of Hammett Avenue, consisting of a frontage road.

    A project to construct a Tagus-Goshen 6-lane (Ave 264 to Goshen) was submitted to the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account ($96,800K requested), but was not recommended for funding.

    TCRP Project #90 widened the freeway to six lanes from Kingsberg to Selma in Fresno County. Additional funding was up in July 2005. In December 2005, state transportation officials broke ground the $62-million 6-mile project. Field reports indicated it was completed by December 2008.

    There are plans for roadway improvements near Kingsberg. The CTC, in January 2007, considered a resolution to approve for future consideration of funding a project on Route 99 in Tulare and Fresno Counties that will construct roadway improvements near Kingsburg. This project is not fully funded. The project is fully funded for Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) in the Interregional Improvement Program for $2,202,000. Full funding for the project is being proposed from the State Route 99 Infrastructure Bond Program. The total estimated project cost is $172,600,000. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2010-11.

    In November 2005, the CTC considered relinquishment of 6-Tul-99-PM 40.6: right of way in the County of Tulare, at Avenue 308, consisting of a cul-de-sac.

    In August 2009, the CTC approved relinquishment of right of way in the city of Tulare adjacent to Route 99 on South “K” Street, consisting of a frontage road and adjacent appurtenant drainage facilities.

    In July 2005, the CTC received a notice of EIR preparation for Route 99 in Madera County to realign and widen to six lane freeway near Merced (NOP). This project consists of two sections: the Plainsburg section and the Arboleda section. In the Plainsburg section there are four alternatives in addition to the No Build Alternative; in the Arboleda section there are two alternatives in addition to the No-Build Alternative. The four build alternatives currently under consideration for the Plainsburg Section (Alternatives 1A, 1B, 2, and 3) would provide the following features using different alignments:

    • Construct a six-lane freeway on an eight-lane right-of-way.
    • Construct a diamond interchange at Sandy Mush/Plainsburg Avenue.
    • Construct an eastern frontage road resulting in alterations to Plainsburg Avenue.
    • Convert the existing southbound lanes into the proposed western frontage roads.
    • Realign a section of Sandy Mush Road to tie in to the proposed interchange.
    • Realign a section of Plainsburg Road to tie in to the proposed interchange.

    The two build alternatives currently under consideration for the Arboleda Section (Alternatives 4 and 5) would provide the following:

    • Alternative 4 – Construct an interchange at Arboleda Drive.
    • Alternative 5 – Construct an interchange at Le Grande Drive.

    In July 2005, the CTC considered funding to convert 4-lane expressway to 6-lane freeway and construct interchange at Mission Avenue in Merced from Owens Creek Bridge to south of Childs Avenue.

    In July 2009, the CTC approved adjusting the funding for a TCRP #106, which will construct a new four-lane, limited access expressway (Campus Parkway) on the east side of the City of Merced from Route 99 to Yosemite Avenue. The work has been divided into three segments: [Segment 1] Route 99 to Childs Avenue; [Segment 2] Childs Avenue to 0.25 mile north of Route 140; [Segment 3] From 0.25 mile north of Route 140 to Yosemite Avenue.

    In June 2008, the CTC approved relinquishment of right of way in the city of Madera, on Almond Avenue easterly of South Gateway Drive, consisting of a reconstructed and relocated city street.

    In May 2009, the CTC accepted the mitigated negative declaration for the Ellis Street Overcrossing Project. The project includes construction of an overcrossing on Route 99 between Avenue 17 and Cleveland Avenue in the City of Madera and a new roadway connecting Ellis Street on the east side of Route 99 with Avenue 16 on the west side of Route 99. The project will include a crossing over the freeway and railroad tracks to provide vehicular and pedestrian access to the residential and commercial areas east of the freeway and reduce the congestion at the Cleveland Avenue/Gateway Drive/County Club Drive intersection and at the Route 99/Cleveland Avenue Interchange. The project is estimated to cost $16,596,000 and is funded with STIP ($8,534,000), Proposition 1B Local Streets and Roads ($1,746,000) and Local ($6,316,000) funds. Construction is estimated to begin in fiscal year 2009/10.

    In March 2006, the CTC considered relinquishment of right of way in the city of Merced between Sycamore Avenue and Early Dawn Road, consisting of reconstructed and relocated county roads, frontage roads and cul-de-sacs.

    In October 2008, the CTC received notice of a negative environmental impact declaration for construction of two interchanges near Madera. The project proposes to reconstruct the existing Route 99/Route 145 and Route 99/Gateway Drive interchanges within the City of Madera. The purpose of the project is to relieve congestion at the Route 99/Route 145 Interchange, to provide better access from Ropute 99 to the Madera Community Hospital on Almond Avenue and to provide an additional two-way crossing of Route 99 in South Madera. The project is needed to provide sufficient capacity for the interchanges to improve existing level of service deficiencies and to meet Year 2025 traffic projections, as well as to improve traffic safety by reducing the accident potential. The proposed modifications will improve both the current and predicted levels of service for both interchanges. Two alternatives were considered in the Initial Study. One alternative, the no build alternative, did not meet the project purpose and need since concerns regarding traffic congestion at the Route 99/Route 145 Interchange as well as access to Madera Community Hospital on Almond Avenue from SR 99 would remain unresolved. The second alternative, the preferred alternative includes:

    • Route 99/Gateway Drive Interchange – widening the existing over crossing to accommodate two lanes of traffic, creating new on and off ramps, and extending Gateway Drive to connect to Almond Avenue.
    • SR-99/SR 145 Interchange – widening of the overpass from two to six lanes. These modifications will decrease traffic congestion by providing additional through lanes across the bridge, as well as dedicated turn lanes for entrance to northbound SR 99.

    The cost estimate for both interchanges totals $18,037,000. According to Caltrans, in May 2005, the project was split into two projects for programming and construction. The Route 99/Gateway Drive Interchange Project was completed in 2006. The project costs totaled $8,138,000. Funding was provided through Regional Improvement Program Funds ($4,700,000) and Local Measure A Funds ($3,438,000). The Route 99/Route 145 Interchange Project, estimated to cost $9,899,000 is scheduled for construction in FY 2008/09 and is fully funded with Regional Improvement Program Funds ($6,400,000), Local Measure A Funds ($1,099,000) and Federal High Priority Projects Program Funds ($2,400,000).

    In September 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project to widen Route 99 from four to six lanes between Prosperity Avenue and north of the North Goshen Overhead, and construct roadway improvements on Route 99 in the city of Tulare. The project is not fully funded. The project is programmed in the 2008 State Transportation Improvement Program for Plans, Specifications and Estimate, and Right of way. The total estimated project cost is $114,800,000, capital and support. The begin construction date is unknown, pending funding availability.

    [TCRP 104-105]An Environmental Impact Report is in preparation for widening this route from 4 to 6 lanes, and to replace all existing bridges, in San Joaquin County [April 2002 CTC Agenda Item 2.2a.(1)]. This is likely TCRP Project #104, which will build 7 miles of new six-lane freeway from Buchanan Hollow Road to Healey Road in Merced Country. There is also TCRP Project #105, which will build 2 miles of new six-lane freeway from the Madera County line to Buchanan Hollow Road in Merced County. However, these projects had their TCRP funds deallocated in September 2005 due to inactivity. In April 2007, the CTC considered amendments to projects #104 and #105. These amendments would build seven miles of new six-lane freeway south of Merced, Buchanan Hollow Road to Healey Road in Merced County (#104) and build 4.5 miles of new six-lane freeway, Madera County line to Buchanan Hollow Road in Merced County (#105). Specifically, TCRP Project #104 will upgrade a four-lane expressway to a six-lane freeway with an interchange at Arboleda Road. The project will close at-grade median crossings and improve capacity on Route 99 and is programmed with $5,000,000 of TCRP funds for Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) and Right of Way (R/W) support and capital. Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) and Construction are programmed in the State Transportation Improvement Program for $144,900,000. TCRP Project #105 will upgrade Route 99 from a four-lane expressway to a six-lane freeway. This project is also funded with $5,000,000 from the TCRP for PS&E and R/W support. The project schedule and funding changed due to environmental issues that delayed the project. This delay escalated construction costs and delayed project delivery. These projects are now estimated for completion in FY 2012/2013.

    In May 2009, the CTC approved a public road connection to Route 99 at Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, in the county of San Joaquin. The San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG), in conjunction with the City of Stockton, San Joaquin County, and the Department, are proposing to construct a new interchange at Route 99 and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard in San Joaquin County, near the junction with Route 4. Within the project limits, Route 99 is a four-lane freeway with four closely spaced interchanges. Traffic in the project area is highly congested during peak hours, with high demand from both regional and local traffic. These high traffic volumes, coupled with localized traffic weaving on Route 99, cause traffic to slow down to below acceptable levels. The proposed project is expected to improve the safety and operations of Route 99. In order for this project to proceed, Commission approval is required for the new public road connection to Route 99 at Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. This two mile section of Route 99 is a four-lane divided freeway with 12-foot wide travel lanes, 8-foot wide outside shoulders, and 5-foot wide inside shoulders. The median width varies from 36 feet to 26 feet between Mariposa Road and the Crosstown Freeway, Route 4 west of Route 99. Route 4 is not continuous through this area. Ramp connectors from Route 99 to Route 4 east of Route 99 are provided at Farmington Road interchange. Proposed improvements will include freeway widening to six-lanes, reconstruction of structures to accommodate a future eight-lane facility, construction of auxiliary lanes in both directions from Mariposa Road interchange to the Crosstown Freeway, modification and reconstruction of the Mariposa Road interchange, removal of the Farmington Road interchange, removal of the Charter Way interchange, and construction of the new Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard interchange. Golden Gate Avenue will be realigned and renamed Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. In addition, approximately 0.2 miles of Route 4, east of Route 99, will be reconstructed to align with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard at the new interchange, hence providing route continuity between Route 99 and Route 4.

    [TCRP 106]TCRP Project #106 will develop a new four-lane, limited access expressway from Mission Avenue to Yosemite Avenue on the east side of the city of Merced, to support the new University of California, Merced. In June 2006, the CTC considered TCRP Application Amendment to redistribute $4,486,000 from Construction to R/W for this project, as well as updating the project schedule and funding plan. The project is currently scheduled for completion in FY 2014.

    In March 2006, the CTC approve for future consideration of funding a project in Merced County that will improve a 10.5 mile section of Route 99 from a four lane highway to a six lane expressway. The project is programmed in the 2006 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The overall project is not fully funded. Project development and right of way, however, are fully funded in the Interregional Transportation Improvement Program and Traffic Congestion Relief Program for $35,787,000. The total estimated project cost is $270 million. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2009-10. The project is proposed in the State Route 99 Bond Program. The project runs from the Chowchilla River to McHenry Road, and includes interchanges at Arboleda Dr. and Plainsberg Rd.

    The Arch Road interchange in San Joaquin County (groundbreaking: 6/17/02) will be the first SPUI in the central valley and the third in California. It was completed in 2005.

    In September 2005, the CTC considered relinquishment of right of way in the County of San Joaquin, at Olive Avenue and Austin Road, consisting of reconstructed and relocated county roads, frontage roads and cul-de-sacs.

    [Stockton]In March 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project in San Joaquin County will widen the highway from four to six lanes in each direction and construct roadway improvements between Arch Road and Route 4 in the city of Stockton. The project is programmed in the State Route 99 Bond Program and the 2008 State Transportation Improvement Program, and includes local funds. The total estimated cost is $250,500,000, capital and support. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2011-12.

    [TCRP 135 - From City of Elk Grove Website]TCRP Project #135 will reconstruct and expand the Route 99/Sheldon Road interchange. These improvements will provide efficient accessibility to and from Route 99, as well as improvement to Sheldon Road to accommodate the current and projected traffic volumes for the City of Elk Grove. Planned improvements include construction of a two-lane southbound loop off-ramp and a diagonal southbound on-ramp within the southwest quadrant; construction of a two-lane northbound loop on-ramp with one mixed flow lane and one high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) bypass lane and a diagonal northbound off-ramp within the southeast quadrant; construction of a diagonal northbound on-ramp within the northeast quadrant; replacement of the existing bridge over Route 99 (which dates to 1957); addition of bike lanes, landscaped medians, and sidewalks on Sheldon Road; installation of on-ramp metering with high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) bypass lanes; and relocation and expansion of the existing Park & Ride lot. The project is anticipated to be completed by Fall 2009.

    In his 2006 Strategic Growth Plan, Governor Schwartzenegger proposed a complete corridor enhancement master plan. This included conversion of a number of expressway sections to freeway, and widening a number of freeway sections. This will bring the corridor to a full freeway standard, add capacity/lanes overall, improve and add interchanges, and make other improvements.

    2007 CMIA. A project on Route 99 in Stockton (widening and operational improvements) in San Joaquin ($50M) was submitted to the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) for funding. It was not recommended for funding. Neither was the Central Galt Interchange. In May 2008, there was a Draft EIR in circulation regarding this that proposed four alternatives:

    1. Alternative 1 – No Build.

    2. Alternative 2 – This alternative would widen a 2.7 mile portion of Route 99 from four lanes to six lanes and reconfigure the Mariposa Road interchange to a partial cloverleaf configuration.

    3. Alternative 3 – This alternative would widen a 2.7 mile portion of Route 99 from four lanes to six lanes and realign the existing Charter Way interchange. A new interchange would also be constructed south of Golden Gate Avenue on Route 99.

    4. Alternative 4 – This alternative would widen a 2.7 mile portion of State Route 99 from four lanes to six lanes and reconfigure the Mariposa Road and Farmington Road interchanges.

    The SAFETEA-LU act, enacted in August 2005 as the reauthorization of TEA-21, provided the following expenditures on or near this route:

    • High Priority Project #287: Rehabilitation, repair, and/or reconstruction of deficient two-lane roads that connect to I-5, Route 180, Route 41 and Route 99 throughout Fresno County. See also HPP #3798. $2,800,000.

    • High Priority Project #716: Preparation of a Project Study Report for new Route 99 interchange between Route 165 and Bradbury Road, serving the Turlock/Hilmar region. Related to this is Transportation Improvement #18. $400,000.

    • High Priority Project #1257: Construction of the Central Galt and Route 99 Interchange and Access Improvements. $2,400,000.

    • High Priority Project #1780: Construction of Campus Parkway from Route 99 to Yosemite Ave., Merced County. This related to TCRP #106.$400,000.

    • High Priority Project #1830: Improve the Route 99/Route 145 interchange in the City of Madera, CA. $2,400,000.

    • High Priority Project #1990: Route 99 improvements at Sheldon Road. $3,200,000.

    • High Priority Project #2067: Complete the engineering design and acquire the right-of-way needed for the Arch-Sperry project in San Joaquin County. The Project will widen Arch-Sperry Road to six lanes west of Airport Way to Route 99 and construct an interim four lane elevated roadway including five bridges crossing three railroads, two roadways and French Camp Slough east to I-5. The project will include reconstruction of the French Camp/I-5 interchange.$4,000,000.

    • High Priority Project #3132: Improvements/Widenening of Route 99 from Goshen to Kingsburg in Tulare County, California. See also HPP #3800. $6,560,000.

    • High Priority Project #3798: Rehabilitation, repair, and/or reconstruction of deficient two-lane roads that connect to I-5, Route 180, Route 41 and Route 99 throughout Fresno County. This seems to be supplemental funding for HPP #287. $1,500,000.

    • High Priority Project #3800: Improvements/Widenening of Route 99 from Goshen to Kingsburg in Tulare County, California. This seems to be supplemental funding to HPP #3132. $8,000,000.

    • High Priority Project #3806: Construct eastern loop of Campus Parkway in Merced. $2,000,000.

    • Transportation Improvement #18: Hilmar/Turlock Route 99 interchange engineering and construction in Merced County. This is related to HPP #716.$1,000,000.

    • High Priority Corridor. Section 1304 adds Route 99 to the list of high priority corridors (#54): The California Farm-to-Market Corridor, California State Route 99 from south of Bakersfield to Sacramento, California.

    • Future Interstate Routing The following language authorizes Corridor #54 to become part of the Interstate System in the "future": (5) INCLUSION OF CERTAIN ROUTE SEGMENTS ON INTERSTATE SYSTEM- (A) IN GENERAL- The portions of the routes referred to in clauses (I), (ii), and (iii) of subsection (c)(5)(B), in subsection (c)(9), in subsections (c)(18) and (c)(20), subsection (c)(45), subsection (c)(54), and subsection (c)(57) that are not a part of the Interstate System are designated as future parts of the Interstate System.

    Route 99 as an Interstate Highway

    Shafter Assemblyman Dean Florez has proposed creating a Route 99 supercorridor, in four phases, between Grapevine and Fresno. Fresno Mayor Alan Autry is lobbying federal officials to upgrade Route 99 and make it part of the nearly 47,000-mile interstate system. Backer says that say Fresno is the largest U.S. city (440,000 residents) not tied to the interstate system, and the absence of a federal highway is one reason national and international firms refuse to locate there. Preservationists oppose the change on historical grounds, as the old stagecoach trail that is now Route 99 was the longest toll-free road in the world—it the road traveled by the immigrants from Oklahoma, described by Steinbeck, Saroyan, McWilliams and Chavez. Everyone agrees on upgrading of the condition of the highway. This has been captured in a Master Plan for the Route 99 Corridor, which among other things, proposes applying for the designation Interstate 9. There were lots of discussions about including this funding in the 2005 Transportation Bill. Converting Route 99 to an interstate would mean rebuilding it to the higher standards or winning a federal waiver. Caltrans estimates the cost of a conversion at $20 billion to $25 billion. In contrast, the agency says it would cost $6 billion to widen Highway 99 to six or more lanes if interstate standards aren't applied. The difference is due to bridge retrofitting and improvement. Route 99 might alternatively be designated a High Priority Corridor. This would allow Route 99 to compete with more than 40 other highways for $3.3 billion over six years.

    The Fresno Bee provided more specifics: The legislation in question states "Section 1105(e)(5)(A) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032; 115 Stat. 872) is amended by striking 'and subsection (c)(45)' and inserting the following: 'subsection (c)(45), and subsection (c)(54).' " What this does is make Route 99 eligible for Interstate designation, but doesn't directly designate it as an interstate. This lets the federal Transportation Department and the California Department of Transportation negotiate a long-range plan for the upgrading of the highway to meet interstate standards. Interstates, for instance, must maintain medians of at least 36 feet in rural areas. Paved shoulders on the right must be at least 10 feet wide. Bridges must offer at least 16 feet of clearance. A crucial part of future negotiations would identify which interstate standards might be waived. Bridge heights originally designed to permit passage of missile-bearing military trucks, for instance, could be waived, while highway shoulder requirements might be retained. The legislation doesn't spell out such details; that will be up to state and federal negotiators. The language did make it into the final bill, which was signed in August 2005. Some folks are suggesting that this might be designated as I-7. The legislation also included widening Route 99 between Goshen and Kingsburg and building a parkway connecting the highway to the new University of California at Merced campus.

     

    Business Routes
    • Los Angeles, San Fernando: Before the highway renumbering in 1964, San Fernando Road was Business US 99 through the San Fernando Valley near Los Angeles.
    • Bakersfield: "Golden State Highway", Route 204.
    • Atwater
    • McFarland
    • Delano: High Street from Exit 54 to Exit 58 (at County Line Road)
    • Earlimart
    • Pixley
    • Tulare: J and K Street
    • Fresno: Golden State Avenue. This runs south all the way to Kingsburg, and about halfway thru that city. Also, both stretches of US 99 thru Selma, are still used as city streets. W. Front St. was the original US 99, and in the 30's moved over to Whitson Ave.
    • Highway City
    • Madera: N and S Gateway Blvd
    • Merced: 16th Street
    • Turlock: Golden State Blvd.
    • Modesto: 9th Street
    • Manteca: Moffet Blvd and Main Street. According to Jeremy Hannon, because of the widening of Route 99 from 4 to 6 lanes from the San Joaquin County Line (southern) to the Route 120 Interchange, the Mofett off-ramp (a left-hand off-ramp) was removed. Going Northbound, one would need to take the Austin Road Off-ramp, cross over Route 99 to make a right onto Mofett. At then end of Mofett, one then proceeds up Main Street to the right, following the old route. Southbound traffic can take the "Manteca" exit. Note, that this is not signed as "Business Route 99" as most segments are. There is no mention of Business Route 99 or Business Route 120 through Manteca.
    • Lodi: Cherokee Lane
    • Stockton: Charter Way to Wilson Way

     

    Naming

    This segment is designated as part of "Historic US Highway 99" by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 19, Chapter 73, in 1993. Areas marked include San Fernando Road, Avenue 20, Main Street, and Valley Blvd in the City of Los Angeles, and San Fernando Blvd (I know one sign is just S of the Media Center Mall) in Burbank.

    Historically, the route was named the "Golden State Highway" between Sacramento and Bakersfield. This is because the route ran the length of the "Golden State".

    This segment is designated as part of "Historic US Highway 99" by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 19, Chapter 73, in 1993.

    The portion of this route from the I-5/Route 99 junction to Bakersfield is part of the historic "Ridge Route".

    The portion of this route between the southern terminus of Route 99, three and one-half miles south of Mettler and the northern Kern County line in Delano at County Line Road (County Route J44) is named the "Kern County Korean War Veterans Memorial Highway". This is in honor of the 42 Kern County military personnel killed in action in Korea, the three who died while missing, the two who died while captured, and the six who died from wounds, and the approximately 8,120 Korean War veterans who presently live in Kern County. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 46, Resolution Chapter 54, filed May 31, 2001.

    The portion of Route 99 constructed to freeway standards near the City of Livingston is colloquially called the "Livingston" Freeway. Officially, it is the "Kenneth L. Maddy" Freeway. Kenneth L. Maddy served as California Senate Republican leader (1987-1995) and was the legislative proponent of the Livingston Bypass on Route 99. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 25, Chapter 85, in 1997.

    The portion of Route 99 between McFarland to Tulare is named the "Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States Memorial Highway". It was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 54, Chapter 19, in 1992.

    The portion of Route 99 between the City of Fresno and the City of Tulare is officially designated the "Pearl Harbor Survivors Memorial Highway". Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 13, Chapter 81, in 1993.

    The portion of Route 99 between the Cities of Fresno and Madera is (also) officially named "The 100th Infantry Battalion Memorial Highway". At the time of the Pearl Harbor attack on December 7, many Nisei served in the Federalized 298th and 299th Infantry of the Hawaii National Guard, inducted through three military drafts prior to Pearl Harbor. 1,432 Nisei soldiers transferred out of the 298th and 299th into the “Hawaiian Provisional Infantry Battalion” and sailed from Honolulu on the SS Maui on June 5, 1942. Upon arrival in Oakland, they were then activated into the “100th Infantry Battalion (Separate);” “separate” meaning not attached to any other military unit, literally a military orphan outfit. On September 2, 1943, the 100th landed in Oran, North Africa. On September 5th the 100th was assigned to the 133rd Regiment, 34th Division. On September 22, 1943, the 100th made an amphibious landing at the Salerno beachhead as part of the 34th “Red Bull” Division. Tough battles, especially at Cassino, marked the harsh, bitter route of the 100th from Salerno to Rome. For the Cassino battles alone, the 100th suffered 48 casualties, 144 wounded, and 75 hospitalized for trench foot. The 100th landed at Salerno with over 1,300 personnel, but after Cassino only 521 remained. The “Guinea Pig Battalion” had now become known as the “Purple Heart Battalion.” On March 10, April 2, and May 24, 1944, three waves of replacements from the 442nd arrived, replenishing the ranks of the 100th with 555 replacement troops. On June 26, 1944, the 100th, still retaining its name “100th Infantry Battalion” began fighting with the 442nd Regimental Combat Team and fought together until the surrender of Germany on May 8, 1945.
    [Information excerpted from the Go For Broke Educational Foundation's page on the 100th Infantry Battalion]

    The portion of Route 99 between Mountain View Crossing in southern Fresno County to the San Joaquin River on the northern boundary is named the "William "Bill" Lehn Memorial Highway". Named in honor of Fresno Police Officer William "Bill" Lehn, killed while in the line of duty on June 21, 1994, when his Fresno Police Department motorcycle collided with a car while he was attempting to make a traffic stop. Officer Lehn was born in Hanford and raised in Lemoore, graduating in 1974 from Lemoore High School. He began his career in law enforcement in 1979 when he joined the City of San Joaquin Police Department. In 1980, he was hired by the Kings County Sheriff's Department where he was a deputy until he was hired by the Fresno Police Department in 1986. He was a well liked officer who was remembered as a pleasure to know and to work with. He died at the age of 38. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 30, Chaptered 7/2/2003, Chapter 82.

    The portion of Route 99 from the San Joaquin River to the Madera/Merced County line in Madera County is named the "Steven Lindblom Memorial Freeway". Named in honor of Madera County Sheriff's Deputy Steven Lindblom, who was killed by gunfire in 1975 when a deranged gunman ambushed him from a barricaded residence upon his response to a hostage situation. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 35, Chaptered 7/2/2003, Chapter 83.

    The portion of Route 99 between Childs Avenue and 16th Street in the City of Merced is named the "Officer Stephan Gene Gray Memorial Highway". This segment was named in memory of Officer Stephan Gene Gray of the Merced Police Department, who was killed in the line of duty on April 15, 2004, while working in an undercover detail with the Special Operations Unit specializing in street level narcotics and gang violence suppression. Officer Gray was born on August 21, 1969, in Tulare; he attended local schools until his family relocated to Hanford, where he graduated from Hanford High School in 1987. Officer Gray attended Fresno City College for two years, and entered the Fresno Police Academy; upon completion, he was hired as an officer by the Merced Police Department. Highly decorated, Officer Gray was a gallant and dedicated officer who exemplified the true character of the brave men and women who devote their time and energy to the perilous duties of law enforcement. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 7, Resolution Chapter 56, on 05/25/2006.

    The portion of Route 99 between the Cities of Salida and Manteca is officially named "The 442nd Regimental Combat Team Memorial Highway". The "100th Infantry" and "442nd Regimental" names are in honor of the Nisei Soldiers of World War II who served in units of the United States Armed Forces comprising the 100/442/MIS triad. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 62, Chapter 115 in 1994. The other part of the triad is on Route 23.

    The portion of Route 99 between Mitchell Road and the Stanislaus/Merced County line in the County of Stanislaus is named the "Joash E. Paul Memorial Highway". Named in honor of Joash E. Paul, a lifelong resident of the City of Turlock where he was a rancher, an entrepreneur, and a dedicated servant of the people of Stanislaus County. Born on September 23, 1919, Joash Paul was elected to the Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors in 1968 and served as a board member until 1980. He worked in real estate for 25 years, and until the mid-1970s helped operate a family-owned lodging and dining establishment along Route 99 when it passed through the City of Turlock. After retiring from the board of supervisors, he served as president of the fund-raising foundation for the then county-owned Scenic General Hospital in the City of Modesto. He was an active member of various community organizations in the City of Turlock, including the Assyrian American Civic Club, the Sacred Heart Catholic Church, and the Portuguese Union of the State of California. Joash E. Paul died in 2000. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 19, Chaptered 7/2/2003, Chapter 81.

    The portion of Route 99 from the Stanislaus county line to Route 132 in Modesto is named the "John G. Veneman Freeway". It was named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 171, Chapter 131, in 1984. John Veneman was born in 1925 in Corcoran, California. In 1944, he graduated from Arizona State College. After serving with the United States Naval Reserve (1944-1945), he attended the University of Texas. In 1959, he was elected to the Board of Supervisors of Stanislaus County, where he served until 1962. In 1962, he was elected to the California State Assembly, serving until 1969. He authored legislation to improve and complete the section of Route 99 from Modesto to Turlock, which bears his name. In 1969, he was appointed Under Secretary, Department of Health, Education and Welfare. In 1973, he left government for private industry. He died in 1982 in Sacramento, California.
    [Adapted from information at the Online Archives of California]

    The interchange at Route 99 and Whitmore Avenue in the City of Ceres is named the "Sergeant Howard K. Stevenson Memorial Interchange". It was named in memory of Sergeant Howard K. "Howie" Stevenson, who was born on February 18, 1965. On June 3, 1986, at 21 years of age, Stevenson became a peace officer with the Ceres Police Department. On January 9, 2005, while responding to a call for assistance at a local liquor store, Sergeant Stevenson and fellow officers were ambushed and met with a hail of gunfire from an assault rifle. Sergeant Stevenson died almost instantly. Sergeant Stevenson was the first police officer in the 86-year history of the City of Ceres to be killed in the line of duty. Sergeant Stevenson is remembered affectionately by his fellow officers as being a role model and mentor to younger officers, and as being "a cops' cop". Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR) 20, Resolution Chapter 77, on 7/17/2009.

    The portion of Route 99 between Standiford Avenue/Beckwith Road, and Tuolumne Boulevard in Modesto is named the "Jerry Medina Memorial Freeway". This section of highway was named to remind all of us of the need to keep safety a priority and a reminder to cherish every day and enjoy it to the fullest. It was named after Jerry Medina, an 18 year old killed on March 29, 2001 when a truck crossed the highway median and landed on Jerry's car near Maze Boulevard. Five other people were injured as a result of this accident. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 168, Chapter 140, on September 3, 2002.

    The portion of Route 99 from Mission Avenue to Campus Parkway in Merced is officially named the "CHP Officer Walter Frago and Roger Gore Memorial Freeway". On April 5, 1970, four California Highway Patrol Officers were murdered in one of the worst uniformed police officer killing incidents in American history when Officers George Aleyn, Walter Frago, James Pence Jr., and Roger Gore were gunned down just off of Interstate 5. Two of those officers, Walter Frago and Roger Gore were from Merced County, Officer Frago having grown up in Merced, while Roger Gore resided in Snelling. The officers were on the lookout for a suspect who had been reportedly seen brandishing a weapon. Officers Frago and Gore were the first on the scene, pulling over a vehicle with two men, when a gun fight ensued leaving both of these fine officers dead at the age of 23 years. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 180, Chapter 147, September 18, 2000.

    The portion of Route 99 between Athlone Road and Worden Avenue in Merced County is officially named the "CHP Officer James J. Schumacher, Jr., Memorial Highway". CHP Officer James J. Schumacher was a graduate of Luther Burbank High School in Sacramento, and attended Golden West College. Her served in the United States Army, where he achieved the rank of Sergeant. After graduating from the CHP Academy, he was appointed to the California Highway Patrol on May 19, 1969. An admired and respected 12-year veteran of the California Highway Patrol, he served in the South Los Angeles, Westminster, and Merced areas. Officer Schumacher was killed while in the line of duty, early on the morning of June 13, 1981, on Route 99 approximately four miles south of Merced. He had just finished writing a speeding ticket and was standing approximately four feet off the highway while obtaining the ticketed driver's signature and warning the ticketed driver to be careful pulling out onto the highway, when he was struck by another car driven at a high rate of speed by a driver who had fallen asleep at the wheel. He died instantly from massive injuries to his head and body. The tragedy was made worse by the theft of Officer Schumacher's badge from the scene of the accident by a bystander--it being the tradition of the California Highway Patrol since its inception, to memorialize a fallen officer by presenting his or her badge to the officer's family. Officer Schumacher was only 33 years of age at the time of his death and was survived by his wife, Roberta, and their sons, James, then aged 9, and Andrew, then aged 7, his parents, three sisters, and two brothers, one of whom was a fellow officer in the California Highway Patrol. He died only five miles north from where California Highway Patrol Officer Al Johnson died, when he was struck by a drunk driver while writing out a ticket, in August of 1972. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 111, Chapter 32, April 22, 2002.

    The protion between Hammer Lane and Route 4 in Stockton is officially designated the "Women Veterans' Highway". Named in recognition of the sacrifices made by women in defense of our nation that began over 220 years ago with the American Revolution and continues today. Throughout our country's history, nearly two million women have attained the esteemed title of veteran because of their service to the United States. In 1999, women comprised 14 percent of all Americans in military uniform and accounted for 20 percent of all new recruits. Though women were not permitted to participate in the United States' armed forces in earlier years, historical records verify that over 60 women were either wounded or killed at various battles during the Civil War. In 1901, the United States' Army recognized women's enthusiasm to serve our country by establishing the first official entity for women named the Army Nurse Corps, without providing the benefit of military rank, equal pay, or benefits. Because of their courageous efforts and determined commitment to their country, women were finally granted attendance to the United States Military Academies in 1975 when Congress introduced and passed a law allowing for these highly regarded universities to become coeducational. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 43, Chapter 129, 9/12/2003.

    The portion of this route between Route 4 in Stockton and Route 50 in Sacramento is named the "Purple Hearts Veterans Highway". It was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 54, Chapter 19, in 1992.

    The portion between Route 50 and the Sacramento County line near Galt is named the "South Sacramento" Freeway. This was named after the unincorporated area of South Sacramento, which consists of parts of the incorporated city of Sacramento as well as the unincorporated enclave of Parkway, a place with a distinctive street grid where every route is a "parkway" of some sort.

     

    Named Structures

    The interchange between Route 99, Route 204, and Airport Drive in Bakersfield is named the "Richard Alan Maxwell Memorial Interchange". State Traffic Officer Richard Alan Maxwell began his career in law enforcement with his appointment to the California Highway Patrol on May 15, 1989, and was killed in the line of duty on July 11, 1994. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 60, Chapter 135, in 1994, and Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 119, Chapter 147, in 1994.

    The Route 41/Route 99 interchange in downtown Fresno is named the "Rosa Parks Interchange". Rosa Parks (born February 4, 1913, in Tuskegee, Alabama) is considered the "Mother of the Modern Day Civil Rights Movement". This fame started when she was arrested on December 1, 1955, in Montgomery, Alabama, for refusing to give up her seat on a bus to a white man. Her arrest was the impetus for a boycott of Montgomery buses, led by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and joined by approximately 42,000 African Americans for 381 days. On November 13, 1956, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Montgomery's segregation law was unconstitutional, and on December 20, 1956, Montgomery officials were ordered to desegregate buses. Rosa Parks refusal to surrender her seat in compliance with Montgomery's segregation law inspired the civil rights movement, which has resulted in the breakdown of numerous legal barriers and the lessening of profound discrimination against African Americans in this country. Her courage and conviction laid the foundation for equal rights for all Americans and for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Rosa Parks was the first woman to join the Montgomery chapter of the NAACP, and was an active volunteer for the Montgomery Voters League. She cofounded the Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development in 1987 with Elaine Easton Steele to motivate and direct youth to achieve their highest potential through the "Pathways to Freedom" program. She is the recipient of many awards including the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation's highest civilian honor, the Congressional Gold Medal of Honor, the highest honor Congress can bestow upon a civilian, and the first International Freedom Conductor Award from the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 3, Chaptered 7/16/2003, Chapter 98.

    The intersection of Route 99 and White Lane in Bakersfield is named the "Mark C. Salvaggio Interchange". It was named in honor of Mark C. Salvaggio, a native Californian who graduated from California State University, Bakersfield in 1972. After obtaining his teaching credential, Mark C. Salvaggio taught seventh and eighth grade students in the Arvin Union School District for more than 30 years, from 1972 until his retirement in 2004. He also was a distinguished member of the Bakersfield City Council, representing Ward 7 for nearly 20 years, from 1985 to 2004. During his tenure on the Bakersfield City Council, Mark C. Salvaggio served as Vice Mayor from December 2000 to December 2002, and as a council member was instrumental in numerous projects that benefitted the community, including the Kern River Parkway Plan, construction of the Northeast Bakersfield Water Treatment Plant, the extension of the Bakersfield Bike Path, the establishment of the Bakersfield Educational Studies Area, and the enhancement of the White Lane-Route 99 Interchange in Bakersfield. He has received numerous awards and commendations for his community service. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 53, Resolution Chapter 39, on 4/26/2006.

    Bridge 39-196 over Shanks Road in Merced county is named the "Dallas C. Bache Interchange". Dallas C. Bache was a dedicated civic leader whose efforts helped to bring about the construction of the Delhi Freeway in the 1970's. It was built in 1979, and was named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 104, Chapter 43, in 1978 (before construction was finished).

    This route also has the following Safety Roadside Rest Areas:

    • Philip S. Raine (Tipton), in Tulare County 2.5 mi N of Tipton. It was named in 1982 in honor of Philip S. Raine, Chief of the Division of Highways in Sacramento until he was forced into an early retirement with subsequent death by cancer in 1981. CALTRANS and The Great Valley Center, with the support of the American Institute of Architects, California Council, and private organizations, are partnering in an open one-stage international competition to select a design, and thereby a design team, to update this stop as a self-sustainable and "off the grid" roadside GreenStop. In other words, the goal is to make this a "green" rest area that can serve as a model for current and future rest stops within the state system, with the ability to be customized so as to be regionally relevant for each location. Details on the competition may be found at http://www.greenstopdesign.com/.

    • C. H. Warlow (Kingsburg) in Tulare County at Dodge Avenue near the Kings River. Chester Warlow was a member of the California Highway Commission from Fresno. He was also a member of the Shaver Lake fishing club (there is a picture of him in the gallery at www.shaverlake.org/gallery.html). Mt. Warlow near Muir Pass was also named for him.

    • Enoch Christoffersen Memorial Rest Area, S of Turlock in Stanislaus County. Enoch Christoffersen served as Mayor of the City of Turlock from 1952 to 1958, and again from 1962 to 1978. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 41, Chapter 60, in 1993.

     

    National Trails

    Pacific Highway Sign The portion of this route from Fresno to Stockton was part of the "Pacific Highway (Valley Route Portion)".

    Lincoln Highway Sign Victory Highway Sign This portion of this segment from Route 120 to US 50 (i.e., former US 50) was part of the coast-to-coast "Lincoln Highway" and part of the "Victory Highway".

    National Park to Park Highway Sign Portions of this route were part of the "National Park to Park Highway".

     

    Freeway

    [SHC 253.5] Entire portion. Added to the Freeway and Expressway system in 1959.

     

    Commuter Lanes

    HOV lanes currently exist between Mack Road and Martin Luther King Blvd. in Sacramento. These lines are in operation between 6 AM and 10 AM, and 3 PM and 7 PM, on weekdays, and require a minumum of two people.

    Caltrans plans to add lanes to the segments from 0.8mi S of Elk Grove Blvd to Mack Road (11.4 mi, planned opening October 1997), and from Martin Luther King Blvd to Route 51 (construction starts August 1999).


  2. From Route 5 in Sacramento to Route 36 near Red Bluff, passing near Catlett and Tudor.


    Post 1964 Signage History

    In 1963, this segment was covered by (b) and (c) of the original definition: “(b) Route 5 in Sacramento to Route 20, passing near Catlett and Tudor. (c) Route 20 to Route 5 near Red Bluff.”

    The segment from Sacramento to the Route 70/Route 99 split was once cosigned as Route 70/Route 99, although it is legislatively Route 99. In 1969, this segment ran along Jibboom St., Garden Highway, El Centro Road.

    The Chico bypass was completed by 1967. Before the Chico Bypass was constructed, the route through Durham and Richvale followed Richvale Highway west to Richvale, Richvale South Highway north to Nelson, Midway from Nelson to Chico via Durham, Main Street and Broadway through Chico, and Esplande north from Chico to current Route 99 near Wilson Landing Road.

    In 1984, Chapter 409 combined (b) and (c), creating "(b) Route 5 in Sacramento to Route 5 near Red Bluff, passing near Catlett and Tudor."

    In 1988, Chapter 106 changed the terminus of this segment to "Route 36 near Red Bluff"

     

    Pre 1964 Signage History

    The present routing of Route 99 follows I-5 out of Sacramento along former Route 24, and then N cosigned with Route 70 to Marysville. This corresponds to portions of LRN 232 (defined in 1951), LRN 245 (defined in 1959), and LRN 87 (defined in 1933), and LRN 3 (defined in 1909). At one point this was signed US 40 Alternate between Route 113 north of Knight's Landing and Route 20 in the Yuba/Marysville area. According to Chris Sampang, the routing of US 99/US 40 between the Yolo Causeway and Route 113 was as follows:

    • County Road 32A (which still retains some of its original concrete) from the Frontage Road exit westbound to where it crosses the railroad tracks

    • Olive Drive (note that the connection between County Road 32A and Olive Drive was paved over by I-80 and may be approximated by the current bike trail)

    • Richards Boulevard, which was originally graded into Olive Drive; the Olive and Richards extensions were built circa 1960.

    • First Street westbound

    • B Street northbound

    • Russell Boulevard westbound at Central Park in Davis (home of a Lincoln Highway marker; Lincoln Highway markers have been appearing on portions of Old US 40 west of Davis and in Dixon on Route 113)

    At Route 113, US 99 (later US 99W) went north. Note that US 99W later was given this route solo (from Olive Drive west) in the early 1950s, after US 40 was placed on the bypass that is now I-80 and right when US 40A was first commissioned (but before the north-south connector from Russell to I-80 was constructed that would later become Route 113). Also note that the Yolo Causeway originally was a twin-bridge four lane structure up until the 1960s; the original Causeway (1910s-1920s vintage) was located between the current railroad and freeway structures and was dismantled to make way for the I-80 bridge. US 99 (and US 99W) were routed this indirect way to Woodland via Davis, rather than the direct route of former Route 16/Route 24 to Woodland, due to the issues of flooding and closure.
    [Based on information provided by Chris Sampang]

    Parts of the original US 99 12 foot wide original concrete slab (OCS) still exist in Siskyou County, and can be driven on:
    [Based on a posting by donutbandit on M.T.R]

    • Off Crag View Drive going north, just south of Dunsmuir, the original US 99 slab enters Dwight's Wrecking and Towing.

    • In Dunsmuir, driving north on Dunsmuir Avenue, go straight into Florence Loop, and you are on Old US 99 for 2 blocks. The bridge that once linked Florence Loop with present day Siskiyou Avenue is long gone.

    • In Mt. Shasta, at N. Mt. Shasta Blvd. and Ski Village Drive: The OCS is visible in front of the Humane Society compound. Go right on Ski Village, and you can see the OCS winding away between some houses into a field.

    • Off Spring Hill Road north of Mt. Shasta: the road ends under an arch leading into a private driveway. The original concrete slab is the driveway.

    • Truck Village Drive between Weed and Mt. Shasta: go north and watch the road turn into OCS just before it is gated.

    • Black Butte Drive in Weed: go south, and the road quickly turns into 12 foot wide asphalt, with gaping potholes revealing the OCS beneath. Additionally, a short spur of the OCS exists at the northern end.

    • One can easily short sight the route across the current I-5 freeway into S. Weed Blvd. on the other side of the freeway, which was part of the original US 99.

    • Edgewood Road (formerly Trailer Lane) north of Weed: asphalt covered US 99 intact for several miles. At one point, you can easily see across the freeway to the southern terminus of Old US 99 Road (emptying out onto the freeway), which would have been the original route.

    The bypass route used the modern Dunsmuir Avenue bridge over the Sacramento River in Dunsmuir, then followed current Dunsmuir Avenue/Mott Road to the northern terminus which is a dead end at the old Diamond Lumber building. It likely followed the existing freeway route from there up to S. Mt. Shasta Blvd.

    In the Lake Shasta area, I-5 replaced the former Route 99 routing, which was submerged when the lake was filled. Relics of this routing reappears when the lake water level drops, as noted in this story: "A bridge from Highway 99, the precursor to Interstate 5, was being used last week as a makeshift low-water boat ramp at Antlers Resort & Marina near Lakeshore Drive in Lakehead."

     

    Status

    In October 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project that will construct an interchange at Route 99/Elverta Road to replace the existing signalized “at grade” intersection. On July 14, 2009, the County Board of Supervisors certified the MND finding that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. The project is estimated to cost $30,200,000. The project is programmed for funding with SR 99 Bond ($19,110,000) and Local ($ 11,090,000) funds. Construction is estimated to begin in fiscal year 2010/11.

    In August 2008, officials from Elk Grove to Rancho Cordova, Folsom and El Dorado County will gather for a historic summit that will focus on the long-proposed connector/expressway linking I-5, Route 99 and US 50.

    In early 2009, work began on a $54 million project to widen Route 99 to four lanes and realign connections at Wilson Road and Route 113. Completion is expected in 2010.

    [Tudor Bypass]There are plans to widen this route to four lanes near Yuba City. There are also plans to bypass the city of Tudor. As of Mid-May 2009, it was reported that visible progress is being made on the Tudor Bypass, a $54.8 million project to reroute Route 99 past the sweeping, accident-prone S-curve at Route 113. The new four-lane roadway, a straight shot through an expanse of orchards, is expected to open in September 2010. The section has the most need for improvements, as the junctions of Route 99 and Garden Highway and Route113 have an unusually high incidence of accidents. Property owners were not happy with the loss of road frontage. Traffic signals will be added at the intersections with Route 113 and Wilson Road

    The portion from Route 5 to 5 miles north of I-5 is cosigned with Route 70. Some old routings have been relinquished, for example, KP 20.5/29.1 in Sutter County, and RM 28.2-R32.7 in the County of Merced. A proposed route adoption was also relinquished: From PM 36.0/42.2 in Sutter County and from PM 0.0/13.1 in Butte County.

    [Riego]There are plans to construct a new interchange to connect Riego Road to Route 99 at the Sacramento/Sutter County line. The project is programmed in the Route 99 Corridor bond program and will be combined with local funds. The estimated cost of the project is $30,840,000 and is estimated to begin construction in Fiscal Year 2010-11. The scope, as described for the preferred alternative, is consistent with the project scope set forth in the approved project baseline agreement.

    [Feather River Project]In June 2008, the CTC approved reallocating some funding related to the Feather River Bridge reconstruction. The Sutter 99 Segment 2, Feather River Bridge Project PPNO (8361B) is part of the Route 99 Bond Program. The project proposes to widen Route 99 in Sutter County from two to four lanes with a continuous left turn lane from just south of Nicholaus Road to Sacramento Avenue. The project mainly consists of a new 3,045 foot two-lane bridge east of the existing Feather River Bridge (#18-26). The project also realigns the ramps to Nicholaus Road. The existing two-lane Feather River Bridge will remain in service. As the design work started, and detailed design information became available, the design and construction strategies considered during the environmental phase were reevaluated. Foundation drilling revealed different foundation conditions than what was originally considered. Preliminary consultations with the regulatory agencies for permitting began with the updated information. It was determined that environmental permit requirements had become more stringent and the agencies were requiring a reduced impact on the river. In addition, a more restrictive construction window for work being done in the channel is required. These factors led to a change in design and construction strategy. To address these new requirements and information, the current design reduces the number of bridge spans and foundations in the water, in order to minimize impacts to the main river channel. The longer spans require longer and larger diameter piles and an increased super structure and deck thickness, which in turn increases structure costs. Other options available will not render any financial savings; in fact, they could potentially be more costly in time and money. The proposed construction method minimizes the work area in the channel and reduces the noise levels from pile driving.

    In his 2006 Strategic Growth Plan, Governor Schwartzenegger proposed a comprehensive Route 70/Route 99 project. The project (stretching from the I-5/Route 99 junction to Route 149 in Butte County) converts two-lane conventional corridors to four-and-five-lane expressways, completes key segments to freeway by constructing interchanges, and provides additional capacity and throughput for current and projected future populations. It connects the Sacramento, Yuba-City and Chico urbanized area with an improved facility, saves lives by removing two lane segments, and supports improved freight movement.

    There are plans to construct a freeway near Fairmead.

    In August 2009, the CTC approved reinquishment of right of way in the county of Tehama along Route 99 near Los Molinos at Butler Street, consisting of a reconstructed county road.

    In June 2007, the CTC considered rescinding a portion of the freeway adoption for Route 99 in the County of Sutter, Post Mile T36.0/42.2 and the County of Butte, Post Mile 0.0/13.1. This was up for a vote again in December 2007. Due to funding constraints, Caltarns is unable to construct a freeway on a new alignment (bypassing the cities of Live Oak and Gridley) to replace the existing Route 99 facility in Sutter and Butte Counties. The specific portion to be rescinded is along Route 99 from Encinal Road at PM T36.0 to PM 42.2 in Sutter County and from the Sutter/Butte county line PM 0.0 to SR 162, at PM 13.1, in Butte County. Numerous studies were conducted on the Route 99/Route 70 corridor, with the conclusion to upgrade Route 70 to freeway standards, parallel to Route 99. Route 70 has been designated as a focus route in the Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan and maintains priority for Interregional Transportation Improvement Program funding. Route 99 runs 36.8 miles through Sacramento County as a four-lane expressway to an eight-lane freeway. Route 99 continues northward through Sutter County for 42.3 miles as a two-lane conventional highway to a four-lane freeway. It continues 45.9 miles through Butte County as a two-lane conventional highway to a four-lane conventional highway. On May 22, 1963, the Commission adopted the current Route 99 corridor, which bypasses the cities of Live Oak and Gridley. Numerous parcels, but not all, were purchased to obtain the necessary right of way for the adopted corridor. A decrease in freeway funding caused the project to be suspended. In 1988, the Commission asked that a corridor study determine the alignment for a divided expressway, for ultimate conversion to a freeway, connecting Sacramento, Yuba City/Marysville, and Chico. The result was a Routes 70 and 99 Corridor Study, which was adopted by the Butte County Association of Governments and by the Sacramento Area Council of Governments in 1990. Twenty-four alternatives were studied. The recommended proposed alternative was “A four-lane freeway (initially to be constructed as an expressway) on Route 70 from the Route 70/99 interchange to Route 149 via a Marysville Bypass; a four-lane freeway on Route 149 from Route 70 to Route 99; and a four-lane freeway on Route 99 from Route 149 to the existing freeway section south of the City of Chico.” The Study’s proposed alignment does not include a new alignment for Route 99 bypassing the cities of Live Oak and Gridley, though such a bypass was studied in 7 of the 24 alternatives. Butte County’s direction on a bypass goes back to its 1984 General Plan Circulation Element, which does not discuss or map a bypass of Live Oak or Gridley along Route 99 as an alternative. Sutter County concurred with the State Routes 70 and 99 Corridor Study in its 1995 General Plan Circulation Element and did not discuss the Live Oak or Gridley bypass alternative nor recognize it as an alternative on any maps in the Circulation Element. Gridley City Council discussions indicate a strong desire to work with the Department to reach a mutually beneficial solution.

    In December 2009, an effort by the state to sell 24 parcels east of Gridley. purchased by Caltrans in the 1960s for a future Route 99 bypass around the city ran into problems. The plan was dropped in the 1990s when it became clear either Route 99 or Route 70 could be improved to freeway or expressway status, but not both. After study and debate, Route 70 was chosen. The state started proceedings to sell the land in 2004, but delayed at the request of Gridley, which saw an eventual need for such a bypass. The bypass has been retained in both the city and Butte County general plans now being developed... and in Demember 2009, the Butte County Association of Governments added its endorsement to those seeking to have the state retain the property. Caltrans estimates the sale would raise $2.2 million. In the Gridley and county general plans, the bypass would be an "arterial" constructed to local standards, rather than a highway that would trigger state and federal oversight.

    [99 aux lane near Chico]In February 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project to construct an auxiliary lane near Chico. The project is located in the City of Chico on Route 99 between the Route 32 and East 1st Avenue interchanges and on East 1st Avenue in the vicinity of the Route 99/East 1st Avenue interchange. The project would improve the operational characteristics of Route 99 by providing an auxiliary lane in each direction between Route 32 and East 1st Avenue. Two build alternatives, the Inside Widening Alternative and the Outside Widening Alternative, were considered during the environmental process. The Inside Widening Alternative with signalized conventional ramp intersections on East 1st Avenue was selected as the preferred alternative. The preferred alternative results in certain environmental impacts related to land use, transportation, air quality, noise, hydrology and water quality, biological resources, cultural resources, earth resources, visual resources, public services and facilities that require mitigation to be reduced to a less than significant level. The project is planned to be constructed in three phases. Phase I consists of northbound ramp improvements at East 1st Avenue. The construction capital and support costs for this phase were programmed at $8,286,000. Phase I construction is nearly complete. Phase II consists of the construction of a northbound auxiliary lane and widening of median and structures. This phase is estimated to cost $39,520,000 and is programmed with SR 99 Bond ($23,520,000) and STIP ($16,000,000) funds. Construction is estimated to begin May 2010. Phase III will construct a southbound auxiliary lane. This phase is estimated to cost $12,500,000 and is not programmed.

     

    Suffixed Routings

    The old US 99 used to split into US 99E and US 99W in Sacramento:

    US 99E

    The current routing is what was much of US 99E. US 99E ran concurrent with US 40 (now I-80) to Roseville along a portion of LRN 3, defined in 1909. At Roseville, still as LRN 3, it ran N to Lincoln along present day Route 65 (for a while, Route 65 and US 99E were cosigned). From Lincoln, US 99E ran to Marysville still as LRN 3 (this segment is present-day Route 65 to Olivehurst, and Route 70 from Olivehurst to Marysville). From Marysville, US 99E turned north to Chico, and Red Bluff, all as LRN 3.

    Route 20 between Yuba City and Marysville was co-signed with US 99E and Alternate US 40. (US 40A east was multiplexed with 20 east and US 99E south)

    Part of the US 99E routing in Sacramento is now part of Route 51, the former Elvas Freeway. See Route 51 for specific historical information.

    US 99W

    US 99W originally ran W out of Sacramento along LRN 50, defined in 1933, and then W along US 40 to the vicinity of Davis (along LRN 6, defined in 1909). It ran to near Exit 73 westbound (Olive Drive), then somehow connected with 5th Street on a now-removed alignment headed from US 40 west to the current Power Line Road/5th Street junction. (This removed alignment of 5th Street seems to have existed as late as 1967). US 99W continued west on 5th Street through downtown Davis, continuing in that direction as the street name changed to Russell Boulevard at B Street (where Davis's Central Park is located). US 99W then followed Russell to current Route 113 where it then merged with Alternate US 40 eastbound going north on Route 113 (cosigned as Route 113/US 99W). It then ran N cosigned with Alternate US 40 (present-day Route 113) to Woodland (along LRN 7, defined in 1909). It jogged W briefly along Route 16 (LRN 50), and then continued N signed as US 99W, along LRN 7, to Red Bluff. This was later replaced with I-5 (LRN 238, defined in 1959), whose routing is a closer approximation to Route 16 out of Sacramento to Woodland.

    The routings in Davis changed to the Route 113 routing by 1953.

    There was also a split at one time between Manteca to Stockton, between 1930 and 1933. At this time, US 99 ran down to Stockton, and US 99W split from US 99 in Stockton.

     

    Business Routes
    • Gridley
    • Chico: The Esplanade

     

    Naming

    The portion of Route 99 between Oroville Dam Boulevard West and Nelson Avenue in Oroville is named the "Milton La Malfa Memorial Highway". It was named in memory of Milton Joseph La Malfa, who died on October 5, 2008. Born in San Jose, California, to Tony and Marge La Malfa on February 22, 1937, Milton La Malfa was raised and lived nearly his entire life in Richvale, California, on the farm that his Italian grandfather, Giusseppe La Malfa, purchased in 1931. Earning a degree in agriculture/business from Fresno State University in 1959, Milton La Malfa married Karon Myers of Oroville, California, in 1958, and they had three children, Doug, Sherry, and Lisa. Distinguishing himself as a prominent rice farmer in the area, Milton La Malfa worked with his father to level the ground in the 1950's and 1960's, taming new acreage and improving irrigation methods of rice. Milton La Malfa was also involved with experimental projects through the rice experiment station, where he worked on fertilizer and herbicide studies to improve rice production and yields and grew foundation seed rice, and in 1960, a small rice dryer was built on the ranch for seed rice storage and isolation. In addition to utilizing his outstanding talent and skills as an innovative thinker in his farming operation, Milton La Malfa shared his wise counsel in numerous capacities on a broad range of public and private organizations, including several rice industry organizations. Milton La Malfa provided leadership and results-oriented vision as a director of the Butte County Rice Growers Association from 1973 to 1975 and again from 1981 to 1986, as well as secretary-treasurer for four years and chair for one year. Milton La Malfa also served with distinction as a director of Associated Rice Marketing Cooperative from 1988 to 1993, serving as chair for one year, and also gave his time as director of the Richvale Seed Growers for many years. Milton La Malfa was instrumental in organizing local farmers in 1985 to form the Western Canal Water Users Association, which initiated the negotiations with Pacific Gas and Electric to purchase the water rights and conveyance system for the farmers in the area; he subsequently became director of the Western Canal Water District (formed from the Western Canal Water Users Association) and also served as its president. Milton La Malfa also contributed extensively as a director of Drainage District 200 and was on the Board of the Northern California Water Association, which is the advocacy arm of the water districts in Sacramento. Milton La Malfa was recognized for his leadership in rice propagation, development, and in securing water for California rice's future, and was nationally awarded the prestigious 2008 Rice Farmer of the Year Award by the USA Rice Federation. Milton La Malfa was dedicated to philanthropy in his personal life, and his many contributions to the community will not be forgotten. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR) 71, Resolution Chapter 107, on 9/23/2009.

    The 5-mile segment of Route 99 south of its intersection with Route 70 in the County of Sutter is named the Bernie Richter Memorial Highway. It was named in memory of Bernie Richter, born September 7, 1931, a member of the Assembly of the State of California from 1992 to 1998. In January 1998 Bernie Richter witnessed a vehicle lose control, crash into a bridge abutment just south of the intersection of Route 99 and Route 70 in the County of Sutter, and burst into flames. At this point Assemblymember Richter raced to the vehicle with his own fire extinguisher, and with the assistance of another good Samaritan, rescued the driver by pulling him out of the vehicle. Bernie Richter died at the age of 68 on October 25, 1999. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 189, August 17, 2004, Chapter 142.

    The portion of Route 99 consisting of the four-lane expressway between the Edgar Slough (Bridge No. 12128) and the Pentz Road overcrossing (Postmile 24.2, Butte County) is officially designated the "Ray E. Johnson Expressway" (this is in the segment between the Route 99/Route 149 junction and Chico). Ray E. Johnson was a member of the California Legislature for 18 years, having been first elected in 1964 to the Assembly, and to the Senate in 1976. He represented 15 counties as a Member of the Legislature and, in that capacity, was instrumental in securing the completion of the Route 65 Bypass of Interstate 80 and in the three-lane widening of Interstate 80. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 74, Chapter 113, in 1993.

    The Tudor Bypass segment of Route 99, from the intersection of Route 99 and Route 113 south to the intersection of Route 99 and Central Avenue, in Sutter County is formally named the "Joan Bechtel Memorial Highway". It was named in memory of Joan Bechtel, was elected to the Sutter County Board of Supervisors in November 1992, and who subsequently represented the citizens of the Fourth Supervisorial District from January 1993 to May 2002. She served as the Sutter County Clerk-Recorder from May 2002 to December 2007. Ms. Bechtel also showed her commitment to the community by serving as a member of the Fremont-Rideout Health Group's Board of Directors for 25 years, and on the Yuba-Sutter Fair Board for eight years. During her tenure as county supervisor, Ms. Bechtel led the effort to widen Route 99 for the safety of all citizens of Sutter County and all those that travel along Route 99. As a direct result of her efforts, there has been a precipitous drop in accident rates and fatalities on Route 99. Ms. Bechtel passed away on June 25, 2008, and the Legislature wishes to honor her commitment and dedication to Sutter County. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR) 150, Resolution Chapter 162, on 9/19/2008.

    The portion of this route from Route 65 to Red Bluff was historically called the "Capitol Highway". In local usage, it is called the "East Side Highway".

     

    National Trails

    Pacific Highway Sign This segment was part of the "Pacific Highway".

     

    Freeway

    [SHC 253.5] From Route 5 in Sacramento to Route 36 near Red Bluff. Added to the Freeway and Expressway system in 1959.

     

    Interregional Route

    [SHC 164.15] With routing to be determined via Route 70 or via Route 99 between Route 70 north of Sacramento and Route 149 north of Oroville.

Post 1964 Signage History

US Highway Shield Until the signed/legislative route alignment and renumbering in 1964, Route 99 was longer on both ends:

  • On the southern end, the route ran to the Mexican border. From the current terminus of Route 99, US 99 continued S along present-day I-5 into Los Angeles. Before 1964, this was signed as US 99 to the junction with (pre-1964) Route 7 (also known as US 6). This was LRN 4, defined in 1909. It entered Los Angeles along San Fernando Road, (along what was then Route 7) and headed east at Fletcher (in Glendale). For a portion of this, it ran concurrent with US 6.

    Originally, US 99 then ran into Eagle Rock and Colorado, where it ran concurrent with US 66 as far as San Bernardino (LRN 9), where it joined cosigned US 60/US 70. One map shows US 99 running along the old Route 118 (approx. I-210) routing along the foothills. This was the former LRN 9 routing, so this does make sense. This former LRN 9 routing was gone by 1929.

    By 1939, US 99 ran cosigned with US 6 into downtown Los Angeles (LRN 4, defined in 1909). Before the freeway was constructed, it ran along San Fernando Road. After the freeway was constructed, it ran along the freeway portion (LRN 161 defined in 1933), bypassing San Fernando Road (which was signed as Business US 99). This is present-day I-5.

    Near downtown, until the construction of the Pasadena Freeway, it ran down San Fernando Road to Ramona, where it joined cosigned US 60/US 70. Once the first segments of the Pasadena (Arroyo Seco Parkway) and San Bernardino (Ramona Parkway) Freeways were constructed in the early 1940s, US 99 was rerouted to run down the Route 11 (LRN 165, defined in 1933) to cosigned US 66/US 101, and then E to US 60/US 70 (along LRN 2 to LRN 26). Once the Santa Ana Freeway was constructed, US 99 was again resigned to run E directly from the Route 11/US 66 junction to the San Bernardino Freeway (this segment was LRN 4). This is present-day I-5 to the I-10 junction.

    There is evidence the route ran along the Aliso Street Viaduct in downtown Los Angeles.

    After the junction with US 60/US 70, the route continued E cosigned. This was LRN 26, although the original surface route along Valley Blvd was LRN 77 by 1963. This is present-day I-10.

    E of Pomona, US 99 was cosigned only with US 70 to Beaumont. This was LRN 26. This is present-day I-10.

    From Beaumont to Indio, US 99 was cosigned with US 60 and US 70, and was LRN 26. This is present-day I-10.

    From Indio, US 99 left US 60/US 70 and continued S to Calexico through Brawley and El Centro. This is present-day Route 86, and was LRN 26.

  • Between Sacramento and Red Bluff: Originally (i.e., 1929), there was only one US 99 N of Sacramento, following the route of what was later US 99W. Some maps show US 99W signed as Route 99, and US 99E as Alt Route 99. By 1939, there was both a US 99W and a US 99E out of Sacramento.

  • On the northern end: Before 1964, the current routing of I-5 was signed as US 99 to the Oregon border. This was LRN 3. Parts of this have been bypassed by the I-5 freeway. The older true Route 99 segments include present-day Route 273, Route 265, and Route 263.

 

exitinfo.gif

 

Other WWW Links

 

National Trails

Midland Trail Sign The portion of former US 99 that was cosigned with US 6 was part of the Midland Trail.

 

Interstate Submissions

Route 99 was not recommended for inclusion in the Interstate system. However, Assembly Joint Resolution 63 requested the President and Congress of the United States to enact legislation to include Route 99 in the interstate highway system. (August 19, 2004, Chapter 153).

 

Blue Star Memorial Highway

The portion of this route that is former US 99 was designated as a "North-South Blue Star Memorial Highway" by Senate Concurrent Resolution 33, Ch. 82 in 1947.

 


Overall statistics for Route 99:

  • Total Length (1995): 415 miles
  • Average Daily Traffic (1993): 6,000 to 155,000
  • Milage Classification: Rural: 261; Sm. Urban 50; Urbanized: 104.
  • Previous Federal Aid Milage: FAP: 415 mi.
  • Functional Classification: Prin. Arterial: 415 mi.
  • Counties Traversed: Kern, Tulare, Fresno, Madera, Merced, Stanislaus, San Joaquin, Sacramento, Sutter, Butte.

 

Pre-1964 Legislative Route

In 1933, Chapter 767 added the route from "[LRN 53] at Rio Vista via Ryer Island to [LRN 6] near Broderick" to the highway system. In 1935, this was defined in the code to be LRN 99 with the same definition.

In 1961, Chapter 1146 relaxed the origin to be "[LRN 53] near Rio Vista".

This route ran from Route 12 near Rio Vista via Ryer Island to US 40), now I-80, near Broderick. It is part of the present-day unsigned Route 84 in this area.


Unconstructed

Post 1964 Legislative Route 100



Routing

From the junction of Routes 1 and 17 to Route 1 west of the San Lorenzo River via the beach area in Santa Cruz.

 

Post 1964 Signage History

This routing is unchanged from its 1963 definition. It was a proposed freeway loop routing through Santa Cruz. This route adoption was rescinded in August 1975. The route location was never determined.

 

Pre 1964 Signage History

This was LRN 287 (defined in 1959), which was proposed with the routing undetermined in 1963.

Route 100 was not defined as part of the initial state signage of routes in 1934. It is unclear what (if any) route was signed as Route 100 between 1934 and 1964.

 

Status

Unsigned and unconstructed.

 

Freeway

[SHC 253.1] Entire route. Added to the Freeway and Expressway system in 1959.

 


Overall statistics for Route 100:

  • Total Length (1995): 5 miles unconstructed.
  • Milage Classification: Rural: 0; Sm. Urban 0 Urbanized: 5.
  • Counties Traversed: Santa Cruz.

 

Pre-1964 Legislative Route

In 1933, Chapter 767 added the route from "Rio Vista-Broderick Road on Ryer Island to Sacramento-Antioch Road" to the highway system. In 1935, this was added to the highway system as LRN 100, with the definition:

[LRN 99] on Ryer Island to that part of [LRN 11] between Sacramento and Antioch

This definition remained unchanged until the 1963 renumbering. It ran from present-day unsigned Route 84 on Ryer Island to present-day Route 160 (pre-1963 Route 24). This is present day Route 220.


US Highway Shield

US Highway 101



Routing
  1. Route 5 near Seventh Street in Los Angeles to Route 1, Funston approach, and the approach to the Golden Gate Bridge in the Presidio of San Francisco via Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, and Salinas.


    Post 1964 Signage History

    (105-110)In 1963, this segment was segment (a) and (b), and was defined as the route "(a) The junction of Routes 105 and 110 in Los Angeles to Route 80 in San Francisco, passing near Ford Road south of San Jose. (b) Route 80 to Route 480." In this definition, "the junction of Routes 105 and 110 in Los Angeles" refers to the present-day I-10 east/US 101 junction -- the plan in 1963 was for those to be short stub interstates I-105 and I-110.

    In 1968, Chapter 282 changed the definition of both segments. This reflected two major changes. On the southern end, the stub definitions of I-105 and I-110 were removed. What had been I-105, the portion of US 101 from the I-10 E junction to I-5, was added to US 101 (I-110, which was the short stub from (present) US 101 to I-5/I-10, was added to I-10). On the northern end, the freeway revolt in San Francisco was in flower, and routes were changing everywhere. Portions of routes were switched between I-480 and I-280 (and some of I-480 was deleted); changes were made to I-80. As a result, both segments changed, and the new definition was: "(a) The junction of Routes 105 and 110 Route 5 near Seventh Street in Los Angeles to Route 80 near Division Street in San Francisco, passing near Ford Road south of San Jose. (b) Route 80 near Division Street in San Francisco to Route 480."

    In 1991, Chapter 498 changed segment (b) to absorb former Route 480, making it "(b) Route 80 near Division Street in San Francisco to the junction of Route 1, Funston approach, and the approach to the Golden Gate Bridge in the Presidio of San Francisco passing near the intersections of Lombard Street and Van Ness Avenue."

    In 1992, Chapter 1243 combined (a) and (b): "(a) Route 5 near Seventh Street in Los Angeles to Route 1, Funston approach, and the approach to the Golden Gate Bridge in the Presidio of San Francisco via Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, and Salinas."

    Section 72.1 explicitly abandons as a state highway the portion of current Route 101 between Fell Street and Turk Street. The portion of current Route 101 between Market Street and Turk Street ceases to be a state highway unless the alternative to the Octavia Street Project is approved in November 1999. This reflects a portion that came to US 101 from Route 480.

    There are some planned freeway routings in the city of San Francisco. California Transportation Commission (CTC) Agenda Item June 2000 2.3a discusses a route from PK (Post Kilometer) 7.6 at South Van Ness to PK R8.2 at Fell Street. July 2000 Agenda Item 2.3a discusses a route from PM R5.0 at Eire Street to PM 5.3 at Golden Gate Avenue.

    There have been some small relinquishments, either of current routings or past routings. CTC June 2000 Agenda Item 2.3c included relinquishment resolutions for Marin County PM 16.3-18.3 in the City of Novato, and San Francisco PM G4.7-5.3 in San Francisco.

    The following freeway-to-freeway connections were never constructed:

    • NB US 101 to EB Route 134. Rationale: Construction of this connector was put "on hold" pending completion of the interchange for the Laurel Canyon Freeway (Route 170), which ended up never being constructed.

    An additional bit of history: The Los Angeles Times in December 2009 published a nice article on the Hollywood Freeway chickens. The flock started with the 1969 crash of a poultry truck on the Hollywood Freeway. As the driver, Joe Silbert, told The Times in 2000, "I was taking anywhere from 500 to 1,000 chickens back from the Valley to a slaughterhouse in L.A." During the accident, many of the birds spilled out and escaped into the brush near the Vineland Avenue onramp in Studio City. Silbert gave chase but estimated that at least 200 chickens made their way to freedom. The fugitives took up residence along US 101 and became known as the Freeway Chickens. The birds' existence was eased by an elderly resident (Minnie Blumfield) who sprinkled seed through the chain-link fence, left water for them and inevitably became known as the Chicken Lady. By 1976, Blumfield was 90 and worried about who would care for the flock after she was gone. She gave her blessing to the Great Chicken Roundup. Animal services officers captured the fowl and shipped them to a farm in Sylmar. Evidently a few survived, and there are sighting to this day.

     

    Pre 1964 Signage History

    San Diego County

    US 101 was first signed in 1928. It began at the Mexican border, and ran N through San Diego along National Avenue, Main St., Harbor Drive, Pacific Drive, Midway Drive, Morena Blvd, and Pacific Coast Highway (all LRN 2, defined in 1909). This was later bypassed by the present-day I-5 (Montgomery Freeway). SignOnSanDiego has noted there is an oral-history project recording memories of old US 101. There's a Historic US 101 sign on San Diego Ave. in the Old Town section, near the Whaley House. Also, street names like "Old Hwy 101" and "Coast Hwy 101" follow the old route in Solana Beach and Encinitas.

    This alignment, along Torrey Pines and La Jolla Blvd., was once signed as US 101W. The later I-5 alignment, the Rose Canyon Highway, was signed as US 101E.

    County Route Shield From San Diego, the route ran N along Pacific Coast Highway to San Juan Capestrano. This route is now San Diego County Route S21. The old "El Camino Real" is San Diego County Route S11. This has been bypassed by I-5, and was LRN 2. Other portions that wree onced signed as US 101 include San Diego County Route S6, San Diego CR S8. This is one of the older freeway segments in the San Diego area, encompassing the former Carlsbad Freeway, and including a Business Routing for US 101 in Oceanside.

    Between this point and Oceanside, I-5 buries the old road. Between San Juan Capestrano and Oceanside, the following is a description of how to find the old road (alias, it goes from N to S, while the rest of this paragraph goes from S to N):

    South of San Juan Capistrano, you can follow US 101 pretty closely on Camino Capistrano then continuing south on the Old Coast Hwy which then turns into El Camino Real through San Clemente. You will have to get back on the freeway at Christantos. Then you can take Baslone Road and turn right, you will be on the Old Pacific Hwy and if you can do it, when your making the sharp left turn after the Fwy take a look right and you can see the old Expressway thats now buried by I-5. Continue south on the old expressway, over the railroad overpass and past San Onofree Nuclear Power Station until you get to the entrance to the San Onofree State Beach. Pay the ranger and continue on. Now eventually you will have to get on a bycycle to continue further south, when the Expressway gets to area below the Vista Point this is point where I-5 buries the old road all the way to Oceanside.

    With respect to the route through the Marine base, US 101 was open through the base, all the way to San Diego. It was only four lanes divided through the base, with a 60mph speed limit. The accident rate was high. Portions of the original road still exist south of Camp Pendleton down to San Diego, with historic US 101 markers. Within the base, the northern part of the old road still exists, as a service road to San Onofre State Beach and the nuclear power plant. Most of the rest was incorporated into, or obliterated by, I-5, or still exists as a bike trail.
    [Oscar Voss]

    Orange County

    From San Juan Capestrano, US 101 ran N through El Toro and Irvine to Santa Ana. It ran along 1st Street, Main Street (Santa Ana), Santa Ana Blvd, Los Angeles Blvd (post 1970s: Anaheim Blvd), and Spadra (post-1967: Harbor Blvd). From Spadra, it ran along Anaheim-Puente Road to Whittier, and W to Mission. It ran N along Mission to Sunset. This portion of the routing has been bypassed by I-5. It may have taken, at one time, a different route through Norwalk, as there is an El Camino Real bell at the intersection of Orr and Day and Imperial. In terms of LRNs, the freeway routing of US 101 S was LRN 2 (defined in 1909) from San Diego to a point S of Anaheim, LRN 174 (defined in 1933) from Anaheim to Route 35, and LRN 166 (defined in 1933) into downtown LA. The surface street routing ("old US 101") was LRN 2 at this point, and was likely signed is "Business US 101". It is present-day Route 72. For a short time, there was also a Bypass US 101 ranning from the intersection of Firestone Blvd / Manchester Ave. and Los Angeles St, northwest along Firestone (pre-1964 Route 10), N along Lakewood Blvd. ( Route 19), W at Anaheim Telegraph Rd (Route 26), N to Whitter Blvd at Calzona St.

    Los Angeles County

    At this point, the present-day routing of US 101 N began. Note that the portion in the downtown area (between the Route 110 (former Route 11/US 66) interchange and the Route 60 interchange) was signed, between 1947 and 1958, as US 99/US 101/US 60/US 70. Before the construction of the freeway in Los Angeles, US 101 ran W along Sunset to Cahuenga, N along Cahuenga to Ventura Blvd, and ran out of Los Angeles on Ventura Blvd. Ventura Blvd is the oldest continuously traveled route in the Valley. Originally part of the famed El Camino Real, the dirt path between between California's Spanish missions, it has been known as Camino de las Virgenes and Ventura Road.

    The Cahuenga Pass Parkway concept was developed by City Engineer, Lloyd Aldrich. Aldrich’s plan include four lanes in each direction, with separation between opposing traffic flows with the Pacific Electric Railroad tracks in the middle. Bridges connecting the service roads and spanning the parkway were constructed at the Pilgrimage (now John Anson Ford) Theater, Mulholland Drive and Barham Boulevard. At the southern end of the Pass, southbound traffic destined to Highland Avenue would stay to the right, while traffic destined to southbound Cahuenga Boulevard would stay in the left two lanes and travel in a tunnel under the Pacific Electric Railroad tracks. The first unit was opened on June 15, 1940 and extended northerly to the Barham Boulevard ramps. By January 1, 1941, the roadway was extended to terminate in a 90° curve connecting with the older segment of Cahuenga Boulevard near Bennett Drive. Cahuenga Boulevard Parkway, a freeway less than two miles long, was opened just one day after the Arroyo Seco Parkway was dedicated. The next phase of extending the parkway to the intersection of Ventura Boulevard and Vineland Avenue was disrupted by World War II, and was completed by the State in 1949. In 1954, Cahuenga Parkway was altered and incorporated into the Hollywood Freeway. This route was LRN 2, started in 1909.

    While the last phase of the Cahuenga Parkway was being completed, work already was underway on building the Hollywood Freeway. The last segment of the freeway, built in 1954, connected to the south end of the original Cahuenga Parkway. The completion of the Hollywood Freeway necessitated the demolition of the 1940 tunnel connection under the Pacific Electric Railroad tracks between the Pilgrimage bridge and Odin Street. In addition, since the Pacific Electric Railroad had ceased operation in 1944, the area that it had occupied in the median was reconstructed to accommodate traffic from northbound Highland Avenue. In 1957, when the Hollywood Freeway was extended northwesterly of Lankershim Boulevard, the northbound on-ramp, northbound off-ramp and southbound on-ramp at Barham Boulevard were abandoned. The abandoned ramps have remained preserved since that time. Despite alterations, much of the original Cahuenga Parkway remains intact. The original ornamental street lights on the bridges still look charming. The Pacific Electric Railroad overhead cable hooks can still be seen on the bridges over the area formerly occupied by the tracks. And the ornamental design in the corners of Barham Boulevard bridge remains.
    [The historical information above on the Cahuenga Pass Parkway was derived from "Transportation Topics and Tales: Milestones in Transportation History in Southern California" by John E. Fisher, P.E. PTOE, available at http://ladot.lacity.org/pdf/PDF100.pdf]

    An August 1941 report issued by the Regional Planning Commission of Los Angeles County entitled “A Report on the Feasibility of a Freeway Along the Channel of the Los Angeles River” proposed a four-lane roadway on each levee from Anaheim Street in Long Beach north to Sepulveda Boulevard in the San Fernando Valley; excepting between Soto Street and Dayton Street in downtown Los Angeles, where, due to a lack of right-of-way along the river, the alignment matches the future alignment of the US 101 portion of the Santa Ana Freeway. There is no mention in the report of a master plan of freeways like that issued in 1947, although the maps showed connections to the already-completed Arroyo Seco Parkway and the proposed Ramona and Rio Hondo Parkways.
    (Thanks to Daniel Thomas for hunting down this information)

    Ventura County

    The three mile segment of the Ventura Freeway from Palm Street to Emma Wood State Park began construction on February 28, 1961. This construction included a one mile segment of the Ojai Freeway (Route 33), which replaced a hazardous at-grade intersection that had originally existed. The project was completed in May 1963.

    Santa Barbara/ San Luis Obispo/San Benito Counties

    The route remained signed as US 101, and legislatively as LRN 2, into San Jose, running through Santa Barbara, San Luis Obsipo, Paso Robles, Salinas, and Gilroy.

    An interesting side note about San Luis Obispo: It was the location of the first motel. To be more specific, in December 1925, architect Arthur S. Heineman opened a group of cottages that permitted lodgers to drive to their doors. It was originally named the Milestone Motel, but was later called the "Mo-Tel Inn." It was located at 2223 Monterey Street, and accomodated 160 guests. It is next to the current Apple Farm restaurant and motel. For more information, visit the History in San Luis Obispo County site.

    In Templeton, Main Street and possibly Old County Road is a former routing of US 101. Near San Ardos, Cattleman Dr. is former US 101.

    According to Tod Fitch, it appears as if San Juan Road and San Juan Grade road may be early routing of US 101 through San Juan Bautista (since bypassed). This is based on topological maps at http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/histopo/. Following the link to the Monterey Bay region, he was able to get two 15 minute topographic quadrangle maps for San Juan Bautista. The first, from 1917 reissued in 1932, shows the San Juan Grade road as "state highway" and does NOT show a road near the current alignment of US 101. The second, from 1939 reissued in 1958, shows US 101 near or on the current US 101 alignment. It may very well be that San Juan Grade Road and San Juan Road were an early alignment of US 101 from Salinas through San Juan Bautista; there is some logic in this based on the US highway system approach of running through the small towns in the area.

    Santa Clara County

    Business Route Shield The route between Gilroy and San Jose approximates the original routing. The original routing still exists and is designated as Business Route 101, and is "Monterey" Highway.

    In San Jose, the routing followed the present El Camino route that is present-day Route 82. This was signed as US 101 and was LRN 2. The present-day freeway routing was signed as Bypass US 101, and was LRN 68, defined in 1923. Construction began on LRN 68 in 1924, it was completed in 1929. The portion from 10th St. N was LRN 2.

    San Mateo/San Franciso Area

    Here are some specifics on the routings:

    • Up to 1932, US 101 from San Jose to San Francisco was US 101W, following El Camino Real, Mission St., Valencia St, Market St. (where it met US 101E coming from Oakland, via a Ferry), Van Ness Av, Bay St., and Hyde St., to the Sausalito Ferry. In July 1932, the US 101W/US 101 E split occurred.

    • In 1933, US 101W changed at Daly City to the route of San Jose Ave., Alemany Blvd., Bayshore Blvd., Potrero Ave., 10th St., Fell St., Van Ness Ave., Bay St. and Hyde St. to the Sausalito Ferry.

    • In 1936, US 101W became US 101.

    • In 1938, the Bayshore Blvd from San Francisco to San Jose became US 101, and Alemany Bl - San Jose Ave - El Camino Real becamse US 101A. From Bayshore Blvd & Alemany, US 101 continued on Bayshore Blvd., Potrero Ave., 10th St., Fell St., Van Ness Ave., Lombard St., and Richardson Blvd. to the Golden Gate Bridge. There evidently was a lot of infighting as to whether the El Camino or Bayshore would be US 101; some of this is illustrated by the Trees for El Camino Project

    • In 1940, Alemany Blvd., San Jose Ave., and El Camino Real became US 101, while Bayshore Blvd. became Bypass US 101. The old US 101 and Bypass 101 rejoined in southern San Francisco. The route was LRN 68 for a short time.

    • In 1962, the freeway was completed in 1962 (construction started in 1945).

    • In 1964, I-280 was routed on the 19th Avenue corridor (the north extension of the Junipero Serra Freeway, including the current freeway stub south of Font Boulevard); Route 1 was routed on the Southern Freeway between the current Route 1/I-280 split and Route 82 was routed on the Southern Freeway on the old US 101 portion (which includes Alemany Boulevard) as well as San Jose Avenue, Mission Street (in Daly City and Colma) and El Camino Real (from Colma south) and also on the Southern Freeway between Army Street (the planned junction with Route 87) and the Alemany Maze (Southern/Bayshore junction). US 101 was moved from the El Camino/Southern routing to the Bayshore/Lick (former Bypass US 101) routing from San Jose (the current Route 82/US 101 split) to the Alemany Maze.

    • In 1968, Route 82 was cut back from the Southern Freeway to end at the San Jose Avenue junction. Route 87 was cut back from I-80/Route 480 junction in downtown SF to the Army Street/Southern Freeway junction (and would be further cut back to Route 237 in 1970). The I-280 designation was removed from the 19th Avenue corridor and Route 1 was legislatively restored to the entire route (and taken off the short connector of the Southern Freeway between Daly City and San Jose Avenue). It is uncertain if the short Route 1 freeway stub between Font and the I-280/Route 1 junction was ever signed as part of the interstate. Interstate 280 was then rerouted to the entire Southern Freeway between Daly City and the I-80/Route 480 junction. No changes were made to US 101; the move to the Bayshore/Lick routing had already taken place.

    • In 1991, the portion of US 101 that would've been part of Route 480 (between Van Ness/Lombard and the Route 1/US 101 interchange in the Presidio) was legislatively given to US 101, although it has never been signed as anything else since the first portions of freeway were built in the 1940s. Thus, had Route 480 been constructed from the terminus at Broadway northwest to near the current left turn of US 101 (Van Ness to Lombard), there would have been a co-signage of Route 480 and US 101 on Doyle Drive. The rationale for the Route 480 numbering would have been its terminus at I-280 in the Presidio (when I-280 ran up the Route 1 corridor), very similar to the 280/680 numbering change in San Jose)

    A good history of the route in the San Francisco Bay Area may be found in the article "History Traces the Bayshore from Highway to Freeway", from the San Mateo Community Journal.

    The Hyde Park Ferry across San Francisco Bay has a large "Historic US 101" sign on it. At one point, ferries were considered part of the state highway system.

    In San Francisco, US 101 was routed on the Central Freeway, which starts at I-80 and ended on the northbound (lower deck) side at Franklin and Golden Gate. It then went via Golden Gate to its current routing on Van Ness. The southbound upper deck started at Turk and Gough, using Turk from Van Ness. After the Loma Priata earthquake, it was only open to Fell and Oak at Laguna, and US 101 exited at Mission/Van Ness. In 1996, this was closed down to take out the double deck portion.

    The Central Freeway had four sets of "ghost ramp" stubs off it:

    1. Stubs that could have been used to extend the freeway beyond its original north end at Turk/Golden Gate.

    2. A potential additional northbound off-ramp and southbound on-ramp (or another path for extending the freeway) to the west near Fulton St.

    3. A potential southbound off-ramp and northbound on-ramp at Fell/Oak, if extension (1) had occurred. (Conversely, if the freeway had been extended along Fell/Oak, these would have provided a connection >between the extension and the Turk/Golden Gate spur.

    4. On the surviving, single-deck section, what would have been a southbound off-ramp and northbound on-ramp at Van Ness/Mission.

    On US 101 near Moffet Blvd there are some bus cutouts. According to a posting on misc.transport.road, these were there to allow people to pick up soldiers, but their use is now discouraged, and they will be removed when the interchange is reconstructed.

    At the Rengstorff exit and around Mountain View, one can still see the old white-on-green BYP US 101 signs (with BYP greened out).

    The former terminus of the Bayshore Freeway (Blossom Hill Road (nee Ford Road) junction with Route 82 (Monterey Road)) still shows some vestige of the former Y interchange that fed the Bayshore into the older routing. Here one can see where the freeway makes a sudden turn to the left at this point, even though the Blossom Hill interchange is now a mere diamond. This old interchange was removed in 1982, for the Caltrans bridge log shows the bridges for the current CA 82/US 101 separation having been built then. (Thanks to Chris Sampang for this information)

    According to the San Mateo Daily Journal, the predecessor to the Bayshore Freeway in the San Mateo area was the old Bayshore Highway. Parts of this highway (El Camino Real, once called the County Road) had already been built by the 1920s. In 1926, this was incorporated into the new US Highway system as part of US 101. As the Bayshore Freeway began to be designated as US 101, El Camino Realtime became known as the US 101 BYP. In 1931, the highway was completed to Redwood City. The southern section to San Jose was finished in 1937. The route of the old Bayshore began at 10th and Market in San Francisco. It extended past the intersection at today’s Cesar Chavez and Potrero. It continued along what is now Bayshore Boulevard, which parallels today’s freeway until it intersects with Third Street. From Third Street, the Bayshore Highway proceeded through “Boneyard Hill”, continuing around San Bruno Mountain south of Brisbane, extending through South San Francisco along what is now Airport Boulevard. Airport Boulevard crosses under the freeway at the north end of San Francisco International Airport. Cutting through the rich dairy land which once comprised much of Millbrae, the Bayshore Highway rolled through what is now a runway at SFO, then past today’s hotel row in Burlingame, stopping at Broadway in Burlingame. At that point, the highway followed essentially the same route as today’s Bayshore Freeway, until it reached Redwood City. There, today’s Veteran’s Boulevard served as the highway course, extending south to Marsh Road in Menlo Park. Beyond Palo Alto, the old highway followed much the same configuration as the present US 101. The first overpass over the Bayshore emerged at Peninsula Avenue, with the interchanges at Ralston Avenue, Holly Street and Whipple Avenue constructed later. By 1940, traffic congestion on El Camino Real led to construction of a a 27-mile freeway from San Francisco to Palo Alto. By 1948, most of initial construction of the Bayshore Freeway from San Francisco to Broadway-Burlingame had been completed. The second phase of construction extended the freeway into San Mateo. By July 11, 1957, the Candlestick causeway had been built over the water linking San Francisco with San Mateo County. This section of the freeway was constructed through the marshland from Candlestick Point and Oyster Point in South San Francisco, including excavating a mountain and filling the marsh east of Brisbane with landfill. In 1964, with the great renumbering, the Bayshore Freeway gained the sole designation of US 101, while El Camino Real became Route 82.

    In Brisbane (up to the Bayshore district of Daly City), the Bayshore Freeway takes a direct north-south path between the Cow Palace exit and the SF county line; Bayshore Boulevard swings to the left here because until the early 1960s, that was the actual SF Bay shoreline in what is called the Brisbane Lagoon. When the Bayshore Freeway was constructed here, part of the SF Bay was filled in for the freeway lanes (and is now occupied by the freeway and by the Sierra Point Parkway); the Brisbane Lagoon now is seperated from the rest of the Bay. (Thanks to Chris Sampang for this information)

    According to the Millbrae Spur Project: In the 1920s, San Francisco and San Mateo Counties proposed a faster through route between San Jose and San Francisco. The Junipero Serra Highway went through the congested downtown area of southern San Francisco, west to Daly City, and ended in Colma. In the late 1930s, the route (now US 101) was extended to Sneath Lane in San Bruno. It then connected to El Camino Real via Sneath Lane. In the mid-1950s a section was added extending the route to Crystal Springs Road, at which point one traveled east to El Camino or west to Skyline Boulevard. The CHC intended to complete this road through Millbrae to Millbrae Avenue, and create a connector to the Bayshore. However Millbrae housing development conflicted with the proposed highway construction. In early 1955 the proposed route of the Junipero Serra Highway was reoriented in San Bruno to go to Skyline Boulevard and south to Ralston Avenue in Belmont. This was considerably west of the original route; it no longer divided the Peninsula cities. In the 1960s the route was again modified, and the proposed highway was absorbed into I-280.

    There are also quite a few old alignments of Bypass 101 still existing: (Again, thank you Chris)

    • Bayshore Boulevard, Airport Boulevard, and South Airport Boulevard from Alemany Boulevard in San Francisco (near the Alemany Maze interchange of I-280/US 101, formerly Route 82/US 101 and before that, US 101/Bypass US 101) to San Bruno Avenue in San Bruno near the San Francisco International Airport, passing through the Bayshore district of Daly City, Brisbane, and South San Francisco. (Bayshore Boulevard between Army Street and Alemany Boulevard was mainline US 101, though it may have been US 101A when that existed on the Peninsula.)

    • McDonnell Road between San Bruno Avenue and Millbrae Avenue passing through the San Francisco International Airport, which was probably constructed after the airport was built.

    • Old Bayshore Highway between Millbrae Avenue near the San Francisco International Airport and Broadway/Airport Boulevard in Burlingame.

    • North Bayshore Boulevard between Coyote Point Drive in San Mateo and East Third Avenue in San Mateo.

    • South Bayshore Boulevard between Beacon Avenue in San Mateo and Newbridge Avenue in San Mateo.

    • Veterans Boulevard in Redwood City (from Holly Avenue exit to Route 84).

    • East Bayshore Road in Redwood City from Whipple Avenue to Bair Island Road.

    • East Bayshore Road in Redwood City from Seaport Boulevard to Secluded Avenue.

    • East Bayshore Road and Bayshore Parkway from Saratoga Avenue in East Palo Alto to Salado Drive in Mountain View passing through Palo Alto.

    • West Bayshore Road in East Palo Alto from Donohoe Street to Manhattan Avenue.

    • West Bayshore Road from Capitol Avenue in East Palo Alto to Embarcadero Road in Palo Alto.

    • West Bayshore Road from Oregon Expressway in Palo Alto to Fabian Way in Mountain View.

    • Old Bayshore Highway in San Jose from Airport Parkway to North 4th Street.

    • Old Bayshore Highway in San Jose from Zanker Road to Commercial Street.

    There is also, according to Chris, the possibility that Mission Road between Colma (originally known as Lawndale) and South San Francisco was once part of US 101. Chris did an analysis of a 1933 and a 1942 map posted by Mark Furqueron. In the 1933 map, US 101W takes a route that includes an intersection with Grand Avenue; the current El Camino Real alignment does not touch Grand Avenue. This is made clear in the 1942 map, suggesting that the current alignment of current Route 82 in South San Francisco was constructed between 1933 and 1942. As the Mission Road alignment first shown as bypassed a 1936 Gousha map, it's possible that this new routing around Colma Creek was constructed between 1933 and 1936, but not before 1933 at least. In the 1942 map, Mission Road intersects El Camino Real in "Baden Station", near the present junction of Westborough Boulevard/Chestnut Avenue with Route 82. This would mean that Chestnut Avenue's bridge over Colma Creek may have once been part of the US 101 routing, or a different bridge may have existed (Mission Road now ends in a T intersection with Chestnut). According to the CalTrans bridge log, the original Colma Creek bridge at the Mission/El Camino junction in Colma was built in 1913, and revamped in 1927 (thus suggesting that Mission Road may have only been a temporary routing before the Colma Creek bypass was finished).

    In 1942, southbound Bypass US 101 did not continue down Bayshore Highway past Fourth Street (near the current I-880/US 101 junction) but went down Fourth, Reed, and Second to rejoin US 101 (First Street, now Route 82) near the current I-280/Route 82 junction. The Bayshore Highway continued only southeast from Fourth Street to McKee Road, where it became 30th Street (but reconnected to Monterey Highway). 30th Street has since been relegated to a non-continuous frontage road next to the Bayshore Freeway.

     

    Alternate Routes

    Between the mid-1930s and 1964, there was also an Alternate US 101. This ran along the 1934 state signed Route 3 between San Juan Capestrano and El Rio (near Ventura), and is present-day Route 1. This was LRN 60, defined in 1919. In Southern California, this ran along Pacific Coast Highway, Palisades Beach Road (PCH in Santa Monica), Olympic Blvd (Route 26), Lincoln Blvd, Sepulveda Blvd, and PCH.

    A second Alternate US 101 (US 101E) existed in the San Franciso Bay area. This alternate diverged from US 101 in downtown San Jose, at approximately Alameda and Santa Clara. It ran along Santa Clara, and then along 13th St N to what is now Old Oakland Road. Later it followed the route of what was then Route 17 (original Route 13; LRN 69 (defined in 1933); present-day I-880) into Oakland. Briefly, the US 101 routing was signed as US 101W, and the Alternate US 101 routing was signed as US 101E. The US101E routing may have been the original 1926 US 101 routing. It appears the 101W and 101E designations disappeared with the opening of the Golden Gate Bridge.

    There is a report that a 1934 Gousha map shows US 101E following US 50 from Oakland to Hayward, then along the route that is now Route 238 southward, not along the Route 17 alignment.

     

    Status

    Los Angeles County

    There's a plan afoot to build a park atop the Hollywood Freeway in Hollywood. This would roughly be over the freeway between Western and Franklin. Details are on Curbed-LA. The plan is called Hollywood Freeway Central Park.

    In 2006, NBC/Universal proposed a series of new plans for developments and improvements at the Universal Studios property. These plans include an extensive package of transportation proposals they say are designed to enhance mobility throughout Universal City and the community. The improvements under consideration include: a shuttle system from Universal Village and throughout Universal City to the MTA station; construction of a North/South "Great Street" through Universal Village connecting Forest Lawn Drive to Coral Drive; freeway and access improvements including possible construction of a southbound entrance to US 101 from Universal City. Also under consideration are a single-purpose urban interchange (SPUI) near Campo de Cahuenga connecting to US 101, and other system improvements to the US 101 corridor and the Route 134 interchange. Barham corridor improvements including the modification of the intersection at Forest Lawn Drive and Barham Boulevard and the possible widening of the Barham Bridge at the L.A. River; the enhancement of the pedestrian crossing at Lankershim Boulevard and Campo de Cahuenga, and various traffic signal system upgrades and intersection enhancements.

    In September 2000, the California Transportation Commission considered a proposal (TCRP Project 51) to add an auxiliary lane and widen the ramp through the I-405/US 101 freeway interchange in Sherman Oaks. For phases 1 and 2, the request was for $4 million, with a total estimated cost of $34 million.

    There is also work afoot to address another problem at that interchange -- specifically, the connector between southbound I-405 and the northbound US 101. This might involve construction of an elevated two-lane connector. There are five options currently under consideration, some of which could affect nearby homes or take out part of the Sepulveda Basin wildlife refuge. The connection between two freeways is now just one lane and often backs up on I-405. The project would build a two-lane connector across the Sepulveda Dam spillway, and could possibly include changes to southbound I-405 and the southbound US-101 interchange, and the Burbank Boulevard on-and-off-ramps.

    TCRP Project #48 is a study to improve the US 101 corridor between Route 170 and Route 23. Many of these ideas will never happen. There is also a proposal for short term measures, such as adjusting city streets.

    Note that in the San Fernando Valley, portions of the route are labelled as east/west instead of (or sometimes, in addition to) being north/south. Presumably, this is to simplify directions for local travellers, who don't see the route as running North/South.

    Ventura County

    In May 2005, the CTC considered relinquishment of right of way in the City of Camarillo, on Petit Street, 0.1 mile west of Calleguas Creek, consisting of frontage roads.

    In May 2009, using money from the ARRA (Stimulus Package), Ventura County commissioners agreed to give $6.5 million to Thousand Oaks to begin the design process for the widening of the interchange of US 101 and Route 23. The Thousand Oaks City Council recently decided to loan the project money from the city’s General Fund so the process could begin this year and to reimburse the General Fund when (if?) the state funding comes through in 2010-11. In late July 2009, the city reached a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Transportation to take over the design. The proposed improvements will add one lane on US 101 in each direction between the Los Angeles/Ventura County line and Moorpark Road by widening the freeway, restriping, reconstructing the median, and realigning a portion of the center line. Soundwalls will be constructed between Hampshire Road and Conejo School Road on the northbound side and between Manzanita Lane and Hampshire Road on the southbound side. The city hopes that the design process will be completed by May 2012 at the latest and that Caltrans will be able to take back the project at that point to begin the construction process. However, the construction phase is still unfunded at this point and additional federal funds will be required to complete the work by 2016 as laid out in the preliminary schedule.

    [Reyes Adobe]In August 2008, it was announced that work would begin in October on the demolition of the narrow Reyes Adobe Road bridge over Route 101, and its replacement with a new overpass. The final $8.4 million package of federal, state and regional transportation funds is being secured, and officials expect the Agoura Hills City Council will approve going out to bid on the project in September 2008. The project will replace a bridge built in 1965 that has three lanes squeezed into space for two, no room for bikes, and a sidewalk on only one side of the road. However, right of way restrictions will prevent them from moving frontage roads a block away from the freeway ramp intersections in a major circulation reconfiguration (as was done at Kanan Road). As a result, the signal for Canwood Street on the north side of the freeway will have to remain within a dozen yards of the northbound half of the diamond interchange. The project will cost $11.3 million, with most of that coming from impact fees paid by developers to the city. About $3.9 million is coming from the federal treasury under two special congressional appropriations, $2.1 million from a grant from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and the rest from the city of Agoura Hills. (source)

    There are plans to construct a new interchange at Springville Drive in Camarillo, CA. According to the Ventura County Star in December 2009, the Camarillo City Council finally agreed to move forward with a new US 101 interchange project near Springville Road. The council voted unanimously to establish a “benefit area” to raise money for the $51 million Springville Interchange project. About $23 million is needed for a new bridge, on- and off-ramps and road extensions, said City Manager Jerry Bankston. The rest is for additional improvements in the Springville and north Camarillo Airport areas. Property owners in the benefit area will pay one-time road and bridge improvement fees to the city, which will sell bonds to finance the interchange up-front. The council also approved the formation of a Community Facilities District within the benefit area. The district would include 47 acres owned by Robert D. Selleck of Selleck Properties. “Without the district, we could not have raised the (bridge fee) money, especially under these tough economic times,” Selleck said. Mayor Kevin Kildee said the interchange is necessary to improve traffic flow throughout the city, especially with the recent expansion of Camarillo Premium Outlets and future growth at CSU Channel Islands. The project will include an interchange with a six-lane bridge over the freeway, new on- and off-ramps and a connection to an extended Verdulera Street. Ponderosa Drive will be widened to four lanes from Las Posas Road to the new interchange. Ventura Boulevard will also be extended east and west of Springville. The California Department of Transportation has approved permits for the project, and the city plans to start construction at the beginning of 2010.

    In February 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project in Ventura County to reconstruct the interchange at Route 101 and Rice Avenue and improve traffic operations, enhance safety and increase capacity. The project is programmed in the Trade Corridor Improvement Fund (TCIF) and includes local funds and federal demonstration funds. The total estimated project cost is $86,899,000. It is estimated to begin construction in Fiscal Year 2008-09. The scope as described for the preferred alternative is consistent with the project scope set forth in the approved project TCIF baseline agreement. In May 2009, the Ventura County Transportation Commission approved the allocation of $5 million for improvements to the Rice Road-US 101 interchange in Oxnard, using regional ARRA funds.

    [TCRP 47] In Ventura, the current 5-lane bridge (3 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB) over the Santa Clara River will be replaced with a new 12 lane bridge. The current Route 1 flyover that currently brings that traffic into the left-lane lane of US 101 will become a right-lane entrance that is standard. This is TCRP Project #47. In October 2006, the city of Ventura requested additional funding for environmental documentation. The goal of the Route 101, California Street Off-Ramp project is to improve the traffic flow, sight distance, and increase ramp storage to mitigate an existing problem of traffic backing up to the freeway. The project also creates a connection between California Street and the downtown business district. The project is projected to be completed in FY 2009/2010, although according to the Los Angeles Times, the widening should be completed in mid August 2007. Work began in 2002 and was to be completed in four years. Problems and design revisions delayed the project and pushed construction costs from $72 million to $85 million. The project was constructed by Sacramento-based MCM Construction Inc., a leading bridge builder in California who has erected spans over Malibu Lagoon on Pacific Coast Highway, built the Riverside Freeway (Route 91) and I-5 interchange near Knott's Berry Farm and installed bridges across I-210 between Fontana and San Dimas. The project was subject to numerous restrictions. Between Dec. 15 and June 1, crews couldn't use heavy equipment in the streambed. Wildlife authorities imposed the restriction to protect a rare songbird that, despite the nearby traffic and development, nests in the willows and alders along the river. The presence of the imperiled southern steelhead trout, which migrates up the river in winter months, hampered progress on the bridge. In 2004, the heaviest rainfall in Southern California in over 100 years swept away the project's scaffolding and support equipment. Average daily traffic flows are forecast to reach 214,000 trips daily while peak traffic flows are expected to reach 18,000 vehicles per hour by 2025, according to Caltrans and the county Transportation Commission.

    [Mussel Shoals]In 2007, the CTC recommended funding (from the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account [CMIA]) to construct HOV lanes from Mussel Shoals to Casitas Pass Rd ($151,470K requested; $131,600K recommended). In March 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project spanning Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties to construct HOV lanes in each direction and roadway improvements near the community of Mussel Shoals in Ventura County to Casitas Pass Road in Santa Barbara County. The project is programmed in the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) and the 2008 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Total estimated cost is $151,470,000. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2010-11. Specifically, six miles of car-pool lanes will be added, and the project shuld begin in winter 2011. In November 2010, the Ventura County Star noted that the project will also include a bike path that is separate from the highway lanes, a new walkway under the highway between La Conchita and the beach, and the closing of the left turn lanes in and out of La Conchita and Mussel Shoals. Caltrans officials say they would have preferred the bike path to be on the mountain side, but the California Coastal Commission asked them to move it because it wants to encourage development of a network of coastal trails that stretch from Oregon to the Mexican border. Putting the bike lanes on the southbound side means a smaller shoulder on that side of the road — 10 feet, down from 19 feet now — which means there won’t be room for surfers, fishermen and beachgoers to park their cars. The southbound shoulder near La Conchita is designated now as emergency parking only, but the rule is rarely enforced. Caltrans is also including sound walls at the request of Mussel Shoals homeowners. The agency asked people living in all of the small communities along US 101 whether they wanted sound walls, and Mussel Shoals was the only community that voted for them. The walls will be from 8 to 14 feet tall.

    In February 2009, the CTC approved relinquishment of right of way in the city of Camarillo along Route 101 from Route 34 (Lewis Road) to Arneill Road, consisting of relocated or reconstructed city streets, frontage roads, and parking facilities.

    In his 2006 Strategic Growth Plan, Governor Schwartzenegger proposed widening US 101 in Santa Barbara and Ventura County.

    Santa Barbara/San Luis Obispo/San Benito Counties/Monterey

    [Carpinteria]In June 2008, the CTC received a notice of preparation for roadway improvements on a portion of Route 101 near Carpinteria in Santa Barbara County. The project is not fully funded. The project is programmed in the 2008 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for project development, right of way and construction support for $50,468,000. Total cost of the project is estimated to be $100,451,000. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year (FY) 2013-14, depending on the availability of funds. There are five alternatives being considered for the project.

    • Alternative 1: This alternative would replace the Linden Avenue Overcrossing with a five-lane structure, construct a northbound on-ramp and a southbound off-ramp in a diamond configuration, replace the northbound Franklin Creek Bridge, replace the Casitas Pass Road Overcrossing with a five-lane structure, construct northbound hook ramps, construct southbound diamond ramps, widen and replace the northbound and southbound Carpinteria Creek Bridges, construct a new two-lane bridge for the Via Real extension over Carpinteria Creek, and extend Via Real to provide connectivity between Bailard Avenue and Linden Avenue.

    • Alternative 2: This alternative would replace the Linden Avenue Overcrossing with a four-lane structure, construct a northbound hook on-ramp, construct a southbound diamond off-ramp, replace the Casitas Pass Road Overcrossing with a five-lane structure, construct northbound hook ramps, construct southbound diamond ramps, widen and replace the northbound and southbound Carpinteria Creek Bridges, construct a new two-lane bridge for the Via Real extension over Carpinteria Creek, and extend Via Real to provide connectivity between Bailard Avenue and Linden Avenue.

    • Alternative 3: This alternative would replace the Linden Avenue Overcrossing with a four-lane structure, construct a roundabout with one leg as a northbound on-ramp, construct a southbound diamond off-ramp, replace the Casitas Pass Road Overcrossing with a five-lane structure, construct northbound hook ramps, construct southbound diamond ramps, widen and replace the northbound and southbound Carpinteria Creek Bridges, construct a new two-lane bridge for the Via Real extension over Carpinteria Creek, and extend Via Real to provide connectivity between Bailard Avenue and Linden Avenue.

    • Alternative 4: This alternative would replace the Linden Avenue Overcrossing with a five-lane structure, construct a northbound on-ramp and a southbound off-ramp in a diamond configuration, replace the northbound Franklin Creek Bridge, replace the Casitas Pass Road Overcrossing with a five-lane structure, construct northbound hook ramps, construct southbound diamond ramps, widen and replace the northbound and southbound Carpinteria Creek Bridges, construct a new two-lane bridge for the Via Real extension over Carpinteria Creek, and extend Via Real to provide connectivity between Bailard Avenue and Linden Avenue.

      Alternative 5: No-build

    In February 2009, the CTC received the Draft EIR on the above project for review. The alternatives changed slightly:

    • Alternative 1 - No Build.

    • Alternative 2 - This alternative replaces the bridges on Route 101 over Carpinteria Creek including reconstructing the Casitas Pass Road overcrossing, reconfiguring the northbound on- and off-ramps, extending Via Real to Linden Avenue, and reconstructing bicycle paths.

    • Alternative 3 - Same as Alternative 2 yet relocates the northbound on-ramp with a direct connection to the north side of Linden Avenue, requiring a five-lane overcrossing.

    • Alternative 4 - Same as Alternative 3 yet uses a roundabout at the intersection of Via Real, Ogan Road and the northbound on-ramp.

    In June 2009, the CTC recieved notice of the preparation of a draft EIR. The project under consideration would construct a new HOV lane on Route 101 between Bailard Avenue in the city of Carpinteria and Milpas Street in the city of Santa Barbara. The project is not fully funded. The project is programmed in the 2008 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for Plans, Specifications, and Estimates in the amount of $12,585,000. Santa Barbara County voters, through the passage of Measure A in November 2008, dedicated $140,000,000 of regional sales tax funds toward the construction of this project. The total cost of the project is estimated to be between $380 million and $600 million. Assuming the availability of funding, construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2013-14. In addition to the no build alternatives, there are three alternatives under consideration. All build alternatives propose to add one HOV lane in each direction, resulting in a six-lane freeway within the project limits. Alternative 1 proposes to add the HOV lane while balancing outside and inside (median) landscaping impacts. Alternative 2 proposes to add the HOV lanes while maximizing the amount of median planting within the project limits. Alternative 3 proposes to add the HOV lanes within the existing median with minor incidental outside widening.

    In December 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project that will construct operational improvements to the existing four-lane Route 101 including additional lanes, new and reconfigured ramps, replacement/widening of Milpas Street Undercrossing and Sycamore Creek Bridge, new Cacique Street Undercrossing, and bicycle/pedestrian facilities in the city of Santa Barbara. The Department and the Federal Highway Administration originally approved the FEIR/FONSI in 2004. In November 2007, the Commission allocated $53,043,000 programmed in the 2006 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). At that time, the landscape scope of work was split to form a parent project (PPNO 0478) and a child project (PPNO 0478Y). The revalidation of the document is needed for the landscaping project (PPNO 0478Y), acknowledges the addition of scope that was added in 2005, and corrects inaccuracies in the Notice of Determination that was filed in 2004. The landscape project is programmed in the 2008 STIP for $3,065,000, capital and support. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2009-10.

    [101 Work in Santa Barbara]In July 2008, work began on a series of projects to improve the flow of US 101 in Santa Barbara. This includes a $53 million project to widen the freeway between Montecito and Santa Barbara. As of August, the extent of the work had included the removal of trees and bushes along the roadway, restriping some of the lanes and putting in concrete barriers. The speed limit has also been reduced along the route to 55 mph. The two lanes will remain open during the day, but at night, when construction is being done, the highway will be reduced to one lane each way. The more significant work of widening US 101 all the way to the Ventura County line depends on voters' in Santa Barbara County approving a renewal of a transportation sales tax in November. Voters rejected the renewal once before. Ventura County voters have twice rejected a similar measure, but local officials are mulling over a third try in the coming years. In three years there are plans to begin widening the highway from Mussel Shoals, past La Conchita and north past the Rincon. But before that begins, there will likely be several phases of construction in Santa Barbara County. The first phase would add a lane in both directions between Milpas Street in Santa Barbara south to Montecito's Hot Springs Road. Specific information on this project can be found at http://www.sbroads.com/index.htm.(source)

    In May 2005, the CTC considered relinquishment of right of way in the City of Santa Barbara, between Lawrence Street to 0.6 mile westerly of State Street, consisting of reconstructed and relocated city streets, frontage roads, and cul-de-sacs.

    In March 2007, the CTC considered for future consideration of funding Route 101 in Santa Barbara County – Roadway improvements near Goleta. This project in Santa Barbara County will replace an existing overcrossing and construct roadway improvements associated with the new overcrossing. The project is fully funded in the 2006 State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP). The total estimated project cost is $6,880,000. It is estimated to begin construction in Fiscal Year 2008-09.

    In his 2006 Strategic Growth Plan, Governor Schwartzenegger proposed widening US 101 in Santa Barbara and Ventura County.

    There are plans to widen US 101 to 6-lane freeway from 0.4 km south of Santa Maria Way Undercrossing to Route 135/US 101 Separation in Santa Maria . This was on the July 2005 CTC agenda. In February 2006, the CTC considered adding funding. The proposal noted that the widening would be within the existing 46 to 56-foot median area. The existing inside shoulders would be removed and the entire median area paved to include two 12-foot traveled lanes, two 10-foot inside shoulders and a type 60 concrete median barrier placed in the area between the inside shoulders for the entire length of the project. There are also five locations where soundwalls are to be constructed.

    [Union Valley]In December 2008, the CTC reviewed a draft EIR regarding construction of a new interchange for Santa Maria and the community of Orcutt. The interchange would be constructed between Clark Avenue overcrossing and Santa Maria Way undercrossing and extend Route 58 (note: The CTC document said Route 58, but Route 58 isn't in that area--it ends at Route 1 in Santa Margarita) approximately 1.6 miles in length in the community of Orcutt. The project is not fully funded. The project is programmed in the 2008 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) with Regional Improvement Program and Regional Surface Transportation Program funds for $12,782,000. The total cost of the project is estimated to be $36,100,000. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2013-14. There are four alternatives identified in the draft EIR:

    • No Build Alternative

    • Alternative 1 - The Union Valley Extension proposes to extend Union Valley Parkway between Hummel Drive and Blosser Road and construct an eight-foothigh masonry soundwall on the south side of the extension between California Boulevard and Foxenwood Lane.

    • Alternative 2 - Curved Alignment proposes to extend Union Valley Parkway between Hummel Drive and Blosser Road curving northward near Blosser Road to avoid an existing area of eucalyptus woodland. Included is construction of an eight-foot-high masonry soundwall on the south side of the extension between California Boulevard and Foxenwood Lane.

    • Alternative 3 - Foster Road Alignment proposes to extend Union Valley Parkway between Hummel Drive and Blosser Road east of Route 135, but contains a realigned roadway that forks northeast toward Foster Road between Foxenwood Drive and California Boulevard. Included is construction of an eight-foot-high masonry soundwall on the south side of the extension between California Boulevard and Foxenwood Lane.

    • Alternative 4 - Reduced Extension Alternative proposes only improvements east of Route 135, and would not include any improvements west of Route 135.

    In January 2010, the CTC approved a new public road connection at Willow Road to US 101, in the community of Nipomo, at Post Mile (PM) 6.4, in San Luis Obispo County. The proposed project includes the extension of Willow Road across US 101 to Thompson Road with the intention to provide a much needed east-west arterial connection to Route 1 and the Callender area. The project will also relieve future traffic demand at the adjacent Tefft Street and Los Berros Road/Thompson Road interchanges. The Nipomo area is served by three interchanges on US 101: Hutton Road (Route 166) on the south, Tefft Street in the central area, and Los Berros Road/Thompson Road on the north. Recent traffic forecasts for the Nipomo area predict that the existing Tefft Street interchange and the existing Los Berros Road/Thompson Road interchanges will be inadequate to serve projected development during peak traffic periods. Motorists would be subjected to recurring congestion and delays due to increasing traffic on US 101 and on the existing local street network. Of the three interchanges, only the Tefft Street interchange is located centrally to existing and planned developments. Los Berros Road/Thompson Road and Hutton Road (Route 166) are located at the fringe of future development.

    In October 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project that will construct the extension of Willow Road and connect it with US 101 in the community of Nipomo, south San Luis Obispo County. The proposed project includes the extension of Willow Road east from its existing terminus approximately 1,000 feet west of Pomeroy Road to Thompson Avenue; construction of a frontage road between Willow Road and Sandydale Drive; and construction of a new US 101/Willow Road interchange. In March 1999 a Tier I Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the project was adopted by the County Board of Supervisors and a preferred alignment and interchange were selected. The FEIR specified that subsequent design refinements for the road extension, interchange, and frontage road would be evaluated in a Tier 2 construction level environmental document. The County prepared the FSEIR to satisfy the requirements for evaluating the preferred alternative in a Tier 2 construction level environmental document. The FSEIR was prepared for the entire US 101/Willow Road Interchange Project. However, for construction and financing purposes, the County split the project into two phases as follows:

    • Phase I is programmed in the Proposition 1B State and Local Partnership Program (SLPP) and consists of a new roadway extension on Willow Road, from Misty Glen Place to Hetrick Road. This phase will construct a new two lane roadway with 12’ travel lanes and 8’ shoulders; installation of left turn lanes and right turn pockets at Willow/Pomeroy and Willow/Hetrick intersections; drainage facilities, including underground storm drain collection and two infiltration basins. The project is estimated to cost $6,500,000 and is programmed with SLPP ($1,000,000) and Local ($5,500,000) funds. Construction is estimated to begin in fiscal year 2009-10.

    • Phase II is programmed in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and will continue the roadway extension on Willow Road, from Hetrick Road to Thompson Road. This phase will construct frontage road improvements between Willow Road and Sandydale Drive; a new interchange at US Route 101, a cross street and drainage facilities. The project is estimated to cost $32,000,000 and is programmed with STIP ($10,000,000), Federal ARRA ($500,000), and Local ($21,500,000). The County has applied for $1,000,000 in SLPP Cycle 2 funding and if approved, the amount of Local funds will be $20,500,000. Construction is estimated to begin in fiscal year 2010-11.

    In August 2008, Caltrans released a bid to widen the highway and construct retaining walls and drainage systems in San Luis Obispo County in and near Pismo Beach at various locations from 0.2 KM North of Route 227 to 0.2 KM South of the US 101/Route 1 separation.

    The Cuesta Grade is a 7% grade around Cuesta Peak into San Luis Obispo. It was the site of a major construction project on US 101. This project added truck climbing lanes, improving drainage, stabilizing retaining walls, and widening shoulders, and was the third major reconstruction of the grade. The first one, in 1937, reduced the number of curves along the route from 71 to 12; the second one, in 1990-91, focused on the northern approach to the Grade.

    In December 2009, the CTC vacated right of way in the city of Pismo Beach along Route 101 at 0.13 mile west of North 4th Street, consisting of highway right of way no longer needed for State highway purposes.

    In December 2004, the CTC considered a resolution to relinquish right of way in the City of Atascadero, at San Ramon Road, consisting of reconstructed and relocated city streets and frontage roads. The City, by cooperative agreement dated July 27, 2004, waived the 90-day notice requirement and agreed to accept title upon relinquishment by the State.

    In September 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project to reconstruct the existing two-lane structure with a four-lane overcrossing, add leftturn lanes, reconstruct all access ramps within the project limits, and construct roadway improvements in and near Salinas from 0.6 mile south to 0.2 mile north of the Airport Boulevard Overcrossing on Route 101. The project is fully funded in the 2008 State Transportation Improvement Program, and includes federal and local funds. The total estimated project cost is $36,603,000, capital and support. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2010-11.

    There are currently plans for a "Prunedale Freeway" to provide an alternative to the safety and capacity problems that exist on the current route, which serves as the "Main Street" of the Prundale urbanized area north of Salinas (see http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist05/prunedale/index.htm). In November 2000, Caltrans narrowed the field of alternatives to the following (construction planned for 2007):

    1. No build. This would keep the existing roadway as it is except for a couple of interchange improvements already planned (San Miguel and the Route 101/Route 156 interchange improvement).

    2. Improve existing alignment. This would upgrade existing Route 101 to a six-lane freeway. New interchanges are proposed at the Russell/Espinosa Roads, Blackie Road/Reese Circle, and at Crazy Horse Canyon/Echo Valley Roads. Substantial improvements would be made to the existing Route 156 / Route 101 interchange. Access onto Route 101 from existing driveways and local roads would be redirected to the interchanges via new access or frontage roads. More local trips would be possible without needing to get onto Route 101.

    3. The Alternative 4 East Bypass (4 lane freeway on new alignment). This swings the widest eastward from the current alignment. Caltrans and many local officials see this alternative as having the least amount of impacts to the environment and causing the least number of residential homes to be lost.

    As of February 2004, it appears that Alternative 4 East (the new-terrain routing from Espinosa Road/Russell Road in Salinas north to near Echo Valley Road in Prunedale) has been chosen. As a result, it is likely that the US 101/Route 156 expressway between the south Route 156/US 101 interchange and Echo Valley Road will become solely Route 156. There is no info as to what the southern portion of the El Camino Real expressway from Espinosa Road to Route 156 will be.

    [New Road Connection]In November 2007, the CTC considered the addition of a public road connection to US 101 at Sala Road. This new interchange will essentially replace an existing at grade connection located to the south at Russell/Espinosa Roads and it is expected to improve both safety and operations on US 101. The Russell Road/Espinosa Road connection currently has a collision rate higher than the statewide average for similar facilities. The project is expected to be open to traffic in the Fall of 2012. Specifically, in the vicinity of Russell and Espinosa Roads, the plan is to construct a new section of access controlled four-lane freeway from 0.2 miles north of the Boronda Road interchange to approximately Martines Road. The alignment of US 101 would be elevated to accommodate modifications to the existing at grade connection of Russell and Espinosa Roads. Undercrossing structures would be constructed to facilitate the connection of Russell and Espinosa Roads to enhance local circulation. Since no freeway access would be allowed at this location, a new interchange at Sala Road will be needed. This segment of mainline US 101 would be constructed primarily to standard freeway geometrics except where it conforms to existing conditions at the northern end of the segment. Design exceptions for all nonstandard features have been approved. Median width would range from 21 to 70 feet and median barrier would be constructed from the undercrossing structure at Russell and Espinosa Roads to existing concrete median barrier at Martines Road. A new interchange and local road, Sala Road, would be constructed approximately 0.62 miles north of Russell/Espinosa Road. To facilitate merge/diverge traffic movements, auxiliary lanes would be constructed along the new freeway segment between the northern ramps at the Boronda Road interchange and this new interchange. The new interchange at Sala Road would connect to Harrison Road to the east via Sala Road. The interchange would consist of three directional ramps and a westbound to southbound loop-ramp. No ramp would be constructed in the southwest quadrant. Initially, the overcrossing structure would accommodate two lanes with left-turn channelization. However, the structure would be constructed with consideration for the future widening to four lanes with left turn channelization.

    There is also an unconstructed-adopted segment from Salinas to Route 156; 12 miles parallel to the traversable route. When completed, this portion of US 101 will become Route 156.

    In April 2006, the CTC received the notice of the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for construction of a new interchange near San Juan Bautista in Monterey County (PM 100.0/101.3). The project is currently programmed as “environmental only.” The following alternatives are being considered: (·) Alternative 1A: Spread Diamond Interchange – Located approximately midway between Dunbarton Road to the south and San Juan Road to the north; (·) Alternative 1B: Compact Diamond Interchange – Same location as Alternative 1A, with interchange ramps and frontage road closer to alignment of highway; (·) Alternative 2: Compact Diamond Interchange – Located near the San Juan Road/ Route 101 intersection, with frontage road on east side of Route 101; (·) Alternatives 4, 5, 9A and 9B: Same general location as Alternative 2, with variations on the interchange configuration and the frontage road alignment; (·) No Build. The potential impacts include floodplain encroachment, drainage, hazardous waste, and visual impacts. Proposed mitigations include avoidance of service station acquisition, visual resource mitigation, and new alternative north of the floodplain and Elkhorn Slough.

    In 2007, the following requests for funding from the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) were made, but not recommended for funding: Operational improvements Phase 1b in San Luis Obispo county ($5,432K requested); widening and adding Intelligent Traffic Systems from Milpas to Cabrillo Hot Springs in Santa Barbara County ($28,613K requested); widening of the Santa Maria River Bridge ($58,540K requested); and the addition of HOV lanes from Casitas Pass Rd to Milpas St in Santa Barbara County ($12,600K requested); Freeway conversion, San Juan Rd interchange in Monterey County ($50,800K requested).

    Santa Clara County

    In Spring 2003, widening was completed on a four-lane section of US 101 between Bernal Road in San Jose and Cochran Road in Morgan Hill, bringing it to four lanes in each direction including one HOV lane. This added 7.5 miles more of commute lane operating the usual 5-9 and 3-7 period from Morgan Hill all the way to Redwood City.

    In June 2006, the CTC considered relinquishment of right of way in the city of San Jose, at Channing Avenue and Seaboard Avenue, consisting of reconstructed and relocated city streets, frontage roads and cul-de-sacs.

    In June 2001, the CTC had on its agenda addition of a northbound lane through San Jose, Route 87 to Trimble Road in Santa Clara county. There are also plans to widen the route to 3-lanes + HOV each direction from Burnett Road to Route 85. In June 2002, plans were unveiled to widen the route from Marsh Road to Ralston Avenue in Belmont. The widening between Bernel Road to Burnett Road (four to eight lanes) is TCRP Project #3, requested by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. The addition of the northbound lane from Route 87 to Trimble Road is TCRP Project #5, again requested by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. According to a poster on m.t.r, in May 2003 new southbound lanes between Route 85 and Cochrane Road were completed making US 101 8 lanes (with variations of 10 lanes in certain spots) between San Francisco, all the way down to Morgan Hill for nearly 70 consecutive miles.

    280-yerba-buena mapIn October 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of fuinding a project in Santa Clara County that will construct one additional lane in the southbound direction from south of the Story Road Interchange to south of the Capitol Expressway Interchange, modify the Route 101/Tully Road Interchange to a partial cloverleaf interchange, and rebuild the existing Tully Road Overcrossing. The project is programmed in the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account and the 2008 State Highway Operation and Protection Program, and includes Federal Demonstration funds and local funds. Total estimated project cost is $62,975,000, capital and support. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2009-10. The scope as described for the preferred alternative is consistent with the project scope set forth in the approved project baseline agreement.

    In September 2009, amended a project located on Route 101 in San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties. The current project will: a) Widen Route 101 to add auxiliary lanes in each direction from the Marsh Road Interchange in San Mateo County to the Embarcadero Road Interchange in Santa Clara County. b) Widen/modify various on/off-ramps at four interchanges within the project limits. c) Re-construct Ringwood Pedestrian Overcrossing and Henderson Underpass to accommodate the auxiliary lanes. d) Install Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) equipment within the project limits. The amendment eliminate the Henderson Underpass structure (which would have to be rebuilt anyway as part of an upcoming rail project), updated the funding plan, and split the project into three segments: Segment 1 (PPNO 0658B) – US 101 Auxiliary Lanes: Embarcadero Road to University Avenue; Segment 2 (PPNO 0658C) – US 101 Auxiliary Lanes: University Avenue to Marsh Road; and Segment 3 (PPNO 0658D) – US 101 Replacement Landscaping: Embarcadero Road Interchange to Marsh Road Interchange.

    In October 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project in San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties will construct auxiliary lanes in each direction on Route 101 from the Embarcadero Road Interchange in the city of Palo Alto (Santa Clara County) to the Marsh Road Interchange in the city of Menlo Park (San Mateo County). The project is programmed in the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account and the 2008 State Transportation Improvement Program and includes local funds. Total estimated project cost is $111,389,000, capital and support. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2010-11. The scope as described for the preferred alternative is consistent with the project scope set forth in the approved baseline agreement. (what's odd about this is that it seems to be the project they amended the previous month)

    In June 2009, the CTC approved relinquishment of right of way in the city of San Jose along Route 101 on N 31st Street, consisting of a relocated or reconstructed city street and an adjoining nonmotorized transportation facility, namely a pedestrian walkway.

    In 2007, the CTC considered a number of requests for funding from the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA). one request was funded: construction of auxiliary lanes from Route 85 to Embarcadero in Santa Clara County ($84.93M). Requests to widen the route from Yerba Buena to I-280/I-680 in Santa Clara County, and to widen the route from Route 25 to Monterey Rd in Santa Clara County were not recommended for funding.

    In his 2006 Strategic Growth Plan, Governor Schwartzenegger proposed constructing additional lanes both directions from San Benito County line north to Cochran Road.

    San Mateo/San Francisco Counties

    Note: With the closure and removal of a portion of the Central Freeway in San Francisco between Fell Street to Turk in 1996 as part of the 1989 earthquake damage, Route 101 is now signed on Van Ness Ave. from the Central Freeway. In early 1997, the Central Freeway was reopened in the northbound direction, but is not presently signed as Route 101.

    The portion of this route defined as "the approach to the Golden Gate Bridge" in the legislative definition depends on Section 72.1 of the State and Highways Code. This section (defined by Senate Bill 798, Chapter 559, 9/29/99) defines the Central Freeway Replacement Project. This involves demolition of the existing Central Freeway, construction of a new freeway between Mission Street and Market Street, construction of appropriate ramps to the new freeway, and an improvement of Octavia Street from Market Street north. According to Robert Cruckishank, as of Summer 2004, the new Central Freeway in San Francisco is taking shape, with piers constructed and steel beams being lowered into place for what will be the viaduct itself. The freeway will end at Market Street and what had been a freeway north of Market will become Octavia Boulevard, a "Parisian-style" landscaped road.

    (By the way, Octavia Street is named after Miss Octavia Gough, the sister of Charles Gough, who was on the commission to lay out the streets west of Larkin Street known as the Western Addition. This comes from an obituary of Gough, published in the San Francisco Call, dated July 27, 1895. It eliminated the former supposition that Octavia meant the eighth street back from Divisadero. It documents the relationship of Charles Gough to Octavia Street and; almost surely, to Steiner Street, named for Gough’s good friend. Steiner was delivering water in the pioneer days when Gough was delivering milk.)

    According to reports, demolition of the existing freeway west of Mission Street (the remains of the double-deck section built in 1957-9) began in January, 2003 and continued for 180 days, with penalties of $9600/day for each day it runs over (a closure party—the end of the freeway revolt—was held in March 2003). Construction of the new Octavia Blvd on the land previously occupied by the freeway from Market Street to Fell Street east of Octavia Street began in October, 2003 and was originally scheduled to be completed in September, 2004. During demolition, Mission, Market, and Oak Streets under the freeway will be closed on some weekends. Other streets are apparently subject to longer closures. A new section of elevated freeway, with two lanes in each direction (plus a right-turn lane at the very end) will be built from Mission Street to Market Street, replacing the current northbound-only structure. Construction began in February 2004 and is to be completed in February, 2006. Because the new structure will meet Market Street at grade, McCoppin Street between Market Street and Valencia Street will be closed. Caltrans is not allowing anything to be built under the freeway structure because they may need access to it from underneath, so some of the space underneath may continue to be used for parking lots. [Thanks to a posting by Eric Fisher on m.t.r for this information.]

    In early September 2005 (about a year late), the long-awaited replacement for San Francisco's Central Freeway was opened. Where the freeway structure was, drivers heading north or west descend from the freeway at Market Street and are greeted by a boulevard with poplar trees in the middle and Chinese elms on each side of the four-lane thoroughfare between faux historic lampposts. The central roadway with its lines of trees is framed by a one-way path on each side reserved for local traffic—the east side is for drivers heading north and west side is for those heading south. Even with parking lanes and a sidewalk, the result is a passage that measures just 133 feet from side to side. There are a number of awkard features to the design, but most reports seem to feel it is an improvement.

    Routing in San Francisco. There's lots of confusion about the current routing of US 101, because of problems with signage in the city of San Francisco. After the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, US 101 N was rerouted to exit the Central Skyway at Mission St., then NE to Van Ness Ave. US 101 S was rerouted along Van Ness Ave and South Van Ness Ave to the Central Skyway on-ramp. However, there are signs labeled "To US 101" on Central Freeway N at 7th Street, making people believe that US 101 exits there. Similarly, the "To US 101" signs southbound make people think US 101 exits at 5th Street. This is wrong. According to Caltrans, US 101 officially is routed on the Central Freeway. It is neither 7th or 5th St. Hence, to follow US 101, take the Central Freeway. Note that the signs at 5th St. and 7th St. were specifically requested by the City of San Francisco; subsequent surface street signing to direct people to US 101 is the city's responsibility. The city has placed such signs; according to a missing piece of the Photolog uncovered by Joe Rouse, the path is 7th to McAllister to Leavenworth to Turk to Van Ness, with the route to US 101 being signed at each junction (in addition to several reassurance trailblazers on 7th Street).

    According to Joe Rouse, the Central Freeway is officially still part of US 101, even after the post-Loma Prieta modifications. Prior to the quake, the Central Freeway ended at Golden Gate and Turk; Turk and Golden Gate were part of US 101 between the Central Freeway and Van Ness Avenue. After the Central Freeway was lopped off at Fell Street, Golden Gate and Turk were decommissioned as state highways and a break in the official routing was created on US 101 at Fell Street, with the route resuming at Van Ness and Golden Gate. Van Ness Avenue south of Golden Gate Avenue (and Mission Street for that matter) have never been officially adopted as state highway.

    After the Central Freeway was lopped off at Fell Street, signage for US 101 was extended on Van Ness south of Golden Gate and on Mission Street, but this is signage only—not route adoption. While the Central Freeway's future was being debated, the City of San Francisco requested that Caltrans direct traffic bound for NB 101 so that those coming from the Bay Bridge were directed to exit at 5th Street (and then continue down Harrison to 7th), and NB 101 traffic was directed to continue to 7th Street via I-80. From there, to get to US 101 motorists were directed to use 7th to McAllister to Leavenworth to Turk to Van Ness. But this is signage only—these streets were never adopted as part of US 101. The purpose was to get motorists to bypass the confusing mess at the Market/Van Ness/Mission intersections. The state did leave a sign for 101 North at the turnoff to the Central Freeway from WB I-80, again most likely for motorists's benefit, since there are two onramps to WB I-80 downstream of the 5th Street exit. It was also useful if you were coming from the Bay Bridge and you somehow missed the exit to 5th Street, as you could still get to US 101 North via the Central Freeway.

    Although the signage for the Central Freeway from the south indicated that it was for Mission and Fell Streets, signage for US 101 North was also left on that connector to the Central Freeway (where the offramp for 9th Street splits off). Once on the Central Freeway itself, 101 North traffic was directed to exit at Mission. So if you were coming from the south and didn't see the signs directing you to 7th Street, you were okay too.

    With the completion of Octavia Blvd, it appears that traffic from the south and from the east are once again directed to use the Central Freeway to continue on NB US 101, rather than use the 7th or 5th Street exits. The exit number listing for WB I-80 will have to be corrected to show that Exit 1B is now for US-101 North. It currently does not show this. So what is the planned alignment for US 101 in this area? It appears that the plan was to continue to sign the Mission Street exit as the exit to continue north on US 101, with the mainline touchdown to Octavia Street being treated as an exit. This makes it look like US 101 is exiting itself. But nothing is finalized. Although the signage may show route continuity via Mission and Van Ness, officially, there is a gap in Route 101 from where the freeway ended at Fell Street to the intersection of Van Ness and Golden Gate Avenues. The southern end of this gap might be moved to the new end of the freeway at Market Street.

    In December 2000, the CTC had on its agenda adoption of a traversable highway a segment of Route 101 in San Francisco from PM R5.0 (PK R8.0) at Erie Street to PM 5.3 (PK 8.5) at Golden Gave Avenue.

    There appear to be some plans to make a portion of this route in San Francisco into an underground tollway. The San Francisco Chronicle published an article on 2/18/2001 where it indicated that transportation planners "said the city should look into building ``supercorridor'' roads under Van Ness Avenue, 19th Avenue, and Fell and Oak streets." The suggested 19th Avenue tunnel would run five miles, from Junipero Serra Boulevard through Golden Gate Park and up to Lake Street, with exits at Brotherhood Way, Ocean Avenue, Quintara Street, Lincoln Way and Geary Boulevard. The Van Ness tunnel would run almost two miles, from about Fell to Lombard Street, with exits at Broadway and Geary Boulevard. Along Oak and Fell, the planners suggest an underground road running more than half a mile from Laguna to Divisadero streets. However, the roads would would violate the long-standing general plan for San Francisco, which calls for no new highway capacity.

    In March 2001, the CTC had on its agenda relinquishment of a segment of the original routing from PM 22.1 and PM 23.9 in the City of South San Francisco.

    [Doyle Drive]Doyle Drive. There are also plans to reconstruct the Doyle Drive portion from Lombard St/Richardson Ave to the Route 1 Interchange in San Francisco. The environmental studies for this are part of TCRP Project #22, requested by the San Francisco County Transportation Authority. More information can be found at http://www.doyledrive.org/. It appears that there may be an extra toll on the Golden Gate Bridge to help pay for repair of the dangerous Doyle Drive approach, which handles 91,000 vehicles a day. The toll, which has not yet been set, probably would fluctuate, rising during times of heavy traffic to a high of around $2. Doyle Drive is particularly dangerous because lanes are too narrow by 2 to 3 feet, there's no barrier separating opposing traffic, there are no shoulders and the structure is seismically fragile. According to San Francisco transit officials, Doyle Drive has almost three times the typical number of accidents for a facility of its type. Toll revenues would be used to help pay for the $810 million project to replace the 70-year-old Doyle Drive with a wider, safer, sturdier roadway. The federal government would pay an additional $35 million. San Francisco officials have collected the bulk of the money from state and local sources and hope to begin construction by 2009.

    In 2007, the CTC considered a number of requests for funding from the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA). One request were funded: construction of aux lanes from Embarcadero to Marsh Rd in San Mateo County ($60M). The Doyle Drive replacement in San Francisco County was not recommended for funding. However, in August 2007 the CTC amended the project (TCRP #22), which is an environmental study for reconstruction of Doyle Drive, from Lombard St./Richardson Avenue to Route 1 Interchange in City and County of San Francisco to update the project schedule and funding plan. TCRP Project #22 is to replace Doyle Drive (US 101) in order to improve the seismic, structural, and traffic safety of the roadway. The redesign of Doyle Drive will have qualities that keep within the setting of the Presidio of San Francisco as a National Park, will incorporate increased intermodal access to the Presidio, and will improve access from local roadways. The project has attracted intense scrutiny from the National Park Service, the Presidio Trust, and the public, as it affects an area of the Presidio where the Presidio Trust is planning the restoration of a river habitat along Tennessee Hollow, as well as the planned expansion of Crissy Marsh. The project is now scheduled to start Phase 1 in FY07/08, with completion estimated for FY12/13. Note that this is just for the environmental study!

    Part of the problem with the Doyle Drive reconstruction is a provision included in the $58 million federal offer: the new Doyle Drive must become a toll road that would help pay back the construction costs. This has resulted in a lot of opposition from the North Bay that would pour south - particularly from Marin County. This opposition may endanger the effort to replace the road, threatening to entangle it in the same kind of political morass that stalled construction of the new eastern span of the Bay Bridge and caused its cost to soar. Marin officials have called the proposal to charge a $1 to $2 toll on the road unfair to North Bay commuters, who account for 75 percent of the morning southbound traffic on Doyle Drive, and labeled the proposal "a Marin commuter tax." Regional transportation officials, on the other hand, believe the federal money may be the only chance to fix the dangerous structure. The issue needed to be resolved quickly: to qualify for the federal money, San Francisco needs the legal authority to charge tolls on Doyle Drive by March 31, 2008. San Francisco needed the state Legislature to pass a law allowing the city to collect tolls, yet the political dispute seems to have cowed Bay Area legislators who planned to introduce that legislation. Election year politics are part of the argument; the other part is that since Doyle Drive is a state highway, Caltrans should pay to replace the narrow, seismically fragile viaduct. But Caltrans didn't build the road originally: The Golden Gate Bridge district built the road with no shoulders, no median and narrow lanes in 1933 as part of the bridge project. In 1945, it was turned over to the state Division of Highways, predecessor to Caltrans, according to a history compiled by the San Francisco County Transportation Authority. But the bridge district didn't give up its interest in Doyle Drive. In 1955, it asked the state to rebuild Doyle Drive and make it wider. When the state came up with a plan for an eight-lane highway with a median, San Franciscans objected, and the state Legislature passed a bill requiring San Francisco's approval to widen the highway. Numerous attempts to come up with a plan - and money - to replace Doyle Drive without adding more lanes of traffic have fallen victim to community opposition and a lack of funding. The current plan, with an estimated cost of $1.1 billion, is the result of about 15 years of planning, studies and negotiations. The so-called "Presidio Parkway" design was selected in 2006 after planners, engineers and community groups winnowed down 16 options to one that features a combination of a high viaduct, two short tunnels, and an open sunken roadway, all with a landscaped median. The existing Doyle Drive, which carries 120,000 vehicles a day, is near the top of the state's list for bridges in need of replacement. Its six lanes are narrow, its road has no shoulders and opposing lanes of traffic are separated only by a line of plastic stakes. According to Caltrans, Doyle Drive is rated a 2 out of 100 on the Federal Highway Administration's structural safety index. The current funding plan for replacement, according to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the San Francisco County Transportation Authority, has the state contributing about $475 million from a variety of accounts, San Francisco chipping in $68 million from sales tax revenues, and the federal government adding $58 million from the Urban Partnership program. That federal program requires congestion tolling - tolls that rise and fall with congestion in an effort to dissuade drivers from traveling when traffic is heaviest. There's still a gap of about $460 million.
    [Source: San Francisco Chronicle, February 19, 2008]

    In May 2008, the Golden Gate district considered a congestion toll plan. The district already plans to increase by a dollar its current toll of $5 for those who pay with cash and $4 for those who use FasTrak. The congestion-based toll would add a dollar more during the periods of 7 to 9 a.m. and 4 to 6 p.m. on weekdays and 3 to 7 p.m. on weekends and holidays. This would be part of a federal program that would bring $158 million in federal funds to the Bay Area for transportation projects, including Doyle Drive. North Bay drivers and politicians - particularly those from Marin County - objected to the Doyle Drive toll idea, and bridge directors from the north side of the span pledged to fight what they called "a Marin commuter tax." As part of a regional compromise, the bridge board agreed to collect a congestion-based toll on the bridge but only if it could use the revenue to fund improvements to Golden Gate buses and ferries. The board also voted to ban use of any of the money to pay for Doyle Drive improvements.
    [Source: San Francisco Chronicle, May 9, 2008]

    In Mid-December 2008, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, acting as the San Francisco Transportation Authority board, certified the environmental impact report for the Doyle Drive replacement project and officially selected the $1 billion Presidio Parkway design for construction. This clears the way for the federal government to approve the project, which is expected by the end of 2008. The authority hopes to complete engineering and design, and begin construction, by 2010. The new Doyle Drive is expected to open in 2014. The design chosen includes stretches of elevated and at-grade roadway and two tunnels, with six lanes of traffic, three in each direction, shoulders, and a median. The parkway design was favored by community committees in 2006. Some relatively minor changes have been made the past two years to satisfy officials at the Presidio National Park and neighbors concerned about pedestrian safety.
    [Source: San Francisco Chronicle, December 17, 2008]

    In March 2009, it was reported that Doyle Drive was among 57 transportation projects in California chosen to receive the first wave of 2009 federal stimulus funds. The Doyle Drive replacement is expected to create about 500 jobs. The commission plans to disburse the money in April 2009 for the 1.2-mile Doyle Drive project, pending a commission environmental approval. The rebuilding of Doyle Drive will cost about $1 billion. Before the commission's decision Wednesday, sources for all but about $100 million of the funding had been identified. Both U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrats from San Francisco, have said that securing full funding to replace Doyle Drive is a top priority. They're looking to the economic stimulus windfall from Washington to cover the remaining tab. If the money comes through, construction could begin by the end summer 2009, instead of in 2010, with completion anticipated in 2014, state and regional transportation officials said. The roadway is used by more than 100,000 vehicles a day.

    In April 2009, the CTC accepted the EIR on the Doyle Drive project. The purpose of the project is to improve the seismic, structural, and traffic safety of the roadway that is approaching the end of its useful life. Doyle Drive, the southern approach of US 101 to the Golden Gate Bridge, is 1.5 miles long with six traffic lanes. The proposed project will replace the existing facility with a new six lane facility and southbound auxiliary lane, between the Park Presidio Interchange and the new Presidio access at Girard Road. In April the CTC also allocated $50,000,000 in funding from the Federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).

    In January 2010, construction started with the closure of a sharp hook-shaped curve that veered off of Doyle Drive before the toll plaza and passeed beneath the highway to Park Presidio. The southbound Doyle Drive off-ramp to southbound Route 1 will be periodically closed, and starting in February 2010, the northbound Route 1 to southbound Doyle Drive connection will be closed for a year and a half for construction. The official detour uses Lombard Street, Van Ness Avenue and Geary Boulevard. Drivers approaching Doyle Drive will be warned of the closures with electronic signs. Those missing the warnings will be able to use a "last chance" detour at Lincoln Boulevard or Merchant Road via the visitors parking area at the south end of the bridge.

    Golden Gate Bridge. Lastly, note that the Golden Gate Bridge is not part of US 101. The Golden Gate is maintained by the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway, and Transportation District. However, the Golden Gate Bridge is part of a Safety Enforcement-Double Fine Zone, per Senate Bill 155, Chapter 169, on July 23, 1999 and a Safety Awareness Zone per SB 988, Chapter 593, September 29, 2006. The Golden Gate Bridge will also be undergoing a seismic retrofit under TCRP Project #143. The Golden Gate Bridge opened in 1937.

    In January 2010, it was reported that the Golden Gate Bridge District was working on plans to raise money for the bridge. Ideas include elevator rides to the very top of the Golden Gate Bridge's international orange towers, or a chance to tour the famed structure's catwalks beneath the busy roadway. Some of the ideas are in this article from the LA Times.

    General

    The following portions of this are currently constructed to freeway standards: (1) from Route 5 to 4 miles west of Ventura, ending at Sea Cliff (approx 80 miles); (2) from Punta to the western city limits of Goleta (approx 17 miles); (3) near Rufgio St Beach (approx 5 miles); (4) from Gaviota to Solvang (approx 20 miles); (5) from Route 176 to Nipomo (approx 19 miles); (6) from Arroyo Grande to 1 mile north of San Luis Obispo (approx 17 miles); (7) from Santa Margita to Paso Robles (approx 19 miles); (8) from San Miguel to 2 miles north of King City (approx 22 miles); (9) through Salinas (10 miles); (10) from Gilroy to San Jose (33 miles); (11) the Bayshore Freeway in San Jose to San Francisco.

    The SAFETEA-LU act, enacted in August 2005 as the reauthorization of TEA-21, provided the following expenditures on or near this route:

    • High Priority Project #246: Operations and management improvements, including Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) technologies on US 101 in Santa Barbara County. $800,000.

    • High Priority Project #429: Seismic retrofit of the Golden Gate Bridge. Note that the Golden Gate Bridge is not part of US 101. This appears to be supplemental funding for TCRP Project #143, and might even be a kickstart for that project, as it hasn't been discussed at the CTC level. The funding is likely insufficient, being cut down from the requested $11M. $8,800,000.

    • High Priority Project #525: Construct US 101 Auxiliary Lanes from 3rd Ave in the City of San Mateo to Millbrae Ave in Millbrae. $3,000,000.

    • High Priority Project #943: US 101 Operational Improvements in San Jose. $4,000,000.

    • High Priority Project #961: Construction of US 101 Auxiliary Lanes, Marsh Rd. to Santa Clara County Line. $1,800,000.

    • High Priority Project #1092: Widen the Santa Maria River Bridge on US 101 between Santa Barbara County and San Luis Obispo County. $2,720,000.

    • High Priority Project #1335: Construct new interchange and related road improvements on US 101 near Airport Blvd, Salinas. $1,936,000.

    • High Priority Project #1565: Interchange improvements at Rice Avenue and US 101 in the City of Oxnard. $2,640,000.

    • High Priority Project #1955: Improvements to US 101 ramps between Winnetka Ave. and Van Nuys Blvd. $320,000.

    • High Priority Project #2245: US 101 Corridor Improvements — I-280 to the Capitol-Yerba Buena Interchange. $4,000,000.

    • High Priority Project #2606: Replace South Access to the Golden Gate Bridge—Doyle Drive. Supplemental fundings ppears to be in HPP #3808. $8,000,000.

    • High Priority Project #2701: Construct US 101 bicycle/pedestrian overpass at Millbrae Ave for the San Francisco Bay Trail. $1,000,000.

    • High Priority Project #3062: Conduct environmental review of proposed improvements related to the connection of Dumbarton Bridge to US 101. $400,000.

    • High Priority Project #3099: Modify and reconfigure Kanan Road interchange along US 101 in Agoura Hills. $4,000,000.

    • High Priority Project #3808: Replace South Access to the Golden Gate Bridge—Doyle Drive. This appears to be additional funding in HPP #2606. $6,000,000.

     

     

    Double Fine Zones

    Between the intersection with Boronda Road and the intersection with the San Benito-Monterey County line. Authorized by Senate Bill 155, Chapter 169, on July 23, 1999.

    The Golden Gate Bridge, per Senate Bill 988, Chapter 593, September 29, 2006.

    Route 101 between Golden Gate Avenue and Lyon Street in the City and County of San Francisco, per Senate Bill 1491, Chapter 121, July 10, 2008.

     

    Naming

    Historically, this route is close to the original "El Camino Real" (The Kings Road). This route (from Route 5 to Route 82) has officially been designated as "El Camino Real by Assembly Bill 1769, Chapter 1569, in 1959. Note that there are other roads that are likely the original El Camino Real, in particular, portions of Monterey Road from S of Gilroy to downtown San Jose.

    The I-5/I-10/Route 60/US 101 interchange, commonly referred to as the East Los Angeles Interchange, is named the “Medal of Honor Recipient , Eugene A. Obregon, USMC, Memorial Interchange” (it was originally named the “Marine Private First Class Eugene A. Obregon Interchange”). This interchange was named in memory of Medal of Honor Recipient Eugene A. Obregon, USMC. While serving as an ammunition carrier with Golf Company, Third Battalion, Fifth Marine Regiment, First Marine Division (Reinforced), during the Korean War, PFC Obregon was killed in action on September 26, 1950. The machine-gun squad of Private Obregon was temporarily pinned down by hostile fire; and during this time, he observed a fellow marine fall wounded in the line of fire. Armed only with a pistol, Private Obregon unhesitantly dashed from his cover position to the side of the fallen marine. Firing his pistol with one hand as he ran, Private Obregon grasped his comrade by the arm, and despite the great peril to himself, dragged the marine to the side of the road. Still under enemy fire, Private Obregon was bandaging the marine's wounds when hostile troops began approaching their position. Quickly seizing the wounded marine's rifle, Private Obregon placed his own body as a shield in front of the wounded marine and lay there firing accurately and effectively into the approaching enemy troops until he, himself, was fatally wounded by enemy machine-gun fire. By his courageous fighting spirit, and loyal devotion to duty, Private Obregon enabled his fellow marines to rescue the wounded marine. By fate and courage, Private Obregon is one of the valiant Mexican Americans to receive the Congressional Medal of Honor, the nation's highest military honor for bravery. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 109, Resolution Chapter 66, on 6/26/2008.

    The segment of US 101 from the Route 5/Route 10/Route 60/US 101 to the "four-level" interchange (i.e., the Route 110/US 101 interchange) is named the "Santa Ana Freeway". It was named by its location.

    The interchange of the US 101, Route 134, and Route 170 freeways is named the "Bruce T. Hinman Memorial Interchange." Officer Bruce T. Hinman was on routine motorcycle patrol on Route 170 at US 101 when he stopped to assist a disabled motorist. A drunk driver traveling at 60 m.p.h. along US 101 attempted to change routes by driving over a raised berm, then across the freeway and onto the dirt shoulder where he crashed into the disabled vehicle. The impact spun the disabled vehicle around, striking the motorist, who was using the freeway call box, and knocking Officer Hinman to the ground. The car came to rest with its rear wheels on top of the officer's chest, suffocating him. Officer Hinman, 34, was placed on life support but died a week later. He was a nine-year member of the CHP and was assigned to the West Valley Area office directly after graduating from the Academy. CHP Officer Bruce Hinman, an eight-year CHP veteran, was said to be the first officer in the 26-year history of the patrol's West Valley station to die in the line of duty.

    Officially, the segment of US-101 from Route 110 to Route 134 is named the "Hollywood Freeway". The first segment of the Hollywood Freeway opened in 1940 (as the Hollywood Expressway); the last segment opened in 1948. As for the origin of the name Hollywood, many different stories can be found. A popular explanation is that it was the name given by the wife of founder Horace H. Wilcox who named it after the "Mass of the Holy Wood of the Cross" said by Father Junipero Serra near the site. It may have also been a name borrowed from one of the Hollywoods of the east.

    The segment of US 101 from Route 110 to Route 2 is part of "Historic Highway Route 66", designated by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 6, Chapter 52, in 1991.

    The segment of US 101 from Route 134 to the northern end of the Ventura County line is named the "Ventura Freeway". It was named a Senate Concurrent Resolution in 1973. The first segment of the Ventura Freeway opened in 1955; the last segment in 1974.

    The portion of Route 101 from the top of the Conejo Grade to Lewis Road in the City of Camarillo is named the "Adolfo Camarillo Memorial Highway." Named in honor of Adolfo Camarillo, born in 1864 in what would become Ventura County. In 1880, at 16 years of age, took over operations of the 10,000 acre Rancho Calleguas upon the death of his father Juan. Adolfo Camarillo married Isabella Menchaca in 1888 and they moved into an adobe on the ranch and subsequently raised five children. In 1890, Adolfo Camarillo planted two rows of eucalyptus trees, with the help of two Chumash Indians, which arched over what became Route 101 for many years. These trees were designated as Ventura County Historical Landmark Number 3 on August 5, 1968, and were identified as the Adolfo Camarillo Heritage Grove in the Negative Declaration for the widening of Route 101 through Camarillo in 1980. In 1892, Adolfo Camarillo constructed the Queen Anne Victorian Camarillo Ranch House, which is visible to the north from Route 101 and was recommended for designation as a California Point of Historical Interest by the State Office of Historical Preservation on August 5, 2005, and was approved for that designation by the State Director of Parks and Recreation on September 29, 2005. Adolfo Camarillo graduated from the International Business College in Los Angeles in 1895 and was a pioneer in raising lima beans, which became the major crop in Ventura County during that time. He served as a member of the Board of Supervisors of Ventura County from 1907 to 1915. He was a member of the Pleasant Valley School District Board of Trustees for 56 years, serving as presiding officer for a total of 23 years. Adolfo Camarillo donated property for the Southern Pacific Railroad to be constructed through Camarillo in 1898 and this resulted in a station being built that became known as "Camarillo," and the town site for Camarillo was laid out that same year. He gave to the community by donating 50 acres of land for the first high school in Camarillo, which is named for him, and granted land for the new Conejo Grade Route 101 project in 1937, enabling the highway to be constructed across the entire width of the original Rancho Calleguas from the Conejo Grade to the Union Pacific Railroad, formerly the Southern Pacific Railroad, tracks adjacent to downtown Camarillo, He was a leader in a number of organizations in Camarillo and California, including the Ventura County Fair Board, the Camarillo Chamber of Commerce, Los Rancheros Visitadores, and the California Lima Bean Growers Association. He was a director of the California State Fair Board and of the Bank of A. Levy. He also bred and raised a stable of Morgan-Arabian horses, now famously known as the "Camarillo White Horses," which represented the community at many events, including the Pasadena Rose Parades and the opening of the Oakland Bay Bridge in 1936, and were ridden by him at many Los Rancheros Visitadores trail rides. Adolfo Camarillo was known affectionately as "The Last Spanish Don" because he cherished and preserved the Spanish traditions of early California. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR) 116, Resolution Chapter 74, on 7/3/2008.

    The portion of US 101 in the County of Ventura is named the "Screaming Eagles Highway". Named in honor of the 101st Airborne Division ("Screaming Eagles"). The 101st Airborne Division traces its lineage to World War I with the formation of the 101st Division on July 23, 1918, and subsequently has been involved in every major war that the United States has participated in since then. It was instrumental in the success of the D-Day Invasion, in the Operation Market Garden in Holland, in Bastogne for the Battle of the Bulge, in Vietnam for Operation Nevada Eagle, and in many other courageous missions worldwide. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 54, Chaptered 7/2/2003, Chapter 85.

    Throughout Santa Barbara Country, this freeway is called the "El Camino Real 101" Freeway.

    Between Santa Barbara County and the San Jose area, it is simply named "El Camino Real".

    US 101 from mile marker 9.67 in Monterey County to mile marker 36.16 in Santa Barbara has been formally submitted for inclusion in the “National Purple Heart Trail”. The National Purple Heart Trail was established in 1992 for the purpose of commemorating and honoring men and women who have been wounded or killed in combat while serving in the United States Armed Forces. It courses its way across the vast majority of the United States. In 2001, pursuant to SCR 14, the Legislature designated portions of I-5 and I-80 as California's selections for inclusion in the National Purple Heart Trail. In 2009, the state legislature found it was appropriate to designate additional portions of the state highway system for inclusion in the National Purple Heart Trail in order to honor the men and women who have been wounded or killed in combat while serving in the United States Armed Forces. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR) 12, Resolution Chapter 84, on 8/24/2009.

    The portion of US 101 from the south edge of the Santa Maria River Bridge to Santa Maria Way in Santa Barbara County is designated the “Officer Loren D. Scruggs Memorial Highway.” This segment was named in memory of CHP Officer Loren D. Scruggs. Officer Scruggs attended high school and college in Santa Maria in Santa Barbara County, and, after joining the CHP, served his entire career in that community. On April 23, 1971, Officer Scruggs, at the age of 35 years, was killed in the line of duty near the Betteravia Avenue offramp on US 101. He had stopped a vehicle for a registration violation, but was approached by another driver who asked for directions, and who subsequently pulled out a gun and shot Officer Scruggs, and the killer fled but his body was later found with self-inflicted wounds. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 57, Resolution Chapter 38, on May 14, 2008.

    The portion of US 101 from the Madonna Road exit in San Luis Obispo to the Santa Barbara Road exit in South Atascadero is named the "Alex Madonna Memorial Highway". This segment was named in honor of Alex Madonna. Alex Madonna was a San Luis Obispo native, born in 1918 in a house that was on property that is now a part of Camp San Luis Obispo. He lived with his mother and older sister near the Mission San Luis Obispo, and graduated from San Luis Obispo High School in 1937. While still in high school, Madonna started a construction company with a Model T Ford truck and a pick and shovel. This construction company built the San Luis County Regional Airport; completed work on many projects involving the construction of US 101 within the County of San Luis Obispo (included grading and plant mixed surfacing of Route 101 from one mile south of Templeton to Paso Robles, construction of five bridges and pedestrian undercrossings on Route 101 from 1.5 miles west of Santa Margarita to Atascadero, resurfacing and installing pavement markers on Route 101 from the Vineyard Drive Overcrossing to the South Paso Robles Overhead, and ramp repair on Route 101 at Atascadero Creek); building a good portion of Route 101 from Salinas to Buellton; repaving portions of Route 1, Route 41, and Route 46; consutruction of the final stretch of I-5; and construciton of a bridge on Route 58 and Route 166. Alex Madonna also was responsible for opening the world famous Madonna Inn in San Luis Obispo in 1958. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR) 97, Resolution Chapter 83, on 07/11/2006.

    The portion of US 101 between Spring Street in Paso Robles and Santa Barbara Road in Atascadero in San Luis Obispo County is named the "Vernon L. Sturgeon Memorial Highway" It was named in honor of Vernon L. Sturgeon. Although born in Chandler, Arizona, he attended schools in Paso Robles and followed in his father's footsteps as a milk distributor in San Luis Obispo County for 20 years. Sturgeon served on the Paso Robles City Council for eight years and as the Mayor of the City of Paso Robles for three years. He was elected to the State Senate for Senate District 29 in 1961, and served in the Legislature until 1966, when that district was reapportioned. At that time, he became a key advisor to Governor Ronald Reagan, serving as the Governor's Legislative Liaison Officer, starting in 1967, and also serving as Chief Deputy Director of the Department of Public Works. He was appointed by Governor Reagan to the Public Utilities Commission in 1969, and was later reappointed by Governor Jerry Brown, making him one of the few people to be appointed to the same position by both governors. He served on the commission until 1979, which included a three year term as president of the commission. In has various capacities, he played a significant role in securing the temporary site for the original Cuesta College, and was instrumental in securing funds for a number of projects and California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo. Also, through his efforts, the library at Hearst Castle was made available to University of California students for research. He also carried the appropriations bill in the Senate for funding the construction of Route 46 from Paso Robles to the coast in San Luis Obispo County. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 72, Resolution Chapter 96, on 8/15/2006.

    The section of US 101 in Salinas is the "Veterans Memorial Highway". Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 133, Chapter 103, in 1994.

    The portion of Route 101 north of Chualar between Payson Street and Esperanza Road in Monterey County is named the Caltrans Highway Maintenance Lead Worker Michael (Flea) Feliciano Memorial Highway. This segment was named in memory of Michael (Flea) Feliciano, who was born on January 25, 1949, in Monterey, California. He graduated from Pacific Grove High School and Monterey Peninsula College where he majored in Police Science. He played varsity baseball all four years in high school, was the first athlete at Pacific Grove High School to receive All Mission Trail Athletic League three years in a row as a varsity pitcher, and played as a semi-pro baseball pitcher from 1967 to 1976. He worked for 14 years for the City of Seaside Parks Department and was responsible for all irrigation of parks, islands, and medians; and also worked for the Fort Ord Golf Course and the Garnerville Ranchos District. In 2004, Michael (Flea) Feliciano was the District 5 Maintenance Lead Worker of, and an eleven year employee with, the Department of Transportation (Caltrans). He was a state-certified water auditor, a member of the Northern California Turf Council, and a member of the National Crisis Prevention Institute. On February 25, 2004, Michael (Flea) Feliciano's crew was returning to the maintenance yard in Salinas after closing a lane due to storm flooding on Route 101 when an errant driver crossed the highway median and slammed into the truck Michael (Flea) Feliciano was driving, killing Michael (Flea) Feliciano. Michael (Flea) Feliciano was the 159th Caltrans worker to be killed in the line of duty since 1924. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 120, Resolution Chapter 141, on 9/8/2006.

    The section from Route 82 in San Jose to I-80 in San Francisco is named the "Bayshore" Freeway. It was named by its location. One map shows it as the "South Valley" Freeway in Santa Clara County (between Route 82 and Monterey Street), but that seems not to be a name recognized by Caltrans.

    Route 101 between Ralston Avenue in Belmont and Route 92 is named the "Civilian Women Volunteers All Wars Memorial Freeway". It was named in honor of the civilian women volunteers that have run recreation centers and libraries on military institutions, taught in hospitals and schools, provided health care, and run orphanages. in a large number of wars. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 83, Chapter 36, approved March 15, 2000.

    The section between US 101 near Brisbane and US 101 in San Francisco was at one time called the "Hunters Point Freeway". This route was adopted in late 1963. It was named by location.

    The hill on Route 101 between Greenbrae and San Rafael is called "California Park Hill". California Park was housing development begun about 1910 in this area.

    The curve on Route 101 in San Francisco just north of Army Street to just south of Vermont Street is named "Hospital Curve", because the highway runs behind San Francisco General Hospital.

    Route 101 through Morgan Hill is also named the "Sig Sanchez Highway". Sig Sanchez was a San Jose Councilman. During his tenure as mayor and as a county supervisor, the passion and perseverance of Sig Sanchez overcame several obstacles so as to allow the building of the Morgan Hill Bypass on Route 101 in the County of Santa Clara. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 46, Chapt. 1994 in 1994.

    Route 101 in San Mateo County between the Santa Clara County line and the Ralston Avenue exit is named the Military Servicewomen's Memorial Highway. It was named in recognition of the contribution made by our country's women in the defense of the United States. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 171, Chapt. 154, September 1, 1998.

    Route 101 between the San Franciso International Airport and the Broadway-Burlingam Exit is named the "Officer Dave Chetcuti Memorial Highway". Millbrae Police Officer Dave Chetcuti, 43, became the first officer from that city's police department to be killed in the line of duty, April 25, 1998. It was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 97, Chapter 158 in 1998.

    Route 101 in San Francisco from the San Mateo County line and the junction of I-80 is named the "James Lick Freeway". It was named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 37, Chapter 122 in 1951. James Lick (1796-1876) worked in his youth as an expert organ and piano maker, following this trade some twenty years in Argentina, Chile and Peru. He arrived in San Francisco just before the gold rush with about $30,000 and made investments in what was then outlying real estate. He built the famous hotel known as the Lick House and continued to purchase real estate which kept being absorbed by the city as it grew. He also built a large flour mill in San Jose. As a result of investments he was very wealthy at the time of his death and left several million dollars for scientific, charitable and educational purposes. He financed the observatory atop Mt. Hamilton.

    From Route 80 in San Francisco until the freeway portion ends, it is named the "Central Skyway" or "Central Freeway".

    The segment from Route 1 to Waldo Point is named the "Golden Gate Bridge Freeway". It was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 11, Chapter 39 in 1954. The name comes from the fact that the route crosses the Golden Gate Bridge. The bridge, in turn, was named after the straight, which was named by Frémont in 1846 in analogy to the Golden Horn in Europe. He chose the name because he foresaw the day when riches of the Orient would flow through the gate, but he could not forsee that the discovery of gold in a few years would give the name new significance.

    Historically, this entire route was called the "Coast Highway".

     

    Named Structures

    Colloquially, the intersection of US 101 and Route 110 is called the "Four Level Interchange". Plans for it were unveiled in 1947 and it was constructed and open to traffic by 1949 or 1953-54, depending on who you believe. (SCAQMD and Library of Congress say 1949; Caltrans' own website says 1953; a historian at USC has material on the Web that says 1954). According to the Automobile Club, by the early 1950s the uppermost roadway was open for traffic on the Hollywood Freeway. The connections to the Harbor/Pasadena Freeway were completed a year later. This was the world's first four-level interchange. The Four Level itself has been recognized as a historic resource in its own right for some time. This has resulted in ill-advised cosmetic modifications, such as a cast-concrete bridge rail installed because it was considered to look "historic" (in fact the Four Level opened with very modern-looking steel bridge rails), as shown in the famous 1954 photo Caltrans Public Affairs has put online.

    At the South Ventu Park Road exit in Newbury Park is the "Stagecoach Inn Historial Plaque". This marks the original location of the historic Stagecoach Inn.

    Bridge 52-241 over the Ventura River in Ventura county is named the "Senator James J. McBride Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1962, and named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 9, Chapter 18, in the same year. State Senator James F. McBride served the people of Ventura County in the California Assembly and Senate from 1933 to 1961.

    Tunnel 51-172R in Santa Barbara county is named the "Gaviota Gorge Tunnel". It was built in 1953.

    Bridge 44-053, the Lime Creek Bridge in Monterey County, is named the "Harvey Robert Huss Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1975, and named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 59. Harvey Robert Huss, Caltrans maintenance worker, lost his life on February 11, 1973 while attempting to rescue to occupants of a car threatened by a mudslide on Route 1 near Big Sur. Mr. Huss was posthumously awarded the Medal of Valor, California's highest civilian award for heroism.

    Bridge 44-177, over the Salinas River in Monterey county, is named the "Skinner-Serrano Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1971, and named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 105, Chapter 37, in 1992. United States Army Cpl. Rodolfo Carillo "Rudy" Serrano, 21, was killed in action in Dinh Tuong Province, South Vietnam, on April 1, 1968. United States Marine Corp PFC Walter Francis Skinner, 19, was killed in action in Quang Tri Province, South Vietnam, on February 25, 1968.

    The intersection of Route 85 and US 101 in San Jose is named the Michael Evanhoe Interchange. It was named in honor of Michael Evanhoe, who served between 1995 and 2004 as the chief development officer responsible for the planning, programming, project development, marketing, and congestion management functions for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) in the County of Santa Clara. In that position, Mr. Evanhoe managed the $700 million VTA highway program, and was responsible for long-range transportation planning and programming for VTA, working to address and set the VTA's priorities for discretionary state and federal transportation funds. Mr. Evanhoe worked in the field of transportation since 1965, initially with the Caltrans in its Sacramento, Marysville, and San Francisco offices from 1965 to 1974, and later serving as Assistant Secretary for Transportation in the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency from 1975 to 1978 and Executive Director of the California Transportation Commission from 1978 to 1984. He joined the Sunset Development Company in San Ramon in 1984 and served as Vice President of Operations until 1988, was later appointed as Executive Director of the Golden Triangle Task Force in Santa Clara County from 1988 to 1990, and was subsequently appointed as the Executive Director of the Congestion Management Agency of Santa Clara County in 1990, serving in the latter position until the agency merged with the Santa Clara County Transit District in 1994 to form the VTA. Over the years, Mr. Evanhoe has gained the respect and admiration of elected officials, staff, and business leaders by getting the job done, maintaining a positive work environment, taking on new challenges, and working collaboratively with others. He had substantial responsibilities for construction of the Route 85/US 101 interchange and the widening of US 101. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 152, chaptered September 1, 2004. Resolution Chapter 175.

    Bridge 35-252 on US 101, the Route 92/Route 101 Interchange in San Mateo, is named the "Harold "Bizz" Johnson" Interchange. Congressman Harold T. "Bizz" Johnson, state Senator from 1949 to 1958, who served in the House of Representatives from 1958-1980, was instrumental in helping establish the Rails-to-Trails program. He also promoted water development projects and sided with consumer-owned electric utilities against the economic and political clout of big investor-owned systems like Pacific Gas and Electric Co. He also successfully broadened language in the Surface Transportation Assistance Act to allow bridges over highways, railroads and other physical features to qualify for funding under the Act's bridge replacement provisions. It was built in 1971, and was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 42, Chapt. 155 in 1985.

    Bridge 35-232 is also named the "Leslie Charlene Curtis Memorial Bridge". This name was assigned by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 84, Chapter 129, in 1985. Leslie Charlene Curtis, 19, was killed in 1985 by a drunk driver at the then notoriously unsafe intersection of South Norfolk and Route 92.

    This route also has the following Safety Roadside Rest Areas:

    • Gaviota, in Santa Barbara County, at the S end of the Gaviota Tunnel.
    • Camp Roberts, in Monterey County, 8.5 mi N of San Miguel.

     

    National Trails

    De Anza Auto Route This route is part of the De Anza National Historic Trail.

    Arrowhead Trail Sign This portion of this route from Route 110/Figueroa Blvd to Route 2 (Santa Monica Blvd) was part of the "Arrowhead Trail (Ocean to Ocean Trail)". It was named by Resolution Chapter 369 in 1925.

    National Old Trails Road Sign This portion of this route from Route 110/Figueroa Blvd to Route 2 (Santa Monica Blvd) was part of the "National Old Trails Road".

    New Santa Fe Trail Sign This portion of this route from Route 110/Figueroa Blvd to Route 2 (Santa Monica Blvd) was part of the "New Santa Fe Trail".

    National Park to Park Highway Sign Pikes Peak Ocean to Ocean Highway Sign This portion of this route from Route 110/Figueroa Blvd to Route 2 (Santa Monica Blvd) appears to have been part of the "National Park to Park Highway", and the "Pikes Peak Ocean to Ocean Highway".

    Pacific Highway Sign Lone Star Trail Sign This route appears to have been part of the "Pacific Highway". It also appears parts of the original route were part of the "Lone Star Trail".

     

    Business Routes
    • Los Angeles: Ventura Blvd (formerly signed, now deprecated as a business route)
    • Ventura: Main Street
    • Salinas: Boronda Road east to Main Street; Main Street south to Salinas Street; Salinas Street south into John Street (Route 68) east; John Street (Route 68) east to Abbott Street; Abbott Street south near Spreckels and to the half-interchange/half at-grade with the US 101 expressway near the Gould Road at-grade
    • Gonzales: Alta Street
    • Soledad: Front Street
    • Greenfield: El Camino Real
    • King City: First Street, Broadway
    • Atascadero: Traffic Way, El Camino Real.
    • Santa Maria: Route 135 south to Santa Maria Way, and Santa Maria Way east back to US 101
    • San Luis Obispo: Marsh Street. This shares signage with Route 1. Portions may be on Monterey Street.
    • Paso Robles: Spring Street
    • Pismo Beach/Grover Beach: Price Street
    • Arroyo Grande: Traffic Way. This is wrong-way multiplexed with Route 227 at its end.
    • Gilroy to Morgan Hill: Monterey Highway (some of this is former business route).

     

    Memorials

    Christopher G. Williams, Southbound US 101 @ Blackie Road in Prunedale, CA. The accident was 6/10/98 and the sign actually went up the first year the assembly bill was adopted (2001). Chris was killed on his Harley Davidson motorcycle by a hit and run drunk driver on the evening of Salinas' Big Hat Barbeque (kickoff to the California Rodeo in Salinas, CA) and the driver was later apprehended in Santa Cruz County. The driver was eventually sentenced to 11 years, 8 months in prison and has since been released after serving 5 years. Chris was the father of 3 children. Chris was a generous, fun, caring, loving father, brother and friend. He was 36 years old and worked for Pacific Bell in San Jose and commuted to and from Salinas daily and would not hesitate to stop and help a driver on the side of the road. He worked hard for his family and loved life. His three young children were the most important things in his life and after the accident the kids were split up and their lives have been a challenge without their father.
    (Information provided by Laurie R. Moreno, Chris's sister)

     

    Scenic Highway

    [SHC 263.6] From Route 27 (Topanga Canyon Boulevard) to Route 46 near Paso Robles; and from Route 156 near Prunedale northeasterly to Route 156.

     

    Freeway

    [SHC 253.5] From Route 5 near Seventh Street in Los Angeles to near Fell Street in San Francisco; signed as US Highway. Added to the Freeway and Expressway system in 1959.

     

    Interstate Submissions

    The portion from Route 5 to the Route 10 interchange was to have been designated I-105; this was deleted as chargeable interstate in August 1965. The entire length of this portion of US101 was submitted for inclusion in the interstate system in 1945; it was not accepted.

     

    Commuter Lanes

    In San Mateo County, a HOV lane runs (in both directions) from Whipple Avenue to the Santa Clara county line, for a length of 6.6 mi. This was opened in July 1991. It requires two or more occupants, and operates on weekdays during the following hours: 5:00-9:00AM, 3:00-7:00PM.

    In Santa Clara County, a HOV lane runs (both directions) from the San Mateo county line to the vicinity of Bernal Road, for a length of approximately 25 miles. The portion between the San Mateo County Line and Guadalupe Parkway was opened in November 1986 and extended twice in 1988; the portion between Guadalupe Parkway and Route 280 was opened in April 1993; and the portion between Route 280 and Bernal Road was opened in June 1990. All require two or more occupants, and operate on weekdays during the following hours: 5:00-9:00AM, 3:00-7:00PM.

    With respect to usage: A 2001 Caltrans survey showed that use of the HOV lane in the San Francisco Bay Area fell from 14,110 vehicles in 1996 to 9,093 in 2001. During the busiest hour of the morning, more than 1,500 cars used the HOV lane, which is about the same number of cars as in each non-carpool lane. Note that the 2001 survey showed that US 101 has the distinction of the slowest speed for carpoolers at 28 mph during the afternoon.

    There are plans to add a reversible HOV lane through San Rafael from Sir Francis Drake Blvd to N San Pedro Road in Marin County. This is TCRP Project #17, requested by the Marin Congestion Management Agency together with Caltrans. In August 2005, this was amended to be two HOV lanes, instead of a single reversable lane.

    There also appear to be plans to address the HOV gap between south of the Coleman School Pedestrian Overcrossing to North San Pedro Road Undercrossing.

     

    Other WWW Links


  2. From a point in Marin County opposite San Francisco to the Oregon state line via Crescent City.


    Post 1964 Signage History

    The definition of this segment remains unchanged from 1963, other than it changing from (c) to (b).

    Portions of this route are now Route 254, as surface routings have been replaced by freeway. Another "old US 101" segment is present-day Route 271. It also appears that State Street in the Ukiah, Calpella, and Redwood Valley areas is a former segment of US 101, in particular, the segment from Route 253 to downtown Calpella.

     

    Pre 1964 Signage History

    N of San Francisco, US 101 (which was signed since the mid-1930s) was LRN 1, defined in 1909, N to 5 mi NE of Crescent City. It was LRN 71, defined in 1919, from this point (the junction with US 199) to the Oregon border.

    Chris Sampang observes that there are quite a few surface streets that are likely old US 101 routings, having been bypassed when the freeway N of Willits was completed. He identifies these as:

    • Garberville and Redway: Redwood Drive
    • Sylvandale to Pepperwood: Avenue of the Giants/Route 254
    • Scotia: Main Street
    • Rio Dell: Wildwood Avenue. At one time, US 101 was on Pacific Avenue.
    • Alton: Old State Highway (found near the Route 36 junction)
    • Fortuna: Fortuna Blvd and Main Street
    • Worswick to Beatrice: Route 211 from Worswick to Fernbridge, Eel River Drive from Fernbridge to Beatrice, Old State Highway south of Loleta. Eel River Drive. Tompkins Hill Road north of Beatrice may also be old US 101, US 101 here follows the railroad and that makes more sense.
    • Spruce Point: Broadway Street, now known as South Broadway.
    • Eureka: Broadway, 5th (NB) and 4th (SB) Streets.
    • Arcata: G Street
    • McKinleyville to Clam Beach: Central Avenue
    • Clam Beach: Clam Beach Drive
    • Moonstone to Trinidad: Scenic Drive.
    • Trindad to Patricks Point: Patricks Point Drive, maybe Old Stagecoach Road
    • Big Lagoon: Roundhouse Creek Road, Oceanview Drive, A Street, Redwood Highway, later seemingly rerouted to Roundhouse Creek Road and Lynda Lane (it is unclear if the Redwood Highway here was actually connected to US 101)
    • North of Big Lagoon: There's a routing (unnamed) that appears to go through some state park
    • Dry Lagoon: Old State Highway, which takes a routing to the east of Dry Lagoon.
    • Exit 753 north to Exit 765: Old Highway 101, paralleling Prarie Creek on a straighter alignment than the current freeway; part of it (at the junction with Red Park Road in the Prarie Creek Redwoods near the Humboldt/Del Norte county line) is named Redwood Highway.
    • Klamath: Klamath Mill Road and Klamath Avenue
    • Crescent City: If US199 actually ended in the city itself, then Parkway Drive would be an old routing of US 199 at first, and then possibly a pre-freeway version of US 101 after US 199 was made to end north of Crescent City. One possible pre-freeway (but post-US 199 move out of Crescent City itself, if US 199 had ever been there) route is Railroad Avenue and Wonderstump Avenue; another longer one is the route from Crescent City to Smith River via Northcrest Drive, Lake Earl Drive to Tryon Corner, and then Fred D. Haight Drive from Tryon Corner to Smith River. West First Street and Oceanview Drive north to near the Oregon stateline might also be a part of a pre-expressway route. (A second Oceanview Drive begins across the Oregon state line 3/4 mile north of the border eventually meeting up with 101 in Brookings; this name might've been one continous route pre-expressway.)

    Note also that in Cloverdale, part of Cloverdale Blvd was likely part of US 101, and was cosigned with Route 128.

     

    Status

    In September 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project in Marin and Sonoma Counties that will construct a northbound high occupancy vehicle lane from Route 37 to Atherton Avenue and a southbound HOV lane from Route 37 to Rowland Boulevard; construct a southerly interchange at San Antonio Road and Route 101, including frontage roads with pedestrian/bicycle facility; replace the bridge over San Antonio Creek and realign the roadway curve; construct an interchange at Petaluma Boulevard including frontage roads with pedestrian/bicycle facility; and construct roadway improvements in the cities of Novato and Petaluma. The project is fully funded using Corridor Mobility Improvement Account, Traffic Congestion Relief Program, State Transportation Improvement Program, federal and local funds for $274,000,000, capital and support. The scope as described for the preferred alternative is consistent with the project scope set forth in the approved project baseline agreement. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2010-11.

    For Marin/Sonoma Counties, in 2007, the CTC considered a number of requests for funding from the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA). Two requests were funded: Marin-Sonoma Narrows Seg. A (Novato) ($82.4M), and construction of aux. lane from WB I-580 to NB US 101 ($20M) in Marin County. Requests to add HOV lanes from Wilfred Av to Santa Rosa Av in Sonoma County, adding HOV lanes from Railroad Av to Rohnert Park Expwy in Sonoma County, adding HOV lanes from Steele to Windsor River (North Ph A) in Sonoma County, the Marin-Sonoma Narrows Seg. B (Novato-Petaluma) in Marin/Sonoma County, and adding HOV lanes near Airport and operational improvements (North Ph B) in Sonoma County were not recommended for funding. The funding plan was updated in December 2007. The funding plan was modified again in February 2009.

    [Rohnert Park]In June 2008, the CTC approved amending the scope of the Sonoma 101 Central – Phase A CMIA project by adding an additional 1.3 miles of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes using $8,000,000 in local funds. The proposed amended project would be a combination of the CMIA approved Central - Phase A project with the Central - Cotati Grade project (a portion of the original Central – Phase B project). The proposed amended project would complete 5.0 miles (of 6.4 miles planned) of the Central HOV project from Pepper Road in Petaluma to Rohnert Park Expressway in Rohnert Park. The remainder of the Central- Phase B project would be constructed at a future date when funding becomes available. The full Central HOV lane project proposes widening Route 101 from four to six lanes in Sonoma County. The project is 6.4 miles long extending from Old Redwood Highway in Petaluma to Rohnert Park Expressway in Rohnert Park. The new lanes are part of the Highway 101 Corridor Management Plan that will provide for continuous HOV lanes from just north of the Golden Gate Bridge in Marin County to Windsor River Road north of the city of Windsor in Sonoma County. The Central HOV project also upgrades the highway to current standards, adds auxiliary lanes, and provides Intelligent Transportation System elements, such as changeable message signs, vehicle detection systems, ramp metering systems and stations, advisory variable speed signs, and communication network links. To reflect funding constraints and potential delivery challenges associated with a slide area on southern end of the Cotati Grade, the Central HOV project was segmented into Phase A and Phase B prior to the time of CMIA program adoption. Central – Phase A was included in the adopted CMIA program, Central - Phase B was not. The Central – Phase A project proposes to complete the northern 3.7 miles of the full Central HOV project from Railroad Avenue in Cotati to Rohnert Park Expressway in Rohnert Park and is fully funded and on schedule to begin construction in July 2009. The median section of the Cotati Grade is wide enough to provide for the two additional lanes, standard outside shoulders, and six foot inside shoulders.

    In March 2009, the CTC again amended the STIP regarding the widening of Route 101 from a four to a six-lane highway with the addition of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes between north of Pepper Road to the Rohnert Park Expressway. Caltarns and the SCTA proposed to transfer $2,947,000 in RIP shares from R/W capital to construction ($1,747,000) and construction support ($1,200,000). A corresponding amount of local Measure M funds will be transferred from construction and construction support to R/W capital. The amount of $3,000 RIP will remain in R/W capital to cover previous expenditures. There is no change to the total project cost and the project scope remains consistent with the amended baseline approved in June 2008. The purpose of this amendment was to consolidate R/W capital to one funding source. Existing R/W capital has both STIP and Measure M, and this amendment will result in R/W capital being fully funded by Measure M (with the exception of $3,000 in prior expenditures). Given the State's fiscal environment, this amendment will provide fund flexibility and will simplify the accounting of only one funding source for R/W capital.

    In August 2009, the CTC adjusted funding and schedule for the Sonoma Narrows project.

    In February 2009, the CTC approved a project on US 101 involving the construction roadway improvements including reconstructing and widening the East Washington Street/US 101 interchange in Petaluma.

    In January 2009, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding roadway improvements that include the construction of an additional high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction between Old Redwood Highway and the Rohnert Park Expressway in the cities of Petaluma, Cotati and Rohnert Park. The project will construct roadway improvements to a 6.4 mile long section of Route 101 in Sonoma County. The improvements will include the construction of an additional HOV lane in each direction. The additional lanes will be constructed in the existing median. The project is programmed with corridor mobility improvement account funds, state transportation improvement program funds, and local funds. The total estimated project cost, capital and support, is $118,250,000. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2009-10. The scope, as described for the preferred alternative, is consistent with the project scope set forth in the approved project baseline agreement.

    [Santa Rosa]In December 2008, the CTC approved for future consideration of funding a project in Sonoma County that would widen the existing four-lane route to six lanes between the Steele Lane interchange and the Windsor River Road interchange in the unincorporated community of Windsor. The project is fully funded in the 2008 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The project is programmed with Corridor Mobility Improvement Account, local, and federal funds. The cost of the project is $120,260,000. The scope, as described for the preferred alternative, is consistent with the project scope set forth in the approved project baseline agreement. Construction of the project impacts aquatic habitat of steelhead, coho, and shinook salmon, which are federally-listed species; and western pond turtle, northwestern pond turtle, northern red-legged frog, and foothill yellow-legged frog, which are state species of concern. Additionally loss of mature vegetation and redwood trees, permanent impacts to waters of the U.S., and the public controversy regarding the project resulted in an environmental impact report being completed for this project. Due to mitigation such as revegetation, tree replacement, aesthetic design treatments, riparian and aquatic habitat restoration, and relocation of identified turtle and frog species encountered during surveys, impacts were determined to be less than significant.

    In March 2007, the CTC considered relinquishment of right of way on US 101 in the city of Rohnert Park, at Rohnert Park Expressway, consisting of reconstructed city street. The City of Rohnert Park, by cooperative agreement dated March 9, 1999, waived the 90-day notice requirement and agreed to accept title upon relinquishment by the State.

    In June 2007, the CTC considered a resolution to authorized roadway improvements in Rohnert Park. This project is fully funded in the 2006 State Transportation Improvement Program and Corridor Mobility Improvement Account Program. The total estimated project cost is $86,300,000. Construction is estimated to begin in FY 2007-08. AThe project will involve construction activities in the environmentally sensitive habitat of the California tiger salamander. In addition, the project will also remove 150 mature redwood trees.

    There are a number of projects under consideration for this route:

    • [Willits Map] Willits Bypass (US 101/Route 20). There are several alternatives under consideration here, most of them bypassing the city on the east, one on the west. This would be a new four-lane freeway on a new alignment near Willits; the EIR is currently in circulation. [July 2002 CTC Agenda; 2.2b.(1)]. Additional details on this bypass can be found on the Caltrans Willits Bypass Page. The recommended route is LT, which will leave current US 101 at the Upper Haehl Creek interchange, and rejoin current US 101 at the Quail Meadows Interchange.

      As part of the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) program, the Willits Bypass was submitted for $177M in funding, but this funding request was not funded.

      A negative environmental impact declaration was received in July 2007

      Willits BypassIn February 2008, a route was adopted for the Willits Bypass. As part of this, a portion of former Route 101 will be designated as Route 20 (and may require legislation to make the route contiguous). As shown in the map to the right, the open dashed line is the freeway alignment adopted in 1968 that is being rescinded. The solid heavy line is the new alignment. The heavy solid dashed line is the 1968 freeway alignment being retained. The project proposes to construct a four-lane freeway bypass with full access control, two interchanges, and three grade separations east of Willits. The freeway will depart from existing Route 101 approximately 0.3 miles south of the Haehl Overhead and will end approximately 1.8 miles south of Reynolds Highway along the existing Route 101 alignment just south of the at-grade rail crossing of the Northwestern Pacific Railway. The bypass will provide access to Willits and Fort Bragg at interchanges toward the north and south ends of the project. Frontage roads and driveways to local roads will be constructed as needed to provide access to landlocked parcels. A portion of the January 11, 1963 freeway route adoption will be rescinded as part of this proposed freeway route adoption as shown on the route location map. The proposed freeway route adoption will link the portions of the January 11, 1963 route adoption remaining in effect. The Department recommended redesignating a portion of existing Route 101 to Route 20 from 0.3 miles south of Haehl Overhead to existing Route 101/ Route 20 junction, in town as Route 20 in order to provide a link from Route 20 to Route 101 on its new alignment. Relinquishment of the existing Route 101 from Route 20, in town, to near the north end of the bypass would occur after project construction. Relinquishment would transfer the State’s right of way, title, and interest of a section of Route 101 to the City of Willits and to Mendocino County.

      The Willits Bypass dates back to 1962. A project report recommending construction of a four-lane freeway facility on Route 101, to bypass the City of Willits, was approved in 1962. As a result of this Report, a bypass route was adopted by the California Highway Commission on January 11, 1963. In 1969, improvements to Route 101 were made. A segment of freeway south of Willits was constructed and right of way was acquired. Due to funding shortfalls and a shift in transportation philosophies, further development of the bypass project stopped. In 1987, the Commission directed the Department to re-evaluate the adopted route and to consider other alternatives to satisfy the “new” required environmental process. In 1988, a Project Study Report (PSR) investigating the feasibility of constructing a four-lane freeway bypass around Willits was approved. This approved PSR authorized environmental studies to be completed. During the course of the studies, the Department investigated a wide range of alternatives. In the 1992 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), the Commission partially funded the Willits Bypass project, programming $60.5 million for construction and $9 million for right of way. Engineering and environmental studies continued on the many alternatives under consideration through 1994, but due to funding shortages and resource redirection, by 1995, progress halted. With a new route adoption, construction should proceed. It is interesting to note that there are five signalized intersections on the existing alignment within the project limits, the only signalized intersections on Route 101 between San Francisco and Eureka.

    • Laytonville Bypass (US 101).

    • Hopland Bypass (US 101).

    • Marin-Sonoma Narrows Project. This project proposes freeway, High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) improvements, and pedestrian/bicycle improvements to the US 101 corridor. Running 17-miles in length, it begins south of the Route 37 interchange in the City of Novato (Marin County), continues through the narrower non-freeway portion of US 101 between Novato and Petaluma known locally as the "Novato Narrows", and ends south of the Old Redwood Highway in the City of Petaluma (Sonoma County). For more information, see http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/projects.htm.

      [Map]In April 2006, the CTC considered approval of the a TCRP project application amendment for $15,400,000 in new TCRP funding for Project #18 – Route 101, which will widen eight miles of freeway to six lanes from Novato to Petaluma (Novato Narrows) in Marin and Sonoma Counties. The goal of the application was to program $600,000 in TCRP funds for Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E); program $1,000,000 in TCRP funds for Right of Way (R/W); program $13,800,000 in TCRP funds for Construction; and update the project schedule and funding plan. The overall project is to construct an HOV lane in both the northbound and southbound directions of Route 101 from Route 37 in Novato to the Old Redwood Highway in Petaluma. The project will convert the section from north of Atherton Avenue to Route 116 from a fourlane expressway to a six-lane freeway. In addition, the project includes provisions for interchanges, extension of frontage roads, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. East Washington Street Interchange improvements on Route 101 are part of the overall project. The existing northbound off-ramp does not have enough storage capacity to handle the traffic. Therefore, traffic is stored on the mainline causing congestion in the northbound direction. The existing southbound on-ramp does not have standard geometrics and enough tapering to allow for traffic to merge into the mainline, creating congestion in the southbound direction. The goal is to have the improvements to the off- and on-ramps be compatible with the future HOV lane project. However, as of 2007, environmental studies and preliminary engineering have been delayed due to the inability to hire consultants to complete the technical studies. Complicating this is the requirement of the United States Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) for additional surveys to determine the impacts on the Red Legged Frog within the project limits. As of April 2007, the estimated completion dates are: Phase 1: FY 2008/2009; Phase 2: FY 2007/2008; Phase 3: FY 2007/2008.

      This was updated in September 2007, with a approved resolution to redistribute $10,900,000 from Construction to PS&E, and designate two sub-projects: TCRP Project #18.1 – Route 101, East Washington Interchange and receive transfer $1,600,000 in TCRP funds from Project #18; and TCRP Project #18.2 – Route 101, San Antonio Curve Correction and to receive transfer of $2,900,000 in TCRP funds from TCRP Project #18.

      In January 2008, this project was updated to be consistent with CMIA funding.

      In May 2008, increased construction costs led to reduction in scope and division of the project. The CMIA element (PPNO A0360F) constitutes only a portion of the overall Marin-Sonoma Narrows (“Narrows”) project. The scope of the overall Narrows project (mostly unfunded) extends 16 miles from Route 37 in Marin County to north of the Corona Overcrossing in Petaluma (Sonoma County). It includes the addition of HOV lanes, and the construction of interchanges, frontage roads and other pedestrian facilities. It also includes the installation of traffic operation system (TOS) elements such as monitoring stations and ramp metering on the mainline and ramps. The May 2008 reduced the HOV lane limits in the southbound direction by one mile in order to fully fund the construction of the San Antonio Road Interchange. Constructing the San Antonio Interchange now will significantly reduce the number of left and right turn access points in the corridor, allowing effective management of the freeway traffic. This will provide significant benefits in the form of reduced recurrent and non-recurrent congestion. In addition, the construction of this new interchange positions the corridor for the future addition of an HOV lane in each direction. The amendment also divides the project into three portions:

      1. A1PPNO 0360F - $77.3 Million - Highway 101 Marin-Sonoma Narrows (MSN) – HOV lane (Contract A1) This contract constructs a NB HOV lane from Route 37 to Atherton Avenue and a SB HOV lane from Route 37 to Rowland Boulevard. Completion of this project would extend the existing HOV lane system north of Route 37. The other project improvements include constructing soundwalls and installing TOS elements, such as monitoring stations and ramp metering on mainline and ramps.

      2. B1PPNO 0360J - $67.4 million - US 101 Marin-Sonoma Narrows (MSN) – Southerly Interchange (Contract B1) This contract constructs a new interchange and frontage roads to serve the San Antonio Road. These improvements implement access control and will become the first step in converting the facility from expressway to freeway. New frontage roads will eliminate existing direct driveways access to and from US 101, eliminate a left turn movement across travel lanes on US 101 and provide new pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The right of way acquisitions will accommodate some future phases of the overall “Narrows” project. The intent is to affect each property owner only once and also to acquire as much right-of-way for the overall MSN project as the current funding and favorable real estate market conditions will allow for.

      3. B2PPNO 0360H- $58.1 million - US 101 Marin-Sonoma Narrows (MSN) – Petaluma Blvd. South Interchange (Contract B2) This contract constructs a new interchange, frontage roads, and equipment for ramp metering. These improvements implement access control and will become the first step in converting the facility from expressway to freeway. New frontage roads will eliminate existing direct driveways access to and from US 101, eliminate a left turn movement across travel lanes on US 101 and provide new pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The right-of-way acquisitions will accommodate some future phases of the overall “Narrows” project. The intent is to affect each property owner only once and also to acquire as much right-of-way for the overall MSN project as the current funding and favorable real estate market conditions will allow for.

    Note that not all of these projects may actually be funded and constructed. The long term plan is to make US 101 four-lane all the way up to the Eureka area. It is being done as funds become available.

    In December 2009, the CTC approved for future funding a project that will repair, upgrade, or replace 36 existing drainage facilities on Route 101 from 0.4 miles north of Baechtel Creek Bridge in Willits to 0.2 miles south of Cummings Road Undercrossing near Leggett. The project is fully funded in the State Highway Operation and Protection Program. Total estimated project cost is $5,979,000, capital and support. It is estimated to begin construction in Fiscal Year 2011-12.

    In December 2008, the CTC reallocated the funding on TCRP Project #18, effectively moving funds from Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) to Project Approval and Environmental Documentation (PA&ED).

    In April 2006, the CTC considered relinquishment of two segments of US 101 near Sonoma: 04-Son-101-PM 15.4 in the County of Sonoma, and 04-Son-101-PM 53.9/56.2 in the County of Sonoma. The first is right of way in the County of Sonoma, at Santa Rosa Avenue and Roberts Lake Road, consisting of superseded highway right of way. The second is right of way in the County of Sonoma, between the Preston Overhead and the Mendocino County Line, consisting of superseded highway right of way.

    In January 2007, the CTC considered relinquishment of right of way on US 101 near Sonoma between the Preston Overhead and the Mendocino County line, consisting of superseded highway right of way.

    In October 2006, the CTC considered relinquishment of right of way in the county of Mendocino, about 300 feet northerly of the Pieta Creek Bridge, consisting of superseded highway right of way.

    In his 2006 Strategic Growth Plan, Governor Schwartzenegger proposed constructing HOV lanes between Santa Rosa and Windsor. He also proposed completing the Willits and Hopeland Byasses.

    TCRP Project #159 will redesign and reconstruct the Steele Lane Interchange.

    Additionally, a number of segments have recently been upgraded to freeway status. These include:

    • A 3.5 mile section from US 199 to Crescent City City Limits
    • A 17 mile section from Klamath River Bridge to Newton B. Druary Scenic Highway (1.2 miles of it is 2 lanes)
    • A 24 mile section from Big Lagoon Road to Arcata
    • A 15 mile section south of Eureka to South of Fortuna
    • A 2.5 mile section through Rio Dell
    • A 46 mile section from Shively Road to Richardson Grove State Park
    • A 8 mile section from Mendocino County Line to south of Piercy
    • A 11 mile section from Jct 1 at Leggett to Cummings
    • A 16 mile section from Ukiah Street to south of Ukiah
    • A 45 mile section from Cloverdale to Petaluma
    • A 25 mile section from Novato to Golden Gate Bridge.

    The following portions are constructed to freeway standards: (1) from the Golden Gate Bridge to 2 miles north of Novato (approx 30 miles); (2) from Petaluma to 3 miles north of Cloverdale; (3) through Ukiah (approx 12 miles). From this point north, there are a couple sections of 2 mile signed freeways. Route 101 is also freeway from Garberville to Eureka (approx 70 miles); from N of Eureka to Trinidad State Beach (approx 16 miles); near Klamath (approx 5 miles); and from Crescent City to US-199.

    In March 2009, the CTC received for review a draft EIR concerning a project in Humboldt County to widen, realign and construct roadway improvements on Route 101 from just north of the Mendocino/Humboldt County line to just south of Garberville. The project is not programmed. The project is included in the 2008 State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) Long Lead Projects list consistent with Commission Resolution G-13. This resolution requires the Department to notify the Commission when project development work is begun on SHOPP projects that are not currently programmed. The total cost of the project is estimated to be $5,500,000. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2013-14.

    [Rtes 101/36 near Alton]In August 2008, Caltrans released for bid a project to construct and interchange and frontage road in Humboldt County near Alton on Route 101 from Van Duzen River Overflow Bridge to 0.6 Km North of Drake Hill Road and on Route 36 from 0.5 Km West of Main Street to Main Street. Known as the Alton Interchange, this will upgrade a section of US 101 to full freeway, at the Route 36 Junction.

    In November 2002, the CTC considered vacation of the portion of the original routing in the city of Arcata, from PM 86.63 to PM 87.18 in Humboldt County.

    In November 2007, the CTC reviewed a draft EIR that proposed constructing roadway improvements that included closing median crossings along a portion of Route 101 near Arcata. Total estimated project cost is $38,985,000. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year (FY) 2009-10. The STIP project involves upgrading Route 101 to a four-lane facility and is not fully funded. The project may also include construction of a diamond interchange at Indianola Cutoff and/or signalization of the Airport Road/Route 101 intersection. The project is currently programmed for $5,719,000 in the STIP (RIP) and Federal Demonstration funds. Total estimated project cost is $42,090,000, capital and support. This project should be ready for construction in FY 2009-10, depending on the availability of funds.

    Eureka ImprovementsIn July 2006, the CTC received a notice of preparation for an EIR for a corridor project consisting of a 2006 State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) project and a 2006 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) project. The roadway rehabilitation work programmed in the SHOPP is fully funded. Construction is estimated to begin in Fiscal Year 2009-2010. The STIP project to upgrade Route 101 to a four-lane facility is not fully funded. The project is currently programmed for $5,719,000 in Regional Improvement Program funds and Federal Demonstration Funds. Total estimated project cost is $42,090,000, capital and support. This project is estimated to begin construction in Fiscal Year 2011-2012. There are a number of alternatives being considered.

    According to Compass's Redwood Coast map, a freeway alignment is planned for US 101 between Leggett (where Route 271's south segment and Route 1 have their terminus) and the Red Mountain Creek (where another freeway segment begins) north of Riverdale; this explains why Route 271 is defined as a single-segment route (as presumably it will be extended to the existing non-freeway US 101 through Standish-Hickey State Recreation Area). There are plans to realign the highway near Leggett to avoid a rockslide. In addition to a no-build alternative, there are three build alternatives on slightly different alignments. All three of the build alternatives would realign the highway to the west and construct two bridges to span the South Fork of the Eel River. In February 2006, the FEIR was transmitted to California Transportation Commission staff; it was prepared due to the potentially unmitigable visual impacts associated with the placement of new bridges over a designated Wild and Scenic River. Based on this, in February 2006, the CTC considered a route adoption of a bypass around Confusion Hill as a traversable highway from 1.1 kilometer (0.7 mile) south of Red Mountain Creek to 0.5 kilometer (0.3 mile) south of Red Mountain Creek, in the county of Mendocino. The current adopted alignment from 0.4 kilometer (0.6 mile) north of Tan Oak Park to 1.1 kilometer (0.7 mile) south of Red Mountain Creek will not be altered from the north side of the South Fork Eel River, based on the approved 2002 Route Concept Report (RCR).

    As background, this segment is functionally classified as a rural principal arterial, is part of the California Freeway and Expressway System and is included in the National Highway System (NHS). It is also designated as part of the “SHELL” system (Sub-system of Highway for the movement of Extra-Legal permit Loads). The route is also a high emphasis and focus route on the Interregional Road System (IRRS). Hence, the maintenance of US 101 between the San Francisco Bay Area and Oregon is critical to the economic well being of this area, as it carries high volumes of commercial trucking year round and recreational traffic during the summer months. Developing improvements to assure all weather dependability is essential to this route. A portion of SR 101, from 0.6 mile north of Tan Oak Park to the Humboldt County line was adopted as a freeway in 1967 along an alignment on the north side of the Eel River. The existing alignment was later denominated to a controlled access highway. A Project Study Report (PSR) was initiated in spring of 1999 to propose a solution to the unreliability of Route 101 through the Confusion Hill slide area. Frequent road closures due to debris fall and slope movement have been a continual maintenance problem for this portion of Route 101. In 2001, the cost to stabilize the roadway was $3.2 million, and estimated costs of vehicle delays were $665,000. Costs to keep the route open continue to increase, and in 2002/2003, construction costs exceeded $9 million and vehicle delay costs were estimated near $2 million. The PSR approved June 25, 2001 recommended proceeding with project approval and development of an environmental document for realignment of the roadway outside the slide area at Confusion Hill. The project was determined to be consistent with State and Regional transportation planning and would facilitate goods movement. In August of 2003, the Department acquired $72 million in emergency relief funds for emergency repairs and the permanent relocation and restoration of slide-damaged Route 101 at Confusion Hill in Mendocino County. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) allocated $65 million for the permanent relocation of the highway and another $7 million for the emergency re-opening work that has occurred since Winter 2002. FHWA placed several conditions upon funding the project. One condition was that emergency funding be contingent upon construction completion by 2008. Another condition placed upon funding was that the Department must further investigate an alternative for maintaining the existing alignment while investigating relocation alternatives that meet the purpose and need of the project. In 2004, it was discovered that construction of two bridges required an increase in project construction duration from two years to three and an increase in capital cost from $65 million to an estimated $68 to $71 million. The current construction completion date is in 2009.

    According to Caltrans, there were plenty of challenges in building the two bridges that now cross the Eel River in two places, to bypass the slide-prone Confusion Hill area of US 101. Construction crews had to mine 60-foot shafts into the hillside to support the legs of the massive new south span of the bridge, haul more than 400,000 yards of excavated rock and dirt from the construction site and erect a cast-in-place segment bridge, the likes of which are few and far between. The quarter-mile south span of the bypass consists of 68 segments, each of which had to be cast and poured in place, some 255 feet above the river bed. The two bridges were named after and dedicated in memory of a pair of local pioneers, Elizabeth Jane Rosewarne and Mignon “Minnie” Stoddard Lilley. The bypass is scheduled to be opened to southbound traffic in early July 2009, and to northbound traffic by October 2009.

    [Confusion Hill[In 1962, the California Highway Commission adopted 20 miles of US 101 in Mendocino County as a freeway from 0.6 mile north of Tan Oak Park to the Humboldt County line. In 1967, a portion of this adopted route, from 0.9 mile south of Red Mountain Creek to 0.8 mile north of Red Mountain Creek (about 7 miles south of Humboldt County line), was realigned and adopted as a freeway by the California Highway Commission. On February 2, 2006, the Commission approved a resolution adopting as a State highway a 0.4 mile segment of US 101 connecting the existing US 101 and the adopted 1967 freeway alignment across the South Fork Eel River in the Confusion Hill area. This route adoption was necessary to provide connectivity on the State Highway System and bypass an existing ancient landslide. At the time, the plan for the bypassed portion of the existing highway was to be relinquished to the County of Mendocino. Since then, new negotiations between the Department and the County have modified the areas to be relinquished, obliterated and retained by the Department as shown in the route adoption map. The area retained by the Department will become a much needed debris material storage area and will provide public access to Red Mountain Road. This proposed route adoption replaces the route adopted as a State highway in 2006 and realigns a portion of the freeway route adopted in 1967. The proposed route adoption and subsequent freeway construction on a new alignment will improve the reliability, safety and operations of the highway at this location. The relocated route will also bypass the only Surface Transportation Assistance Act truck restriction location on US 101 in Mendocino County.

    In July 2009, the CTC approved relinquishment of right of way in the city of Crescent City along Route 101 at Elk Creek, consisting of nonmotorized transportation facilities, namely the Harbor Trail Bridge and trailhead.

    SAFETEA-LU

    The SAFETEA-LU act, enacted in August 2005 as the reauthorization of TEA-21, provided the following expenditures on or near this route:

    • High Priority Project #278: Widening US 101 and reconstructing the off ramps on between Steele Lane and Windsor, CA to reduce traffic and promote carpools. This ties in with a number of already existing projects for US 101 under the TCRP, including TCRP #159 to repair the Steele Lane interchange, and some HOV projects. $5,600,000.

    • High Priority Project #1767: Construct US 101 bicycle-pedestrian project in Marin and Sonoma Counties from north of Athenton Ave to south of Petaluma River bridge. $400,000.

    • High Priority Project #2444: Widen US 101 in Marin and Sonoma Counties from Route 37 in Novato to Old Redwood Highway in Petaluma. HPP #3762 seems to be providing additional funds for this. $12,000,000.

    • High Priority Project #2749: Construct bypass along US 101 around Willits, CA to reduce congestion, improve air quality and enhance the economic lifeline of North Coast. $5,600,000.

    • High Priority Project #3762: Widen US 101 in Marin and Sonoma Counties from Route 37 in Novato to Old Redwood Highway in Petaluma. Note that this seems to be the same project as #2444, so perhaps this is just adding extra money.$15,000,000.

     

    %BUSINESS

    • Ukiah
    • Rio Dell. This is Route 283.
    • Petaluma (Business routing approved by AASHTO in 1997, 4.8 miles)
    • Novato
    • Santa Rosa: Santa Rosa Avenue, Mendocino Avenue
    • Cloverdale
    • Redway via Garberville.

     

    Naming
    Francisco to Waldo Point (Jct 1/101, north end of Sausalito) across the Golden Gate Bridge is named the "Golden Gate Bridge Freeway". Named by the State Legislature in 1954.

    Route 101 from the Waldo Tunnel in Sausalito to I-580 in San Rafael is named the "William T. Bagley" Freeway . William Bagley was a State legislator and a member of the California Transportation Commission. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 46, Chapter 111 in 1987.

    Route 101 from Lucas Valley Road N for two miles in San Rafael is named the "Marin County Veterans Memorial Freeway". It was named as a token of gratitude to those veterans who have done so much to preserve the American way of life by the citizens of Marin County. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 5, Chapter 49, filed 23 June 1999. Also named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 182 in 1998.

    Route 101 from the Golden Gate Bridge to the Oregon State line is named the "Redwood Highway". The road travels through the redwood forests of northern California. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 174, Chapter 269 in 1957. Note that US 199 is also shown on some maps as the "Redwood" Highway. Widening of the highway to limited access, four-lane expressway started in 1947; it was mostly completed by 1975.

    Route 101, from south of Healdsburg to the Sonoma/Mendocino County line, is named the "Colonel William R. "Bill" Lucius Highway". Col. William B. "Bill" Lucius, USMC, Ret., served as the Mayor of Healdsburg, a member of the Metropolitan Transportation Board (1971-1991) and Chairman of the California Transportation Commission. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 73, Chapter 15 in 1990.

    The portion of Route 101 in Mendocino County, from post mile 32.1 to post mile 33.1, inclusive, is named the "Daniel Broeske Memorial Highway". This segment was named in memory of Daniel Broeske, born on September 30, 1948, in Russell, Kansas. He served in the United States Air Force from 1967 to 1971, inclusive; and graduated from Sonoma State University with a bachelor of arts degree in 1975. He began his career with the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in May 1979 in maintenance and in 1999, he moved to construction as a Transportation Engineering Technician. He had always loved engineering and felt this was the profession that he had always wanted to do. His primary concern on the worksite was safety for the public as well as the highway workers and he was proud to be a Caltrans worker. In 2004, Daniel Broeske received a certificate in recognition of his 25 years of faithful public service with the State of California from Governor Schwarzenegger. He also received a certificate in recognition of his 25 years of service to the citizens of California for his service with Caltrans from Senator Wesley Chesbro and a certificate in recognition and in honor of his 25 years of service and dedication to improving the safety of California's roadways from Assembly Member Patty Berg. He dedicated 26 years of service to the State of California and he spent his life making the roads safer for the traveler and on July 11, 2005, just 10 days after his son, Ian, received his commercial pilot's license, he gave his life in that commitment. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 90, Resolution Chapter 65, on 6/26/2008.

    The portion of Route 101 beween Mill Valley and Corte Madera, specifically from the old Alto Wye where Blithedale met Route 101 is called the "Alto Hill Rise".

    The portion of Route 101 from Englewood to Sylvandale is named the "Frank P. Belotti Freeway". Additionally, the portion of Route 101 in the area known as the Redwood Freeway, from the Bridge numbered 04-241, over the South Fork of the Eel River at Smith Point, to Myers Flat, a distance of approximately 22 miles, which includes the Frank P. Belotti Bridge, is officially designated as the "Frank P. Belotti Memorial Freeway". Frank P. Belotti, a Eureka mink rancher who served as a Member of the Assembly from 1950 to 1972, was an effective advocate of preserving the unique scenic beauty of the redwood groves and was instrumental in securing the legislation that made possible the freeway bypass of the groves and the preservation of the existing state highway designated as the "Avenue of the Giants". He also organized efforts to repopulate the Capitol Park with gray squirrels. The segment from Englewood to Sylvandale was named by House Resolution 461 in 1961; the other segment was named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 54, Chapter 114, in 1994.

    The portion of Route 101 in the area known as the Redwood Freeway, from Myers Flat to Stafford, a distance of approximately 20 miles, is officially designated the "Sam Helwer Memorial Freeway". Sam Helwer, a Caltrans engineer from 1936 until his retirement in 1976, was an acknowledged expert in freeway interchange design. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 54, Chapter 114, in 1994.

    The portion of Route 101 from 0.5 mi S of the Haehl Overhead to 0.5 mi N of Reynolds Highway is named the "Leo Stanley Hulett Highway". It was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 61, Chapter 21, in 1990. Leo Stanley Hulett, elected Mayor of Willits in 1956, worked tirelessly for the creation of the US 101 Bypass that bears his memorial.

    The portion of US 101 from Patrick's Point Undercrossing to four miles north of that undercrossing in Humboldt County as the Everett and Louella Thomas Memorial Highway. It was named in memory of Evertt and Louelle Thomas. Everett Thomas, a native son of Humboldt County, was born in Shively in 1911 and began his career with the Department of Public Works, the predecessor of the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in 1930 as a survey crew member in the Kings River Canyon near Fresno. He rose through the ranks at the Fresno office of the department in District 6, working in construction, materials, and right-of-way. In 1952, Mr. Thomas was promoted and transferred to the Stockton office of the department in District 10, where he served as District Materials Engineer and District Maintenance Engineer. In 1963, Mr. Thomas returned to the county of his birth, accepting a promotion and transfer to the Eureka office of the department in District 1, where he served as a supervising highway engineer in the position of Assistant District Engineer. Shortly after Mr. Thomas' return to Humboldt County, the state faced the massive floods of December, 1964, during which Mr. Thomas became the emergency spokesman for the district and was featured in countless media reports concerning highway conditions, detours, and road restoration. His wife, Louella Thomas, was born in Fresno in 1911 and served as an elementary school teacher both in Fresno and in Humboldt County until her retirement in 1973. Everett and Louella Thomas contributed to many civic activities, including the campaign to build a new Humboldt County Library, the purchase of land for the Azalea State Reserve now operated by the Department of Parks and Recreation, and various activities related to the arts. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 69, July 16, 2004, Chapter 120.

    The portion of US 101 in Humboldt County from milepost 68.40 to milepost 71.10 is named the "Veterans' Memorial Highway". This segment was named in honor of all veterans who have served in this country's Armed Forces from the country's birth, both in war and in peacetime, and to pay tribute to the tremendous sacrifices veterans have made to maintain the strength, freedom, and independence of our country. The naming was spurred by Humboldt County veterans groups, assisted by the Board of Supervisors of Humboldt County. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR) 57, Resolution Chapter 113, on 9/10/2007.

    In Humboldt County, Route 101 from Eureka to Arcata is officially named the "Burns Freeway". It was named by House Resolution 230 in 1949. It was named after State Senator Michael J. Burns of Eureka who was a long-time supporter of State highways and State parks. Senator Burns died in office on May 1, 1949. The district he represented is the location of the Burns Freeway.

    The Redwood National Park Bypass on Route 101 is officially designated the "Don Clausen Highway". Donald H. Clausen was a representative to the United States Congress for the 1st District, from 1963 to 1983. In this role, he was the senior ranking member of the House Public Works and Transportation Committee, where he authored legislation and enlisted the support from his congressional colleagues and the president for a federal appropriation to provide for the construction of the Redwood National Park Bypass project as a way to enhance travel on Route 101 and reduce the conflicts between through traffic and park users. In 1992, the State of California completed the 12-mile bypass of Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park and the Redwood National Park on Route 101 in northern Humboldt and southern Del Norte Counties. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 92, Chapter 62, in 1996.

    The portion of this route from Little River near Trinidad to Patrick's Point Undercrossing is named the "William Z. Hegy Memorial Highway". It was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 53, Chapter 39, in 1988. William Z. Hegy began working for the State of California in 1936 as an Engineering Aid and retired in 1976 as Caltrans District 1 Director.

    The portion of this route from Bridge No. 4-16 to Bridge No. 4-221 near Rio Dell is dedicated to the memory of Dave Ghilarducci. Fire Chief David Ghilarducci was born and raised in Rio Dell and served the community as a volunteer fireperson for 52 years, including 32 years as fire chief. He was the past President of the Humboldt County Fire Chiefs Association, and served as a State of California Deputy Fire Marshal. He organized and led the construction of the Rio Dell Community Park and community hall. In 1992, the City of Rio Dell recognized Dave Ghilarducci for his years of volunteer service; and in 1998 this community leader was recognized by the Rio Dell School District as outstanding alumnus due to his outstanding accomplishments in life and his support of high standards in education. He died on 22 March 2000. Dedicated by Senate Concurrent Resolution 12, Chapter 92, July 26, 2001.

    The section of Former US 101 to the west of Prarie Creek Redwoods State Park, which was bypassed in 1993, is named the "Newton B. Drury Scenic Parkway". Newton Drury was the first executive secretary of the Save the Redwoods League, who later served as director of the National Park Service.

    The portion of US 101 from Crescent City to the Oregon state line is called the "Oregon Coast Highway".

    The portion of US 101 in Del Norte County between the E. M. Fine Memorial Bridge and the Oregon state line is named the "CHP Officer Ernest R. Felio Memorial Highway". This segment was named in memory of CHP Officer Ernest R. Felio. Ernest R. Felio was a Navy veteran and courageously served his country during the Korean War. He joined the California Highway Patrol (CHP) and became an officer in 1962. Officer Felio was the recipient of the State of California's highest award, the Medal of Valor. Officer Felio was personally credited with saving the life of a man who was the victim of electrocution as a result of a traffic collision involving high voltage electrical transmission lines. Officer Felio disregarded his own personal safety and rescued the badly injured motorist by removing the motorist from his electrically charged motor vehicle. Officer Felio's compassion for his fellow man was again demonstrated one evening while working his beat. Officer Felio observed a woman with three girls standing next to a road in an isolated portion of Del Norte Canyon. Out of compassion and fear for the family's safety, after learning the family had been victims of abuse and abandonment, Officer Felio transported the family out of the elements and to his home until relatives could be summoned. On the evening of September 7, 1980, Officer Felio's life tragically ended in horrific violence on the side of a cold dark highway in Del Norte County. Officer Felio was shot and killed during the course of a routine traffic stop after making contact with the motorist on Westbrook Lane west of US 101. Officer Felio fulfilled the CHP's Code of Honor in that he laid down his life rather than swerve from the path of duty. Officer Felio's conduct was, at all times, above reproach and projected an exemplary image of one of the finest CHP officers this state has to offer. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR) 31, Resolution Chapter 70, on 7/3/2007.

    %STRUCTURES

    The vista point on Route 101 at the north end of the Golden Gate Bridge is named the "H. Dana Bowers Memorial Vista Point". Dana Bowers served as the Chief of Landscaping for Caltrans.

    Tunnel 27-040, N of the Golden Gate Bridge in Sausalito (Marin county) is named the "Waldo Tunnel". It was named for Waldo Point along Richardson Bay between Sausalito and Mill Valley. The tunnels were built in 1937 and 1954. William Waldo ran for Governor of California in 1853's as a Whig. He lost and moved to Oregon to establish the town of Waldo. He had attempted to develop the area now known as Waldo Point.

    Bridge 10-273, 0.4 mi N of the Sonoma county line on the Russian River in Mendocino county, is named the "F. Walter Sandclin Memorial Bridge" . It was built in 1988, and was named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 76, Chapter 144, in 1989. F. Walter Sandelin was a member of the California Highway Commission from 1943 to 1956 and was instrumental in achieving the widening of SR 101 to four lanes.

    The new South Fork Eel Bridge (Bridge number 10-0299, Kilometer Post 160.03), located on Route 101 in the County of Mendocino, is named the Mignon "Minnie" Stoddard Lilley Memorial Bridge. This bridge was named in memory of Mignon "Minnie" Stoddard Lilley, a woman of many facets and dimensions: courageous, intelligent, creative, kind, stern, hard working, musically inclined, honest, religious, impetuous, practical, and also, by all accounts, quite an attractive woman. She was a teacher, environmentalist, homesteader, entrepreneur, healer, visionary, and a true pioneer in every sense of the word. Minnie lived in a time when a person was required to deal with the harsh realities of living on the "frontier." As a teacher, Minnie offered the community something that was important to them and as a person she set a positive example for all by her unselfish concern for all those around her. From 1904 to 1936, Minnie taught in the one room schoolhouses of the Andersonia/Piercy area. Minnie spent her entire teaching career in the County of Mendocino teaching at Usal, Moody, Bear Harbor, Alder Glen, Franklin, and Buck Mountain before settling down and staying in the Andersonia/Piercy area. Minnie can also lay claim to being the first school bus driver in the area because around 1919, having acquired a horse-drawn buggie, she would pick up some of her students and give them a ride to school. Minnie met William G. Lilley while she was teaching at Andersonia and they were married January 25, 1905, at the Grand Hotel in San Francisco. In the spring of 1904, Minnie set out to homestead a claim up the Eel River in the redwoods. For many years Minnie had walked over 5 miles to the schoolhouse so a solitary hike up the South Fork of the Eel River through some "darn tough country" was no big deal to her. A quote from a 1950 Humboldt Times article reads "as soon as the spring rains had subsided enough so that the Eel River could be crossed safely, she went into the depths of the redwood forest, fording on a homemade raft the turbulent waters, and set up her location markers". Minnie then hired a man to build her a simple one room cabin on the property. Minnie loved telling people about her first night in the cabin, all alone way out there in the forest which she spent "with prayer on my lips and a pistol in my hand". Around 1925, Minnie and William bought a 55 acre parcel adjoining the homestead and that property included a particular tree Minnie lovingly called "The Fraternal Monarch." This amazing redwood tree stands over 250 feet tall, is 101 feet in circumference, and has had the center burned out by a fire some 300 years ago. Today this tree is known as "The World Famous Tree House". In 1919, construction of the Redwood Highway through the canyon of the South Fork of the Eel River began; and in 1929, Minnie and William started building a few small cabins near The World Famous Tree House. On May 14, 1931, for the sum of $10, the Lilley's deeded enough land to the State of California to make improvements to the new road that ran through their property. During construction of the highway, the tree house was a camp for the convict labor that was used to work on the road. These men actually used the old burned out tree as a shelter to sleep in. Now that tourists were visiting the redwoods, William and Minnie were in a great position to benefit from this new situation, and one day, Minnie decided to put a gift shop inside The World Famous Tree House and she had a floor, windows, and a door fitted to the measurements of the burned out hole in the redwood. This was one of the very first gift shops on the Redwood Highway. On March 8, 1947, Minnie, a remarkable pioneering woman, passed away and according to her wishes to be with her beloved trees through eternity she was interred in her mausoleum right near The Fraternal Monarch. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 114, Resolution Chapter 140, on 9/8/2006.

    The northern span of the Eel River Bridge, located on US 101 in the County of Mendocino is named the "Elizabeth Jane Rosewarne Memorial Bridge". This structure was named in memory of Elizabeth Jane Rosewarne. Elizabeth Jane Rosewarne was born to William and Elizabeth Sandow on July 12, 1866, in Eagle River, Michigan. Elizabeth met Nicholas Rosewarne, who was born in England, in Nevada City, and they married in 1884. Elizabeth and Nicholas moved to San Francisco, where Nicholas was a cable car conductor, and Elizabeth was a professional seamstress. Elizabeth and Nicholas had three children, Edna, Ray, and Myrtle. Due to Elizabeth's poor health, the doctor recommended she move from the foggy air of San Francisco to a warmer climate. Nicholas traveled by boat to Usal and set out in search of land, selecting a 160-acre parcel bordering on the South Fork of the Eel River, across from Confusion Hill, which he purchased in May of 1896. The following May, Elizabeth and the children boarded one of the vessels of the (Robert) Dollar Steamship Company, sailed to Usal, and from there, traveled by mule over a 10-mile backwoods trail to the homestead carrying essential belongings, including a child-size rocking chair that is still in the family today, strapped between two mules. Elizabeth thrived in the new climate, taking the chores of a pioneer woman in stride and, while a petite woman, could work with a cross cut saw, fish the Eel River for salmon and trout, smoke salmon in the smokehouse, and pack a mule and haul wood on the family horse named Queen. With Nicholas working on the Henry Neff Anderson's railroad between Andersonia (Piercy) and Usal during the week, Elizabeth traveled by horseback with both children strapped on the horse on the mountain trail to Usal, to pick up mail and supplies. On one unforgettable trip to Usal, Elizabeth, carrying a sack of fresh meat, was followed closely by a shrieking panther, and although her horse spooked and jumped over a gate, she and the children managed to hold on tight and make it back safely to the homestead. Elizabeth was an expert at baking her own bread, making her own butter and cream, and growing prized heirloom tomatoes that she traded to her neighbors, and in addition she canned over 400 jars of fruit during the summer from the Rosewarne homestead orchard. She was also an expert seamstress and made all the clothes for her family and also loved to quilt, spending many evenings working on her latest quilt. She loved to fish and kept a daily count of her impressive catch, and her favorite fishing hole was in the eddy of the Eel River, which is the proposed bridge site for the northern span of the Eel River Bridge. After a long day of chores, Elizabeth would hitch up the horse and take her daughter, Myrtle, to visit the neighbors, and in the evenings, the family would use a Parcheesi Board circle Elizabeth made on the back of her round oil cloth to play the game. After Nicholas lost his vision in one eye from a logging accident and then in the other eye from glaucoma, Elizabeth cared for him until his death on May 3, 1922, at age 69. After Nicholas' death, Elizabeth moved across the Eel River to the north end of the Rosewarne Homestead, operating a Texaco Star gas station and a country store to support herself and her youngest daughter, Myrtle. Elizabeth Jane Rosewarne died on January 7, 1949, and is buried in the family plot in Piercy Cemetery in Mendocino County, beside her son, Ray. Elizabeth and Nicholas Rosewarne's homestead is the location for both the southern and northern spans of the Eel River Bridge. The southern span of the Eel River Bridge will be named the Minney Lilley Memorial Bridge, and Minney Lilley and Elizabeth Rosewarne were friends, with Minney being mentioned in Elizabeth's diary and the teacher for Elizabeth's daughter, Myrtle, as well as several of Elizabeth's grandchildren and a greatgrandson. These bridge spans are named after two pioneer women, inspiring women and young girls growing up, or traveling to and from the area, to know that pioneer women played a key role in the history of Mendocino County. Named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR) 30, Resolution Chapter 69, on 7/3/2007.

    Bridge 20-061, in Sonoma County at Arata Lane is named the "Richard F. Cavness Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1962, and was named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 141, Chapter 105 in 1994. Richard F. Cavness, a native of Healdsburg, was killed on November 5, 1993, on the Arata Bridge on US Highway 101 while unselfishly rendering aid to a stranded motorist.

    Tunnel 20-112, the 4th Street viaduct through Santa Rosa, is named the "Robert L. Bishop Viaduct". Bishop was Mayor of Santa Rosa and and a Highway Commission member from 1956 to 1960. It was built in 1968, and was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 39, Chapt. 51 in 1971.

    Bridge 20-235, an overcrossing of Route 101 in Rohnert Park in Sonoma county, is named the "Congressman Don Clausen Overpass". It was built in 1973, and was named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 24, Chapter 57 in 1983. Donald H. Clausen was a representative to the United States Congress for the 1st District, from 1963 to 1983. In this role, he was the senior ranking member of the House Public Works and Transportation Committee, where he authored legislation and enlisted the support from his congressional colleagues and the president for a federal appropriation to provide for the construction of the Redwood National Park Bypass project as a way to enhance travel on Route 101 and reduce the conflicts between through traffic and park users. In 1992, the State of California completed the 12-mile bypass of Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park and the Redwood National Park on Route 101 in northern Humboldt and southern Del Norte Counties.

    Bridge 20-252R over First Street in Cloverdale is named the "Gambetta Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1984, and was named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 117, Chapter 101 in 1994. Mr. and Mrs. Albert Gambetta, Sr. were long-time residents of the City of Cloverdale. Mrs. Dena Gambetta served the City of Cloverdale as the unofficial "hostess" of the community. Mr. Albert Gambetta, Sr. served the City of Cloverdale as Planning Commissioner, volunteer firefighter, Councilmember, and Mayor, and thus helped to guide the City of Cloverdale through the midtwentieth century.

    Bridge 04-006, at Dean Creek in Humboldt county, is named the "Elmer Hurlbut Memorial Bridge". It was bult in 1967, and named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 38, Chapter 115. Humboldt County pioneer and rancher Elmer Hurlbutt, (1882-1967), helped to develop the Garberville Water Company.

    Bridge 04-014, S of Scotia at the Eel River in Humboldt county, is named the "Richard Fleisher Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1965, and named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 7, Chapter 42, in 1962. Richard Fleisher (d. 1962), realtor and civic leader, was the organizer of the Humboldt County Crab Feed held annually in Sacramento for the California Highway Commission and the State Department of Public Works.

    Bridge 04-016, the Robinson Ferry Bridge over the Eel River in Humboldt county, is named the "Paul E. Mudgett Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1941, and was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 6, Chapter 47, in 1963. Paul E. Mudgett, a member of the Humboldt County Board of Trade for 35 years, died in an automobile accident on US 101 on August 16, 1962.

    Bridge 04-016L, the Rio Dell Bridge over the Eel River in Humboldt county, is named the "Nello J. Barsanti Memorial Bridge". Nello J. Barsanti (1916-1976) was a lifetime resident of the Scotia-Rio Dell area, community leader, education advocate and member of the Fortuna Unified High School Board of Trustees. It was built in 1974, and named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 231, Chapter 91, in 1977.

    Bridge 04-017, the northbound bridge over the Van Duzen River in Humboldt county, is named the "Harold W. Comfort Memorial Bridge". Harold W. Comfort, M.D., cared for the people of southern Humboldt County for a third of a century until his death in 1954 at the age of 60 years. It was built in 1995, and named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 22, Chapter 55, in 1995.

    Bridge 04-017, the southbound Route 101 bridge over the Van Duzen River in Humboldt County, is named the "James Van Duzen Memorial Bridge". The Van Duzen River is named for one of the county's first settlers, James Van Duzen, formerly of Schyler, New York, who arrived in the area with the Gregg-Wood party in 1849. He established a farm on land at the mouth of the Van Duzen river in 1850. It was built in 1952, and named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 22, Chapter 55 the same year.

    The Salmon Creek Bridge on US 101 in Humboldt County is named the “James F. McManus Memorial Bridge”. This bridge was named in memory of James F. McManus, who had an exemplary career with the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for nearly 40 years, McManus was born on May 29, 1929, in Oakland, California. His love for engineering and flying was stimulated by his father's work with the Univac Supercomputer, which was used to schedule the B-19 Bomber project during World War II. McManus attended City College of San Francisco, until he joined the United States Marine Corps during the Korean War. He later returned to college at San Jose State University. In 1954, McManus began his career at Caltrans as a junior civil engineer and immediately impressed his supervisors with his engineering abilities. During his 18-year tenure in District 1 of Caltrans, McManus moved from construction to the laboratory, where he tested materials for roadways, and ultimately into design, planning, and project management, where he worked on the design of numerous highway and freeway projects. After the 1964 flood incident in northern California, McManus worked on the US 101 freeway project and designed a five-mile stretch of the Redwood Freeway south of Myers Flat. He was particularly proud of this project because, in addition to bypassing Myers Flat and avoiding impact to the old growth redwoods and parks south of the Eel River, he successfully convinced the district leadership to change the original alignment of the highway to create his vision of a panoramic view of the magnificent Eel River. The Myers Flat Bypass included five bridges across the Eel River and its tributaries, including the Salmon Creek Bridge. As a leader of the district computer section, McManus developed a revolutionary computer program called MANSCAN, which scheduled the manpower across the many professional disciplines required to design and construct each major project and thereby allowed projects to be more efficiently tracked and planned. This program was renamed PYPSCAN and was used for purposes of program management for many decades. Following his many achievements in District 1, McManus was promoted in 1972 to work in the department's headquarters in Sacramento, California, as a senior transportation engineer. He became a principal engineer in 1982, and was promoted to Deputy Director of District 7 in Los Angeles in 1984, where he oversaw the planning, design, and construction of the monumental Century Freeway project and won Engineer of the Year for Caltrans as a result. In 1986, McManus moved back to Sacramento, California, and was promoted to Career Executive, Level 3. He finished his career as Deputy Chief Engineer and managed programs for the entire state from 1988 until his retirement in 1992 after 38 years of service. James F. McManus died on December 2, 2006. Named by Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 9, Resolution Chapter 71, on 7/14/2009.

    Bridge 04-028, over Redwood Creek in Humboldt county, is named the "Ralph A. Miller Bridge". It was built in 1982, and named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 99, Chapter 162, in 1986. Ralph A. Miller (b. 1904) was employed as a civil engineer by the Division of Highways for 41 years.

    Bridge 04-065 over the south fork of the Eel River, S of Phillipsville, is named the "Charles R. Barnum Memorial Bridge". Charles R. Barnum pioneered the use of fir trees to produce lumber in California. It was built in 1964, and was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 94, Chapter 229, in 1965.

    Bridge 04-072, at the Eagle Point Viaduct in Humboldt county, is named the "Hod Benedict Bridge". Harold "Hod" Wilson Benedict served as the resident engineer for over 40 projects in Humboldt and Mendocino Counties from 1952 to 1975 and was responsible for the completion of the Redwood Highway. It was built in 1963, and was named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 137, Chapter 127, in 1984.

    Bridge 04-076, at the Eel River in Humboldt county, is named the "George M. Leatherwood Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1958, and was named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 66, Chapter 197 in 1957. George Leatherwood (1904-1956) was a career Caltrans engineer and pioneer aerial surveyor.

    Bridge 04-123, over the south fork of the Eel River, is named the "George J. Cole Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1962, and was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 5, Chapter 41, in 1963. George J. Cole served as a member of the Humboldt County Commission, as Mayor of Eureka, and as President of the County Supervisor's Association of California.

    Bridge 04-155, over the south fork of the Eel River, is named the "Malcom G. Coomes Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1969, and named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 86, Chapter 92. Malcolm G. Coombs, who settled in Humboldt County in 1946, was a benefactor to the county and a member of the California State Water Commission.

    Bridge 04-212, over the south fork of the Eel River near Garberville in Humboldt county, is named the "Frank P. Belotti Memorial Bridge" . Frank P. Belotti, a Eureka mink rancher who served as a Member of the Assembly from 1950 to 1972, was an effective advocate of preserving the unique scenic beauty of the redwood groves and was instrumental in securing the legislation that made possible the freeway bypass of the groves and the preservation of the existing state highway designated as the "Avenue of the Giants". He also organized efforts to repopulate the Capitol Park with gray squirrels. It was built in 1969, and was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 41, in Chapter 101 in 1972.

    The Rio Dell/Eel River Bridge (Bridge 04-221R) is named the "Stanwood A. Murphy Memorial Bridge". It was named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 23, Chapter 91 in 1977. Stanwood A. Murphy (d. 1972), son of Albert Stanwood Murphy, served as the President of the California Redwoods Association and was the fourth generation of his family to head Pacific Lumber Company, founded in Scotia, Humboldt County, in 1869.

    Bridge 04-241, at Smith Point on the Eel River in Humboldt county, is named the "Charles Edward Wagner Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1980, and named by Assembly Concurrent Resolution 132 the same year. Charles Edward Wagner established the first tanbark extraction plant in Humboldt County in 1900 and was a leader in the building of the town of Garberville.

    Bridge 01-005, at Wilson Creek in Del Norte county, is named the "Louis De Martin Sr. Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1957, and named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 521, Chapter 181 in the same year. Louis De Martin, Sr., settled in Del Norte County in 1875 where he fathered 17 children and built the first bridge over Wilson Creek on what is now Route 1.

    Bridge 01-020, at the Smith River in Del Norte county, is named the "Dr. Ernest Fine Memorial Bridge". It was built in 1940, and was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 19, Chapter 40, in 1941. Dr. Ernest M. Fine (1873-1939) was a Del Norte County country doctor who never sent a bill to a patient.

    Bridge 01-028, at the Klamath River in Del Norte county, is named the "G H. Douglas Memorial Bridge". It is a replacement bridge built in 1965, and was named by Resolution Chapter 223 in 1923. Dr. G.H. Douglas, Crescent City physician and State Assembly Member, worked diligently for the construction of the bridge that bears his memorial, but died in 1923, before its completion. The Klamath River Bridge is well known for its two golden bears. According to the Klamath Chamber of Commerce , the Golden Bears on the Klamath River Bridge weren't always golden. The gold first appeared sometime in the late 50's or early 60's. The bears were originally pained by a group of local businessmen (Herb Fehley , John Menary , Ray Thompson , Pat Murphy, Ward Berg, Johnny Rycraft and Bud Harper to name a few) who decided to give Klamath a face lift. Whenever the Highway Department would restore the bears to their natural state, "The Golden Bear Club" would meet again to restore their trademark "Golden Bears" on the Klamath Bridge. It didn't take too long before the Highway Department realized Klamath liked those Bears golden, and the new Memorial Bridge completed in 1965 greets visitors from around the world with its landmark California Golden Bears.

    The Boyes Creek Viaduct on the Redwood National Park Bypass in Del Norte County is named the Delbert A. Brown Memorial Bridge. It was named by Senate Concurrent Resolution 72, Chapter 95 in 1998. Delbert A. Brown (b. 1931) was a Deputy District Director of the California Department of Transportation and a tireless worker for the creation of the Redwood National Park Bypass.

    This route also has the following Safety Roadside Rest Areas:

    • In Marin County at the N end of the Golden Gate Bridge.
    • Moss Cove, in Mendocino County, 10.5 mi S of Laytonville.
    • Irvine Lodge, in Mendocino County, 7.9 mi S of Laytonville.
    • Empire Camp, in Mendocino County, 2.5 mi S of Cummings.
    • Trinidad, in Humboldt County, 0.5 mi S of Seawood Drive.

    %HOV

    In Marin County, HOV lanes run southbound from N of the Greenbrae pedestrian overcrossing to S of the Strawberry pedestrian overcrossing, for a length of 3.7 mi. Northbound, the HOV lanes run from S of the Richardson Bay Bridge to N of the Corte Madera overcrossing, for a length of 3.5 mi. These were opened in February 1974 (opened to carpools in June 1976). HOV lanes also run from Route 37/S Novato Blvd to N of the San Pedro undercrossing, in both directions. These opened in July 1987, and were extended in February 1991. All require two or more occupants, and operate weekdays during the following hours: 6:30-8:30am (SB), 4:30-7:00pm (NB).

    HOV lanes are also planned as follows:

    • From Lucky Drive to N San Pedro Road. Planning stages. Marin County. CTC Agenda June 2001: Reversable HOV lane, Sir Francis Drake Blvd to N San Pedro Road.
    • N San Pedro Road to Mission Avenue. Construction starts in March 1998. Marin County.
    • Mission Avenue to I-580. Planning stages. Marin County.
    • In Santa Rosa, from Santa Rosa Avenue to Wilfred Avenue. Sonoma County. Environmental Impact Report prepared.
    • In Santa Rosa, from Wilfred Avenue to Route 12. Sonoma County. Environmental Impact Report prepared.
    • From Route 12 to Steele Lane. This project includes widening the freeway from four to six lanes. The project will also increase capacity of the College Avenue and Steele Lane interchanges. Other features of the project include: (a) Construction of a collector-distributor road on northbound Route 101, between Route 12 and 3rd Street; (b) Construction of auxiliary lanes between College Avenue and Steele Lane; (c) Extending an existing southbound auxiliary lane between College Avenue and downtown Santa Rosa to Route 12; (d) Replacing the Santa Rosa Creek Bridge; (e) Replacing an existing pedestrian overcrossing with a new pedestrian undercrossing at Santa Rosa Creek Bridge; (f) Constructing a new undercrossing at 6th Street; (g) Constructing soundwalls at various locations; (h) Replacing College Avenue Undercrossing; and (i) Constructing retaining walls at various locations. The project has not yet been awarded.

    There are also studies for adding an HOV lane between Santa Rosa and Windsor, and between Rohnert Park and Petaluma, in Sonoma County.

    %DBLFINE

    The five-mile segment between the Eureka Slough Bridge No. 4-22 to the Gannon Slough Bridge No. 4-24 in Arcata. Authorized by SB 1349, Chapter 378, 9/5/2002.

    %SCENIC

    [SHC 263.6] From a point in Marin County opposite San Francisco to Route 1 near Marin City; and from Route 37 near Ignacio to Route 37 near Novato; and from Route 20 near Calpella to Route 20 near Willits; and from Route 1 near Leggett to Route 199 near Crescent City; and from Route 197 near Fort Dick to the Oregon state line.

    %FREEWAY

    [SHC 253.5] Entire portion. Added to the Freeway and Expressway system in 1959.

    %INTERSTATE

    The portion from San Francisco to Route 37 was submitted for inclusion in the interstate system in 1947 and 1956; it was not accepted both times.

     

    Other WWW Links
    HREF="http://www.mtc.ca.gov/library/101_pricing.htm">US 101 Variable Pricing Study: State Route 37 to the Petaluma River Bridge

between the northern California border and Los Angeles appears to have been part of the "California-Banff "B" Line".

Pacific Highway Sign This route appears to have been part of the "Pacific" highway.

%EXITS

%LINKS

%HIST1934

US 101 is one of the earliest state routes. It was originally recommended for the state highways map in 1896, and was adopted into the highway system in 1909. Construction began in 1912.

Historical Route
portions of US 101 that are still publically maintained and not already designated as part of Historic US 101 as "Historic US 101".

 

Blue Star Memorial Highway
Star Memorial Highway" by Senate Concurrent Resolution 41, Ch. 24 in 1984.

 

Interregional Route
statistics for US 101:

  • Total Length (1995): 807 miles
  • Average Daily Traffic (1993): 3,900 to 308,000
  • Milage Classification: Rural: 487; Sm. Urban 76; Urbanized: 244.
  • Previous Federal Aid Milage: FAP: 807 mi.
  • Functional Classification: Prin. Arterial: 807 mi.
  • Significant Summits: Cuesta Grade (1522 ft); Ridgewood Summit (1956 ft).
  • Counties Traversed: Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, San Mateo, San Francisco, Marin, Sonoma, Mendocino, Humboldt, Del Norte.

 

Pre-1964 Legislative Route
near Dixon" to the highway system. In 1935, it was added to the highway code with that definition as LRN 101. It ran from Route 12 to US 40 near Dixon. This is present-day Route 113.


Unconstructed

Post 1964 Legislative Route 102



Routing

From Route 5 near Elkhorn to Route 80 near Auburn.

 

Post 1964 Signage History

This route remains as defined in 1963.

Around 2000, planning for Route 102 had realigned it from the Auburn-Folsom-Rio Linda-Elkhorn routing of Route 102 (which would've crossed I-80 twice and parallelled Folsom Lake and Elkhorn Boulevard/Greenback Lane) in 1994 to a direct route from Auburn to Elkhorn/Natomas crossing through undeveloped areas in Sacramento and Placer County.

 

Pre 1964 Signage History

This was unsigned proposed LRN 246, defined in 1959.

Route 102 was not defined as part of the initial state signage of routes in 1934. It is unclear what (if any) route was signed as Route 102 between 1934 and 1964.

 

Freeway

[SHC 253.1] Entire route; unconstructed. Added to the Freeway and Expressway system in 1959.

 

Interstate Submissions

In April 1958, it appears that the designation I-102 was proposed for the route that is now I-210. This was part of the first attempt to assign 3-digit interstates n California. The number was rejected by AASHTO.

 


Overall statistics for Route 102:

  • Total Length (1995): 38 miles unconstructed.
  • Milage Classification: Rural: 11; Sm. Urban 1; Urbanized: 26.
  • Counties Traversed: Sacramento, Placer.

 

Pre-1964 Legislative Route

In 1933, Chapter 767 added the route from "Napa-Calistoga Road near Rutherford to Napa-Winters Road via Sage Canyon" to the highway system. In 1935, this was codified as LRN 102 in the highway code with the following definition:

[LRN 49] near Rutherford to [LRN 6] via Sage Canyon

This definition remained unchanged until 1963. This route ran from the Route 29/Route 128 junction (the present-day Route 121/Route 128 junction) near Rutherford to the Route 37/Route 128 junction (the present-day Route 121/Route 128 junction) via Sage Canyon. This is signed as Route 128.


State Shield

State Route 103



Routing

From Route 47 in Los Angeles to Route 1.

 

Post 1964 Signage History

Post-1964 Legistlative Route Graphic In 1963, Route 103 was defined as the route from Route 5 to Route 395 near United States Naval Air Station, Miramar. This route was along Murphy Canyon Road, 40th Street, and Wabash Avenue. In 1969, Chapter 292 transferred this routing to Route 15.

State Shield In 1984, Chapter 409 redefined the route as "Route 47 in Long Beach to Route 1." This was a segment dropped from Route 47 in 1982. This route was signed as Route 47 after 1964, though the alignment of Route 47 actually splits off about ¼ mi north of the drawbridge from Terminal Island. There were later proposals that extended the Terminal Island Freeway as Route 47 north (i.e., the "Industrial Freeway"—see Route 47 for more information) from its end at Willow Street rather than north of the drawbridge. Route 47 was then switched back to Henry Ford Avenue and Alameda Street in 1982 and the remainder became Route 103 in 1984. The portion of freeway from Route 1 to Willow Street is not state highway anymore (technically, it is Route 103U, where U means "unrelinquished") .

In 1986, Chapter 928 corrected the origin to be "Route 47 in Los Angeles"

 

Pre 1964 Signage History
  • Pre-1969 Route 103: This was the routing that would eventually be Route 15. It was LRN 283, and was defined as part of the state highway system by 1959.

  • Post-1983 Route 103: This was part of LRN 270 defined in 1959. Part of this was originally part of Route 47 (as defined in 1962), which was never under the LRN system.

Route 103 was not defined as part of the initial state signage of routes in 1934. It is unclear what (if any) route was signed as Route 103 between 1934 and 1964.

 

Status

The Commodore Schuyler F. Heim Bridge (Schuyler Heim Bridge) crosses the Cerritos Channel in the Port of Long Beach, was commissioned by the United States Navy between 1946 and 1948, and is one of three bridges that connect Terminal Island to the mainland. The bridge was named for Commodore Schuyler F. Heim, commanding officer of the Terminal Island Naval Base throughout World War II. The United States Navy completed construction of the bridge in 1948 and then turned it over to the City of Long Beach, which operated the bridge until 1974. The bridge is a vertical lift structure with a 73-meter (m) (240-foot [ft]) span. It has an 820-ton movable (lift) span that is supported by two crossbraced steel towers suspended by cables, and a pair of 400+-ton counterweights. Historic records indicate that, by 1951, the Schuyler Heim Bridge showed significant settlement caused by oil extraction in Long Beach Harbor. In 1951, the towers were leaning approximately 3.8 centimeters (cm) (1.5 inches [in]) to the east, and the approach structures had settled as much as 10.2 cm (4.0 in). The combined effects of settlement and leaning created the potential to bind the moveable parts and cause the lift span to fail. Subsequently, the towers were straightened, and additional work was conducted on the approaches, truss bearings, guard rails, pier footings, and lift span guide rollers. During the 1950s, the City of Long Beach pumped groundwater into depleted oil fields beneath the harbor, which mitigated the bridge’s rate of subsidence. However, the harbor continued to sink, requiring bridge repairs. By the end of the decade, the shifting terrain beneath the bridge foundations had caused cracks in the reinforced concrete pillars beneath the bridge, requiring additional repairs. Throughout the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, bridge repairs continued for routine maintenance, as well as for damage caused by trucks and marine vessels. In 1987, the Whittier Narrows earthquake (Richter magnitude [M] 5.9) twisted a heavy girder in one of the towers. In 1988, Caltrans initiated a $2 million project to refurbish the bridge to accommodate increased vehicular and marine traffic in response to expansion of the ports. After the 1994 Northridge earthquake, the Schuyler Heim Bridge was determined to be in need of seismic retrofit improvements. A Project Scope Summary Report (PSSR) was completed in 1998 to program the retrofit project and included the plans, specifications, and engineering estimate (PS&E) for the retrofit. During the PS&E phase, it was determined that replacement of the bridge would be more cost-effective and practical than retrofitting the existing bridge to meet seismic requirements for a major earthquake. Therefore, the retrofit design was halted. Subsequently, in consultation with the U.S. Coast Guard, Caltrans developed several fixedspan bridge alternatives. These alternatives met the project purpose of complying with the 1994 state mandate for Caltrans to strengthen its bridges, and met the need to comply with seismic requirements, reduce potential safety hazards to vehicular and marine traffic, and provide a cost-effective solution to the ongoing deterioration of the bridge.
(source)

Additionally, Caltrans has historically wanted an expressway in this area, as part of a series of regional transportation improvements at the southern end of the Alameda Corridor. The Route 47 Expressway is cited in the Southern California Association of Governments Regional Transportation Plan. It would build upon a network of local streets by constructing a high-capacity expressway connecting the Ocean Boulevard/Route 47 Interchange with Alameda Street at Pacific Coast Highway, thereby providing a missing link in the local transportation system. The existing Route 47 extends east from the southern terminus of the Harbor Freeway (I-110) in San Pedro, over the Vincent Thomas Bridge, along Seaside Avenue and Ocean Boulevard, then north across the Cerritos Channel on the Schuyler Heim Bridge, continuing north on Henry Ford Avenue, then onto Alameda Street until its terminus at I-10 in downtown Los Angeles. The Route 103 Expressway is an alternative to the Route 47 Expressway. It also would build upon a network of local streets by constructing a high-capacity expressway that connects existing Route 103, beginning about 0.8 kilometer (km) (0.5 mile [mi]) north of Pacific Coast Highway, to Alameda Street at a point about 0.8 km (0.5 mi) south of the San Diego Freeway (I-405). Currently, to connect from Terminal Island to Alameda Street, vehicles must travel 1.5 km (0.9 mi) north from Ocean Boulevard, then exit at the Henry Ford Avenue off-ramp and travel north through local streets, signalized intersections, and railroad crossings for about 2.0 km (1.2 mi) before joining Alameda Street just south of Pacific Coast Highway. Alameda Street continues north of Pacific Coast Highway for 4.0 km (2.5 mi) and connects to the I-405. About 5.5 km (3.4 mi) north of I-405, Alameda Street connects to the Artesia Freeway (Route 91). The existing Route 103 begins north of the Schuyler Heim Bridge at the Terminal Island Freeway, where Route 47 exits at Henry Ford Avenue. Route 103 continues north to Pacific Coast Highway, where it ends. The Terminal Island Freeway continues past the terminus of Route 103 and ends at Willow Street/Sepulveda Boulevard.
(source)

As a result, Caltrans initiated a $351 million project to start in 2009 with the following goals:

  • Provide a structurally and seismically safe vehicular connection along the critical northsouth corridor between Terminal Island and the mainland that can remain in service following a major earthquake to ensure that ground and vessel transportation are maintained.
  • Improve operational and safety design features of the crossing to facilitate the movement of people, freight, and goods, while meeting current design standards to the maximum extent feasible.
  • Provide a high-capacity alternative route for traffic between Terminal Island and I-405 that reduces traffic congestion and improves safety.

There are a number of alternatives under consideration:

  • Alternative 1. This alternative involves replacement of the existing Schuyler Heim Bridge, construction of a new SR-47 Expressway to provide a high-capacity alternative route along the Alameda Corridor for traffic between Terminal Island and Alameda Street at Pacific Coast Highway, and construction of a flyover that would divert eastbound Ocean Boulevard traffic directly onto northbound Route 47 and across the new bridge. Construction activities for the replacement bridge and Route 47 Expressway are planned to begin in 2009 and be completed in 2011. Construction of the flyover is planned to begin in 2015 and be completed in 2017. With this alternative, a new fixed-span bridge would be constructed, primarily within the existing bridge right-of-way (ROW), but toward the east to avoid impacts to the railroad on the Badger Bridge, immediately to the west; the existing Schuyler Heim Bridge (lift bridge) would be demolished. The replacement bridge would be 13 m (43 ft) wider than the existing bridge due to the addition of standard shoulders, which are not present on the existing bridge. The replacement bridge would include three 3.6-m (12-ft) lanes (two through-lanes and one auxiliary lane), with 3-m (10-ft) shoulders in the northbound direction, and four 3.6-m (12-ft) lanes (three through-lanes and one auxiliary lane), with 3-m (10-ft) shoulders in the southbound direction. Bridge construction would include a southbound off-ramp and northbound on-ramp at New Dock Street on Terminal Island, as well as a northbound off-ramp and southbound on-ramp at Henry Ford Avenue on the mainland side of the bridge. With this alternative, the new bridge would be supported by four piers in the channel, with a minimum vertical clearance of 14.3 m (47 ft) over the mean high water level (MHWL). This clearance would be maintained for the width of the navigable channel, which would be 54.9 m (180 ft), the same as under existing conditions. The new SR-47 Expressway would begin on Terminal Island, at the intersection of SR-47 and Ocean Boulevard, extending north over New Dock Street and onto the new fixed-span bridge. The expressway would extend northward to Alameda Street, south of the intersection with Pacific Coast Highway, a distance of approximately 2.7 km (1.5 mi). The Ocean Boulevard/SR-47 Flyover (flyover) would begin on Terminal Island, about 1,200 m (3,900 ft) west of the Ocean Boulevard/SR-47 intersection, extend eastward along the south side of Ocean Boulevard, and then turn north, cross over Ocean Boulevard and onto the new bridge. The west end of the flyover would be at grade, then rise to a maximum elevation of 21 m (69 ft) to join the new bridge. The elevated portions of the flyover would be supported by fourteen single-column bents, one 2-column outrigger bent, with a total of 15 spans. The flyover would have an overall length of 830 m (2,723 ft), ending at the northerly end point (gore point) of the northbound New Dock Street on-ramp onto the bridge. The left lane of the flyover would converge with the SR-47 through lane to the left; the right lane of the flyover would continue as a northbound SR-47 through lane and would have the option to continue to SR-47 or SR-103. The flyover would be located entirely within the City and Port of Long Beach.

  • Alternative 1A. Alternative 1A is a structural variation of Alternative 1. The main purpose of this alternative is to improve the aesthetics of the replacement bridge over the Cerritos Channel and span a greater horizontal distance across the channel between columns. Other aspects of this alternative, the SR-47 Expressway and Ocean Boulevard/SR-47 Flyover, would be the same as described for Alternative 1.

  • Alternative 2. With this alternative, the existing Schuyler Heim Bridge would be replaced by a fixed-span bridge, and the flyover described under Alternative 1 would be constructed. This alternative also would extend Route 103 to the northwest on a four-lane viaduct to join Alameda Street between Sepulveda Boulevard and I-405. Improvements to Route 103 would begin approximately 3.2 km (2 mi) north of the Schuyler Heim Bridge and extend a distance of approximately 2.6 km (1.6 mi). The viaduct would cross over the Union Pacific Railroad manual yard and San Pedro Branch, through the Southern California Edison (SCE) utility corridor, across the Los Angeles Harbor Department Warehouse 16/17 area, over Sepulveda Boulevard, then parallel the western boundary of the Intermodal Container Transfer Facility (ICTF) to the centerline of Alameda Street. The viaduct would slope to grade south of the Wardlow Road ramps to I-405. Improvements would be made to the existing Route 103 to accommodate the southerly and northerly end connections of the viaduct.

  • Alternative 3. This alternative would preserve the existing Schuyler Heim Bridge and construct a new fixed-span bridge on an alignment east of the existing bridge. Under this alternative, the new bridge would have the same lane configuration as the replacement bridge for Alternative 1. Additionally, the SR-47 Expressway and Ocean Boulevard/SR-47 Flyover described under Alternative 1 would be constructed, and connectivity with SR-103 would be maintained.

  • Alternative 4. This alternative is provided as a means of constructing a new bridge over the Cerritos Channel and, at the same time, preserving the existing bridge. The Schuyler Heim Bridge has been determined to be a historic property and is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. With Alternative 3, the existing bridge would be retrofitted and left in place, but would not be used. However, according to the U.S. Coast Guard, when a bridge is no longer used for its permitted purpose of providing land transportation, the bridge shall be removed from the waterway. Therefore, removal of the existing Schuyler Heim Bridge would be included as a condition of the federal permit for the replacement bridge. This alternative would replace the existing Schuyler Heim Bridge (lift bridge) with a fixedspan bridge, largely along the existing bridge alignment, generally as described under Alternative 1. Also with this alternative, connectivity with the Route 103 would be maintained. The existing Schuyler Heim Bridge would be demolished, as would occur under Alternative 1. With this alternative, however, no roadway improvements would occur, and the flyover would not be constructed. Additionally, the Route 47 Expressway described in Alternative 1 would not be constructed, and the Route 103 Extension to Alameda Street described in Alternative 2 would not be constructed.

  • Alternative 5. This alternative is designed to identify low-cost, easily implementable improvements to the local roadway system as an alternative to constructing more expensive improvements. This Transportation System Management (TSM) alternative focuses on improvements to routes that parallel the proposed SR-47 Expressway, and that serve the same trips.

  • Alternative 6. No Build.

Alternatives that were eliminated included extending Route 103 to I-405 or I-710, with freeway-to-freeway connections. These were just too expensive.

 

Other WWW Links

 

Freeway

[SHC 253.1] Entire route. Added to the Freeway and Expressway system in 1959.

 


Overall statistics for Route 103:

  • Total Length (1995): 2 miles
  • Average Daily Traffic (1992): 14,000 to 18,000
  • Milage Classification: Rural: 0; Sm. Urban 0; Urbanized: 2.
  • Previous Federal Aid Milage: FAU: 2 mi.
  • Functional Classification: Prin. Arterial: 2 mi.
  • Counties Traversed: Los Angeles.

 

Pre-1964 Legislative Route

In 1933, Chapter 767 added the route from "Calistoga to [LRN 1] near Geyserville" to the highway system. In 1935, this was codified as LRN 103 in the highway code with the following definition:

Calistoga to [LRN 1] near Geyserville

In 1959, Chapter 1841 changed the definition to "[LRN 1] near Geyserville to [LRN 49] near Calistoga".

This route ran from US 101 near Geyserville to the present-day Route 128/Route 29 junction (former Route 53/Route 128/Route 29 junction) near Calistoga. This was signed as Route 128.


State Shield

State Route 104



Routing
  1. From Route 99 near Arno to Route 88 near Ione.


    Post 1964 Signage History

    This segment was the original Route 104 as of 1963.

     

    Pre 1964 Signage History

    This segment of Route 104 was part of the original 1934 signage of Route 104. It was defined in 1909. This was LRN 34.


  2. From Route 88 west of Martell to Route 88 southwest of Pine Grove via the vicinity of Sutter Creek.


    Post 1964 Signage History

    In 1970, Chapter 1473 added this segment and segment (c), giving "(b) Route 88 west of Martell to Route 88 southwest of Pine Grove via the vicinity of Sutter Hill. (c) Route 88 southwest of Pioneer Station to Route 26 near West Point."

    In 1984, Chapter 409 changed "Sutter Hill" to "Sutter Creek" and deleted (c). The former (c) was transferred to Route 26.

     

    Pre 1964 Signage History

    This segment was defined in 1970.

     

    Status

    Signed and postmile marked through Sutter Ridge along Ridge Road.

Pre 1964 Signage History

Route 104 was part of the original set of routes defined in 1934. It originally started in Walnut Grove, and ran along Walnut Grove Road and New Hope Road to Galt, where it joined the current routings. The portion from Walnut Grove to Galt is no longer part of the state highway system, and is now County Road E13 (Twin Cities Road).

The route also had a different routing E of Ione. From Ione, the 1934 definition of the route continued E along present-day Route 88 to the vicinity of Jackson.

 

Other WWW Links

 


Overall statistics for Route 104:

  • Total Length (1995): 28 miles traversable; 8 miles unconstructed (unconstructed portion adopted post-1995).
  • Average Daily Traffic (1992): 1,200 to 7,900
  • Milage Classification: Rural: 32; Sm. Urban 4; Urbanized: 0.
  • Previous Federal Aid Milage: FAU: 8 mi; FAS: 28 mi.
  • Functional Classification: Prin. Arterial: 2 mi; Minor Arterial: 3 mi; Collector: 23 mi.
  • Counties Traversed: Sacramento, Amador.

 

Pre-1964 Legislative Route

In 1933, Chapter 767 defined the following segments, all of which became part of LRN 104:

  • Coast Road near Jenner to [LRN 1] near Cotati
  • [LRN 1] near Petaluma to [LRN 8] near Shellville
  • [LRN 8] to [LRN 7] through American Canyon

In 1935, LRN 104 was defined in the highway code with the following definition:

  1. [LRN 56] near Jenner to [LRN 1] near Cotati
  2. [LRN 1] near Petaluma to [LRN 8] near Shellville
  3. [LRN 8] to [LRN 7] through American Canyon

In 1935, a new routing was defined for LRN 7, which filled a previous gap in LRN 7 between Benecia and the N end of the bridge, and obviated the need for (c) This was captured in 1937 by Chapter 841, which removed the American Canyon route and changed the east end of (b) from Shellville to Napa Y, making the definition for (b): "[LRN 1] near Petaluma to [LRN 8] near Napa Y"

In 1939, Chapter 473 changed the terminus of (b) back to Shellville.

The route was signed as follows:

  1. From LRN 56 near Jenner to LRN 1 near Cotati.

    This was originally signed as Route 12; it is present-day Route 116.

  2. From LRN 1 near Petaluma to LRN 8 near Shellville.

    The signage of this segment before 1964 is unclear; it is present-day Route 116.



Back Arrow
Highways 89-96
State Highway Routes
Return to State Highway Routes
Forward Arrow
Highways 105-112
© 1996-2006 Daniel P. Faigin.
Maintained by: Daniel P. Faigin <webmaster@cahighways.org>.